The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 506
STAMPED OR MARKED CONTAINERS AND BASKETS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 506.25

506.25 Alteration or obliteration of marks or brands on field boxes or other specified containers.—If any person shall alter, change, remove or obliterate the registered mark or brand on any field box, pallet, crate, container, or receptacle other than his or her own or shall cause or procure the same to be done, with intent to claim the same, or to prevent identification thereof by the true owner, or use or have in his or her possession, any such field box, pallet, crate, container, or receptacle on which the registered mark or brand has been altered, changed, removed or obliterated, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

History.—s. 6, ch. 16018, 1933; s. 6, ch. 16019, 1933; s. 6, ch. 16859, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 7433(4), (9), (17); s. 469, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 72-47; s. 657, ch. 97-103.

F.S. 506.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 506.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 506.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 506.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S506.25 - FORGERY - ALTER OBLITERATE MARK BRAND FIELD BOX CRATE - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MARTINEZ, v. HILTON HOTELS CORP., 930 F. Supp. 2d 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . & Regs. tit. 12, §§ 142-2.14 (c) (4) (i) (e); 146-3.2(c)(l)(e) (minimum weekly salary ranged from $506.25 . . .

In A. HALL,, 443 B.R. 59 (Bankr. D. Md. 2010)

. . . of claim setting forth a secured claim in the sum of $890.00 and an unsecured claim in the sum of $506.25 . . .

In RBC DAIN RAUSCHER OVERTIME LITIGATION, 703 F. Supp. 2d 910 (D. Minn. 2010)

. . . Law § 142-2.14(e)(4)(i)(e)(3) (establishing a salary basis of not less than $506.25 per week for the . . . every month of Capozzoli’s employment with RBC in 2006 ..., her pay exceeded $2,193.75” per month, or $506.25 . . .

FAULKNER, v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, v., 576 F. Supp. 2d 609 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . $450 $1,350 300,000 — 1st modification $337.50 $337.50 $675 $675 $675 2,025 600,000 — 2d modification $506.25 . . . (75% of $675)_$506.25 $1,012.50 $1012,50 $1,012.50 $3,037.50 150,000 — 3d modification $759.38 (75% . . .

LASSWELL v. THE CITY OF JOHNSTON CITY, L., 436 F. Supp. 2d 974 (S.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . ) Finley — 2.6 hours at $75.00 per hour = $195.00 6) Paralegals — 6.75 hours at $75.00 per hour = $ 506.25 . . .

In JONES, L. M. In In In In V. Z., 356 B.R. 39 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2005)

. . . attorney compensation under Rule 2016(b) on November 30, 2004, reflecting a payment from “creditor(s)” of $506.25 . . .

McKAY, v. Jo BARNHART,, 327 F. Supp. 2d 263 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Applying the $75 per hour rate to these amounts yields a total of $506.25 in paralegal fees. 3. . . . McKay is further awarded paralegal fees incurred during the same time period in the amount of $506.25 . . .

MACSTEEL INTERNATIONAL USA CORP. v. M V IBN ABDOUN, Co. S. A. G., 218 F. Supp. 2d 480 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . United Arab first argues that it is not responsible for the $506.25 spent on rebev-eling because that . . .

NICK, v. MORGAN S FOODS, INC. s, 270 F.3d 590 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . These sanctions were calculated to cover the cost of the ADR conference fees ($506.25) and Nick’s attorneys . . .

NICK, v. MORGAN S FOODS, INC., 99 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (E.D. Mo. 2000)

. . . includes $1,045.00 in attorney’s fees for preparing and attending the mediation in this case, the $506.25 . . .

ABOU- KHADRA, v. G. BSEIRANI, AGB G. BSEIRANI, AGB v. T. MAHSHIE,, 971 F. Supp. 710 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . $145.00 $ 36.25 $ 36.25 Canfield 0 0.75 $130.00 $ 48.75 $ 48.75 ASSOCIATES: Berman 0 13.5 $ 75.00 $ 506.25 . . . $ 506.25 Berry 4.25 116.5 $ 75.00 $ 4,368.75 $ 4,687.50 James 1.75 86.75 $ 75.00 $ 3,253.13 $ 3,384.38 . . .

In WILLIAMS,, 190 B.R. 365 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1996)

. . . Although this inadequate payment may not be the fault of the Debtor, he failed to cure the deficiency of $506.25 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SPANN,, 797 F. Supp. 980 (S.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . Having considered them along with the record, the court finds an award of $506.25 is reasonable. . . .

