The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . agencies require in order to insure that all wages reflected in this opinion, totalling $11,925.20 ($10,-425.20 . . .
. . . A.R. 839 was superseded by IDC Rule 425.20 on August 1, 1984; Rule 425.20 does not contain any reference . . .
. . . . § 425.20 (1980). . . .
. . . Appellant claims that NMG should be classified as a mono-methyl-monoamine under TSUS item 425.20 in accordance . . . The court concluded that NMG was such a derivative, classifiable under item 425.20, and overruled the . . . The court stated that the monoamines described in item 425.20 “can only be those compounds in which the . . . The Customs Court held that NMG, being an alkanolamine, is not included within the scope of item 425.20 . . . The exclusion of alkanolamines from item 425.20 is also supported by the legislative history. . . .
. . . Appellant claims that NMG should be classified as a mono-methyl-monoamine under TSUS item 425.20 in accordance . . . The court concluded that NMG was such a derivative, classifiable under item 425.20, and overruled the . . . The court stated that the monoamines described in item 425.20 “can only be those compounds in which the . . . The Customs Court held that NMG, being an alkanolamine, is not included within the scope of item 425.20 . . . The exclusion of alkanolamines from item 425.20 is also supported by the legislative history. . . .
. . . Generally speaking, it was wrong to regard the language of item 425.20 as indicating the existence of . . . As a result, I am persuaded that the monoamines set out in item 425.20 can only be those compounds in . . . Item 425.20 of the TSUS. . Item 425.52 of the TSUS. . . . .
. . . Generally speaking, it was wrong to regard the language of item 425.20 as indicating the existence of . . . As a result, I am persuaded that the monoamines set out in item 425.20 can only be those compounds in . . . Plaintiff moved for Judgment on the pleadings and defendant cross-moved for summary Judgment: Item 425.20 . . .
. . . Plaintiff claims classification pursuant to item 425.20 of the TSUS providing for “mono-, di-, and tri . . . For the above reasons we hold that the importations are properly classifiable pursuant to item 425.20 . . .
. . . The former was in the face amount of $10,000, and the premium thereon of $425.20 was payable annually . . .