The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
. . . To reach this conclusion, the hearing officer relied on Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20. Id. . . . Whereas the hearing officer relied only on Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20, the Appeals Council used Medical-Vocational . . . Rules 202.20 and 201.27. . . .
. . . Pt. 404,- Subpt. 2, App. 2, rule 202.20 as a framework, the ALJ concluded that if Mr. . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A). . . . See id. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A) provides that: “identifying portions” shall mean one of the . . . or less, the program’s “entire source code with the trade secret portions blocked-out”. 37 C.F.R, § 202.20 . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A). Neither of the two authorities PaySys cites proves its point. . . . ” (emphasis added), and in seeming modification to the deposit requirement set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . Section 5/202.20 of the LVMPD policy manual provides, in pertinent part: The arresting officer has the . . . Sections 5/202.20 and 5/204.06 of the LVMPD policy manual enumerate a limited set of circumstances in . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App¡ 2, Section 202.20. II. . . .
. . . Rule 202.20 states that “younger individuals]” with a high school education and a previous history of . . . Subpart .P, Appendix 2, § 202.20. . . .
. . . full range of light work, a finding of “not disabled” would be directed by Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(xx) (as amended August 8, 2012). . . . .
. . . . §§ 202.20(c)(2)(xi), 202.21(b). . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(l) (2008) (setting forth the particular pages of code to file with copyright . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(d) (2008) (setting forth the requirements of special relief). . . . .
. . . Using Medical-Vocational (“Grid”) Rule 202.20, as a framework for decision-making, and relying on the . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(x); see also Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton, 212 F.3d 477, 486 (9th Cir.2000). . . .
. . . IV Hurter next challenges the ALJ’s decision to apply Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20, which directs a . . .
. . . . § 202.20) (2011). . . .
. . . P, App. 2, § 202.20-.21. (See R. 308.) . . .
. . . See. 202.20(c)(2)(xviii)(B). . . .
. . . light or medium work, and the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, 20 CFR 416.969, Rules 202.20 . . .
. . . significant numbers in the national economy” and is therefore, not disabled under the Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(2) (providing for “block[ing]-out” of “trade secret material” in submission . . .
. . . However, he determined at step five that a finding of not disabled was warranted under Grid Rule 202.20 . . . ), the ALJ stated that a finding of not disabled was appropriate under the "framework” of Grid Rule 202.20 . . . Finally, I note that Grid Rule 202.20, which the ALJ cited, pertains to claimants aged forty-five to . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vi) (2000). . . . . § 202.20(b)(4). . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(c)(2)(vi). Complaint, § 15. 13. . . .
. . . expressly granted Dream Games relief from the deposit requirement, as permitted under 37 C.F.R. section 202.20 . . .
. . . A finding of ‘not disabled’ is therefore reached within the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . purposes of copyright registration under section 408 of title 17, except as expressly adopted in § 202.20 . . . Further, because § 202.20 has no corresponding section exempting addresses from the registration deposit . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rule 202.20). . . .
. . . limitations do not allow her to perform the full range of light work, using Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, rules 202.20 and 202.21, and the testimony of the VE, the ALJ denied benefits, concluding . . .
. . . (Id) The ALJ therefore concluded that, within the framework of the Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20, a . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(vii)(A)(l). . . .
. . . . §§ 202.20(b)(4), 202.20(c)(2)(vi); see also National Conference of Bar Examiners v. . . .
. . . However, using Grid Rule 202.20 as a framework, the ALJ found at step five that there were a significant . . .
. . . capacity to perform substantially all of the requirements of light work” under Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . in the national economy and that a finding of “not disabled” was directed by Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . limitations do not allow her to perform the full range of light work, using Medical-Vocational Rules 202.20 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, rule 202.20 (the grids) as a framework, the ALJ concluded that appellant was not disabled . . .
. . . The ALJ made this determination using the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, Rules 202.20 and 202.13 of Table . . . P, App. 2, Table No. 2, Rules 202.13, 202.20. . . . .
