The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 213.756 (Counts 2, 3, 4) Defendants argue that Fla. . . . . § 213.756 precludes a cause of action in its entirety when, as here, all taxes collected were remitted . . . Stat. § 213.756(2)(a). . . . Stat. § 213.756 does not preclude a finding that the acts were deceptive - whether they kept the taxes . . .
. . . action “because the relief sought—a refund of a purported sales tax overcharge—is barred by section 213.756 . . .
. . . Papa John’s further contends that Florida Statute § 213.756 expressly bars the purchaser from recovering . . . Florida Statute § 213.756, provides in relevant part: (2)(a) In any action by a purchaser against a retailer . . . Furthermore, Plaintiffs claim that Florida Statute § 213.756 has limited applicability in this case and . . . According to Plaintiffs, § 213.756 is not a bar to a suit, but rather in a claim by a purchaser against . . . Therefore, the Court declines to consider Papa John’s affirmative defenses under Florida Statute § 213.756 . . .
. . . We find section 213.756, Fla. . . .
. . . In 1991, the Legislature enacted section 213.756, which provides: 213.756. . . .