Cases from cite.case.law:

. . . . §§ 222.14, 222.18, 222.201, and the liquid assets were exempt under 11 ' U.S.C. § 522(d)(10). . . .

. . . . § 222.201. . . .

. . . But section 222.201, Florida Statutes (2007), expressly allows individual debtors to exempt "in addition . . .

. . . Florida has opted out through provisions of the Florida Constitution and Florida Statute Sections 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201, which makes the property exempt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(d) (10) (E). . . .

. . . Skis(2) $ 3,025.00 $ 3,025.00 Beal Bank Stocks: Prudential — 1 share $ 15.00 $ 15.00 FSA §§ 222.21(2), 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201 specifically opts the state back in with respect to exemptions pursuant to Section 552(d) . . .

. . . . § 222.201 et seq.). See In re Haning, 252 B.R. 799, 804 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2000). . . .

. . . . § 222.201. . . . Stat. § 222.201(1), that states “[notwithstanding s. 222.20, an individual debtor under the federal Bankruptcy . . .

. . . exemption on the basis that the exemption is not allowable pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 222.21(2), 222.201 . . .

. . . Debtor contends that the IRA Accounts are exempt pursuant to Fla.Stat. chs. 222.201 and 222.21 and 11 . . . U.S.C. § 522(d)(10) and that the Payments are also exempt pursuant to Fla.Stat. ch. 222.201 and 11 U.S.C . . . Debtor, however, asserts that the Payments are exempt under § 522(d)(10)(D) and Fla.Stat. ch. 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201 permits debtors to claim the exemptions listed in 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10). . . .

. . . . § 222.201 et seq.). See In re Haning, 252 B.R. 799, 804 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2000). . . .

. . . provide Florida debtors with state law exemptions (as authorized by Section 522), Florida Statutes § 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201). See Crews v. First Colony Life Ins. Co. . . .

. . . . §§ 222.21(2) and 222.201. . . . it not for the debtor’s claim that the plan is nonetheless exempt under Fla.Stat. §§ 222.21(2) and 222.201 . . . Fla.Stat. § 222.201 incorporates by reference the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10). . . . This section, like Fla.Stat. § 222.201, requires the determination of the plan’s tax qualification. . . . It is therefore not exempt under either Fla.Stat. § 222.21(2) or § 222.201. . . .

. . . determined to be exempt from the debtor’s bankruptcy estate pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 222.21(2)(a) and 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201. . . . .

. . . . § 222.201 (West 1989). . . .

. . . FLORIDA STATUTE § 222.201 & 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10) Count III of the Lawsuit is based upon a special theory . . . Fla.Stat. 222.201 (1996). . . .

. . . The Debtor does not contend that the funds in his IRA are exempt based on § 222.201 of the Florida Statutes . . .

. . . At the hearing, the Debtor also claimed that the funds were exempt under section 222.201(1) of the Florida . . . However, pursuant to section 222.201 of the Florida Statutes, an individual debtor may also exempt any . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 222.201 (West 1989). . . .

. . . . § 522(b)(1) and Florida Statute § 222.201. . . .

. . . . § 222.201; Fla.Stat. § 222.21; 29 USC §§ 1056 and 1065 (sic) and Spend Thrift Trust.” . . . Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan) pursuant to Fla.Stat. §§ 222.201, 222.21 and 29 U.S.C. §§ 1056 and 1065 . . . This leaves for consideration the claim of exemption based on Fla.Stat. § 222.201. . . . Notwithstanding, the Legislature enacted Fla.Stat. § 222.201 and in fact selectively opted-back to the . . . Stat. § 222.201 is not without doubt. . . .

. . . . § 222.201 then opts the state back in as far as exemptions in Bankruptcy Code § 522(d)(10) are concerned . . .

. . . Florida Statute 222.201(1) provides that an individual debtor may exempt, in addition to any other exemptions . . .

. . . Stat. 222.201(1), 11 U.S.C. 522(d)(10)(C) and under N.C.G.S. . . . Exemption under Florida Statute 222.201(1) Debtors argue in that alternative that even if the exemption . . . Florida Statute 222.201(1) is consistent with this scheme because a Florida debtor is not allowed both . . . The exemption provided in Fla.Stat. 222.201(1) is not preempted by § 522(b) and debtor may exempt his . . . Trustee’s objection to debtors’ claim of exemption pursuant to Fla.Stat. 222.201(1) is overruled. . . . .

. . . . § 222.201 et seq.) delineate the exemptions available to its citizenry. . . .

. . . . § 222.201). . . .

. . . . § 222.201. . . .

