Cases from cite.case.law:
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. Co. Co. Co. v. O LEARY, B. U. S. A., 131 F.3d 1475 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
. . . . §§ 205.193-.199B. . . .
In COMPTON CORPORATION, COMPTON CORPORATION, By KELLOGG, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,, 90 B.R. 798 (N.D. Tex. 1988)
. . . . § 205.193 (1988). . . .
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, v. WEST TEXAS MARKETING CORPORATION,, 763 F.2d 1411 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1985)
. . . . § 205.193. . . .
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, v. WEST TEXAS MARKETING CORPORATION,, 763 F.2d 1411 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1985)
. . . . § 205.193. . . .
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,, 769 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
. . . . § 205.193, amended by 44 Fed.Reg. at 7925.
. Id. § 205.191(b), amended by 44 Fed.Reg. at 7925.
. . . .
In VANTAGE PETROLEUM CORP. W. HUDTWALKER, Jr. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,, 25 B.R. 471 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1982)
. . . . § 205.193. . . .
STATE OF LOUISIANA, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY W. Jr., 507 F. Supp. 1365 (W.D. La. 1981)
. . . . § 205.193(a).
. Page 50 in oral argument, October 3, 1980.
. . . .
FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY OF CITY OF FORT PIERCE v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 503 F. Supp. 1014 (D.D.C. 1980)
. . . . § 205.193(a), an enforcement proceeding then takes place before the Office of Hearings and Appeals . . . as a person who “would be aggrieved by issuance of the Proposed Remedial Order as a final order,” § 205.193 . . .
NATIONAL DISTILLERS AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY W., 498 F. Supp. 707 (D. Del. 1980)
. . . . § 205.193. . . .
TEXACO, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY W. Jr., 490 F. Supp. 874 (D. Del. 1980)
. . . . § 205.193(e). . . . . § 205.193. . . .
UNITED STATES v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, 408 F. Supp. 450 (W.D. Pa. 1975)
. . . Section 205.193 is the exception to the genera] rules set forth in 205.191 and 205.192, and states that . . . Defendants’ interpretation of the regulations fails to take 10 C.F.R. § 205.193 into account; the provision . . . Section 205.193 clearly super-cedes the normal procedures to be followed in cases of violations, “ . . . .
