Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 689.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 689.15 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 689.15

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 689
CONVEYANCES OF LAND AND DECLARATIONS OF TRUST
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 689.15
689.15 Estates by survivorship.The doctrine of the right of survivorship in cases of real estate and personal property held by joint tenants shall not prevail in this state; that is to say, except in cases of estates by entirety, a devise, transfer or conveyance heretofore or hereafter made to two or more shall create a tenancy in common, unless the instrument creating the estate shall expressly provide for the right of survivorship; and in cases of estates by entirety, the tenants, upon dissolution of marriage, shall become tenants in common.
History.s. 20, Nov. 17, 1829; RS 1819; GS 2294; RGS 3617; CGL 5482; s. 3, ch. 20954, 1941; s. 1, ch. 73-300.

F.S. 689.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 689.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 689.15


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 689.15
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 689.15.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

S. KENNEDY, v. RES- GA LAKE SHADOW, LLC, LLC, G., 224 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla. Stat. . . .

J. FISCHER, v. FISCHER,, 224 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . judgment was ap-pealable because the parties’ interests in the marital property were determined by section 689.15 . . .

IN RE GOESEL, v., 562 B.R. 529 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . Under Florida Statute section 689.15, when couples that hold property by the entirety get divorced, the . . .

EBANKS, v. EBANKS,, 198 So. 3d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (2012); Davis v. Dieujuste, 496 So.2d 806, 809 (Fla.1986). . . .

REGIONS BANK, v. S. HYMAN,, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . of the right of survivor-ship, which was generally abolished as to real and personal property by Ch. 689.15 . . .

S. SIMON, O. v. KOPLIN, 159 So. 3d 281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Simon asserts that the probate court misapplied section 689.15, Florida Statutes (2012), in concluding . . . language in the deed expressly provides for a right of survivorship, the exception articulated in section 689.15 . . . Section 689.15, Estates by sur-vivorship, provides: The doctrine of the right of survivorship in cases . . . “Section 689.15, Fla. . . . real point at issue is whether or not [the appellee] brings herself within the exception to Section 689.15 . . .

A. TATE, v. R. TATE,, 91 So. 3d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (2010); Johnson v. Johnson, 902 So.2d 241, 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). . . .

JOSEPH, v. In JOSEPH,, 83 So. 3d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1996). . . . .

LAYNE, v. LAYNE, In N. a k a, 74 So. 3d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla. Stat. . . .

In J. LATINI N. v. G. J., 334 B.R. 338 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2005)

. . . . § 689.15. . . .

JOHNSON, Jr. v. JOHNSON,, 902 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .” § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

In H. LANKRY, K. v., 263 B.R. 638 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 689.15 (2001). . . .

BEAL BANK, SSB, v. ALMAND AND ASSOCIATES,, 780 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2001)

. . . .” § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

H. BABB, v. S. BABB,, 771 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

In McDOW, W. v. Jr., 248 B.R. 466 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. . . .

SUNSHINE RESOURCES, INC. a v. SIMPSON, LTS T. K., 763 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . remainder interest in the property is held by James and Lorraine as tenants by the entirety, see § 689.15 . . .

In G. SHANNIS, R. G. v. M. Jr. M. Sr., 229 B.R. 234 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 689.15 (West 1998); see Wilkerson v. Wilkerson, 179 So.2d 592 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1965). . . .

L. LEWIS, v. ESTATE OF J. TURCOL,, 709 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Hicks, 146 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); see also § 689.15, Fla. . . .

In L. WILLOUGHBY, 212 B.R. 1011 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . . § 689.15, FlaStat. (1995). . . .

In ESTATE OF H. H. HERRING, HERRING, v. A. HENDERSON,, 670 So. 2d 145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . evidence that the Eustis account expressly provided for right of survivorship as required by Section 689.15 . . . evidence that the account expressly provided for right of survivorship as required generally under Section 689.15 . . .

In ROBERGE, Sr. M. ROBERGE, v. ROBERGE, Sr., 188 B.R. 366 (E.D. Va. 1995)

. . . . § 689.15. . . .

