Cases from cite.case.law:

AMERICAN TUNABOAT ASSOCIATION, v. ROSS, 391 F. Supp. 3d 98 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . §§ 402.12(k)(1), 402.14(a) - (b). . . .

ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,, 384 F. Supp. 3d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . . § 402.12(a) (biological evaluation must "determine whether any such species or habitat are likely to . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 369 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 402.12(a), because the document "does not reflect the personal views of individuals employed by Defendant . . .

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. JEFFRIES, v. M. Pe a, a v., 370 F. Supp. 3d 1208 (D. Or. 2019)

. . . . § 402.12(c). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. SAVAGE,, 354 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (D. Mont. 2018)

. . . Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R §§ 402.14(b)(1), 402.12 . . .

NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, v. KRUEGER,, 348 F. Supp. 3d 1065 (D. Mont. 2018)

. . . . § 402.12(c) - (d) (emphasis added ). . . . . §§ 402.12(f), 402.14(a), (b)(1) ; Forest Guardians v. . . . ]" a listed species, the Forest Service may initiate informal consultation. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(a), 402.12 . . . action-here, the Forest Plan-that may affect a listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1) ; 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE,, 317 F. Supp. 3d 1118 (D. Mont. 2018)

. . . . §§ 402.02, 402.12(a). The Court will address the ESA argument in a future Order. . . .

COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE COALITION, NY NJ v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, R., 898 F.3d 173 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 402.12(k)(1), 402.14(b)(1). . . .

COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE COALITION, NY NJ v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, R., 905 F.3d 49 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 402.12(k)(1), 402.14(b)(1). . . .

AQUALLIANCE, v. U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION,, 287 F. Supp. 3d 969 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . . § 402.12(k). . . .

COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, v. OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT,, 302 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (D. Colo. 2018)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . Id. § 402.12(f). . . . Babbitt , 130 F.Supp.2d 121, 126 n.4 (D.D.C. 2001) (emphasizing § 402.12(f)'s discretionary character . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f)(4). . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(i). . . .

TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE L. U. S. U. S., 878 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 264 F. Supp. 3d 1136 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . . §§ 402.12, 402.14, At the end of the Section 7(a)(2) formal cpnsultation process, the FWS issues a . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. VILSACK,, 276 F. Supp. 3d 1015 (D. Nev. 2017)

. . . Rather, 50 C.F.R) § 402.12(f) governs the contents of the BA, which gives the federal agency discretion . . . well as ‘consideration of cumulative effects, and the results of any related studies.’ 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

FRIENDS OF CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL v. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION v., 255 F. Supp. 3d 60 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . § 402.12(d)(1); Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(d)(1), § 402.14(b)(1), § 402.14(h). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U. S. T. U. S. U. S. Co. LLP,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . determines whether the species or habitat are likely to be adversely affected by the action. 50 C.F.R, § 402.12 . . . to fully “evaluate the potential effects of the action on listed and proposed species,” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 237 F. Supp. 3d 1079 (D. Or. 2017)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES v. KRUEGER, U. S., 664 F. App'x 674 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 402.12(a); see 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). . . . . '§ 402.12(c)-(d). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. SAVAGE, U. S. U. S. U. S. a a, 209 F. Supp. 3d 1181 (D. Mont. 2016)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . proposed critical habitat that may be present in the action area.” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . biological assessment is completed, it must be shared with the Fish & Wildlife Service. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . likely to be adversely affected”; and (2) the Fish & Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

OREGON WILD, v. U. S. FOREST SERVICE, a U. S. a JRS III, LP. LLC R. d. b. a. J- Co. Co. O, 193 F. Supp. 3d 1156 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . discretion of the federal agency” and “may [include] ... consideration of cumulative effects[.]” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . NLAA finding, and rationally connect its conclusion to the BA’s discretionary contents. 50 ■ C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f) (“The contents of a biological assessment are at the discretion of the Federal . . .

MAYO, v. B. JARVIS, v., 177 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . . § 402.12(h). . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 191 F. Supp. 3d 157 (D.P.R. 2016)

. . . . § 402.12 (i)(l)(i). On this point, courts have allowed certain flexibility to federal agencies. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. BRANTON, LLC,, 126 F. Supp. 3d 1090 (D. Ariz. 2015)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. BRADFORD, L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 601 F. App'x 488 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 402.01(b), 402.12(a). . . .

NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, v. KRUEGER, U. S. U. S. U. S., 63 F. Supp. 3d 1246 (D. Mont. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . . § 402.12(d)(1). . . . . § 402.12(d)(1). . . . .” § 402.10; see also § 402.12(d)(1). . . . included all of the species that had been listed and proposed at that time, as required by section 402.12 . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. AUSTIN,, 55 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (D. Mont. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . proposed critical habitat that may be present in the action area.” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . biological assessment is completed, it must be shared with the Fish & Wildlife Service. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . “not likely to be adversely affected” and 2) the Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

SWAN VIEW COALITION, v. WEBER, U. S. U. S. U. S., 52 F. Supp. 3d 1133 (D. Mont. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . Id. at § 402.12(f). . . . likely to be adversely affected” and the Fish and Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . or adverse modification of [critical] habitat of such species.” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION III, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, v. U. S. B. M. U. S., 46 F. Supp. 3d 1254 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . A.R. 7896; see also 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(a) (describing purpose of a biological assessment). . . . initiate formal consultation if, as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. KRUGER, U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 15 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (D. Mont. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . Once the biological assessment is completed, it must be shared with FWS. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12®. . . . . § 402.12(d). . . . is “not likely to be adversely affected” and the Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

OCEANA, v. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT,, 37 F. Supp. 3d 147 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(g) (“Service responsibilities during formal consultation are as follows .... ”). . . .

NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, v. S. M. R. JEWELL,, 62 F. Supp. 3d 7 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 402.12(a). ■ .NMA asserts that the ESA section 7 rules are not binding on other agencies, because . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, a v. WEBER,, 979 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . proposed critical habitat that may be present in the action area.” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . Once the biological assessment is completed, it must be shared with the Wildlife Service. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . The regulation governing biological assessments — 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 — does not prescribe analysis of . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY,, 733 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR WILD ROCKIES, v. KRUGER, U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . proposed critical habitat that may be present in the action area.” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . Once the biological assessment is completed, it must be shared with the Wildlife Service. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . “not likely to be adversely affected” and 2) the Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . .

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 720 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 402.12(a); and (2) the FWS issued an arbitrary concurrence letter accepting the BA’s conclusion, . . . endangered] species or [critical] habitat are likely to be adversely affected by the action.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . well as “consideration of cumulative effects, and the results of any related studies.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . Thus, under the plain meaning of 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f), consideration of cumulative effects is permissive . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASE- REPORT NO., 130 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 2013)

. . . case, you find that the (describe event) was not due to any negligence on the part of (defendant). 402.12 . . . NOTES ON USE FOR 402.12 1. . . .

NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL v. KRUEGER, U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 946 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . affect” or is “likely to adversely affect” the listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . “not likely to be adversely affected” and 2) the Wildlife Service concurs in writing. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . Lynx In the instant case, in compliance with section 7(c) and 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(c)-(d), the Wildlife . . . FP:113-20; 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(c)-(d) (emphasis added). . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U. S. L. L. C. On v. L. L. C. v. U. S. U. S. L. L. C. v. U. S. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. U. S., 698 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 402.12 (2012). . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY,, 895 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (S.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . consultation is not required, however, if: as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL It s v. SALAZAR, D. U. S. J. U. S. LP F. D. Co. D. LLC, 686 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 875 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Mont. 2012)

. . . Id. at § 402.12(a). . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12, 402.13. . . . Dombeck, 304 F.3d 886, 901 (9th Cir.2002); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.02, 402.12. . . .

FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, a a a v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, W. B., 870 F. Supp. 2d 966 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . § 402.12; Sw. Ctr. For Biological Diversity v. U.S. . . .

MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, U. S. U. S., 914 F. Supp. 2d 957 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . But “if, as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 or as a result of informal . . .

v. F. OWW- DLB v. OWW- DLB v. F. OWW- SMS v. OWW- SMS v. OWW- DLB v. OWW- SMS, 791 F. Supp. 2d 802 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. L. SALAZAR,, 804 F. Supp. 2d 987 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 832 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE W., 640 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 402.12(a)). . . .

LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, a v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 776 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.12. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(k)(l). . . .

SAN LUIS DELTA- MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, v. SALAZAR, v. a v. v. v. v., 760 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 726 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . to forego formal consultation if, as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . . 16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A)(i). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(a) states that a biological assessment "shall evaluate . . .

SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 723 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . . § 402.12(a), (k). That BiOp is the subject of plaintiffs’ third claim. . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. BRADFORD, U. S. U. S. U. S., 720 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . . § 402.12(k)(1). . . .

CONSOLIDATED DELTA SMELT CASES, 717 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . evaluates the action’s potential impacts on species and species’ habitat. 16 U.S.C. 1536(c); 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . .

CONSOLIDATED SALMONID CASES, 713 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . . § 402.12(a). 19. . . .

ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S. Ed U. S. v., 703 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . to forego formal consultation if, as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . . require special management considerations or protection^] 16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A)(i). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

MEDINA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ASSOCIATION, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, 602 F.3d 687 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 402.12(f). . . . compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . including consideration of cumulative effects, and the results of any related studies.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . accuses the respondents of failing to consider the WPAP as a "related study,” as it may under 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Finally, instruction 402.12, also new, covers claims of attorney malpractice in civil litigation. . . . Issues — Vicarious Liability 402.10 Burden of Proof on Preliminary Issues 402.11 Issues on Main Claim 402.12 . . . unique to certain professions, such as instruction 402.4(d) (missing medical records) and instruction 402.12 . . . NOTE ON USE FOR 402.11d Derived from F.S. 766.110. 402.12 ISSUES ON CLAIM OF ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE ARISING . . . NOTES ON USE FOR 402.12 1. . . .

SIERRA FOREST LEGACY, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S. U. S., 652 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 632 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 402.12(k)(1), or to engage in informal consultations that resulted in a determination, “with the . . .

SIERRA FOREST LEGACY, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S. U. S., 598 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. J. HARVEY, U. S., 574 F. Supp. 2d 934 (E.D. Ark. 2008)

. . . . § 402.12. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(a). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. . . . .

WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U. S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Nev. 2008)

. . . . § 402.12(b). . . . assessment is required for “Federal actions that are ‘major construction activities.’” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(b). . . . action and is used in determining whether formal consultation or a conference is necessary.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

PACIFIC SHORES SUBDIVISION CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 538 F. Supp. 2d 242 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

WILDERNESS SOCIETY, CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS, v. WISELY, U. S., 524 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (D. Colo. 2007)

. . . . § 402.12(b) (“The procedures of this section are required for Federal actions that are ‘major construction . . . discretion of the federal agency and will depend on the nature of the Federal action.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . whether any such species or habitat are likely to be adversely affected by the action.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. KEMPTHORNE,, 506 F. Supp. 2d 322 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASS N v. D. LOHN, l l M. U. S. R. U. S. S. U. S. U. S. U. S., 485 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D. Or. 2007)

. . . . § 402.12. . . . and “[e]valuate the effects of the action and cumulative effects on the listed species.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, v. U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE, v., 481 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (N.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . . § 402.12; see also George C. Coggins & Robert L. . . . adversely affected, and the wildlife agency confers, then formal consultation is not required. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL v. B. ALLEN, s U. S., 476 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 402.12, 402.14. . . .

FOREST GUARDIANS, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, 462 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (D.N.M. 2006)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

CALIFORNIA LOCKYER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE s v., 459 F. Supp. 2d 874 (N.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . As such, preparation of a biological assessment is not required (50 CFR 402.12(b)). . . .

NEW MEXICO EX REL. RICHARDSON, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, n v., 459 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (D.N.M. 2006)

. . . . § 402.12(a), (b). . . .

CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY v. JOHANNS, U. S. T. R. U. S. U. S., 451 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D. Haw. 2006)

. . . . § 402.12(c) (requiring federal agencies to request information regarding listed species and critical . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. J. HARVEY, U. S., 440 F. Supp. 2d 940 (E.D. Ark. 2006)

. . . . § 402.12(c). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.02. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.02. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. . . . . . § 402.12. . 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(c). .50 C.F.R. § 402.12. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . (c) and (d). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(d). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f)(1). . . . . No. 15-24. . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(a). . 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(k). . Id. . Id. . . . . an agency or the FWS should determine if a listed species may be present in action area; 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . .

FOREST GUARDIANS, v. JOHANNS,, 450 F.3d 455 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . initiate formal consultation if, as the result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. B. FLOWERS, LLC, APAC-, 423 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . “jeopardy” to listed species, and the FWS agrees, then the proposed project may proceed. 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . . effects of the action on the species and its habitat, and an analysis of alternate actions. 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . . any person may prepare BA "under supervision of [agency] and in cooperation with [FWS],” 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. B. U. S. U. S. II, LLC, HB A. LLC, 420 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . See § 402.12(c), (d)(2)(describing requirements of a biological assessment to include only discussion . . .

CITY OF TACOMA, WASHINGTON, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 383 F. Supp. 2d 89 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . See 50 C.F.R. 402.12. . . . See 50 C.F.R. 402.12. . . .

