The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Exemptions that he was seeking to exempt more than 200 acres of land (60 acres plus 141.24 acres equals 201.24 . . .
. . . full range of sedentary work, a finding of “not disabled” would be directed by Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Applying Rule 201.24 of the Grids, the ALJ determined that plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning . . .
. . . The cost to students in the course would have been $201.24 [Jt. Ex. 5 at D-39]. . . . The amount earned would have been $201.24, the amount charged by CCC, [Jt. . . .
. . . sedentary work and that she was, therefore, not disabled using Medical-Vocational Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . . Sawyer was not disabled using Medical-Vocational Rules 201.18 and 201.24 (Tr. p. 25.) . . .
. . . had a limited education; given this description, it is clear that the ALJ intended to reference Rule 201.24 . . . P, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .
. . . his work experience (heavy to very heavy and unskilled work), the ALJ applied Medical Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, rule 201.24 (the grids) as a framework, the ALJ concluded that Ms. . . .
. . . educational background and work experience, Sections 404.1569 and 416.969, and Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . that her testimony about her limitations was only partially credible; that under Medical-Vocation Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . functional capacity to perform sedentary work, age, education, and work experience, Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Applying Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 set forth at 20 C.F.R. . . .
. . . acquisition and transferability to be immaterial to the outcome, the ALJ applied Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . Whether this ease is considered under rule 201.23 (“Illiterate”) or rule 201.24 (limited education), . . . P, App. 2, Tbl. 1, Rules 201.23-201.24. . . .
. . . Section 201.24(1), Florida Statutes (2000), exempts obligations to pay money issued by a Florida municipality . . . Finally, Section 201.24(2), Florida Statutes (2000), exempts transactions involving lease or rental of . . .
. . . determined that he possessed at least a limited education, the ALJ then analyzed Hensley’s claim under Rule 201.24 . . . P., App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24 (2002). . . . In the first instance, Rules 201.23 and 201.24 both reference § 201(h), which, in the “sedentary work . . .
. . . Based on these findings, the ALJ applied Medical Vocational Rule 201.24 and found that it directed a . . .
. . . section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . . do not allow him to perform the full range of sedentary work, using the above-cited Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . .
. . . perform her past physical work, and at step five, relying on the testimony of VE Schroeder and using Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . The ALJ then denied benefits at step five of the sequential evaluation process by applying grid rule 201.24 . . .
. . . The testimony of the VE, along with the regulatory framework in Rule 201.24 of the Medical/Vocational . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, §§ 201.23, 201.24, 201.25, 201.26, 201.27, 201.28. . . .
. . . relevant work experience and residual functional capacity, the ALJ found that the Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . and the claimant’s age, education and work experience, Section 404.1569 of Regulation No. 4, and Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . residual functional capacity allowing for the full range of sedentary work, Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . Resolution 94-801(a)(d); General Ordinance § 201.24(4.26). . . . Moreover, I find that the classification in General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) between employees . . .
. . . work and claimant [sic] age, education and work experience Section 404.1569 and the framework of Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . a)(d), which approved the early retirement incentive package through amendment of General Ordinance 201.24 . . . The amendment added Section 201.24(4.26) which limited the eligibility for the early retirement incentive . . . The resolution also provided that the terms of General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) would take effect . . . Moreover, I find that the classification in General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) between employees . . . I have already concluded that the classification created under General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) . . .
. . . plaintiff is 42 years of age, a younger individual; that she has a limited education; and that under Rules 201.24 . . . Thus, the ALJ properly applied Rules 201.24 and 201.25 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines to find that . . .
. . . vocational expert is consistent with the conclusion reachable under the framework of Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Gereke not to be disabled pursuant to rule 201.24 of the Grids. 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. . . .
. . . P, Appendix 2, §§ 201.23, 201.24 (1994). . . .
. . . claimant’s age, education and work experience, Section 404.1569 and the framework of Rules 202.17 and 201.24 . . .
. . . claimant’s age, education, and work experience, Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and using Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . .” § 201.24(c) . "... we do not mind an infrequent episodic agitation. . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.24 (1992). . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.24. Decision of Administrative Law Judge, R. Vol. I at 10-11. Ms. . . .
. . . It provides in pertinent part: Unless exempt under s. 201.24 or under any state or federal law, if the . . . Duda also construes the phrase “unless exempt under section 201.24 or under any state or federal law” . . . Duda does not contend that the deeds are exempt under the provisions of section 201.24, which relate . . .
. . . .-969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations No. 4, . . .
. . . retained the residual functional capacity to perform the full range of sedentary work, and applying Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . The AU also indicated that rule 201.24, contained in the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . . The most closely applicable rule is 201.24 which applies to individuals whose education is "limited or . . .
. . . Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .
. . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .
. . . Even if the claimant were limited to sedentary work, Rules 201.19, 201.20, 201.24 and 201.25 would direct . . . 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16, and Rules 201.19, 201.20, 201.24 . . .
. . . Part 404, Sub-part P, Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24, indicate that Cruse was not disabled. . . .
. . . Applying the grids to these facts, the AU concluded that claimant was not disabled under Rules 201.24 . . . capacity to perform the full range of sedentary work thus indicating no disability on the basis of Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . Thus, under § 404.1569 of Regulation 4 and § 416.969 of Regulation 16, and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1, . . .
. . . Rule 201.24 in the Grids provides that (1) a younger individual (age 18-44), (2) with a limited education . . .
. . . In this case, the AU applied grid rules 201.24-201.26 to determine the existence of jobs in the national . . .
. . . P, app. 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24 and 201.25. . . .
. . . sedentary work and then applied the grids (20 C.F.R., Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . the full range of sedentary work”; and finally that “section 416.969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rules 201.24 and 201.25, the AU concluded that plaintiff is not disabled. . . .
. . . See 20 C.F.R. 404, Subpt.P.App. 2, Rule 201.24 and 201.25. . . .
. . . The AU then found that medical — vocational rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subp. . . . Medical-vocational rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, subp. P, App. 2 (1986). . . .
. . . P, App. 2, sec. 201.00(a), (b), (c), (h) and rule 201.24. . . .
. . . . § 404.1569 and Rule 201.24, Table 1, App. 2, Subp. P. I. . . .
. . . capacity to perform a restricted range of medium, light and sedentary work, using Rules 203.25, 202.17 and 201.24 . . .
. . . Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .
. . . He applied Rules 201.18 and 201.24, which direct a finding of “not disabled” if the claimant is a younger . . . Subpart P, App. 2, §§ 201.18 and 201.24. . . .
. . . inadequate personality, she would still be found “not disabled” under the framework of Rules 202.17 and 201.24 . . .
. . . . § 404.1569 and the grids found in Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24, the AU determined that the plaintiff . . . of sedentary work, the Secretary properly applied 20 C.F.R. § 404.1569 and Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Considering in addition her age and level of education, under Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2 . . .
. . . pain was not based upon substantial evidence; and second, that the AU’s excessive reliance on rules 201.24 . . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24 and 201.25 Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart . . . Based on the above, the ALJ determined that 20 C.F.R. 404.1569 and Rules 201.24 and 201.25 of the grid . . .
. . . Martinez argues the AU misapplied Rules 201.23, 201.24 and 201.25 of Appendix 2. . . . Rule 201.24 cannot apply because of the literacy requirement. . . .
. . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.23 and 201.24 of Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart . . .
. . . Rules 201.24, 201.25, App. 2, Reg. No. 16, Sub-part I (tr. 15-16). . . . Rules 201.24-201.26, App. 2, Reg. No. 16, Subpart I. . . .
. . . See §§ 201.23 and 201.24, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulation No. 4. . . .
. . . The industrial blindness threshold is 20/200. . 20 C.F.R., Subpart P, App. 2 § 200.00(c); Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . The AU applied Rule 201.24 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . .
. . . Upon application of the grid regulations, specifically Rules 201.26 and 201.24, the ALJ concluded that . . .
. . . capacity to engage in sedentary work and after applying the criteria set forth in 20 C.F.R. app. 2 § 201.24 . . .
. . . in the military was discounted, the grid would still direct a finding of “Not disabled” under Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Rule 201.24. . . . Subparts P and I, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .
. . . capacity the claimant was not disabled under Social Security Regulations §§ 404.1569 and 416.969 and Rules 201.24 . . . Sub-part P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24, 201.25, 201.26. . . .
. . . In fact, the ALJ stated: “Rule 201.24 of Table No. 1 is appropriate and mandates [emphasis added] that . . .
. . . Based on this conclusion, the ALJ found plaintiff not disabled, citing Rule 201.24 of the medical vocational . . . Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.24. . . .
. . . Applying this RFC along with plaintiff’s age, education and experience, the ALJ determined that Rule 201.24 . . . Unfortunately, the footnote to Rule 201.24 expressly provides that the Grid should not be applied in . . .
. . . perform sedentary work, his age, education and work experience and applying all these factors to Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . Consequently, the Grid directs a finding of “not disabled,” Grid, Rule 201.24; it would do so even were . . .
. . . sale amounted to state action and is thus exempt from documentary stamp taxes under Florida Statute § 201.24 . . . Florida Statute § 201.24 exempts any obligations to pay money issued by a municipality, political subdivision . . .
. . . Having made these findings, the AU held that Rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. § 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table . . . Thus, because these findings correspond to the criteria of Rule 201.24, the Guidelines direct a conclusion . . .
. . . . § 404.1513 (1980) (medical-vocational guidelines) and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart . . . further administrative proceedings in the Secretary’s use of the new 1979 regulations, specifically Rule 201.24 . . .
. . . The ALJ determined that Regulation 404.1513 and Rule 201.24 of Table No. 1 of Appendix 2 to Subpart P . . . The ALJ found the plaintiff capable of sedentary work, a criteria of both Rule 201.24 and 201.21 of table . . .
. . . Apparently to avoid a provision of the Wisconsin statutes (§ 201.24), which prohibits a domestic insurance . . .
. . . . § 201.24(h) (1952); Columbia Research Corp. v. Schaffer, supra, note 4, 256 F.2d at page 679. . . . .
. . . Section 201.24 allowed either party to appeal to the Solicitor for the Post Office Department, who was . . .
. . . Globe, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. 2680, 2854 (1870). 37 CFR, 1938, §201.24 (a): “Application for the renewal . . .