J. D. WRIGHT, v. CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI,, 727 F. Supp. 1520 (S.D. Miss. 1989)

. . . the court hereby grants attorney fees m the amount of $23,410.00, law clerk fees in the amount of $506.25 . . .

J. SWICKER v. WILLIAM ARMSTRONG SONS, INC., 484 F. Supp. 762 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . 78.25): 91.50 hours at $60/hour $ 5,490.00 Plus 33.75 hours clerical and/or ministerial at $15/hour 506.25 . . .

PITTSBURGH PRESS CLUB, v. UNITED STATES, 462 F. Supp. 322 (W.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . Independent analysis of the data in PX-13 shows these three categories as $12,-506.25, $2282.15, and . . .

CASCO BANK TRUST COMPANY, u w v. UNITED STATES, 406 F. Supp. 247 (D. Me. 1975)

. . . . $25,113.53 $26,311.29 $24,509.08 Allowable deductions ... 12,068.84 11,977.82 506.25 Distribution deduction . . .

BOSEM v. BOSEM,, 269 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . undertaken to perform the services by agreement with her, based on the number of hours involved, was $43,-506.25 . . .

HOWARD C. DAVIDSON v. THE UNITED STATES MARY M. B. PATTERSON v. THE UNITED STATES JEFFERSON PATTERSON v. THE UNITED STATES JULIA S. CARNELL TRUST, THIRD NATIONAL BANK TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE v. THE UNITED STATES STUART C. DAVIDSON v. THE UNITED STATES MARY H. D. SWIFT v. THE UNITED STATES FRANCES P. DAVIDSON v. THE UNITED STATES JULIA S. DAVIDSON v. THE UNITED STATES, 137 Ct. Cl. 416 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Carnell Trust, TMrd National Bank & Trust Company, Trustees_ 21, 506.25 No. 235-54 Stuart C. . . .

A. ELWERT, v. PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF TACOMA, WASHINGTON, a N. A. a ELWERT,, 138 F. Supp. 395 (D. Or. 1956)

. . . thereon at the rate of six .per cent per annum from February 25,'1949; and the" further sum of $3,-506.25 . . .

SAMUEL WAXMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS ACME IRON WORKS v. THE UNITED STATES ATLANTIC CORPORATION AS ASSIGNEE OF SAMUEL WAXMAN, D B A ACME IRON WORKS v. THE UNITED STATES, 125 Ct. Cl. 464 (Ct. Cl. 1953)

. . . on all Government contracts, excluding the Maritime Commission contracts, did not exceed the sum of $506.25 . . . O. contracts_ 28,989.85 Less: Estimated profit on other Government contracts (Mg. 25)- 506.25 Net Loss . . . on all Government contracts, excluding the Maritime Commission contracts, did not exceed the sum of $506.25 . . . C. contracts- 28,989.85 Less: Estimated, profit on other Government contracts (Fdg. 25)_ 506.25 Net Loss . . .

WAXMAN v. UNITED STATES ATLANTIC CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 112 F. Supp. 570 (Ct. Cl. 1953)

. . . on all Government contracts, excluding the Maritime Commission contracts, did not exceed the sum of $506.25 . . . C. contracts.... 28,989.85 Less: Estimated profit on other Government contracts (Fdg. 25)...... 506.25 . . .

v., 44 B.T.A. 793 (B.T.A. 1941)

. . . in 1935, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, and deductible in that year, the amount of $506.25 . . .

W. D. v., 118 Fla. 323 (Fla. 1934)

. . . of $500.00 and to assume the taxes for 1928, and to pay to Crowder $5,006.25; that Davis paid cash $506.25 . . .

THE HALL. THE SELWYN EDDY, 48 F.2d 646 (D. Mass. 1931)

. . . In conclusion, I find that the libelant would be entitled to assert a maritime lien for the sum of $506.25 . . . .. 41.25 Rent of boiler.................... 180.00 Use of lighter ...•................ 10.00 Total $506.25 . . . The libellant therefore has a good and valid maritime lien for the sum of $506.25 which can be enforced . . .

WILLIAM F. YEE CHONG, BISHOP COMPANY CECIL BROWN, 2 D. Haw. 395 (D. Haw. 1906)

. . . Yee Chong, Honolulu,” to the order of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, for $506.25; . . . I will sign a decree in favor of Cecil Brown for $506.25 with interest from June 22nd, 1901, at the rate . . .

SULLIVAN v. STUCKY, 86 F. 491 (C.C.D. Ind. 1898)

. . . Of said sum of $1,018.75, $506.25 was paid for dues on the stock, and the remainder of said sum, amounting . . . Their contention is that the sum of $506.25, paid as dues on the stock before the society was placed . . .