The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(ii) (requiring that application forms for various state-administered welfare programs . . .
. . . regarding the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that caseworker has an affirmative duty under 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . imposed upon DCF by passage 1840.0110 of the policy manual is similar to that created by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(iii); 18 N.Y. Comp.Codes R. & Reg. tit. 18, § 351.1(d). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)©; “ New York State Social Services Law and implementing regulations and administrative . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1996) (AFDC application need not include non-parents in assistance unit); see . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)© to construe the phrase “reasonable promptness” in 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(10) as meaning . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)©; New York State Social Services Law and implementing regulations and administrative directives . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . .
. . . . §§ 205.10(a)(4)(i)(B) and 206.10(a)(4). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court. . . .
. . . . § 206.10, and to monitor local departments’ compliance. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(A) with 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(24); and (3) that all claims accruing prior to November . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(ll)). . . .
. . . . §§ 201.6(a), 233.120(a) and 206.10(a). . . .
. . . V); 45 CFR §206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1993). See generally Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U. . . . are considered as a unit for purposes of determining eligibility and the amount of payment.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . are considered “as a unit” for purposes of determining the amount of the assistance payment. 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). Vermont has prescribed thirty days as a time limit. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3); 7 C.F.R. § 273.2(g). . . . applications within “reasonable” state-established time standards, not in excess of 45 days. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . reasonable time prescribed by the state regulations, but in no time greater than 45 days. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(12), 7 C.F.R. § 271.4, and New York State Soc.Serv.Law §§ 20 & 34. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(12); 7 C.F.R. § 271.4; New York State Soc.Serv.Law §§ 20 & 34. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), and specify that the application be processed within 45 days of filing. 45 C.F.R . . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . postponement creates a three or four day delay beyond the 45 days permitted by the regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . shall be determined promptly “pursuant to reasonable State-established time standards.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . obtaining medical care and services in emergency situations on a 24-hour basis, 7 days a week. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . §§ 206.10(a)(1), 233.120; N.Y.Soc. . . . individual’s circumstances that may affect the amount of assistance to which he is entitled. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . See 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10(a)(12); 7 C.F.R. § 271.4. . . . after a report is obtained which indicates a change in the individual’s circumstances,” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . regulations as "the review of factors affecting [AFDC] eligibility or payment amount.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(b)(5). One AFDC payment per month is made to each assistance unit. . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38); 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1)(vii). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5). . . . eligible individuals without any delay attributable to the agency’s administrative process.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(b)(5). . . . considered as a unit for purposes of determining eligibility and the amount of payment.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii)(A), (B) (AFDC eligibility based on dependent child living in same household with . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(9)(ii) (1990). . . .
. . . 430, 108 S.Ct. 1306, 1314, 99 L.Ed.2d 515 (1988) (deferring to an agency interpretation that 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . such a rule might well represent sound policy, we do not believe that a fair reading of the text of § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i) provides in pertinent part: "Financial assistance and medical care and services included . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), benefits received by parents . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), benefits received by parents . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1987). In Gardebring v. . . . Title 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(7) provides that “[i]n cases of proposed action to terminate, discontinue . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(A). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . applications for AFDC within forty-five (45) days of the date of application in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . whose applications have not been processed within forty-five (45) days in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . That defendants shall not prematurely deny AFDC applications in violation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3) . . .
. . . consistent with federal law and thus a viable remedy for an imminent budget shortfall. 45 CFR section 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1988). In Pond v. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1987). . . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . . See 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986). . . . way the Secretary must clearly explain that compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) and 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(10) requires states to determine eligibility in a manner consistent with the objectives . . . does not violate notice requirements of the due process clause of the Constitution or 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10 . . . The Social Security Act at 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(10) and the federal regulations at 45 C.F.R. §§ 206.10( . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), and in food stamp cases, within 60 days, 7 C.F.R. § 273.15. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) applies to this case. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(6)(i)(A)(2) mandated that assistance begin within 30 days of the receipt of the application . . .
. . . by a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary), 45 CFR §206.10 . . . See § 206.10(b)(1) (defining “applicant”). . . . .” § 206.10(a)(2)(ii) (emphasis added). . . . She points to §206.10(a)(1)(iii), which provides that “[a]n applicant may be assisted, if he so desires . . . (b)(4), and thus clearly applies to recipients, respondent contends that “applicant” is used in § 206.10 . . . informed about the eligibility requirements and their rights and obligations under the program.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . Secretary took a different position than the one he now maintains: “Federal regulations at 45 CFR § 206.10 . . . Provisions at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(i) do not require a State to publicize the lump sum rule or any other . . . The regulation at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1987) refers only to “applicants,” not to “recipients.” . . . The regulation at 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(2)(ii) (1987) says: “Procedures shall be adopted which are designed . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) (1986) and the corresponding Kentucky state regulations contravene the Social . . . Gilliard, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3013, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987). . 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986 . . .
