The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 688.004(1). . . . Stat. § 688.004(2). There are three sets of alleged trade secrets; we consider them separately. 1. . . . Stat. § 688.004(1). . . . Stat. § 688.004(1). Advantor has not requested royalty damages. . . . .
. . . . §§ 688.002-688.004. . . .
. . . .” § 688.004(1), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Section 688.004, Florida Statutes, does not require that this period be applied to limit a trade secret . . . Instead, section 688.004 requires causation between the actual losses and the misappropriation. . . . This response was consistent with our interpretation of section 688.004, Florida Statutes. . . . . § 688.004, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . section 688.003 of the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”), and damages pursuant to section 688.004 . . .
. . . . § 688.004. . . .
. . . . § 688.004 (2008). . . .
. . . . § 688.004. . CSC Holdings, Inc. v. . . .
. . . See § 688.004, Florida Statutes; Lee v. Cercoa, Inc., 433 So.2d 1, 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). . . .
. . . . § 688.004. . . . Stat. §§ 688.003, 688.004. . . . Stat. § 688.004. . . . AlphaMed seizes on the seemingly permissive language of the quoted statute to emphasize that “Section 688.004 . . .
. . . Section 688.004 of FUTSA states that a complainant may recover damages for the misappropriation of its . . .
. . . . § 688.004. 31. . . .
. . . . §§ 688.003 and 688.004, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 688.004(2), Florida Statutes (1993), the trial court awarded Hook $6,750,000 in exemplary . . . Our interpretation of section 688.004(2) is consistent with the result reached by the Iowa Supreme Court . . . We see no reason to set a different standard for the award of such damages pursuant to section 688.004 . . . Section 550.4 of the Iowa Code is identical to section 688.004(2), Florida Statutes (1993). . . . . Section 688.004(1), Florida Statutes (1993), states: 688.004 Damages.— (1) Except to the extent that . . .
. . . . § 688.004(2). . . . to award exemplary damages on Bateman and Fricker’s trade secret claim of Count VI under Fla.Stat. § 688.004 . . . discretion in refusing to award exemplary damages on their trade secret claim pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 688.004 . . . address Bateman and Flicker’s cross-appeal concerning the award of exemplary damages under Fla.Stat. § 688.004 . . .