The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . ; see also Rules 201.17-201.22. . . . Id. , Rule 201.17. . . .
. . . See Rule 201.17 in appendix 2.” 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1563(c). . . . .
. . . violation of the Omnibus Police Reform Amendment Act of 2000, 6A DCMR § 301.6 and MPD General Order 201.17 . . . police-related services to commercial establishments as set forth in 6A DCMR § 301.6 and MPD General Order 201.17 . . . MPD General Order GO-PER-201.17 (April 16, 2004), available at https://go. mpdconline.com/GO/PER_20 l . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 201.17, Fla. Stat. Glenn Wright Homes v. . . .
. . . . § 201.17); see also Oman, 17 F.3d at 346. . . .
. . . work and had recognized his borderline-age situation, Byes was eligible for benefits under grid rule 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17(Z)). . . . (quoting 37 C.F.R. 201.17(b)) that its regulation does not affirmatively allow industries which have . . .
. . . App.2, Table 1, Rule 201.17. . . .
. . . See, e.g., § 201.17, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . expiration dates were three years from the date of manufacture (Court File No. 84-4 p. 2); 21 C.F.R 201.17 . . .
. . . . §§ 201.17(f)(2), (3). . . .
. . . The ALJ Did Not Err by Failing to Apply Rule 201.17 of the Grid to Find Plaintiff Disabled Plaintiff . . . contends the ALJ should have applied Rule 201.17 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . . The criteria in Rule 201.17 coincide with plaintiffs vocational characteristics, except that Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . found Savage to be illiterate, Medical-Vocational Guideline, commonly referred to a the “grid rules,” 201.17 . . .
. . . Plaintiff claims she should have applied Rule 201.17, which is for individuals aged 45-49, who are illiterate . . . P, App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.17. . . . Thus, in order to fall under Rule 201.17, plaintiff must establish that his prior work experience was . . . Therefore, ALJ Hoppenfeld should have applied Rule 201.17, leading to a finding of total disability. . . .
. . . Tobeay argues that the Commissioner erred by not finding that he was disabled pursuant to Rule 201.17 . . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.17, he should have been found disabled by the Commissioner. . . . As Tobeay has a limited ability to communicate in English, Rule 201.17 is not applicable to his case. . . .
. . . the Guidelines mandate a determination of disability. 20 C.F.R. 404 Subpart P, App.2, Table 1 (Rule 201.17 . . . this court, Higgins argued that the ALJ should have found her disabled under the provisions of Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . Plaintiff raised the following arguments in her Statement of Issues. (1) The ALJ failed to apply Rule 201.17 . . . an individual approaching advanced age (age fifty-six), legally blind in her left eye and that Rule 201.17 . . . Rule 201.17 applies to a younger individual between the ages of eighteen and forty-nine who is illiterate . . .
. . . . § 201(h) and Rule 201.17. . See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). . Id. . Tirado v. . . .
. . . On appeal, Silveira argues that the Commissioner should have applied Rule 201.17, which requires a finding . . . P, app. 2, table 1, rule 201.17. . . . . Rule 201.17 dictates a disability finding for claimants who are limited to sedentary work, who are 45 . . . P, app. 2, table 1, rule 201.17. . . . Thus, Rule 201.17 applies to a claimant who is restricted to sedentary work, who is 45-49 years old, . . .
. . . A penalty for late payment is provided for separately in Section 201.17(2). . . . Section 201.17(2) of the Florida Statutes provides that "[i]f any document, instrument, or paper upon . . . Ann. § 201.17(2) (West 1999). . . . .
. . . acquired any skills that could be transferred to sedentary work, the ALJ opined that neither Grid Rule 201.17 . . . Grid Rule 201.17, the application of which would have achieved Plaintiff's desired results, would have . . .
. . . Ill, Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.17. . . .
. . . . § 201.17(b)(2) (1995). . . . Further, pursuant to the definition of a cable system in both 17 U.S.C. § 111(f) and 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . In this case, the evidence strongly suggests that Rule 201.17, which applies to individuals who are “ . . .
