Cases from cite.case.law:

MR. BUMBLE, INC. v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TOBACCO,, 461 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . .” § 561.58, Fla.Stat. (1981). See also: § 561.20(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

SOL B. CORPORATION, d b a v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO,, 448 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . alcoholic beverage license No. 16-637S, Series 4-COP, be revoked with prejudice as provided in Section 561.58 . . . If revocation of appellant’s license “with prejudice as provided in Section 561.58, Florida Statutes, . . . That the addition of such language does increase the penalty seems clear from the wording of section 561.58 . . . Accordingly, the language “with prejudice as provided in Section 561.58, Florida Statutes,” is stricken . . .

HUBER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. a Co. a v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. a, 307 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1974)

. . . Administrative Procedure Act and commented thereon as follows: “It would therefore appear that even though § 561.58 . . . F.S.A., supra, and it is therefore unnecessary to strike down § 561.58, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., for failure . . . Section 561.58, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and the appropriate sections of the Administrative Procedure Act when . . .

M. BEVERLY v. DIVISION OF BEVERAGE OF DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION,, 282 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . revoked, dead and no longer exists is contrary to the provisions of Florida Statutes, §§ 561.32 and 561.58 . . . The latter, § 561.58, pertains toi the reissuance of a revoked license for the location of the place . . . Business Regulation, have opined that the Beverage Department in 1962 had the power, pursuant to F.S. § 561.58 . . .

WILLIAMS, D. v. J. FERRENTINO, 199 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . the Administrative Procedure Act, commenting that— “[i]t would therefore appear that, even though § 561.58 . . . by §§ 120.22 and 120.-23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., supra, and it is therefore Unnecessary to strike down § 561.58 . . . Section 561.58, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and the appropriate sections of the Administrative Procedure Act when . . .

E. KEATING, v. STATE AUSEBEL,, 173 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1965)

. . . It appears to us that in our consideration of F.S. § 561.58, F.S.A., we shoitld answer two questions: . . . It would therefore appear that, even though § 561.58, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., does not provide for a notice . . . Section 561.58, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and the appropriate sections of the Administrative Procedure Act when . . . The practical effect of the action of the Beverage Director under F.S. § 561.58, F.S.A., in lifting the . . . Sections 561.32 and 561.58, F.S.A., and other provisions of the State Beverage Laws, we cannot in the . . .

MARIAGO INCORPORATED v. STATE BEVERAGE DIRECTOR, 15 Fla. Supp. 140 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1959)

. . . This application was denied by the beverage director on the ground that under provisions of section 561.58 . . . (Florida Statutes 1957 — section 561.58). . . . It takes the position that section 561.58 authorizes the director at the time of the revocation of a . . . opinion that the position of Mariago Incorporated is correct and that the proper construction of section 561.58 . . .