The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . been changed to remove unnecessary language and to include the acknowledanent required bv sections 695.03 . . .
. . . . §§ 695.03 and 689.01. . . .
. . . As section 695.03 of the Florida Statutes observes: “[t]o entitle any instrument concerning real property . . .
. . . that the deed “was not executed according to the requirements of Florida Statutes sections 689.01 and 695.03 . . . Section 695.03 provides that instruments concerning real property must be “acknowledged by the party . . . legalized or authenticated by a civil-law notary or notary public who affixes her or his official seal.” § 695.03 . . . public of that country has affixed her or his official seal is sufficient as an acknowledgment.” § 695.03 . . .
. . . is founded-was not acknowledged, or witnessed, or notarized as required for recordation by section 695.03 . . . [or properly notarized as set forth in § 695.03] These requirements for recording have existed for many . . . By this maneuver Gladstone attempts to circumvent section 695.03. . . .
. . . Fla.Stat. ch. 695.03 (1995). . . . affected by the absence of notarization or the other forms of proof of execution permitted by section 695.03 . . .
. . . . §§ 695.03 and 695.25, Fla.Stat. See, also, % 117.05(16)(b)-(c).) . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 695.03, which governs the acknowledgment and recordation of real property documents . . . Thus, Fla.Stat. §§ 695.03, 92.50, and 117.07, when read in para materia, provide that if an instrument . . . signature, Gi-bralter urges that the document substantially complies with the requirements of Fla.Stat. §§ 695.03 . . .
. . . recorded according to law, since the execution was not acknowledged by the parties as required by section 695.03 . . . affected by the absence of notarization or the other forms of proof of execution permitted by section 695.03 . . .
. . . Charter alleges that the mortgage was not properly recorded in compliance with the requirement of Chap. 695.03 . . . Count II alleges that the mortgage, when recorded, was not properly acknowledged as required by § 695.03 . . . Section 695.03 states in pertinent part as follows: “To entitle any instrument concerning real property . . . Section 695.03(1), Florida Statutes (1981). . . . According to § 695.03, all acknowledgements made in compliance with the statutory requirements are validated . . .
. . . affected by the absence of notarization or the other forms of proof of execution permitted by section 695.03 . . .
. . . and also affirmatively alleged that the notice of amendment was in compliance with Florida Statute 695.03 . . . adopted as the manner required for exercising the power of revocation) are set forth in Florida Statute 695.03 . . . contained a notarial certificate which entitled that instrument to recordation under Florida Statute 695.03 . . .
. . . Sections 28.22, 701.04 and 695.03, F.S.1967, F.S.A. . . .
. . . has no application to acknowledgments taken by notaries public in other states, and because section 695.03 . . .
. . . Section 695.03, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S. A. . . . that the certificate on the mortgage involved in this case meets the simple requirement of section 695.03 . . .
. . . This is slightly less, it is true, than the amount ($88,-695.03) suggested by a witness for the city, . . .