Cases from cite.case.law:

TCHATAT, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 315 F.R.D. 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUTIERREZ DE LOPEZ,, 761 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. . . .

REACH MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. v. WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., 988 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. . . .

ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE v. AE OUTFITTERS RETAIL COMPANY,, 970 F. Supp. 2d 278 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. . . .

JEFF BENTON HOMES, v. ALABAMA HERITAGE HOMES, INC., 929 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . Frazier, 387 F.3d at 1262-63 (citing 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03(2)(a)). . . .

CLENA INVESTMENTS, INC. d b a v. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., 280 F.R.D. 653 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . . § 702.03[2][a]). . . .

FLOREK, v. VILLAGE OF MUNDELEIN, ILLINOIS,, 649 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.03[1], at 702-34 (Matthew Bender 2d ed.2011). . . .

GABLE a k a v. NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY NBC a a, 727 F. Supp. 2d 815 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . McLaughlin, et ah, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[3] (2d ed.2009). . . .

In TBR USA, INC., 429 B.R. 599 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 2010)

. . . )); In re Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc., 90 B.R. 67, 70 (S.D.N.Y.1988); Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 702.03 . . . Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 702.03[2] (15th Ed. Rev.). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCHIFF,, 538 F. Supp. 2d 818 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (2d ed.2006) (footnote omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. NACCHIO,, 519 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (2d ed.2006) (footnote omitted). . . .

LADNER, v. LITESPEED MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a, 537 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (N.D. Ala. 2008)

. . . See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][a]. . . .

T. BRILL, v. J. MARANDOLA,, 540 F. Supp. 2d 563 (M.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . Danaher Corp., 338 F.Supp.2d 566, 570 (E.D.Pa.2004) (citing Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1]) . . .

In APOLLO GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 527 F. Supp. 2d 957 (D. Ariz. 2007)

. . . deciding the issues through the use of its common knowledge and common sense.” 3 Weinstein & Berger, ¶ 702.03 . . .

C. THERRIEN, v. TOWN OF JAY,, 489 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Me. 2007)

. . . issues that arguably fall within the competence of lay people.” 4-702 Weinstein’s FedeRal Evidence § 702.03 . . .

COOK, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 580 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D. Colo. 2006)

. . . Co., 16 F.3d 1083, 1090 (10th Cir.1994) (quotation omitted); see also Weinstein, § 702.03[2][c] (concluding . . . matters that are not well known or commonly understood is admissible); see generally 4 Weinstein § 702.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. I. LIBBY,, 461 F. Supp. 2d 3 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . Berger, Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][b] (2d ed.2006). . . .

CASPER, v. SMG,, 389 F. Supp. 2d 618 (D.N.J. 2005)

. . . (citations omitted); 4-702 Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03[3] ("Expert testimony is not admissible . . .

FALCONER, v. PENN MARITIME, INC., 380 F. Supp. 2d 2 (D. Me. 2005)

. . . McLaughlin, et ah, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03(1) (“As it was under common law, expert testimony . . .

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L. P. v. SCHNEIDER, LLP, v. RBC, 379 F. Supp. 2d 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASFERRER, 367 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Frazier, 387 F.3d at 1263-63 (quoting 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FRAZIER,, 387 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][a]. . . .

TOTAL CONTROL, INC. v. DANAHER CORPORATION,, 338 F. Supp. 2d 566 (E.D. Pa. 2004)

. . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[2][b] (Joseph M. McLaughlin ed., 2d ed.2004). . . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03[1]. . . .

In REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No., 309 F. Supp. 2d 531 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.03[1] (Joseph M. McLaughlin ed., 2d ed.1997). . . . .

LINDON CORPORATION L. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,, 278 F. Supp. 2d 579 (D.V.I. 2003)

. . . $277.50 $2,866.52 2000 $246,736.00_$37,000.00 $3,114.02_$277.50 $2,866.52 2001 $246,736.00 _$37,000.00 $ 702.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHARLEY,, 189 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 1999)

. . . Shay, 57 F.3d 126, 131 (1st Cir.1995); Whitted, 11 F.3d at 785-86; 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHARLEY,, 176 F.3d 1265 (10th Cir. 1999)

. . . Shay, 57 F.3d 126, 131 (1st Cir.1995); Whitted, 11 F.3d at 785-86; 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03 . . .

BIOCORE, INC. v. KHOSROWSHAHI, v., 183 F.R.D. 695 (D. Kan. 1998)

. . . person can understand by the use of common knowledge or common sense.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.03 . . .

In B. POAGE,, 92 B.R. 659 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . Cowans, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 2.4, 70-71 (1986); 4 Collier on Bankruptcy § 702.03 at 702-15 ( . . .