Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE S. LIBRA, v., 584 B.R. 550 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2018)

. . . considerations, at least to the extent not actually performed," citing to 4 Collier on Bankruptcy para 548.07 . . .

In K. CASTELLANO, v. K. J. T. F., 514 B.R. 555 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Sommer, 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 at 548-87-89 (16th ed. rev. 2014). . . .

In G. HUBER, D. G. v. G. a D. U. S. A. M. M. LLC, DGH, LLC, LLC, N. LLC a k a N. LLC, LLC, PSEA, LLC, LLC, a, 493 B.R. 798 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2013)

. . . jurisprudence since at least 1571) when called upon to construe section 548(e).” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In BAYOU GROUP, LLC, v. No LLC, v. LLC, D. v. LLC, L. P. v. LLC, D. III, v. LLC, P. v. LLC, E. v. LLC, LP, v. LLC,, 439 B.R. 284 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . deciding questions of good faith in the context of fraudulent conveyance law”); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 548.07 . . .

W. A. K. II, a S. KARO, v. WACHOVIA BANK, N. A., 712 F. Supp. 2d 476 (E.D. Va. 2010)

. . . Such a delegation of trustee duties is consistent with Va.Code § 55-548.07. . . .

In BAYOU GROUP, LLC, LLC v. L. P. No LLC v. LLC v. D. No LLC v. IRA LLC v. LLC v. LP LLC v. D. III LLC v. KFI LLC LLC v. P. LLC v. No LLC v. LLC v. YK II LLC v. E. LLC v. LP LLC v. LLC v. M. B. LLC v. LLC v. LLC v. LP No LLC v. DW LLC v. LLC v. LLC v. H B II LLC No LLC v. IRA No LLC v. IRA LLC v. LLC v. LLC v. L. P. L. P. L. P. L. P. LLC v. DB LLC v. No LLC v. III IRA III LLC v. D. LLC v., 396 B.R. 810 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Mar.31, 2000); 5 Collier on Bankruptcy 548.07[2][a] at 548-60 (15th ed. 2007) (“The unpredictable circumstances . . .

In LULL, LLC, a v. a C., 386 B.R. 261 (Bankr. D. Haw. 2008)

. . . Maddalena (In re Maddalena), 176 B.R. 551, 556 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1995)(citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In NATIONAL AUDIT DEFENSE NETWORK, A. Jr. v. J. WJC A. Jr. v. J. WJC A. Jr. v. II, R R M. J. USA, A. Jr. v. II, R R M. J. USA,, 367 B.R. 207 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2007)

. . . CollieR, supra, ¶ 548.07[2][a]. . . .

In HILL, v., 342 B.R. 183 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2006)

. . . In re Burry, 309 B.R. 130, 135 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2004); see 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 (15th ed. . . .

In ROSEN AUTO LEASING, INC. D. v. In A. D. v., 334 B.R. 257 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2005)

. . . fact that the activities in question will hinder, delay, or defraud others. 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In ACTRADE FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. P. v., 337 B.R. 791 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07[3] (15th ed.1983). . . .

In BURRY, M. v. USA, N. A., 309 B.R. 130 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2004)

. . . See 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07[2][a] (Matthew Bender 15th ed. revised 2003) (“To the extent that . . . See 5 Collier, ¶ 548.07[2][a]; In re Roco Corp., 701 F.2d 978, 984 (1st Cir.1983) (noting that “good . . .

In FOXMEYER CORPORATION A. Jr. v. CIT La N. A. FSB N. A. BTM, 286 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002)

. . . that the activities in question will[,] hinder, delay, or defraud others,” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 . . . question,” and (c) "no intent to take unconscionable advantage of others.” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 . . .

In HANNOVER CORPORATION XXI ATG, v. G. Jr. G. Jr. v. In XXI ATG, G. Jr. v. v. G. Jr., 310 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . define “good faith” and the statute’s legislative history is quite thin. 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . . absence render any definition of ‘good faith’ inadequate, if not unwise.” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . . , a clause specifically designed to protect transferees, not transferors. 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In HANNOVER CORPORATION XXI ATG, v. G. Jr. G. Jr. v. In XXI ATG, G. Jr. v. v. G. Jr., 310 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . define “good faith” and the statute’s legislative history is quite thin. 5 CollieR on BankRUPtcy ¶ 548.07 . . . absence render any definition of ‘good faith’ inadequate, if not unwise.” 5 Collier on BANKRUPTCY ¶ 548.07 . . . , a clause specifically designed to protect transferees, not transferors. 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In ADLER, COLEMAN CLEARING CORP. A. D. L. A. J. Jr. J. Jr. v. B., 263 B.R. 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz (In re Butcher), 72 B.R. 447 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1987); 5 Collier ¶ 548.07[2][ . . . See, e.g., 5 Collier ¶ 548.07[2][a], at 548-62 (“Awareness of fraudulent purpose of a transaction is . . .

In A. KEMMER, E. v., 265 B.R. 224 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2001)

. . . Revised 2000) ¶ 548.07[2][a], p. 548-59-584-60. . . .

In CHURCHILL MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORP. v., 256 B.R. 664 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . King, COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 548.07[3] (15th ed.1983)). B. . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. FLORIDA STATE ATHLETIC COMMISSION,, 226 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 548.07. . . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. FLORIDA STATE ATHLETIC COMMISSION,, 226 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 548.07. . . .

BIRTH HOPE ADOPTION AGENCY, INC. v. ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, AHCCCS H., 218 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 8-548.07 violates the Commerce Clause. . . . Section 8-548.07 requires out-of-state persons who adopt children from Arizona to reimburse the State . . . Rev.Stat. § 8-548.07. . . . In support of its motion for summary judgment, the State of Arizona argued that, while § 8-548.07 did . . . Birth Hope, as the party challenging § 8-548.07, bears the initial burden of showing that the statute . . .

In SUNSPORT, INC. R. v. USA, T., 260 B.R. 88 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2000)

. . . See 5 Collier, supra, ¶ 548.07[2][a]. . . .

In HALPERT COMPANY, INC. M. v. P. A., 254 B.R. 104 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1999)

. . . See 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07[1] at 548-54 note 1 (15th ed. revised 1998)(citing In re Farmer . . . See 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07[1] at 548-55 (15th ed. revised 1998)(citing Mack v. . . .

In CANNON, III, W. III, v. J. C. Co. J. C., 230 B.R. 546 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1999)

. . . actually disclosed no reason to suspect financial embarrassment.’ 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, § 548.07 . . .

In LABRUM DOAK, LLP, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF FORMER PARTNERS, v. G. BRENNAN,, 227 B.R. 383 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . The discussion of this issue in 5 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, ¶ 548.07 (15th ed. rev. 1998), which does not . . .

COSTAIN COAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 126 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1997)

. . . Pyro Mining requested a refund of $388,-548.07, while Pyro Alcoa sought a refund of $27,340.82. . . . .

COSTAIN COAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 126 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1997)

. . . Pyro Mining requested a refund of $388,-548.07, while Pyro Alcoa sought a refund of $27,340.82. . . . .

In COLONIAL REALTY COMPANY, M. HIRSCH, As v. CAHILL,, 210 B.R. 921 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1997)

. . . See also, 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07[2][a] (15th ed. rev’d.1997) (“ [G]ood faith requires an arm . . .

In H. McCARTIN, A. WOLFE, v. H. McCARTIN,, 204 B.R. 647 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

. . . income and expenses: +/- INCOME EXPENSES (168.58) JANUARY 0.00 168.58 239.42 FEBRUARY 3,270.00 3,030.58 548.07 . . .

In M L BUSINESS MACHINE COMPANY, INC. J. JOBIN, M L v. S. McKAY,, 84 F.3d 1330 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . absence render any definition of ‘good faith’ inadequate, if not unwise.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . . actually disclosed no reason to suspect financial embarrassment.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07 . . . re Anchorage Marina, Inc.), 93 B.R. 686, 693 (Bankr.D.N.D.1988); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07 . . . (citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07[2] at 548-[72]). . . .

In M L BUSINESS MACHINE COMPANY, INC. J. JOBIN, M L v. S. McKAY,, 84 F.3d 1330 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . absence render any definition of ‘good faith’ inadequate, if not unwise.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . . actually disclosed no reason to suspect financial embarrassment.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07 . . . re Anchorage Marina, Inc.), 93 B.R. 686, 693 (Bankr.D.N.D.1988); k Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07 . . . (citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, ¶ 548.07[2] at 548-[72]). . . .

In J. MADDALENA, K. K. T. V. A. GILL, v. J. MADDALENA, K. S., 176 B.R. 551 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07[3], 548-81 (15th ed. 1990). . . .

In TELESPHERE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 179 B.R. 544 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07[2], at 548-71 (Lawrence P. . . .

In M. BUTLER, M. BUTLER, v. LEJCAR,, 171 B.R. 321 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . to defeat a transferee’s claim that he or she acted in good faith. 4 King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 . . .

In M L BUSINESS MACHINE COMPANY, INC. J. JOBIN, M L Co. v. S. McKAY,, 164 B.R. 657 (D. Colo. 1994)

. . . disclosed no reason to suspect financial embarrassment.’ ” Id. at 862 (citing 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

MAX SUGARMAN FUNERAL HOME, INC. v. A. D. B. INVESTORS,, 926 F.2d 1248 (1st Cir. 1991)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 at 548.74 to 548.75 & n. 13 (15th ed. 1990) (citing cases). . . . .

MAX SUGARMAN FUNERAL HOME, INC. v. A. D. B. INVESTORS,, 926 F.2d 1248 (1st Cir. 1991)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 at 548.74 to 548.75 & n. 13 (15th ed. 1990) (citing cases). . . . .

In BARRETT B. BARRETT B. v. COMMONWEALTH FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION J. D., 104 B.R. 688 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . See generally 4 COLLIER, supra, ¶ 548.07, at 548-82. . . .

In LITTLETON D. WALKER, Jr. v. LITTLETON,, 82 B.R. 640 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1988)

. . . investigation actually disclosed no reason to suspect financial embarrassment.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 . . .

In OZARK RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. R. JACOWAY, v. ANDERSON, s R. JACOWAY, v. ANDERSON CAJUN S WHARF, R. JACOWAY, v. McILROY Ed, 77 B.R. 686 (W.D. Ark. 1987)

. . . property or benefit from the debtor or his transferee, immediate or mediate.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 548.07 . . .

In CANDOR DIAMOND CORP. McCOLLEY, v. ROSENBERG, RY Co., 76 B.R. 342 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy 11 548.07 at 548-82 (15th ed. 1987); cf. . . . See 4 L.King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 at 548-69-70 (15th ed. 1987). . . . See generally 4 L.King, Collier on Bankruptcy If 548.07 at 548-82 (15th ed. 1987). . . .

In INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a In UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a a In ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a D. MERRILL, v. ABBOTT,, 77 B.R. 843 (D. Utah 1987)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, at ¶548.07[2]; see also Seligson v. . . . Cf. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07[2] at 548-68 & nn. 10-13 (L. . . .

In STANDARD LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLY CO. OF WISCONSIN, d b a CASTELLANI, v. G. OWENS, v. FIRST WISCONSIN NATIONAL BANK OF MILWAUKEE,, 74 B.R. 608 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1987)

. . . See, 4 Collier on Bankruptcy II 548.07[2] (15 ed. 1987) (where it is stated that “[ajwareness of the . . .

In F. BUTCHER, a k a F. JFB H. BAILEY, III, v. METZGER, SHADYAC SCHWARZ, a P. A. METZGER, SHADYAC SCHWARZ, v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS WELLS, P. A. v. LACY WINCHESTER, 72 B.R. 447 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987)

. . . excludes future considerations, at least to the extent not actually performed.” 4 Collier On Bankruptcy, ¶ 548.07 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TABOR COURT REALTY CORP. Co. J. II, Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Pa. J. J. W. T. W. E. R. Co. Co. W. As E. REALTY COMPANY, Co. Co. Co. Co. No. J. HAGGERTY, UNITED STATES REALTY CORPORATION No., 803 F.2d 1288 (3d Cir. 1986)

. . . ] that permits the good faith transferee or obligee to retain his lien.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy If 548.07 . . .

In ENERGY SAVINGS CENTER, INC. DOYLE, v. D. PAOLINO, Jr. v. A. COUNCIL, 61 B.R. 732 (E.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . Cf. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 548.07[2], at 548-63 to 548-64 (good faith means a lack of knowledge . . .

In BLACK WHITE CATTLE CO. a BLACK WHITE CATTLE CO. a v. GRANADA CATTLE SERVICES, INC. a IV, a a a, 783 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . .; see 4 Collier on Bankruptcy 11 548.07 (15th ed. 1985). . . .

In BLACK WHITE CATTLE CO. a BLACK WHITE CATTLE CO. a v. GRANADA CATTLE SERVICES, INC. a IV, a a a, 783 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . .; see 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 (15th ed. 1985). . . .

In FITZPATRICK WILLIAMS, v. KIDDER SKIS INTERNATIONAL,, 73 B.R. 655 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07, pp. 548-63, 548-67 (15th ed. 1985), to the following effect: “Knowledge . . .

In M. MESA, H. C. STRUVE, v. KHAN, 48 B.R. 208 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . intent to participate in the fraud perpetrated on the transferor’s creditors. 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 548.07 . . .

G. GRAY, M. v. H. SNYDER,, 704 F.2d 709 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . excludes future considerations, at least to the extent not actually performed.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 548.07 . . .

In ROCO CORPORATION, d b a CONSOVE, v. COHEN,, 701 F.2d 978 (1st Cir. 1983)

. . . . ¶ 548.07, at 548-61. . . .

In ROCO CORPORATION, d b a CONSOVE, v. COHEN,, 701 F.2d 978 (1st Cir. 1983)

. . . . ¶ 548.07, at 548-61. . . .