Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 213.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 213.13 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 213.13

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 213
STATE REVENUE LAWS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 213.13
213.13 Electronic remittance and distribution of funds collected by clerks of the court.
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Department of Revenue shall establish procedures requiring the electronic transmittal of funds and associated return information submitted by clerks of the court. These procedures must be developed jointly by the Department of Revenue and the Florida Association of Court Clerks representing the clerks of the court. The department shall adopt rules necessary to implement the procedures contained in this section.
(2) The funds to be remitted electronically by the clerks include proceeds from the taxes imposed by chapter 199, chapter 201, and all other fees, fines, reimbursements, court costs, or other court-related funds that the clerks must remit to the state pursuant to law. At a minimum, these electronic remittance procedures must include:
(a) The prescribed reporting frequency and time period for the clerks to remit such funds and the prescribed time period in which the department must electronically deposit the funds received to the appropriate state and local funds and accounts;
(b) The electronic format and type of debit remittance system to be used by the clerks to remit the funds to the department;
(c) The means of communication used to transmit the required information; and
(d) The information that must be submitted with such remittance.
(3) The clerks shall submit return information with the electronic payments required by this section in a manner that is initiated through electronic means.
(4) To ensure that the Department of Revenue deposits on a correct and timely basis the revenues electronically received from the clerks, the agencies that are statutorily authorized to receive such revenue deposits shall grant the department electronic access to their appropriate funds and accounts.
(5) All court-related collections, including fees, fines, reimbursements, court costs, and other court-related funds that the clerks must remit to the state pursuant to law, must be transmitted electronically by the 10th day of the month immediately following the month in which the funds are collected.
History.s. 1, ch. 2001-122; s. 43, ch. 2005-236; s. 9, ch. 2014-40.

F.S. 213.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 213.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 213.13


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 213.13
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 213.13.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SCHULENBERG, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,, 911 F.3d 1276 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 213.13. Mr. Schulenberg alleges negligence per se based on a violation of § 213.63. . . . 1 5/8 inch deviation in a 62-foot chord did not account for deflection under load, as required by § 213.13 . . .

D. COWDEN, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,, 975 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (E.D. Mo. 2013)

. . . . § 213.13. . . . Section 213.13 states, “When unloaded track is measured to determine compliance with requirements of . . . Defendant claims 49 C.F.R. § 213.13 covers the subject matter of Plaintiffs Allegation “k.” . . . Section 213.13 states, “When unloaded track is measured to determine compliance with requirements of . . . Section 213.13 directly encompasses the subject matter of properly accounting for rail movement. . . .

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. DETROIT HARBOR TERMINALS, INC., 850 F.2d 283 (6th Cir. 1988)

. . . ’ beneficiaries were entitled to 50% of the national average weekly wage at the time of his death ($213.13 . . .

Dr. B. DUBIN, v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Dr. B. DUBIN, v. WARE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 478 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Civ.Prac., par. 213.13) running separately for the damages occasioned each time a breach of the obligation . . .

KANE GAS LIGHT AND HEATING COMPANY, No. No. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN AND OILERS, LOCAL No. No., 687 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1982)

. . . Stat.Ann. tit. 43, § 213.13 (Purdon). . . .

LYLES, v. AMERICAN HOIST DERRICK COMPANY,, 614 F.2d 691 (10th Cir. 1980)

. . . to that insurance contract, paid to plaintiff Lyles compensation benefits in the total sum of $26,-213.13 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. ROSENBLUM,, 197 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1967)

. . . law and membership in The Florida Bar and is ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding in sum of $213.13 . . .