. . . Accordingly, the ALJ applied Grids Rules 202.20 — 202.22 as a framework and relied on VE testimony to . . .
. . . Applying Rule 202.13 and Rule 202.20 of the grids as a framework, and relying on VE testimony, the ALJ . . .
. . . Under the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, Rule 202.20, an applicant with these characteristics is not . . .
. . . approaching advanced age with a high school education and no previous work experience is disabled.) and Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . able to make a successful adjustment to other work within the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . The framework of Rules 202.20, 202.21 (before she turned age 50) and Rules 202.13 and 202.14 (after she . . .
. . . At step five of the sequential evaluation, the ALJ used medical-vocational Rule 202.20 to direct a finding . . .
. . . . § 202.20. . . . definition of a secure a secure test, such as the MCAT, requires restricted access to the test. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . . The Library of Congress does not retain a copy ‘of secure tests. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(c)(2)(vi). . . . .
. . . Thus, using Rules 202.20, 202.21, and 202.22, as a framework for decisionmaking, there are a significant . . .
. . . . § 202.20(b)(4). . . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vi). . . .
. . . P, App., 2 § 202.20. . . .
. . . Based on plaintiffs profile, the ALJ used Rule 202.20 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines to direct . . .
. . . capacity to perform the full range of light work, so a finding of “not disabled” was directed by Rule 202.20 . . . 2000, the ALJ found that Dowles was able to perform the full range of light work and, therefore, Rule 202.20 . . . found that, as of August 7, 2000, Dowles was able to perform the full range of light work and that Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . claimant’s age, education, and work experience, Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16, and Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . her date last insured, September 30, 1992, the claimant was not disabled within the framework of Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . In making the final determination, the ALJ stated that Rules 202.17 and 202.20 of the Medical-Vocational . . .
. . . the claimant’s age, educational background, and work experience, Sections 404.1569, 416.969 and Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . Plaintiff argues that the ALJ erroneously denied plaintiffs claim using Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . . , in accordance with the regulations, the ALJ found that “[s]trict application of these rulés [Rule 202.20 . . . Thus, the ALJ recognized that he could not base his decision on Rule 202.20. . . .
. . . and work experience, a finding of ‘not disabled’ is directed by medical vocational rules 202.18 and 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A). . . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(l). . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A). . . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(l). . . .
. . . range of light work, and considering her age, education, and work experience, Medical-Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . The framework of Rule 202.20 of the Medical Vocational Guidelines and vocational expert [“VE”] testimony . . .
. . . Then, using Vocational Rule 202.20, Table No. 2, Appendix 2, Subpart P, of 20 C.F.R. § 404 as a framework . . .
. . . Finally, Holland asserts that the ALJ erred as a matter of law in applying Vocational Rule 202.20, App . . . The ALJ then determined that application of Rule 202.20 suggested that she was not disabled, even though . . . Accordingly, under Rule 202.20, which refers to a younger person restricted to light work with a high . . . The ALJ was therefore correct in using 202.20 as a framework for his determination that, in light of . . .
. . . . § 202.20 (Supp.2001), the Florida legislature delegated to the Revenue Estimating Conference (“REC” . . .
. . . This also answers plaintiff's attack upon finding number 9 of the ALJ, which references § 202.20 of the . . . Even if § 202.20 is not the appropriate level to consider given plaintiffs educational and intellectual . . .
. . . Burnside could perform a significant number of jobs within the national economy — the ALJ applied Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii) (1999); see also 5 Melville B. . . .
. . . The ALJ then applied these factors to Rules 202.20, 202.21, and 202.22 of the medical-vocational guidelines . . .
. . . (T. 20) The ALJ then applied the Medical Vocational Guidelines (“the grids”) and found that Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(vi) (1999). 12. . . .