. . . . § 222.201 then opts the state back in as far as exemptions in Bankruptcy Code § 522(d)(10) are concerned . . . preemption; and (2) that the Schleins are entitled to exemption of their SEP/IRA account under Fla.Stat. § 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201 then opts the state back in as far as exemptions in Bankruptcy Code § 522(d)(10) are concerned . . . preemption; and (2) that the Sehleins are entitled to exemption of their SEP/IRA account under Fla.Stat. § 222.201 . . .

. . . Florida Statutes § 222.14 and § 522(d)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code made applicable by Florida Statutes § 222.201 . . .

. . . The relevant Statues are Fla.Stat. 222.20 and 222.201 which provide: § 222.20 Nonavailability of federal . . . exemptions given to herein to residents of this state by the State Constitution and the Florida Statutes. 222.201 . . .

. . . . § 222.201. That statute makes exempt property of the type described in 11 U.S.C. . . . 222.201 are constitutional. . . . The Courts of this district have previously ruled that F.S. §§ 222.21 and 222.201 are constitutional. . . . Section 222.201 does not violate the law.” Id. at 751-752. . . . Both F.S. §§ 222.21 and 222.201 are constitutional. . . .

. . . . § 222.201, and Fla.Stat. § 222.21 [sic]. . . . and Lane, M.D., P.A., (Fuller and Lane) as exempt pursuant to Florida Statutes § 222.14, § 222.18, § 222.201 . . . federal exemption for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(2)(A). 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10)(E) and Fla.Stat. § 222.201 . . . (1) The Debtor Knowles and Johnson also rely on Fla.Stat. § 222.201(1) in seeking to have their interest . . . Stat. § 222.201(1), may selectively opt back into the federal exemption scheme provided by § 522(d) of . . .

. . . Clearly, if Section 222.201 is determined to be a state law that permits Florida residents to exempt . . . Rosenquist argues, however, that instead of providing another state exemption, Section 222.201 amends . . . This result follows, of course, because Section 222.201 refers only to subparagraph 10 of Section 522 . . . Section 222.201 provides that a debtor may exempt, “in addition to any other exemptions allowed under . . . The only construction that would give effect to Section 222.201 is that it is a state statute providing . . .

. . . . § 222.201(1). . . . Whether Florida may use Fla.Stat. § 222.201(1) to selectively opt back into the Federal exemptions scheme . . .

. . . . § 222.201(1) and 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10)(E). . . . the Plan was being claimed as exempt pursuant to “29 U.S.C. 1056(d), 11 U.S.C. 522(d)(10), Fla.Stat. 222.201 . . . Next, the Debtors rely on Fla.Stat. § 222.201(1) which provides notwithstanding § 222.20, an individual . . . Even assuming without admitting that Florida, through the enactment of Fla.Stat. § 222.201(1), may selectively . . .

. . . . § 222.201(1) Finally, Mr. Atzkatz and Mrs. . . . . § 222.201(1), which provides: Notwithstanding s. 222.20, an individual debtor under the federal Bankruptcy . . . Stat. § 222.201(1), may selectively opt back in to the federal exemption scheme provided by § 522(d) . . .

. . . . § 222.201. . . . Fla.Stat. § 222.201 applies to both bankruptcy and nonbankruptcy debtors and therefore avoids the Colorado . . .

. . . . § 222.201(1), which provides: Notwithstanding s. 222.20, an individual debtor under the federal Bankruptcy . . .

. . . Florida Statutes but, by amendments, has claimed the annuity as exempt under §§ 222.14, 222.18, and 222.201 . . . Another statutory basis relied upon by the debtor is § 222.201, Florida Statutes, which makes exempt . . . The Court feels that, on the record before it, it cannot conclude that § 222.201 serves to exempt the . . . such policy or contract of insurance was effected for the benefit of such creditor or creditors. . 222.201 . . .

. . . Sec. 222.201 (1987) and 11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(d)(10)(A). The claimed exemptions were allowed. . . . Sec. 222.201 (1987) and 11 U.S.C. . . . Sections 222.14 and 222.201 (1987) and 11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(d)(10)(A), and that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. . . .

. . . . § 222.21 and § 222.201. I disagree. . . . Partial “Opting In” The trustee’s final argument addresses Fla.Stat. § 222.201, which states, in part . . . I find that the validly exercised power of the legislature in adopting Fla.Stat. § 222.201 does not violate . . .

. . . . § 222.20 and § 222.201 (1987). . . .

. . . . § 222.201 and 11 U.S.C. § 522(d). . . . Statutes and § 522(d)(10)(E) of the Bankruptcy Code for its alternative basis for its claim of exemption. 222.201 . . . Turning attention to § 222.201 Fla. . . .