. . . Plaintiff contends that he was limited to sedentary work, and thus should be found disabled under Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17(k)). . . . The Copyright Office added to 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 paragraph (k), which provides: Satellite carriers and . . .
. . . MPAA attached a “Proposed Rule,” which was headed “Substance of New § 201.17(l).” . . . It attached its “Proposed Rule,” a “New § 201.17(l).” . . . the final “rule” in the Federal Register. 5 U.S.C. § 553(d); see 54 Fed.Reg. at 14,221; 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.17, which would mandate a finding of disability if plaintiff were 45 years . . . Such an analysis would require application of Rule 201.17, and would result in a finding of disability . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (emphasis added). . . . acquisition fee is not a prepayment penalty, but rather, a “handling charge” as contemplated by 24 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17(i) (1989). . . . The method for calculating the fee, found generally at 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 (1989), depends on the number . . .
. . . Id., Rule 201.17. . . .
. . . Sorenson complained that the AU should have applied table 1, rule 201.17 of the grids because Sorenson . . . P, app. 2, table 1, rule 201.17 (1988), is applicable to Soren-son. . . . P, app. 2, table 1, rule 201.17 (1988), we do not address the issue of whether or not the requisite level . . . This regulation is part of the explanation and definitions section illuminating table 1, in which rule 201.17 . . .
. . . The plaintiff, on the other hand, argues that 201.19 is inapplicable and that 201.17 should have been . . . Not surprisingly, rule 201.17 dictates a conclusion of “disabled.” . . . RULES 201.18 AND 201.17 It could be that the AU was actually debating between 201.18 and 201.19. . . . This would only be true if the debate was between 201.17 and 201.18. . . . Instead, rule 201.17 must be applied to the time period after the plaintiff reached age 45. . . .
. . . Tamez states that the AU erroneously found he was capable of light work, and that under Rule 201.17 of . . .
. . . Under Rule 201.17 of the Guidelines, a person of Starks’s residual functional capacity, age, and work . . . Starks claims that he is illiterate and that Rule 201.17 therefore directs a finding of “disabled.” . . .
. . . corrected to reflect the record, Turner would be automatically eligible for disability pursuant to Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . Plaintiff argues that even if the guidelines were applicable, a finding of disability is mandated by § 201.17 . . . Section 201.17 applies, however, to a claimant who is “illiterate or unable to communicate in English . . . P, App. 2 at § 201.17. . . .
. . . . § 201.17(b)(1) (1987) — as inconsistent with congressional intent and endorsed instead the position . . . include one or more secondary transmissions of television or radio broadcast signals.” 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . Having reviewed Rules 202.16 and 201.17 Section 404.1569 Regulation 4, Appendix 2, Subpart P, the AU . . .
. . . The AU then applied Rule 201.17 of the “Grid”, 20 C.F.R. . . .
. . . . § 201.17(h)(9) (hereinafter the Regulation), is void as contrary to law. . . . the CRT’s rate adjustments, the Copyright Office issued the Regulation challenged here. 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . . television market quota for importation of network and nonspecialty independent stations. 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17(b)(1) (April 2, 1984). B. . . . television or radio broadcast signals, for additional set fees, and for converter fees.” 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . . Copyright Office and its Register to amend their definition of “gross receipts” contained in 37 C.F.R. § 201.17 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.17. . . .
. . . Ill, App. 2, Rule 201.17, (1983). . . .
. . . Subpart P, App. 2, § 201.17. . . .
. . . court relied on Gory in evaluating a case strikingly similar to the case before this Court: Under Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (1988). . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (1983). . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.17), the AU’s decision must be reversed. . . . Rule 201.17 applies to Mr. . . . Reyes were able to perform a full range of sedentary work, Rule 201.17 would be applicable and would . . .
. . . Applying Rule 201.17, Table 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, of the Social Security Administration Regulations . . . Rule 201.17, Table 1, Appendix 2, Sub-part P of the Regulations mandates a finding of disability for . . .
