Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 279.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 279.07 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 279.07

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIX
PUBLIC BUSINESS
Chapter 279
REGISTERED PUBLIC OBLIGATIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 279.07
279.07 Valid and binding execution; signatures.
(1) Any certificated registered public obligation which is signed by the authorized officers at the time of its signing shall remain valid and binding, notwithstanding the fact that, before its issuance, any or all of such officers have ceased to fill their respective offices.
(2) Any authorized officer who is empowered to sign any certificated registered public obligation may adopt as and for his or her signature the signature of a predecessor in office in the event that the predecessor’s signature appears on such obligation. An authorized officer incurs, by adoption of a predecessor’s signature, no liability that would not be incurred by such authorized officer if the signature were that of such authorized officer.
History.s. 6, ch. 83-271; s. 62, ch. 85-80; s. 187, ch. 95-148.

F.S. 279.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 279.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 279.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 279.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 279.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CALIFORNIA v. ARIZONA, 452 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1981)

. . . S 67°09'09" E 279.07 feet; 499. N 79°03'56" E 50.29 feet; 500. S 71o21'30" E 97.26 feet; 501. . . .

STEPHAN A. v. UNITED STATES,, 490 F. Supp. 323 (W.D. Mich. 1980)

. . . The specific language is as follows: § 279.07 Claimant in the Armed Forces: Tolling Provisions of the . . . Jayson, Handling Federal Tort Claims § 279.07 (footnotes omitted). . . .

T. S. v., 32 T.C. 317 (T.C. 1959)

. . . paid January $281.99 February 242.16 March_ 300.73 April_ 290.24 Month Amount paid May $280.30 June 279.07 . . .

In WRIGHT. WRIGHT v. LOGAN, 75 F.2d 687 (7th Cir. 1935)

. . . $l,-279.07, respectively, and that' neither they nor Logan signed the extension agreement; but, on the . . .