Cases from cite.case.law:

BREVARD COUNTY, v. C. RAMSEY,, 658 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Ramseys did not execute a deed in the presence of two subscribing witnesses as required by section 689.06 . . . If a settlor attempts to transfer real property to a trustee, the requirements of section 689.06 apply . . . In the instant case, however, the requirements of section 689.06 were not invoked because the Ramseys . . . to create a trust of their land with themselves as trustee, they did not need to comply with section 689.06 . . . two subscribing witnesses in the inter vivos and testamentary alienation of real property. §§ 689.01, 689.06 . . .

H. GOLDMAN, J. v. MANDELL, a A., 403 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . , Florida Statutes, must be witnessed by two witnesses in accordance with the provisions of section 689.06 . . . We hold that section 689.06 does not apply and no witnesses are required. . . . Basically, Evelyn Goldman contends that since section 689.071 was enacted subsequent to section 689.06 . . . allows for a trust interest in real property to be deemed personal property, that means that section 689.06 . . . Since the Legislature did not expressly exclude section 689.071 from the provisions of section 689.06 . . .

v., 46 T.C. 723 (T.C. 1966)

. . . See. 689.06, Fla. Stat. . . .

B. McMULLEN, Jr. v. J. McMULLEN, 145 So. 2d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . This contention is well taken where specific statutes have been enacted, such as § 689.06, Florida Statutes . . .

ST. JOHN S PRESBYTERY, a St. v. CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ST. PETERSBURG, a St. St. a J. Jr. H. H., 102 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1958)

. . . chancellor also found the contention of plaintiffs to be that the Statute of Frauds, §§ 689.05 and 689.06 . . .

ST. JOHN S PRESBYTERY, v. CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH,, 8 Fla. Supp. 1 (Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct. 1955)

. . . Plaintiffs contend that the statute of frauds, sections 689.05, 689.06, Florida Statutes 1953, does not . . .

COREY v. DETROIT STEEL CORPORATION, 52 F. Supp. 138 (E.D. Mich. 1943)

. . . difference between time and a half for this overtime, and the straight time paid plaintiff, amounts to $689.06 . . .