. . . sedentary work, the exertional category below light work. 20 C.F.R. part 404, subpart P, appendix 2, Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . that the facts mandate a finding that he is “illiterate” which would require that the AU apply Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17. Statutes imposing taxes must be construed strictly in favor of the taxpayer. . . .
. . . See § 201.17(1) Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . T.C.A. § 67-4102, Item S(b), with § 201.17(1), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . . .
. . . Under Rule 201.17, Table 1, Appendix 2, a younger individual between ages 45 and 49 who is illiterate . . .
. . . He then applied the grids, Rule 201.17, which assumes the following factors: advanced age, high school . . .
. . . capacity, plaintiff stated in his letter that he met the criteria to be considered “disabled” under Rule 201.17 . . . Rule 201.17, Table 1, directs a conclusion of “disabled” for a person who is 45-49 years old, unskilled . . . It is clear that the term “illiteracy" in Rule 201.17 means illiteracy in English, not illiteracy in . . . Plaintiff’s illiteracy in English, therefore, places him squarely within Rule 201.17, which directs the . . .
. . . regulations, finds the appropriate combination of factors listed on one of the rows (such as Rules 201.17 . . . of Holliday’s previous work experience and his level of education are also relevant to whether Rule 201.17 . . . Rule 201.17 provides that a claimant who is 45 to 49 years of age, is illiterate or unable to communicate . . .
. . . . § 201.17, Fla.Stat. (1976). . . .
. . . Sec. 201.17(1). Additionally, F.S.A. . . . Sec. 201.17(2)(b) provides for the payment of a penalty to the Florida Department of Revenue for failure . . .
. . . . §§ 201.11, 201.17, most systems apparently do not comply. Tr. 5/5/80, J. . . .
. . . Under Rules 201.03 and 201.17 of the Table, appellant must be determined to be not disabled, once the . . .
. . . . §§ 201.17 (g) (2), 201.21. Section 17 (a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U. S. . . .
. . . medical-vocational guidelines mandate a determination of disability, 20 C.F.R. 404 Subpart P, App. 2, Table 1 (Rule 201.17 . . . ); 416 Subpart I, App. 2, Table 1 (Rule 201.17) (1980). . . .
. . . Rule 201.17, upon which plaintiff would rely, provides that a claimant between the ages of 45 to 49, . . . plaintiff would not be considered illiterate and accordingly not considered disabled pursuant to Rule 201.17 . . .
. . . Zuckerman-Vernon Corporation, supra, is controlled by Section 201.17(2), Florida Statutes (1975) as it . . .
. . . . § 201.17(d), which provides, in pertinent part: (d) Review by the Commission pursuant to Petition for . . . Rule 17(e), 17 C.F.R. § 201.17(e), indicates that where summary affirmance occurs, briefs are not filed . . .
. . . tax, and that a 100% penalty was owed for failure to apply such tax stamps under Sections 201.02 and 201.17 . . . By the terms of Section 201.17, Florida Statutes (1975) one who makes or receives a document or instrument . . . inherent power of the courts to reduce or modify a documentary tax penalty imposed pursuant to Section 201.17 . . . Ch. 77-281, amending Section 201.17 (1975) was held not to operate retroactively. . . .
. . . documentary stamp tax alleged to be due under F.S. 201.08 plus a penalty of like amount pursuant to F.S. 201.17 . . .
. . . DCA 1976), upon the issues of: (1) whether imposition of the 100% penalty assessment under Section 201.17 . . . If the amount of the penalty assessed pursuant to § 201.17(2), F.S., is a matter generally within the . . . The taxpayer alternatively suggests that Ch. 77-281, Laws of Florida, rather than Section 201.17(2), . . . Under Section 201.17(2), Florida Statutes (1975), the percentage penalty is the same in each case- — . . . Subsections (2) and (3) of section 201.17, Florida Statutes, 1976 Supplement, are amended to read: “201.17 . . .
