Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 202.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 202.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 202.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 202
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TAX SIMPLIFICATION LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 202.25
202.25 Jurisdiction; dealers not qualified to do business in this state.
(1) All suits brought by the department against any dealer for any violation of this chapter for the purpose of collecting any tax due from the dealer, including garnishment proceedings, regardless of the amount, must be brought in the circuit court of this state having jurisdiction of the subject matter.
(2) Each dealer who is not qualified to do business in this state shall designate with the department an agent within this state for service of process to enforce this chapter. If a dealer fails to designate such an agent, the Secretary of State or any agent or employee of the dealer within this state constitutes the agent for the service of such process.
History.ss. 17, 58, ch. 2000-260; s. 38, ch. 2001-140.

F.S. 202.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 202.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 202.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 202.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 202.25.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CAMPBELL, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . His sentencing guidelines called for a sentence ranging from 121.35 months, to 202.25 months. . . .

H. DAVIS, v. NATIONAL MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC. a v. B, 253 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 2001)

. . . at an hourly rate of $60 per hour from the inception of the case until judgment in March 1991; (2) 202.25 . . .

G. HUIZINGA, v. UNITED STATES L., 68 F.3d 139 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . On January 29,1991, Huizinga paid the IRS $202.25 (one employee’s social security and federal income . . . Huizinga asked the IRS to nullify the $1,021,496.25 penalty and requested that the IRS refund the $202.25 . . .

PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, v. P. W. STONE,, 156 F.R.D. 568 (D.N.J. 1994)

. . . Plaintiffs’ counsel in that ease, the same counsel as here, requested over $33,000.00 for 202.25 hours . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . STX 202.25 For fiscal years 1986-87 through 1989-90, AAMU has received the second-highest level of regular . . . STX 202.25, pp. 17, 20. . . .

W. POWELL, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 569 F. Supp. 1192 (N.D. Cal. 1983)

. . . Steel has documented the time and labor expended as 202.25 attorney hours and 38.3 law clerk hours and . . . Accordingly, the court will award fees for 179.15 out of the 202.25 attorney hours requested. . . .

A. McCARTHY, S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 1 Cl. Ct. 446 (Ct. Cl. 1983)

. . . Plaintiff’s counsel advises that 202.25 hours were spent in prosecuting its application, which the court . . .

OLSON Co- L. v. UNITED STATES, BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION,, 437 F.2d 981 (Ct. Cl. 1971)

. . . . § 202.25(e) (iii) (1959). . . .

ETHEL OLSON AND LILLIAN SEARLE, AS CO- ADMINISTRATRICES OF THE ESTATE OF SARILLA L. WHITLOCK, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK, AND SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OAKLAND, THIRD- PARTY DEFENDANTS, 194 Ct. Cl. 297 (Ct. Cl. 1971)

. . . . § 202.25(e) (ill) (1959). . . .

C. WILSON v. UNITED STATES, 376 F.2d 280 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . Wilson’s income from her writing activities in 1960 did not go beyond $202.25 (whereas her literary expenses . . .

CLIFF C. WILSON ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 179 Ct. Cl. 725 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . Wilson’s gross income from her literary activities increased to $202.25. . . . Wilson’s income from her writing activities in 1960 did not go beyond $202.25 (whereas her literary expenses . . . income from the sale of newspaper articles during the period 1958-1960: 1958_ None 1959_ $18.50 1960_ 202.25 . . .

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, a v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO,, 349 F.2d 565 (9th Cir. 1965)

. . . . § 202.25. . . . Section 25(a) (4) of Circular 176, 31 C.F.R. § 202.25(e) (1) (iv), provides that in cases of checks raised . . . constituted the “first examination” within the meaning of Section 25(a) (4) of Circular 176, 31 C.F.R. § 202.25 . . .

ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES, 250 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1957)

. . . The regulations are now codified at 31 C.F.R. 202.25(c) and 360. . . . . not be expected to cash Government checks presented direct to the bank by the general public.” 31 CFR 202.25 . . .

KARPARK CORP. v. TOWN OF GRAHAM, 99 F. Supp. 124 (M.D.N.C. 1951)

. . . Two certain payments were made by the defendants to the plaintiff on June 29, 1949, in the sum of $202.25 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., 150 F.2d 895 (2d Cir. 1945)

. . . . § 202.25. . . .