. . . . § 202.20 regulates deposits of copies and phonorecords for copyright registration. . . . argument was based on Circular 61 of the United States Copyright Office, which is based on 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 202.20. (Tr. 22). . . . The ALJ’s error was more than a simple typing error since she relied on Rule 202.20, which is for an . . .
. . . his age, education, and work experience, 20 CFR 404.1569, the framework of Medical Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . capacity for light work, and the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 404.1569 and Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(1). . . . Section 202.20(e)(2)(vii) of the Code of Federal Regulations, which governs the filing of deposit copies . . . court need only review the Deposit Copy submitted by Quinn as well as the plain language of 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(x). . . .
. . . , defendant argues that plaintiff failed to deposit the identifying materials required by 37 C.F.R. 202.20 . . . Plaintiff argues that the section cited by defendant is inapplicable by its own terms. 37 C.F.R. 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A), which permits the filing of the first and last 25 pages of a computer program . . . text; it is enough to file the first and last 25 pages of the human-readable source code. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . Considering her residual functional capacity for light work and her vocational profile, Vocational Rule 202.20 . . . [Pickering’s] residual functional capacity for light work,” the ALJ concluded that “Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . Vocational rules 202.20 and 202.22 apply and direct a finding that the claimant is not disabled. 10.The . . .
. . . the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . P, App. 2, Rule 202.20 (the grids) as a framework, considered testimony from a vocational expert, and . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A), which allows for deposit of the first and last twenty-five pages of a copyrighted . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vi)). . . .
. . . He found that plaintiffs age, education and work experience matched the criteria described at rules 202.20 . . . Section 202.20 directs a finding of "not disabled” for claimants whose age, education and previous work . . .
. . . . §§ 202.20-202.23. . . .
. . . To reiterate, “[w]hen 37 C.F.R. section 202.20’s definition of a secured [sic] test is read in conjunction . . . Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(b)(4), [a] secure test is a nonmarketed test administered under supervision . . . manner that ownership and control of copies remain with the test sponsor or publisher. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . work, and the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 404.1569 and Rule 201.27 and 202.20 . . . According to the chart, Rule 202.20 indicates that individuals who are 18 to 44 are considered "younger . . .
. . . Sections 404.1569 and 416.969 of Regulations No. 4 and No. 16 and Rules 202.20, Table No. 2 and 201.27 . . .
. . . described, and considering the claimant’s age, education and lack of work experience, Vocational Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii) (1993). . . . , 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 5 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5766-70; see also 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(2) (emphasis added). . . . portion of the deposit to be in machine-readable “object code” (lines of zeroes and ones). 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . . and last ten pages of source code (with no trade secrets blocked-out) in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(vii)(A)(2). . . .
. . . the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and Rule 202.20 . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(A)(2) (1992). . . .
. . . Consequently, Rule 202.20 of the Medical Vocational Guidelines (56 FR 13039, March 28, 1991), requires . . .
. . . P, App. 2 Rules 202.20 and 202.13. . . .
. . . The State concedes that GMAC’s test forms are secure within the meaning of 37 C.F.R. section 202.20(b . . . To reiterate, when 37 C.F.R. section 202.20’s definition of a secured test is read in conjunction with . . . Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. section 202.20(b)(4), [a] secure test is a nonmarketed test administered under . . . manner that ownership and control of copies remain with the test sponsor or publisher. 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . .
. . . See, STX 202.20; 202.21; 202.22; and 202.23 (setting forth the budget recommendations of the various . . .
. . . . § 202.20(c)(2)(ii): Motion pictures ... . . .
. . . Approval of the deposit of documents by the Copyright Office by granting special relief under 37 C.F.R. 202.20 . . . the Copyright Office granted special relief from the ordinary deposit requirements under 37 C.F.R. § 202.20 . . . C.F.R. § 202.20(d) states Special relief. . . .
. . . . § 202.20 (1989). . . . .
. . . The ALJ applied Rules 202.20 and 202.21 of the Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . .