The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 561
BEVERAGE LAW: ADMINISTRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 561.25

561.25 Officers and employees prohibited from being employed by or engaging in beverage business; penalties; exceptions.—

(1) No officer or employee of the division, and no sheriff or other state, county, or municipal officer with state police power granted by the Legislature, shall be permitted to engage in the sale of alcoholic beverages under the Beverage Law; or shall be employed, directly or indirectly, in connection with the operation of any business licensed under the Beverage Law; or shall be permitted to own any stock or interest in any firm, partnership, or corporation dealing wholly or partly in the sale or distribution of alcoholic beverages, except as provided in this section. The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to prevent any certified law enforcement officer, except members of the Florida Highway Patrol or its auxiliary, or employees of the division, from being employed in businesses which have obtained licenses only to sell beer or beer and wine for consumption off the premises. However, the written approval of the chief of police, sheriff, or other appropriate department head must be obtained for any such employment.

(2) Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, and shall be automatically removed or suspended from office.

(3) Nothing herein may be construed to prohibit any sheriff or other state, county, or municipal officer with state police power granted by the Legislature from owning, negotiating, or trading any shares of stock, bonds, or other securities which are regulated by and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and which are customarily traded on the major stock exchanges of the United States, or from being employed as an entertainer or from rendering security services when off duty in any business establishment licensed under the beverage laws to sell beverages, provided the written approval of the chief of police, sheriff, or other appropriate department head is obtained for the place and hours of such employment or service. Any officer employed for the purposes of rendering private security services as permitted under this section shall not be paid less than the established prevailing wage.

History.—s. 3, ch. 16774, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4151(229), 7648(4); s. 6, ch. 22663, 1945; s. 20, ch. 57-420; ss. 16, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-346; s. 560, ch. 71-136; s. 1, ch. 72-93; s. 1, ch. 72-230; s. 144, ch. 73-333; s. 1, ch. 77-471; s. 1, ch. 79-349; s. 2, ch. 88-404; s. 148, ch. 91-224.

F.S. 561.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 561.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 561.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 561.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S561.25 - LIQUOR - PUBLIC OFFICER ENGAGE IN BEVERAGE BUSINESS - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

KENNEDY, v. COMPUCREDIT HOLDINGS CORPORATION,, 9 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . Background Plaintiff Kennedy failed to pay $561.25 in consumer debt. . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, FSLIC FSLIC v. J. OLDENBURG, W. L. H. MGIC, 34 F.3d 1529 (10th Cir. 1994)

. . . . §§ 561.25, 563.41-.43 (1987). . . . .

J. DAVIDSON, JR. v. L. COOK, v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY CO., 594 F. Supp. 418 (E.D. Va. 1984)

. . . preparing the documentation of attorneys’ fees was by paralegals (as it could have been), most of the 561.25 . . .

COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC. v. QANTEL CORPORATION,, 571 F. Supp. 1379 (D. Mass. 1983)

. . . Watson 285.0 150 42,750 1.25 53.437.50 Paralegal 561.25 40 22,450 1.25 28.062.50 234,900.00 Services . . .

In GORDON, Jr., 640 F.2d 1143 (10th Cir. 1981)

. . . For the services rendered, Betty Weirick paid respondent $561.25. . . .

DANIELS, v. GILLESPIE,, 335 So. 2d 353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 561.25 (1975) prohibits a policeman from owning an interest in or being employed in any manner by . . . period, the appellee filed suit for declaratory judgment that he was not in violation of Fla.Stat. § 561.25 . . . appellee was going to be suspended or discharged from the police force for violation of Fla.Stat. § 561.25 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA, DAVID J. HOFFMAN, v. JAMES T. VOCELLE,, 159 Fla. 88 (Fla. 1947)

. . . Stats. 1941 (FSA), and Section 6 of Chapter 22663, supra, amending Section 561.25, F. S. . . .

v. P. M. R. Co. v., 34 F. 582 (C.C.E.D. Mich. 1888)

. . . $107,257.25 during 1881; $34,702.50 in 1882; $12,136.50 in 1883; and $9,945 in 1884, aggregating $164,-561.25 . . .