SITOMER, v. M. ORLAN,, 660 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1993), now provides in pertinent part that the doctrine of right of . . .

In ROBERGE, Sr. M. ROBERGE, v. ROBERGE, Sr., 181 B.R. 854 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995)

. . . . § 689.15 (West 1994). . . . does not involve any complex questions of state law other than mere reference to Florida Statute § 689.15 . . . Section 689.15 provides that "in cases of estates by entirety, the tenants, upon dissolution of marriage . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 689.15 (West 1994). . . .

HAGOPIAN, Jr. v. In ZIMMER, M. Jr. Ad, 653 So. 2d 474 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1989) requires that an instrument creating a joint tenancy must expressly . . .

D ANDREA, v. D ANDREA,, 650 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Pursuant to section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1985), upon dissolution of marriage, the tenants of an . . .

In M. SAMMUT,, 171 B.R. 411 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1994)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. The debtor then owned an undivided one-half interest in the property. . . .

V. KNECHT, v. C. KNECHT, Jr., 629 So. 2d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . .” § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1991). . . .

C. CHANEY, v. J. CHANEY,, 619 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Wilson, 279 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert, denied, 285 So.2d 19 (Fla.1973); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. . . .

LOPEZ v. PALORI, 50 Fla. Supp. 2d 112 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Dissolution of Marriage entered on September 12, 1980 did not, by operation of law, specifically section 689.15 . . .

M. WIGGINTON, v. L. WIGGINTON,, 575 So. 2d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1987); Davis v. Dieu-juste, 496 So.2d 806 (Fla.1986); Ambrose v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH OUT BUILDINGS LOCATED AT S. W. AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA,, 894 F.2d 1511 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 689.15 (1987). . . .

In WARE, a k a d b a WARE, a k a d b a v. MI, Su Mi,, 99 B.R. 103 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 689.15 (1987). . . .

ROSECRANS, v. EDEN, W., 538 So. 2d 970 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . We recognize section 689.15 states that the right of survivorship must be expressly provided for in the . . . Section 689.15 should apply to estates of personal property or real estate, except where a more specific . . .

W. SHARPE, v. T. CALABRESE,, 528 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . By operation of law under section 689.15, Florida Statutes, upon dissolution of their marriage, the ex-husband . . .

M. BRANDT, v. W. BRANDT,, 525 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

F. THOMPSON, v. N. ADAMS, a k a f k a A. D. E. Jr. L., 685 F. Supp. 842 (M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 689.15 (1977). . . .

SHARP, C. HAMILTON, H. S. MUSSELWHITE, v. C. HAMILTON,, 520 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1988)

. . . title to the property became vested in the husband and wife as tenants in common pursuant to section 689.15 . . . Even though section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1985), provides that a tenancy by the entirety becomes . . .

FAUST, v. L. FAUST,, 505 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Ch. 64, Fla.Stat. (1981) (partition); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1981) (tenancy by entirety becomes tenancy . . . order the wife to convey to the husband all her interest in the home, since under the statute (section 689.15 . . .

LEWIS, v. LEWIS,, 503 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

DAVIS, v. DIEUJUSTE,, 496 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1986)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . . Cummings, 330 So.2d 134 (Fla.1976); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

SHARP H. S. v. C. HAMILTON,, 495 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . ultimately determined to follow the decision in Lowery, and stated: However, this statute [section 689.15 . . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1985), provides that a tenancy by the entirety becomes a tenancy in . . .

PASTORE, v. PASTORE,, 497 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1986)

. . . tenancy, and vest an undivided one-half interest in the home in each party as tenants in common, section 689.15 . . .

H. DRAKE II, v. UNITED STATES, 642 F. Supp. 830 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . . § 689.15), the United States’ case wouldn’t even have gotten off the ground. . . . Consistently with common-law concepts, Florida Stat. § 689.15 confirms the destruction of a tenancy by . . .

TINSLEY, n k a v. W. TINSLEY, III,, 490 So. 2d 205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

A. CLAUGHTON, v. N. CLAUGHTON,, 483 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Rollar; see § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .

PASTORE, v. PASTORE, 480 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1988). . . .

SAMMONS, v. SAMMONS,, 479 So. 2d 223 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . dissolution has rendered the couple tenants in common of the property previously held by the entireties, § 689.15 . . .

WYNN, v. A. WYNN,, 478 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . which the parties, upon dissolution, would otherwise share equally as tenants in common under section 689.15 . . .

N. GREGG, v. C. GREGG,, 474 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1981). Ipso facto, each spouse already has a 50% interest in the property. . . .

C. HAVENER, v. HAVENER,, 473 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . See § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). Otherwise, the final judgment is affirmed. . . .

P. WITTENSTEIN, v. WITTENSTEIN,, 466 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1979); Meridith v. Meridith, 366 So.2d 425 (Fla.1978). . . .

SMITH, v. SMITH,, 464 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . entireties and, upon dissolution of the marriage the parties became tenants in common by virtue of section 689.15 . . .

M. TRONCONI, v. TRONCONI,, 466 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

POITIER, v. POITIER,, 458 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .

GREAT SOUTHWEST FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. DeWITT, 458 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 689.15 (1977), and rights to half of the mortgage proceeds would have entered Henderson’s estate. . . .

OSTYN, v. OLYMPIC,, 455 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1983). . . .

S. HUFF, Jr. v. HUFF, HUFF, v. S. HUFF, Jr., 453 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Gorman, 400 So.2d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). . . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1983) provides that the tenants, upon dissolution of marriage, shall . . .

DUARTE, v. DUARTE,, 447 So. 2d 928 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Leonard, 389 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Section 689.15 Florida Statutes (1981). . . .

E. SALYERS, v. A. GOOD,, 443 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Under the provisions of section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1981), when their marriage was dissolved, the . . .

HILER, v. HILER,, 442 So. 2d 373 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . That result is achieved by Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1979) which provides that “... . . .

REINHARDT, v. DIEDRICKS,, 439 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1981) provides in pertinent part: [E]xcept in cases of estates by entirety . . .

In LYNCH, v. LYNCH,, 437 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . That result is achieved by the property law concepts embodied in section 689.15, Florida Statutes, which . . .

RATINSKA, TaHo a v. ESTATE OF DENESUK,, 447 So. 2d 241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1981), which has not been substantially changed since 1941, provides . . . and wife to the wife and a daughter of the wife with right of survivorship was authorized by section 689.15 . . . mortgagor’s death, the court specifically stating that the joint tenancy was authorized by section 689.15 . . .

H. SANDERS, v. J. SANDERS,, 435 So. 2d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . marital assets are in joint names (which assets will after dissolution be equally owned by virtue of § 689.15 . . .

LANDAY, v. J. LANDAY,, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1981). Ipso facto, each spouse already has a 50% interest in the property. . . .

PACE, v. PACE,, 427 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Wild, 157 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); Section 689.15 Florida Statutes (1979) with each entitled, upon . . .

ANDERSON, v. ANDERSON,, 424 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1981). . See, e.g., Cannon v. . . .

MIRABAL, v. MIRABAL,, 416 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . held by the entireties (the marital residence and the Key West property) is controlled by statute, § 689.15 . . .

B. BULLARD, v. BULLARD,, 413 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . That result is achieved by Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1979) which provides that “. . . in cases . . .

MESA PETROLEUM COMPANY, v. C. CONIGLIO,, 16 B.R. 1015 (M.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . Florida Statutes § 689.15 (1981). . . . Florida Statutes § 689.15 (1981). . . .

J. BILLINGS, v. M. BILLINGS,, 406 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1979); Meridith v. Meridith, 366 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1978). . . .

In ESTATE OF N. SUGGS, Jr. M. SUGGS, v. ESTATE OF N. SUGGS, Jr. L. N. Jr., 405 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1971). . . .

HOLLAND, v. HOLLAND,, 406 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1979). In the present case, the judgment merely followed the law. . . .

L. COVIN, v. R. COVIN, a k a, 403 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . in common of their real property, formerly held as an estate by the entireties, by virtue of Section 689.15 . . .

