Cases from cite.case.law:

HEUTON, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 309 F. Supp. 3d 714 (W.D. Mo. 2018)

. . . . § 213.055 ). . . .

MARKHAM, v. WERTIN,, 861 F.3d 748 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . not permitting him to return to work after his physical condition improved, in violation of section 213.055 . . . retaliation claim under section 213.070(2) is thus different from a discrimination claim under section 213.055 . . .

STONE, v. MCGRAW HILL FINANCIAL, INC. LLC, a, 856 F.3d 1168 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

DENN, v. CSL PLASMA, INC., 816 F.3d 1027 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

STONE, v. McGRAW- HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC,, 126 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

. . . . § 213.055(l)(l)(a)). . . .

SHIRRELL, v. ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, 793 F.3d 881 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . . • § 213.055. . . .

JAIN, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., 779 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 213.055, 213.070. . . . See Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.055(l)(a). . . .

NOEL, v. AT T CORP. SBC, 774 F.3d 920 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

CARTER, v. CSL PLASMA INC., 63 F. Supp. 3d 1034 (W.D. Mo. 2014)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

SHIRRELL, v. SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER,, 24 F. Supp. 3d 851 (E.D. Mo. 2014)

. . . Section 213.055(l)(l)(a) RSMo. . . . manner against any other person” because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by section 213.055 . . .

W. CROMEANS. Jr. v. MORGAN KEEGAN CO. INC. v., 1 F. Supp. 3d 994 (W.D. Mo. 2014)

. . . Section 213.055 RSMo provides that it shall be an unlawful employment practice: ‘(1) for an employer, . . . Clearly Section 213.055 RSMo was meant to apply to the state and its political subdivisions. . . .

In S. PEOPLES, S. v. J., 494 B.R. 395 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2013)

. . . hostile work environment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and retaliation pursuant to § 213.055 . . .

NOEL, v. AT T CORPORATION,, 936 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (E.D. Mo. 2013)

. . . Section 213.055, RSMo.2005-.” Id. at 347. . . .

BUEHRLE, v. CITY OF O FALLON, MISSOURI, A, 695 F.3d 807 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 213.055(l)(a)). In Daugherty v. . . .

CLARK, v. MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 639 F.3d 391 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 623(a); Mo.Rev.Stat. 213.055(1), the Supreme Court of Missouri has opined that if an employer’s consideration . . . . § 213.055(1). . . .

L. WIERMAN, v. CASEY S GENERAL STORES,, 638 F.3d 984 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 2000e-2000e-17) and the Missouri Human Rights Act (Mo.Rev.Stat § 213.055) (“MHRA”). . . .

L. FLYNN, v. AT T YELLOW PAGES,, 780 F. Supp. 2d 886 (E.D. Mo. 2011)

. . . . § 213.055; 29 U.S.C. § 622; see also St. Francis Coll. v. . . .

CLARK, v. MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 628 F.3d 462 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 213.055(1). . . .

D. SMITH, v. HY- VEE, INC., 622 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 213.055, 213.070. . . . Smith filed claims for sexual harassment, in violation of Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.055, and retaliation, in . . .

MAREZ, v. SAINT- GOBAIN CONTAINERS, INC., 740 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (E.D. Mo. 2010)

. . . discriminatory act, such as "failed to hire,” "discharged” or other act within the scope of Section 213.055 . . .

O. HAWKS, v. J. P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, 591 F.3d 1043 (8th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 213.055). . . .

BAKER, v. SILVER OAK SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT CO. L. C., 581 F.3d 684 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 213.055(1)(a). In Daugherty v. . . .

RICHEY, v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 540 F.3d 779 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 213.055. . . . in any manner” against a person “because such person has opposed” sex discrimination forbidden by § 213.055 . . .

S. KATOCH, v. MEDIQ PRN LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC., 223 F. App'x 532 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

BLACKWELL, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,, 399 F. Supp. 2d 998 (E.D. Mo. 2005)

. . . (2) retaliation; and (3) hostile work environment in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.055 . . .

JOHNSON, v. AT T CORP., 422 F.3d 756 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge any individual on the basis of age, § 213.055 . . .

RUSSELL, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI,, 414 F.3d 863 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

EPPS, v. THE CITY OF PINE LAWN,, 353 F.3d 588 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 213.055. . . . .

C. DARBY, v. BRATCH J. C. Dr. J. a a a, 287 F.3d 673 (8th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 213.055 (2000). . . .

FIREFIGHTERS INSTITUTE FOR RACIAL EQUALITY, ANDERSON R. v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, St. F. Jr. C. A. O. E. R. Jr. R. v. St. St. F. Jr. C. A. O. E. R., 220 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 1981 and 1988, and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Missouri Revised Statutes § 213.055(3X2). . . .

D. LAVIA, v. PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 224 F.3d 190 (3d Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 213.055; Mont.Code Ann. § 49-4-101; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 48-1104; Nev. . . .

STUART, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., 217 F.3d 621 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 213.055(1) (1996). . . .

STEVENS, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 210 F.3d 732 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 213.055; Mont. . . .

LOWRY, v. POWERSCREEN USB, INC. d b a, 72 F. Supp. 2d 1061 (E.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . . §§ 213.055 et seq. . . .

FLOYD, v. STATE OF MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL, SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES,, 188 F.3d 932 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

S. CARTER, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 173 F.3d 693 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 2000e~2(e)(l); Mo.Rev.Stat. 213.055(2). . . .

GRAY, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., 46 F. Supp. 2d 948 (W.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . . § 213.055). . . .

L. GIPSON, v. KAS SNACKTIME COMPANY,, 171 F.3d 574 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

BREEDING, v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER AND CO., 164 F.3d 1151 (8th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 213.055 (West 1996). . . .

LYNN, v. DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER- WEST CAMPUS,, 160 F.3d 484 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 213.055(l)(l)(a). . . .

DENESHA, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, DENESHA, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,, 161 F.3d 491 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 213.055 (Vernon 1994). . . .

WIRTH, v. COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS,, 26 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (W.D. Mo. 1998)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

OBERKRAMER, v. IBEW- NECA SERVICE CENTER, INC., 151 F.3d 752 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 213.055 (West 1996) (defined unlawful employment practices do not include discrimination based on . . .

HOSSAINI, v. WESTERN MISSOURI MEDICAL CENTER,, 140 F.3d 1140 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 213.055 and 213.070. See Hossaini v. Western Missouri Med. . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, M. Ey, v. HBE CORPORATION, s EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, R. v. HBE CORPORATION, s, 135 F.3d 543 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 213.055 and 213.070 (West 1997). . . .

HENNESSEY, v. GOOD EARTH TOOLS, INC., 126 F.3d 1107 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 213.055-l(l)(a). . . .

KEMPCKE, v. MONSANTO COMPANY,, 945 F. Supp. 193 (E.D. Mo. 1996)

. . . . § 213.055. For purposes of the motion before the Court, the record establishes the following. . . .

S. HOSSAINI, v. WESTERN MISSOURI MEDICAL CENTER Dr. M., 97 F.3d 1085 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 213.055 and 213.070. . . .

MOEBUS, v. OB- GYN ASSOCIATES, INC., 937 F. Supp. 867 (E.D. Mo. 1996)

. . . . § 213.055 (Count II). . . .

L. MARKS, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI,, 941 F. Supp. 886 (W.D. Mo. 1996)

. . . . § 213.055 (1996). . . .

C. HOPPER, v. HALLMARK CARDS, INC. C. HOPPER, v. HALLMARK CARDS, INC. C. HOPPER, v. HALLMARK CARDS, INC., 87 F.3d 983 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 213.055, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. . . .

BRACKETT, v. STATE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF MISSOURI,, 163 F.R.D. 305 (W.D. Mo. 1995)

. . . . § 213.055 (Vernon Supp.1995), a state law similar to Title VII which prohibits certain employment practices . . .

S. WILSON, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION,, 62 F.3d 237 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 213.055. . . .

L. NELSON, v. BOATMEN S BANCSHARES, INC. s St. s, 26 F.3d 796 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 213.055 (Vernon Supp.1993). . . .

D. DAVIS, v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., 21 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . Pursuant to section 213.055 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, an employer may not “discriminate against . . .

J. STAFFORD, v. STATE, 835 F. Supp. 1136 (W.D. Mo. 1993)

. . . . § 213.055. . . . to Title VII and Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.055 based upon the same facts supporting her claims under § 1983 . . . Thus, plaintiffs Title VII and § 213.055 claims against the individual defendants in their individual . . . Regarding plaintiffs Title VII and § 213.055 hostile environment claims against the DOC and its agents . . . Therefore, I find for plaintiff on her Title VII and § 213.055 claims. . . .

In INTERCO INCORPORATED, In INTERCO INCORPORATED,, 152 B.R. 273 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1993)

. . . . § 213.055(l)(a) (1992). . . . .

WILLIAMS, v. FERMENTA ANIMAL HEALTH COMPANY,, 984 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 1981, and Missouri Revised Statute § 213.055 (1986). . . .

A. CRITTENDON, v. COLUMBIA ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP,, 799 F. Supp. 974 (W.D. Mo. 1992)

. . . individual’s race, color, religion, national origin, sex, ancestry, age or handicap;____ Mo.Rev.Stat § 213.055 . . .

In REPRODUCTION SYSTEMS, INC. D. NOBLET D. v. REPRODUCTION SYSTEMS, INC., 133 B.R. 493 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1991)

. . . . § 213.055. 43. The next issue concerns remedies. . . . of nominal damages is also based on the provisions of the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.055 . . .

K. ROBERTS, v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE COMPANY,, 763 F. Supp. 1043 (W.D. Mo. 1991)

. . . . § 213.055 because it refused to offer plaintiff a promotion due to her gender. . . . The Missouri Supreme Court has held that disparate treatment claims of discrimination brought under § 213.055 . . .

HUBBARD, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., 759 F. Supp. 567 (E.D. Mo. 1991)

. . . . § 213.055, by discriminating against her because of her mental handicap. . . . Defendant violated section 213.055 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri which prohibits an employer from . . .

KIENTZY, v. DOUGLAS CORPORATION,, 133 F.R.D. 570 (E.D. Mo. 1991)

. . . . § 2000e et seq., and the Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.055 R.S.Mo. (1986). . . .

F. CAUDILL, v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., 698 F. Supp. 1476 (W.D. Mo. 1988)

. . . . § 213.055, the ADEA’s 300 day limitations period applies. . . . See Mo.Ann.Stat. § 213.055 (Vernon 1986). . . .

G. EUBANKS, MD W. MD M. MD S. MD C. MD MD L. MD H. MD. v. Y. BROWN L. Co. J. Co. E. Co., 604 F. Supp. 141 (W.D. Ky. 1984)

. . . her judgment that the abortion is necessary on a form prescribed by the Department as required by KRS 213.055 . . .