Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO., 191 So. 3d 380 (Fla. 2016)

. . . The Committee proposes replacing the current version of instruction 402.16 (Emergency Medical Treatment . . . The “placeholder” instruction explains that the Committee will propose a new instruction 402.16 that . . . Having considered the CommitteeV report, we hereby authorize the relocation of instruction 402.16, as . . . Thus, relocating instruction 402.16 to appendix D would impair the organizational structure of the civil . . . -Jury- Instr (Civ) 501.12 and 50143 APPENDIX E 402.16 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS . . .

MAYO, v. B. JARVIS, v., 177 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . grizzly bear “in a manner or to an extent not previously considered” by the 2007 BiOp. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 191 F. Supp. 3d 157 (D.P.R. 2016)

. . . See also id., § 402.16 (listing all circumstances when agencies must rein-itiate consultation). . . . That is required by 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(4) & 402.16; see also Catherine E. Kanatas & Maxwell C. . . .

CASCADIA WILDLANDS v. THRAILKILL LLC LLC MFG. LLC,, 806 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 402.16.... ” Id. . . .

WILD EQUITY INSTITUTE, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 147 F. Supp. 3d 853 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . . § 402.16(b). . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. . . . or control over the action has been retained or is authorized-by law” as required under 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . Although § 402.16 is entitled "Reinitiation of Formal Consultation,” the reinitiation requirement applies . . .

OCEANA, INC. v. PRITZKER,, 125 F. Supp. 3d 232 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . . See'50 C.F.R. § 402.16(c) (“Reinitiation of formal consultation is réquired ... . . . agency is “required” to reinitiate Section 7 consultation “immediately.” 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16 . . . Pritzker, 75 F.Supp.3d at 498 (quoting 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i)(4)); see also 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a). . . .

CALIFORNIA TROUT, INC. v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION,, 115 F. Supp. 3d 1102 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . . § 402.16 (requiring reinitiation of consultation where the action is authorized by law and (a) “the . . . In support of their assertion, defendants cite 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a) and (c), which state that “[r]einitiation . . .

COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S., 789 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . The Forest Service remains “involve[d]” in the Forest Plans, 50 C.F.R. § 402.16, because, as SUWA itself . . . Further, the Forest Service retains exclusive “control,” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16, over its own Forest Plans . . . explained that Forest Plans fall squarely within the “discretionary” parameters of 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.03 and 402.16 . . .

OCEANA, INC. v. PRITZKER,, 75 F. Supp. 3d 469 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . . agency is “required” to reinitiate Section 7 consultation “immediately.” 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16 . . . exceeded, NMFS is “required” to reinitiate Section 7 consultation “immediately.” 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(9(4), 402.16 . . . the amount or extent of incidental taking ... is exceeded.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i)(4); see also id. § 402.16 . . .

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a a v. FINLEY, U. S., 774 F.3d 611 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . . § 402.16(b). . . . However, 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 does not require agencies to stop and rein-itiate consultation for “every . . . information” that was “not previously considered” and therefore that the Forest Service violated 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . neither of which is binding on an agency— does not constitute failing to consider them under 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U. S. U. S. U. S. Of U. S. U. S., 772 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . . listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b). Reinitiation of consultation is the precise relief sought by Alliance. . . .

NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION III, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, v. U. S. B. M. U. S., 46 F. Supp. 3d 1254 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16(c). . . . taking specified in the ITS is exceeded, re-initiation of formal consultation is required. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 65 F. Supp. 3d 742 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.03, 402.16; Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. . . . Sierra Club, 816 F.2d at 1388 (quoting § 402.16(b)). . . . U.S.C. §§ 1536(a)(2), 1540(f), 1540(g)(1)(A); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. . . . . . § 402.16 in cases where deference was not specifically discussed. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,, 35 F. Supp. 3d 1137 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16(a)-(c). . . . Thus, while an ITS serves as a regulatory trigger for reinitiating Section 7 consultation, 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. P. BEAUDREAU, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, v. P. LLC,, 25 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16, which requires reinitiation of formal consultation when, among other things, “the amount . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.16(a), (b). . . . Id. § 402.16(a). . . . . § 402.16(b), where the danger of a whale strike has not been deemed impossible, but rather “not likely . . .

NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, v. S. M. R. JEWELL,, 62 F. Supp. 3d 7 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16. C. . . .

NATIVE FISH SOCIETY v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE NMFS ODFW ODFW ODFW,, 992 F. Supp. 2d 1095 (D. Or. 2014)

. . . . § 402.16(a). B. . . . FWS, 273 F.3d 1229, 1249 (9th Cir.2001); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a). . . . Salazar, 628 F.3d 513, 531 (9th Cir.2010); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a), Where NMFS uses a non-numerical surrogate . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY,, 733 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 402.16(c) (providing for reinitiation of consultation if “the identified action is subsequently modified . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . . incidental taking ... is exceeded, the Federal agency must reinitiate consultation immediately.”), 402.16 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 977 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.P.R. 2013)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES v. KRUEGER, U. S., 950 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . . § 402.16). . . .

SALIX v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S., 944 F. Supp. 2d 984 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . . § 402.16(b) and (d): (b) If new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species . . . is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . Service is required to reinitiate consultation on the Amendment if a triggering event under 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . By failing to reinitiate consultation on the Lynx Amendment, the Forest Service violated 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

OCEANA, INC. v. E. BRYSON,, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1028 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . F.Supp.2d 1137, 1146 (W.D.Wash.2000) (agency was required to reinstitute formal consultation under § 402.16 . . . Daley, 122 F.Supp.2d 1110, 1121 (D.Haw.2000) (addressing question of whether § 402.16 required reinitiation . . . Plaintiff offers no argument as to why NMFS was required to reinstitute an ESA consultation under § 402.16 . . . listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, v. SALAZAR,, 993 F. Supp. 2d 1126 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a)). 1. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U. S. L. L. C. On v. L. L. C. v. U. S. U. S. L. L. C. v. U. S. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. U. S., 698 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 402.14(f)(4), 402.16(a)). . . . . § 402.16(c); see also Defenders of Wildlife v. Flowers, 414 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.2005). . . . See id. at 1388 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 402.16). . . . biological opinion,” the section 7 regulations require reinitiation of formal consultation. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. SALAZAR, U. S., 695 F.3d 893 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). 1. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b) (“Reinitiation of formal consultation is required ... . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE CPR v. SALAZAR, U. S. M. U. S., 877 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 402.16(c). (2) FWS’s 2000 Biological Opinion As discussed earlier, see pages 1282-83, prior to NPS . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, v., 684 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion .... 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, ENFORCEMENT,, 871 F. Supp. 2d 1312 (S.D. Ala. 2012)

. . . . § 402.16(b) (“Reinitiation of formal consultation is required ... where discretionary Federal involvement . . . 24, 2010, the NMFS wrote that it "concurs that the MC 252 incident triggers the conditions of 50 CFR 402.16 . . .

TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK KAHEA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 672 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . . Section 402.16 does not support the Longliners’ conclusion. . . . Section 402.16 establishes triggers that require reinitiation of the consultation process, but it does . . . In relevant part, § 402.16 states, “Reinitiation of formal consultation is required and shall be requested . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES, a v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, a a a a, 855 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Or. 2012)

. . . . § 402.16(a). IV. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 820 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . in the 2005 BiOp, and the FS’s failure to immediately reinitiate consultation violates 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

v. F. OWW- DLB v. OWW- DLB v. F. OWW- SMS v. OWW- SMS v. OWW- DLB v. OWW- SMS, 791 F. Supp. 2d 802 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16 to determine whether the action agency unlawfully failed to reinitiate consultation. . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (D. Or. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16(a). . . . Allen, 476 F.3d 1031, 1038 (9th Cir.2007); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a). . . .

COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 812 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16 (requiring re-initiation of consultation where "discretionary Federal involvement or control . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, U. S. A., 791 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (S.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . . request is in response to the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) incident and is meant to comply with 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

UNITED STATES A v. PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC,, 776 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . .

WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, v. L. SALAZAR, W., 628 F.3d 513 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16(b), (c); see Conner, 848 F.2d at 1458 n. 42; see also N. Alaska Envtl. Ctr. v. . . . . § 402.16(b))). . . . biological opinion” does not, standing alone, justify preparing a short-term biological opinion. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 726 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16. 2. . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. BRADFORD, U. S. U. S. U. S., 720 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . .

OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASS N, v. TIDWELL, v., 716 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Or. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16(a). . . . ONDA contends that the Forest Service failed to reinitiate consultation as required by 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . Id. at § 402.16(a). . . .

ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE U. S. Ed U. S. v., 703 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (D. Mont. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16. 2. . . .

RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW v. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, L. Lt. L. M. Lt. De Fe,, 601 F.3d 1096 (10th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 402.16, demonstrate, the duty to consult is not itself an ongoing agency action subject to challenge . . . Pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16, reinitiation of consultation is required when the action agency exceeds . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. In No. In No. In No. In No. s In No. In No. In No. In No., 35 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2010)

. . . 402.13 Burden of Proof on Main Claim 402.14 Defense Issues 402.15 Burden of Proof on Defense Issues 402.16 . . . to affirmative defenses, and instruction 402.15 should be modified as appropriate for those issues. 402.16 . . . EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT CLAIMS INTRODUCTORY COMMENT Instruction 402.16 addresses the provisions . . . The applicable part of instruction 402.16 should be preceded by instructions 402.1, 402.2, 402.3, and . . . (Proceed to instructions ¿02.1¿ and ¿02.15) NOTES ON USE FOR 402.16 1. . . .

ALLIANCE FOR WILD ROCKIES, v. U. S. FOREST SERVICE U. S., 351 F. App'x 167 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 402.16(b), fails given that the Forest Service reiniti-ated consultation with the Fish and Wildlife . . . . § 402.16; see Conner v. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. U. S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,, 746 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . the analyses, re-initiation of formal consultation, as described at 50 Code of Federal Regulation § 402.16 . . . critical habitat analysis, then the FWS was obligated to reinitiate consultation pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 (reinitiation required when, inter alia, “new information reveals effects of the . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE U. S., 647 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (D. Or. 2009)

. . . . § 402.16(a). . . . (quoting 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b)). . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U. S., 623 F. Supp. 2d 1044 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . Despite the absence of ITSs, both biological opinions state, as set forth in 50 C.F.R. section 402.16 . . . ONRC at 1034-35, citing 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . .

SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 629 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . § 402.16(a)) (“ONRC”). . . . . § 402.16(b)-(d). . . . , the Forest Service had breached its duty to reinitiate consultation under ESA § 7 and 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 (listing events that trigger a duty to re-consult). . . .

HEARTWOOD, INC. v. L. AGPAOA,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 675 (E.D. Ky. 2009)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . Id. at § 402.16. . . . setting forth the Forest Service’s obligation to reinitiate formal consultation contained in 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . only required to reinitiate consultation with FWS if one of the four factors set forth in 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . that may affect listed species ... in a manner or to an extent not previously considered.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

SALMON SPAWNING RECOVERY ALLIANCE v. M. GUTIERREZ, D., 545 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 402.16. . . .

PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN S ASSOCIATIONS, v. M. GUTIERREZ,, 606 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . § 402.16(d) (requiring reinitiation of consultation “if a new species is listed or critical habitat . . .

PACIFIC SHORES SUBDIVISION CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 538 F. Supp. 2d 242 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . § 402.16(a). II. . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14®, 402.16(a). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. KEMPTHORNE, U. S., 539 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . § 402.16 (Return to step II)applies section 7(d) applies Section 7(d) was enacted in response to the . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. UNITED STATES U. S., 528 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . . § 402.16(a-d), also provides that reinitiation of consultation will occur if the circumstances change . . . new information or a greater adverse impact upon critical habitat or species is revealed. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS v. CABLES, s LLC, a LLC, a LLC, a C. C. Co. LLC, a INC. a F a a a a a, 509 F.3d 1310 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . never initiated regarding the revised AMP (and no biological opinion was ever issued by the FWS), § 402.16 . . . . § 402.16 (defining circumstances in which reinitiation of consultation is required). . . . Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 402.16 both require reinitiation of consultation only when the effects to . . . See 51 Fed.Reg. 19,926, 19,956 (June 3, 1986) (“[50 C.F.R. § 402.16(c) ] show[s] that changes to the . . . Its decision not to reinitiate consultation, see § 402.16(b), (c), thus did not violate the ESA. . . .

SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION CA, 242 F. App'x 462 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 402.16(d) (requiring reinitiation of consultation “where discretionary Federal involvement or control . . .

PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN S ASSOCIATIONS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION v., 226 F. App'x 715 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 402.16.”); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL v. B. ALLEN, s U. S., 476 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 402.14(i)(4), 402.16(a). . . . species or newly designated critical habitat may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . species or newly designated critical habitat may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. BARTEL, v., 470 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (S.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . review of the substantive protections for the vernal pool species in San Diego. § 1539; 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . causes effects to listed species or critical habitat that were not previously considered. 50 C.F.R. 402.16 . . .

NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER v. KEMPTHORNE, 457 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . .

CONSEJO DE DESARROLLO ECONOMICO DE MEXICALI, AC v. UNITED STATES W. III,, 438 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Nev. 2006)

. . . . §§ 402.10-402.16. Further, as Justice Stevens pointed out in his concurring opinion in Lujan v. . . . is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . for Biological Diversity, ..., clearly triggers the need for reconsultation pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, v. J. HARVEY, U. S., 437 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16(b). Compl. ¶ 37. . . .

FOREST GUARDIANS, v. JOHANNS,, 450 F.3d 455 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16(b), or (2) “the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect . . . to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion,” id. § 402.16 . . . Pursuant to § 402.16, consultation is required where “the identified action is subsequently modified . . . We held that COE violated 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 by not re-initiating consultation because during initial . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(c); see also Sierra Club, 816 F.2d at 1388. . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. UNITED STATES U. S., 430 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . . § 402.16. At least implicitly, one Judge in the Southern District of Florida agrees. . . . critical habitat analysis, then the FWS was obligated to reini-tiate consultation pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. B. FLOWERS, LLC, APAC-, 423 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Either the Corps or the FWS may request re-initiation. 50 C.F.R. 402.16. Sierra Club v. . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. UNITED STATES U. S., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 402.16(b). . . .

TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK Ka v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE M., 438 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . affect listed species ... to an extent not previously considered” in the biological opinion. 50 C.F.R. 402.16 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. B. U. S. U. S. II, LLC, HB A. LLC, 420 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Toxics, 413 F.3d at 1032) (applying § 402.16, which has similar language to § 402.03); see also Sierra . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. C. RODGERS,, 381 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . Federal involvement or control over the action has been retained or is authorized by law.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

NORTHERN ALASKA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, v. NORTON,, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Alaska 2005)

. . . . § 402.16(b) (requiring reinitiat-ing of formal consultation “if new information reveals effects of . . . This provision complies with the regulations guiding implementation of the ESA, 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b) . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,, 345 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (W.D. Wash. 2004)

. . . . § 402.16 (requiring re-initiation of consultation where “discretionary Federal involvement or control . . . FWS as to whether re-initiation of consultation was warranted under its regulations at 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

GIFFORD PINCHOT TASK FORCE, a a v. UNITED STATES FISH WILDLIFE SERVICE,, 378 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 402.16). . . . critical habitat analysis, then the FWS was obligated to reinitiate consultation pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

PROTECT OUR WATER v. Lt. B. FLOWERS, U. S. J. Jr. U. S., 377 F. Supp. 2d 844 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . . § 402.16). . . . . § 402.16. . . . However, this statement merely suggests and does not demonstrate, as required by 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(a . . . Pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b), “if new information reveals effects of the action that may affect . . . Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir.1992); 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. . . .

WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL v. BOSWORTH, U. S., 284 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . § 402.16. B. . . . Id. at 32 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b)). . . . listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . warranted, the FWS presumably will speak up if conditions requiring reinitiation arise. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . . which has an independent duty to request reinitiation where warranted, has not done so. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

HAWAII LONGLINE ASSOCIATION, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, L. EVANS, In, 281 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . Id.; 16 U.S.C. § 1539; 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. EVANS,, 364 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . taking specified in the ITS is exceeded, reinitiation of formal consultation is required. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. EVANS,, 279 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . . § 402.16. . . . taking specified in the ITS is exceeded, reinitiation of formal consultation is required. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16 . . .

ORO VACA, INC. v. NORTON R., 55 F. App'x 433 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . Section 402.16(b) (2001), which required the BLM to reinitiate consultation if “new information reveals . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 255 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (D. Colo. 2002)

. . . reini-tiate consultation if the agency retains “discretionary Federal involvement or control.” 50 C.F.R. 402.16 . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. L. EVANS,, 232 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (N.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . . § 402.16. . . .