. . . Finding, however, that HRS failed to comply with the provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) of the federal . . . at the AFDC office advised applicants “of the broad spectrum of information as set forth in 45 CFR 206.10 . . . regarding the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that caseworker has an affirmative duty under 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1985); see also Gorrie v. Bowen, 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir.1987). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a) (1986). . . . adoptive parent, or stepparent ... and (B) [a]ny blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(1) states that “Each individual wishing to do so shall have the opportunity to apply for . . . assistance without delay.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1)© states that “Each individual may apply under whichever . . . Once an applicant applies, DSHS is required to determine eligibility. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 imposes this . . . The State is also required to give various notices under the AFDC program. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)© . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) and New Jersey practice which include plaintiffs in AFDC assistance units, violate . . . determining AFDC eligibility violates 42 U.S.C. 601 et seq. and the implementing regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . challenge the Secretary’s interpretation of section 402(a)(38) of DE-FRA as implemented by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . the six-month grace period was an available option, we conclude that the duty to inform in section 206.10 . . . appellant has been erroneously deprived of benefits as the result of HRS’s failure to comply with rule 206.10 . . . legal proceedings to make an applicant eligible for benefits are not within the purview of 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5)(i), 232.20(d) and 302.-51(b)(1), as amended ... . . . § 602(a)(10)(A), and/or “without any delay attributable to the agency’s administrative process.” § 206.10 . . . A standard may not take into account bureaucratic delay. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(5)(i). . . . agency in providing traditional Title IV-A payments, i.e., prompt, see §§ 602(a)(10)(A); 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . Section 206.10(a)(5)(i) provides: Financial assistance and medical care and services included in the . . .
. . . . §§ 232.20, 206.10(a)(9), 233.33. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1986), which requires that all parents and siblings living in the same household . . . state implementation of the AFDC filing provision, 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38), on grounds that 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . child’s application must also include any blood-related or adoptive brothers and sisters. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . adoptive parent, or stepparent ...; and (B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . See 45 CFR § 206.10(a)(1)(vii) (1986). . . . laws of general applicability); and “(B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister.” 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) provides in pertinent part: Applicants shall be informed about the eligibility requirements . . . the applicant’s eligibility for benefits, that ease-worker has an affirmative duty under 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3)(i); rule 10C-1.-80(9), Florida Administrative Code. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) (1985), requires a reading of 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (Supp. . . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (1985) (“family unit filing regulation”). . . . the court interpreted the portion of the Secretary’s regulation applicable- to parents, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), interpreting 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) provides: For AFDC only, in order for the . . . 1-21-011, known as “the standard filing unit rule”, which interprets federal regulation 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(1)(vii)(B). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), the regulation, which became effective October 1, 1984, provides: For AFDC only . . . The neediness condition is incorporated in 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) by the phrase “and otherwise . . . The Court finds the most reasonable interpretation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) to be that it incorporates . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), the court today concludes that the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare was legally . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). (Emphasis added). . . . We are therefore of the view that it is not “appropriate” within the meaning of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a) . . . However, the Secretary of HHS, during a notice and comment period on 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i) in 1978 . . . In short, we agree with the District Court that 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(2)(i) by its terms requires advance . . . In her response to interrogatories posed by the defendant, she states that under 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(4) (1985): Adequate notice shall be sent to applicants and recipients to indicate that . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B), and a concomitant Maryland regulation, COMAR 07.03.02.02B(l)(a), altering the . . . On October 1, 1984, HHS implemented the new law through regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B) . . . by the officials of the Maryland Department of Human Resources on § 2640 of DEFRA and on 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), which provides that for a child to be included in the AFDC unit pursuant to Section . . .
. . . . § 206.10. . . . otherwise eligible for assistance: (B) Any blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . interpretation of the statute is fully consistent with the HHS’ implementing regulation at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii)(B). . . . The challenged regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(vii), simply effectuates this statutory mandate. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), which provides in relevant part that: Applicants shall be informed about the eligibility . . . eligibility and appeals in simple, understandable terms are publicized and available in quantity. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (hereinafter “New Rule”), interpreting .section 2640(a) of the Deficit Reduction . . . blood-related or adoptive brother or sister. 49 FecLReg. 35599 (Sept. 10, 1984), to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . because of defendant Heckler’s new regulation issued September 10,1984 to be codified at 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . are available, within the definition of 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (1984) as implemented by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . terminated because of Secretary Heckler’s regulations issued September 10, 1984 and codified at 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . .
. . . The defendants are enjoined from enforcing any regulation, including but not limited to 45 CFR § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii). 11. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i). . . . as a supplement to written material, rather than vice versa, as the defendant proposes. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . provided by the defendants, as modified by the Court, clearly satisfies the requirements of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . has taken the position that prior written notice of the lump sum rule is not required by 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . 3. the notice attached to the Court’s Order as Appendix A satisfies the requirements of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(l)(vii) (hereinafter “New Rule”), interpreting 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(38) (1984) (hereinafter . . .
. . . . § 206.10 by adding the following: “For AFDC only, in order for the family to be eligible, an application . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i), and the due process clause of the fifth and fourteenth amendments. . . . short of the requirement that applicants are to be advised of “conditions of eligibility.” 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . policy violates the federal regulation requiring notice of AFDC eligibility requirements, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . that those members of the class who had their AFDC benefits terminated in violation of 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . In a statement made during a notice and comment period on section 206.10(a) in 1978, the Secretary of . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(12). . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(12); 45 C.F.R. § 205.120(a)(1); Coleman v. . . .
. . . was] almost impossible to put a clamp on it that [did] not leak a little brine,” plaintiffs’ exhibit 206.10 . . .
. . . . §§ 205.10(a)(12), 206.10(a)(8); see also Davis v. . . . for written notice of any adverse determination of a request for emergency assistance. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . . §§ 205.120, 206.10(a)(12). . . . .
. . . Knudson_ 206.10 Deposition of Red Murphy_ 33.60 Filing Fee (3/25/82). 15.00 Expert Witness D.W. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3) (1981). . . . notification of denial of assistance or change of award is mailed to the applicant or recipient. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . eligibility determinations of not more than forty-five days from the date of application. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . . . §§ 205.120 and 206.10(a)(12). . . . date the assistance check, or notice of denial of assistance, is mailed to the applicant. 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . processing standard and defendants have failed to do so. 42 C.F.R. § 435.904, 45 C.F.R. §§ 205.120, 206.10 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 435.911, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3)(ii). 6. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2)(i) (1981). However, it appears that IDPA does not have such a program. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(c)(5)(i). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3)(i) (1980). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3)(i). In Perez v. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(11) (1978). . . . medical need. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396, 1396a(a)(10)(C)(i), (ii), 1396a(a)(17), 1396a(a)(19); 42 C.F.R. §§ 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(iii). . . . Carter litigation, that “the time limits contained in 45 C.F.R. §. 206.10(a)(iii) prescribe a forty-five . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(3). . . .
. . . aid shall be continued regularly until an eligible individual is found to be ineligible, 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . . Commissioners on State Responsibilities for Notifícation to Recipients, which in interpreting 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(9) requires in relevant part that “eligibility will be considered or redetermined: . . . . . sufficiently relevant to current circumstances to trigger a redetermination pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 . . . However, even if the requirements of § 206.10(a)(9)(ii) and § 303.52(c) were not met by the computer . . . (a)(12)(iii)(a), and authorized termination of assistance for refusal to consent, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10( . . . that states would develop methods of verifying eligibility subject to the general constraints of § 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5) (1976). . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(3) (1976); Class v. Norton, 507 F.2d 1058 (2d Cir. 1974). . . .
. . . and by not using Plaintiffs as the primary sources of information, Defendants have violated 45 C.F.R. 206.10 . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(5). . . .
. . . . § 206.10 in force on the date of application.” . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(12), he is obliged to: establish and maintain methods by which [he] shall be kept currently . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(7) (1975). . . .
. . . . § 206.10 Application, determination of eligibility and furnishing of assistance. . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(l)(iv)(c). . . . As mentioned previously, 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(a)(1) dictates that the opportunity to apply be afforded . . . Transcript at 422. . 45 C.F.R. § 206.10 further provides: (a)(2)(ii) Procedures shall be adopted which . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 206.10(b)(2). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(10); 45 C.F.R. § 233.10(a)(1)(h) and (vii) (1975). . . .
. . . . § 206.10(5) provides: Financial assistance and medical care and services included in the plan shall . . .
. . . . § 206.10. . . .
. . . . § 206.10(a)(2). 45 C.F.R. § 249.10(a) (5) (ii) imposes a further requirement that the State assure . . .