. . . (appellee herein) does not have to pay the interest penalty set forth in Section 201.17(2)(c), Florida . . . Section 201.17, Florida Statutes, states as follows: (1) Whoever makes, signs, issues, or accepts, or . . . While the matter was stayed Section 201.17(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes was enacted providing for interest . . . The lower court addressed the issue of whether or not Section 201.17(2)(c), Florida Statutes, was applicable . . . was stayed by this Court pending the outcome of an appellate case dealing with similar facts, Section 201.17 . . .
. . . If the amount of the penalty assessed pursuant to § 201.17(2), F.S., is a matter generally within the . . .
. . . petitioner, from attempting to collect the documentary stamp tax and penalty pursuant to Sections 201.02 and 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.02 and § 201.17 are not applicable to the subject matter of the conveyance upon which the Department . . . Stat. § 201.17 violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the constitutions of Florida . . .
. . . penalty imposed by the Department of Revenue (Department) pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statute 201.17 . . . tax in the sum of $17,925.00 (Florida Statute 201.08[2]) and a penalty in a like sum (Florida Statute 201.17 . . . assessment of documentary tax (F.S. 201.08[2]) and rejected the applicability of the penalty (F.S. 201.17 . . . correctly asserts that the sole statutory authority for imposition of same is found in Florida Statute 201.17 . . . As pointed out by the Department, Florida Statute 201.17(2) provides that “[a]ny document, instrument . . .
. . . to F.S. 201.021 and that in addition a penalty assessment in a like amount was made pursuant to F.S. 201.17 . . .
. . . consider a direct appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County holding constitutional Section 201.17 . . . Suit was filed in the Circuit Court alleging estoppel and challenging the constitutionality of Section 201.17 . . . It is our view, and we so hold, that Section 201.17(2), Florida Statutes, is constitutional. . . . collecting delinquent documentary stamp taxes, we do not feel that the penalty assessed by Section 201.17 . . . Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. . “201.17 Penalties for failure to pay tax required . . .
. . . transactions; that these additional taxes were improper and illegal; that the penalties assessed under Section 201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17. . . .
. . . . § 201.17 pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, as amended, Pub.L. . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (c), which provided that it shall be a violation of Pay Board regulations to “[i]n-duce, solicit . . . of a wage and salary increase not authorized by such regulations or Pay Board decision . . . 6 CFR §201.17 . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (1972) (“[lit shall not be a violation to bargain for ... or agree to (as contrasted with . . .
. . . . § 201.17 (1972). . . .
. . . . § 201.17 and for violating the arbitration provisions of collective bargaining agreements between the . . . Pay Board Reg. § 201.17 declared it “a violation of the Pay Board regulations, subject to the sanctions . . . § 201.10 without material change (37 F.R. 24960). . 37 F.R. 4899, March 7, 1972; the substance of § 201.17 . . .
. . . the wage increase, as demanded by appellant, was a violation of Pay Board Ruling No. 34 and 6 C.F.R. 201.17 . . . The Pay Board issued Regulations on March 7, 1972, 6 C.F.R. 201.17 (37 F.R. 4899), providing in part . . . This resulted in the violation of 6 C.F.R. 201.17 (6 C.F.R. 201.41). . . . Issue: Would it constitute a violation of Economic Stabilization Regulations, 6 CFR 201.17, 37 F.R. 4899 . . . Section 201.17, among other things, prohibits the payment or receipt of any portion of a wage and salary . . .
. . . Accord, Reg. 201.17, 36 F.R. 25427. . . .
. . . It is implicit in both Pay Board Ruling 34 and Section 201.17 of the Pay Board Regulations that payments . . .
. . . . § 201.17, as most recently amended by 37 Fed.Reg. 4899 (March 7, 1972), which would bar such negotiations . . .
. . . Sec. 201.17. 11. . . .
. . . . § 201.17(g) (2), “On review the Commission may affirm, reverse, modify, set aside or remand for further . . .
. . . . §§ 201.17, 201.29(g) (Supp. 1959). . . .
. . . Section'201.17 of the Rules provides: “Judicial Officer. . . .