The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 702
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND STATUTORY LIENS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 702.05

702.05 Mortgaged lands sold for taxes.—Any person who has a lien by mortgage or otherwise upon lands sold for taxes may, within the time allowed by law for redemption, redeem such lands, and the receipt of the officer authorized to receive the amount paid for redemption money shall entitle the lienholder to collect the said amount, with interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum, as a part of and in the same manner as the amount secured by her or his original lien.

History.—s. 1, ch. 3903, 1889; RS 1990; GS 2504; RGS 3847; CGL 5750; s. 783, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 702.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 702.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 702.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 702.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 702.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CROWLEY, v. PERDUE, U. S., 318 F. Supp. 3d 277 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Berger, WEINSTEIN'S FEDERAL EVIDENCE , § 702.05[4] (Joseph M. . . .

MILWARD J. v. RUST- OLEUM CORPORATION,, 820 F.3d 469 (1st Cir. 2016)

. . . Auker, 700 F.3d 1180, 1191 (9th Cir.2012) (quoted approvingly in Weinstein’s § 702.05[2][c], at 702-103 . . . Principi, 439 F.3d 18, 25 (1st Cir.2006); see also Weinstein’s § 702.05[3], at. 702-112 n. 58 (collecting . . .

MARTIN v. APEX TOOL GROUP, LLC,, 961 F. Supp. 2d 954 (N.D. Iowa 2013)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.05[1], p. 702-33 (2d ed.1998)). Here, Dr. . . .

WOLFE, v. McNEIL- PPC, INC. a PPC, a PPC, LLC,, 881 F. Supp. 2d 650 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . to determine whether the expert has “good grounds” for his opinion. 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. KOKENIS,, 662 F.3d 919 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.05[1], p. 702-33 (2d ed.1998)); see also Uniloc USA, Inc . . .

K. SAMAAN, v. ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL,, 764 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . . § 702.05[l][b] (2d ed. 2010). . . .

GRAVES v. MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION,, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (W.D. Okla. 2009)

. . . Kumho, 526 U.S. at 157, 119 S.Ct. 1167 (quoting from 4 McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, ¶ 702.05 . . .

W. DORN, M. v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY,, 397 F.3d 1183 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05[3], at 702-80.12 to 702-80.13 (emphasis added); see also Jahn v . . .

DSU MEDICAL CORPORATION, v. JMS CO. LTD, JMS, 296 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . determine whether the expert’s conclusions are actually correct. 4-702 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05 . . .

GARCIA, v. BRK BRANDS, INC., 266 F. Supp. 2d 566 (S.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . Berger, Wien-stein’s Federal Evidence, § 702.05[2][b] (2d ed.2002) (citing Fed.R.Evid. 702 committee . . .

J J SNACK FOODS, CORP. v. EARTHGRAINS CO., 220 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05[4], This threshold determination of the admissibility . . . the party offering the evidence on a crucial element of the claim. 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05 . . .

AMORGIANOS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d b a, 303 F.3d 256 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05[2][a], at 702-66 to 702-72.2 (Joseph M. . . . Daubert, 509 U.S. at 596, 113 S.Ct. 2786; accord Weinstein, § 702.05[3] at 702-76. . . .

NOOK, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY,, 190 F. Supp. 2d 639 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, ¶ 702.05[1], p. 702-33 (2d ed.1998)); see Daubert, 509 U.S. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. D. HORN, 185 F. Supp. 2d 530 (D. Md. 2002)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 702.05[1] (2d ed. 1997) (Under Frye “[t]he court itself did not . . .

M. TESKA v. POTLATCH CORPORATION, a J. Co. a, 184 F. Supp. 2d 913 (D. Minn. 2002)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.05[1], p. 702-33 (2nd ed.1998). . . .

WHATLEY, v. MERIT DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, H. v., 166 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (S.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, §§ 702.02[2], 702.05[2][a] (Joseph M. . . .

MAIN STREET MORTGAGE, INC. v. MAIN STREET BANCORP, INC., 158 F. Supp. 2d 510 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . Mason, 32 F.Supp.2d 733, 745 (D.N.J.1999), citing 4 Weinstein’s Evidence Section § 702.05[3]. . . .

In HURLEY, v. Al, 258 B.R. 15 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2001)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05[2][a] (2nd ed.2000). . . .

RUDD, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 127 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (M.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence, §§ 702.02[2], 702.05[2][a] (Joseph M. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALATORRE,, 222 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2000)

. . . However, the trial judge is not required to hold a hearing on the admissibility of expert evidence.”), § 702.05 . . .

J. SAMUEL, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 96 F. Supp. 2d 491 (D. Md. 2000)

. . . .”); see also 4 WEINSTEIN’S FEDERAL EVIDENCE § 702.05[2] (2d ed,1997)(noting that whether or not there . . .

NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PROPERTIES, INC. v. PROSTYLE, INC., 57 F. Supp. 2d 665 (E.D. Wis. 1999)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.05[1], at 702-33 (2d ed.1998); Advisory Committee’s Note . . .

GRDINICH, v. BRADLEES,, 187 F.R.D. 77 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, 11 702.05[1], 702-33 (2d ed 1998)). . . .

KUMHO TIRE CO. LTD. v. CARMICHAEL, 526 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1999)

. . . McLaughlin, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence ¶ 702.05[1], p. 702-33 (2d ed. 1998); see also Advisory Committee . . .

K. BLACK, v. RHONE- POULENC, INC., 19 F. Supp. 2d 592 (S.D.W. Va. 1998)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.05[2] (2d ed.1998). 2. . . .

In DOW CORNING CORPORATION,, 211 B.R. 545 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1997)

. . . . -, 116 S.Ct. 189, 133 L.Ed.2d 126 (1995)); 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 702.05[2], at 702-30 ( . . .

M. MICHEL, v. FISHER, A. BRANDT, Jr. v. FISHER, In LAKE STATES COMMODITIES, INC. In W. COLLINS,, 185 B.R. 259 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . a bankruptcy judge need not approve the result of even a proeedurally perfect election. 4 Collier ¶ 702.05 . . . Id at ¶¶ 321.03 & 702.05-.07. . . .

COIN MACHINE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, v. MORGENSTERN,, 232 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . Compare § 702.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and 22 Fla.Jur. Mortgages, §§ 199 and 202. . . .

v., 8 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1807)

. . . the bond (which had been calculated as if she had been a foreign bottom) was too large by the sum of $702.05 . . .