Cases from cite.case.law:

In GRAY, 382 B.R. 438 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008)

. . . seller $14,362.48 = net trade-in $ 4,261.98—h cash $ 1,000.00 + other (describe) REBATES $ 3,500.00 $ 238.02 . . .

J. PROSSER, v. S. PROSSER,, 40 F. Supp. 2d 663 (D.V.I. 1998)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 238.02[2] (2d ed.1995). . . .

OPUS CORPORATION, a v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a, 956 F. Supp. 1503 (D. Minn. 1996)

. . . .09, Subdivision 1; 116B.10, Subdivisions 1 and 4; 148.621, Subdivision 13; 150A.01, Subdivision 7; 238.02 . . .

CARLSON T. V. v. CITY OF MARBLE, 612 F. Supp. 669 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . § 238.02, subd. 3 provides that the definition of “Cable communications system" does not include: ( . . . Minn.Stat. § 238.02, subd. 2. . . . Minn.Stat. § 238.02, subd. 3(a). . . .

M. CUMMINGS, v. UNITED STATES M., 648 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . See generally 9 Moore’s Federal Practice U 238.02 (2d ed. 1980); 16 C. Wright, A. Miller, E. . . .

EXHIBITORS POSTER EXCHANGE, INC. v. NATIONAL SCREEN SERVICE CORP., 78 F.R.D. 192 (E.D. La. 1978)

. . . According to 9 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 238.02, at 4252, “the cases interpreting § 1912 indicated . . .

UNITED STATES INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, v. SANTA FE ENGINEERS, INC. a s a, 567 F.2d 860 (9th Cir. 1978)

. . . Willacy, 239 F.2d 179, 16 Alaska 499 (9th Cir. 1956). 9 Moore’s Federal Practice H 238.02 (1975). . . .

WEITZMAN, v. STEIN,, 436 F. Supp. 895 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . Jacobs, The Impact of Rule 10b-5 § 238.02 at 10-60 & n.17 (1977) and authorities cited therein, and note . . .