J. GORMAN, v. E. GORMAN,, 400 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . That result is achieved by the property law concepts embodied in section 689.15, Florida Statutes, which . . .

WEST, v. WEST,, 399 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . judge here found, there was a gift, upon dissolution the donee has a moiety as a tenant in common (§ 689.15 . . .

In J. MARSH, v. MARSH,, 399 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.stat. (1979). . See § 90.103(3), Fla.Stat. (1979). . In Parramore v. . . .

ZELLER, v. J. ZELLER,, 396 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . either of the parties wants his jointly held property divided in a manner other than that provided by 689.15 . . .

DIEJUSTE, v. DAVIS,, 400 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The judgment of dissolution caused Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1979) to operate, thereby transforming . . .

A. HOLT, v. R. BOOZEL,, 394 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Leatherman, 96 So.2d 136 (Fla.1957), as authority for the proposition that section 689.15, Florida Statutes . . . See § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

E. ABELLA- FERNANDEZ, M. D. v. E. ABELLA,, 393 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . upon dissolution of a marriage, the parties become tenants in common in the marital home under Section 689.15 . . .

P. FORTMAN v. FREEDOM FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF TAMPA,, 403 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . that the account expressly provided for right of survivor-ship as required generally under Section 689.15 . . .

MESA PETROLEUM COMPANY, v. C. CONIGLIO C. A. Jr. T Co. Jr., 629 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 689.15. Cf. Hillman v. McCutchen, 166 So.2d 611 (Fla.1964). . . .

WEINER, v. Al WEINER,, 386 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla. Stat. (1979). . . . Therefore, we reverse, leaving the parties as tenants-in-common. § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1979). ' We reverse . . .

LOCKE, v. LOCKE,, 383 So. 2d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . far beyond the 90 day jurisdictional period previously reserved by the trial court, and (c) Section 689.15 . . . dividing all marital property held at the time of the marriage dissolution in accordance with Section 689.15 . . .

K. HART, v. E. HART,, 377 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . . § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1977). . . .

DUTTON, v. DUTTON,, 379 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . each of the parties has a one-half interest in the real properties as tenants in common under Section 689.15 . . .

MUHLRAD, v. MUHLRAD,, 375 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . title to real property as tenants by the entireties during coverture is that upon dissolution, Section 689.15 . . . Harder, 264 So.2d 476 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); Section 689.15; Rankin v. . . .

C. SUPPLE, v. SUPPLE,, 370 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . 312 So.2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), (rescission based on fraud, accident or mistake only), and Section 689.15 . . .

MERIDITH, v. MERIDITH,, 366 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1978)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

DI MARTINO, v. DI MARTINO,, 360 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . a final judgment contains no finding of special equity in property, title is controlled by Section 689.15 . . .

LIBERMAN M. v. KELSO,, 354 So. 2d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . divorced, title to the property became vested in the husband as a tenant in common pursuant to Section 689.15 . . . Of course, Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975) specifies that in the case of estates by the entireties . . .

J. HAGIN, v. T. HAGIN,, 353 So. 2d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . former spouses automatically become tenants in common as to this personalty by operation of Section 689.15 . . . We note also that § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1975) expressly applies to both real estate and personal property . . .

E. SEGAL, v. SEGAL,, 353 So. 2d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . See Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

L. LINDQUIST, v. W. LINDQUIST,, 351 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . See Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed. . . .

In ESTATE W. SILVIAN,, 347 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Florida specifically recognizes ownership of personalty by the entireties as reflected from § 689.15, . . . clearly created an estate with survivorship characteristics in accord-anee with the requirements of § 689.15 . . .

RUTKIN, v. RUTKIN,, 345 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

G. HAZELWOOD, v. HAZELWOOD,, 345 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . change the statutory legal effect of the judgment of dissolution on the aforesaid entireties property [689.15 . . .

S. MARGOLIS, v. B. MARGOLIS,, 343 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Cummings, 330 So.2d 134 (Fla.1976); Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

M. PEARSON, v. L. PEARSON, Jr., 342 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .