Cases from cite.case.law:

DAVIS, v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY,, 515 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 399.11, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

HUGHES AIR CORPORATION v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 492 F.2d 567 (D.C. Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 399.11(d), “Use it or lose it” policy for subsidized local service carriers: In evaluating the continuing . . .

NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT COMMISSION, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 371 F.2d 733 (D.C. Cir. 1966)

. . . . § 399.11 (1966). . . . . . § 399.11(b) (1966), states: Under this “use it or lose it” policy, the Board will require each city . . .

CITY OF PONTIAC, MICHIGAN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, REED CITY, MICHIGAN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 361 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . commerce; and (f) The promotion, encouragement, and development of civil aeronautics.” . 14 C.F.R. 399.11 . . .

OUTAGAMIE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, CITY OF CLINTONVILLE, WISCONSIN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, CITY OF ASHLAND, WISCONSIN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, STATE OF WISCONSIN, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 355 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1966)

. . . . § 399.11(d) (1965), and states that: “In evaluating the continuing need for air service at any ■ point . . .

FLYNN v. SMITH, 90 F.2d 305 (7th Cir. 1937)

. . . to the close of April 23, there had been other deposits, not here in question, in the total sum of $399.11 . . .