Cases from cite.case.law:

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 314 F. Supp. 3d 1178 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . . § 402.05, a Corps regulation covering emergencies. (Id. ) 13. Effects of Sediment Retention. . . .

IN RE TENDERLOIN HEALTH, FKA HIV AKA E. v., 849 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Next, it moved the rest of its net sale proceeds — $526,-402.05 — from escrow into its BOTW deposit account . . .

IN RE TENDERLOIN HEALTH, FKA HIV AKA E. v., 849 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Next, it moved the rest of its net sale proceeds — $526,-402.05 — from escrow into its BOTW deposit account . . .

MARKLE INTERESTS, L. L. C. P F L. L. C. PF L. L. C. v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE M. v. M., 848 F.3d 635 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 402.05(b) (in the context of emergency consultation, referring to “impacts to endangered or threatened . . .

FRIENDS OF MERRYMEETING BAY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 810 F. Supp. 2d 320 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . ESA] using the emergency consultation procedures specified in NMFS’s joint regulations at 50 C.F.R. 402.05 . . . of the repairs, NMFS can confirm that emergency consultation procedures outlined under 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . Second, assuming for the moment that the ongoing use of 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 is a final agency action, . . . Id., While 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 plainly applies to emergencies, the Secretary is entitled to significant . . . Under this interpretation of 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 and the ESA Handbook, FERC, as the action agency was . . .

FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 726 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . . § 402.05]. Id. D. . . . contemplated in Gifford Pinchot, but rather an expedited emergency consultation pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . Watersheds, the answer is yes; the opinion contains no mention of emergency consultation or 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . exclusively evaluated under the lesser strictures of the emergency consultation procedures of 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . USFS AR 339 at 3. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.05. . . . .

WASHINGTON TOXICS COALITION s s v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 457 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (W.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . . § 402.05 to cover all FIFRA section 18 actions, effectively equating FI-FRA emergencies with ESA emergencies . . . emergency is under control,” at which time formal consultation must be initiated, if necessary. 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . regulations that would treat all FIFRA emergency exemptions as ‘emergencies’ for the purpose of sec. 402.05 . . . , “acts of God, disasters, casualties, national defense or security emergencies, etc”). 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . of FIFRA emergency exemption actions could properly be considered emergencies for the purposes of § 402.05 . . .

FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 397 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Mont. 2005)

. . . . § 402.05 sufficiently satisfies the USFS obligations under 16 U.S.C. § 1536. . . . However, the emergency consultation provision of 50 CFR 402.05 is not a substitute for required consultation . . . The emergency provision of § 402.05 allows for informal consultation “when there is a need to consult . . . consultation still must be “consistent with the directives of sections 7(a)-(d) of the Act.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.05 . . . Further, 50 C.F.R. § 402.05(b) makes clear that “formal consultation shall be initiated as soon as practicable . . .

STRAHAN, v. L. LINNON, E. D., 967 F. Supp. 581 (D. Mass. 1997)

. . . . § 402.05. . . .