BUCKEYE FOREST COUNCIL v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 378 F. Supp. 2d 835 (S.D. Ohio 2005)

. . . . § 402.12 states that the purpose of a biological assessment is to evaluate the potential effects of . . . whether such species or their habitat are likely to be adversely affected by the action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . such an assessment is required for federal actions that are major construction activities. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

FUND FOR ANIMALS, W. v. NORTON, U. S. U. S., 365 F. Supp. 2d 394 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . . § 402.12(a), the FWS must undertake a biological assessment to determine whether ESA-protected species . . . request for a list of protected species or the critical habitat that may be in the area. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . ultimately may issue an assessment of how the underlying activity affects protected species. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . (d)(2), 402.12(f). . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,, 345 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (W.D. Wash. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12 or as a result of informal consultation with the Service under 50 C.F.R. § 402.13, the action . . . is not required here because the agency action is not a "major construction activity.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

CITY OF SAUSALITO, a v. O NEILL l U. S. C. U. S. U. S. P. U. S. U. S. U. S. R. U. S., 386 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12(f)(l)-(5). . . . Id. § 402.12(a). . . . exceptions, that a biological assessment be completed within 180 days. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

KLAMATH- SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 373 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . Id. § 402.12(k)(l). . . .

GROUND ZERO CENTER FOR NON- VIOLENT ACTION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Jr. A. III,, 383 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . . Id. § 402.12(k)(l). . . .

In AMERICAN RIVERS AND IDAHO RIVERS UNITED,, 372 F.3d 413 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12, or informal consultation with the Service, see id. § 402.13, the agency determines — and . . .

PEARSON, v. E. POWELL, V, 96 F. App'x 466 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12(k)(1). . . .

MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION a v. FRY, U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. a, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (D. Mont. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12(a); 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(1). . . . threatened and endangered species, and FWS concurs, formal consultation is not required. 50 C.F.R. 402.12 . . . a BA are discretionary, depending upon the nature of the federal action being assessed. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . effects of the action on the species and habitat and an analysis of alternative actions. 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12 . . . agency to assess the potential effects of the action on threatened or endangered species. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

PROTECT OUR WATER v. Lt. B. FLOWERS, U. S. J. Jr. U. S., 377 F. Supp. 2d 844 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . . § 402.12. . . . area affected by the action to determine if listed or proposed species are present .... ” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . An agency may prepare the biological assessment “in cooperation with the Service.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. NORTON, BNP BNP, 74 F. App'x 376 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 1536(c); 50 CFR § 402.12. . . . biological opinion is not required if: ... as a result of the preparation of a biological assessment under § 402.12 . . .

TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 340 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a a a K. E. v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE v. a a a K. v. v. v., 307 F.3d 964 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 402.12 . Other species which were included in the original complaint are no longer at issue. . . . .

NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, a a v. DOMBECK, U. S. M. In, 304 F.3d 886 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 402.12 (2001). . . .

CITY OF SAUSALITO, v. O NEILL,, 211 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (N.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . . § 402.12(f). . . . . § 402.12(a). A biological assessment may be part of an environmental impact statement. . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 295 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 402.12(b)(1). . . . alternatives which would eliminate any jeopardy it perceives, the project may proceed. 50 C.F.R. § 402.12 . . . See also 40 C.F.R. § 1508.28; 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(g); 33 C.F.R. § 230.13(c). . . .

AMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION, T. II, J., 199 F. Supp. 2d 217 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . . § 402.12(b); 50 C.F.R. § 402.01(a); 50 C.F.R. § 402.02; see also Newton County Wildlife Ass’n v. . . .

ARIZONA CATTLE GROWERS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE,, 273 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12. . . .

WATER KEEPER ALLIANCE De I. I. O. La M. y De O. De Al De J. s R. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE H. B., 271 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12(b)(1); see also 51 Fed.Reg. 19948 (noting that the biological assessment may be conducted . . . required biological assessment has been completed and submitted to the [Services] in accordance with § 402.12 . . . (See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(b)(1); 51 Fed.Reg. 19945, contemplating voluntary preparation of a biological . . . Id. § 402.12(b)(1). . . . . § 402.12(b)(1). See Water Keeper I at 159. . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 162 F. Supp. 2d 406 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12(c). . . .

SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY v. P. CARROLL,, 182 F. Supp. 2d 944 (C.D. Cal. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12(b). . . . . § 402.12(a). . . .

BLUE WATER FISHERMEN S ASSOCIATION, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE L., 158 F. Supp. 2d 118 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12 (formal consultation); 50 C.F.R. § 402.13 (informal consultation). . . .

WATER KEEPER ALLIANCE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,, 152 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D.P.R. 2001)

. . . . § 402.12 (2001). . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f).” . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(f) (2001). . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)