Cases from cite.case.law:

FLINN, v. DOTY, A., 275 So. 3d 671 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . . However, the court cited to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2018), which governs mortgage foreclosures . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. LANHAM,, 264 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . On review, the Florida Supreme Court disagreed with this Court's precedent and held "that section 702.06 . . .

IN RE M. DUKES, M. v., 909 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 702.06 ; see also Royal Palm Corp. Ctr. Ass'n v. . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. STERMILLI,, 249 So. 3d 797 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . reserves jurisdiction to adjudicate a deficiency judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06 . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. LANHAM,, 257 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2018)

. . . reserves jurisdiction to adjudicate a deficiency judgment claim but has not adjudicated the claim, section 702.06 . . . its conclusion that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the suit under section 702.06 . . . ANALYSIS The sole issue in this case is governed by section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which every . . . Section 702.06 reads in relevant part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SILVA,, 889 F.3d 704 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . Berger, Weinstein's Federal Evidence § 702.06[5][b], at 702-158 (Mark S. . . . See 4 Weinstein & Berger, § 702.06[5][b], at 702-158. We affirm. III. . . .

WHITNEY BANK, a a FDIC a v. GRANT, Jr. D., 223 So. 3d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The Grants’ argument reads the foregoing statute in pari materia with section 702.06, Florida Statutes . . . See § 702.06, Fla. Stat. . . . Reading section 95.11(5)(h) in pari materia with section 702.06 is therefore unwarranted, since this . . .

BONITA REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLC, a LLC, a A. W. v. SLF IV LENDING, L. P. a, 222 So. 3d 647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . underlying foreclosure action, the lender filed a motion for deficiency judgment pursuant to section 702.06 . . . We note that section- 702.06 provides in relevant part that a party “shall also have the right to sue . . .

BUSH, v. WHITNEY BANK, a a FDIC, 219 So. 3d 257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . In particular, he argued that section 95.11(5)(h) should be interpreted in conjunction with section 702.06 . . . Specifically, he contends that section 95.11(5)(h) must be interpreted in conjunction with section 702.06 . . . section 95.11(5)(h) does not apply to an action following a short sale, then the portion of section 702.06 . . . The language of section 702.06 does suggest that the Legislature considers an action following a short . . . Thus, our interpretation of .section 95.11(5)(h) does not render the short sale provision in section 702.06 . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. MEIKLE,, 215 So. 3d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Plaintiff seeks to use that judgment to obtain a money deficiency judgment pursuant to Florida Statute 702.06 . . . Second, the court also incorrectly found that section 702.06 was unenforceable because it was “vague . . . Section 702.06 provides in pertinent part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . We have recently held that section 702.06 is “unambiguous” and permits a separate suit to recover a deficiency . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. KONSTANTINOS,, 251 So. 3d 220 (Fla. App. Ct. 2016)

. . . separate deficiency action such as the underlying one is authorized by the plain language of section 702.06 . . . This court stated: "[T]he plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013),[ ] authorizes the . . . in which the First District "rejected the Third District's plain language interpretation of section 702.06 . . . Section 702.06 provides as follows: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. McKENNA,, 198 So. 3d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . This court held that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, “is unambiguous,” and “the foreclosure judgment . . .

GDOVIN, v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 198 So. 3d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . We agree with the Third District’s conclusion that the plain language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes . . . The court in Higgins rejected the Third District’s plain language interpretation of section 702.06 and . . . Makar stated in his dissenting opinion in Higgins, the plain language of the 2013 amendment to section 702.06 . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. ROJAS,, 197 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Thereafter, Appellant filed a separate action at law pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013 . . . Neal, Inc,, 178 So.3d 433, 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that the unambiguous language of section 702.06 . . . original foreclosure proceeding because, under the facts of the case, the plain language of section 702.06 . . .

ALUIA, v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 205 So. 3d 768 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . DONI initiated its action pursuant to section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014). Mr. . . . Florida’s deficiency decree statute, section 702.06 “binds a plaintiff [in a mortgage foreclosure action . . . PNC Bank, NA, 89 So.3d 923, 931 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting § 702.06, Fla. Stat. 2008). . . . And “[a]lthough the reporters of the Restatement seem to believe that section 702.06 is something of . . .

COLLINS ASSET GROUP, LLC, v. PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., 197 So. 3d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. BECKETT, II,, 200 So. 3d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Both courts determined that the language in section 702.06 is unambiguous and that a separate action . . . Section 702.06 is unambiguous. . . . Thus, the plain language of section 702.06 permitted Appellant to bring the suit at issue to recover . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. HENDRICK, Jr., 200 So. 3d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The resolution of this appeal comes from the language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2014), which . . . unless the court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Both courts determined that the language in section 702.06 is unambiguous and that a separate action . . . We agree with the Third District and Fourth District that section 702.06 is unambiguous. . . . Thus, the plain language of section 702.06 permitted Appellant to bring the suit at issue to recover . . .

HIGGINS v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 201 So. 3d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 702.06, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 2013-137, Laws of Fla. . . . Every Florida court addressing the issue of whether section 702.06 jurisdictionally bars a separate suit . . . if the “court in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment.” § 702.06 . . . Neal, Inc., 199 So.3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (agreeing with Third District decisions “that section 702.06 . . . If the statutory “right to sue” in section 702.06 results in significant problems—which appears unlikely . . . the unbroken string of district courts (save for ours) that have upheld the clear language of section 702.06 . . . The Fifth District recently held that the “plain language” of section 702.06 permitted the company to . . . And the Second District recently characterized section 702.06 as allowing the “filing of the statutorily . . . even our court has allowed an independently filed complaint for a deficiency judgment under section 702.06 . . . we return to the analysis of this court’s decision in Compass Bank: Prior to June 7, 2013, section 702.06 . . . Section 702.06 was amended in 2013 to read: In all suits for .the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . In addressing Appellant’s argument, a review of the case law construing section 702.06 is instructive . . . While we agree that-the plain language of both versions of section 702.06 supports an argument that a . . . We need look no further than the plain language of section 702.06. . . .

CHENG, v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 199 So. 3d 932 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Weinberg, 190 So.3d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), that section 702.06, Florida Statutes, is unambiguous: “The . . .

GROSSO a k a L. v. HSBC BANK USA, N. A., 195 So. 3d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

SHAFFER, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 190 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 702.06 gives the court power to limit deficiency judgments. . . . .” § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). . . .

DYCK- O NEAL, INC. v. WEINBERG,, 190 So. 3d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Based on the unambiguous language of section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013) and the holding in Garcia . . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2013) 'governs suits to recover deficiencies. . . . On appeal, this Court found the language of section 702.06 to be unambiguous, and -also found the dicta . . .

GARCIA, v. DYCK- O NEAL, INC., 178 So. 3d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Analysis Section 702.06 of the Florida Statutes provides the authority for affirming the trial court’ . . . unless the court, in the foreclosure action has granted or denied a claim for a deficiency judgment. § 702.06 . . . Notwithstanding the clear and unambiguous language of section 702.06, Garcia argues that First Federal . . . We need look no further than the plain language of section 702.06. . . . The remedial nature of the 2013 amendment to section 702.06 militates against our further interpreting . . .

G. REID, v. COMPASS BANK,, 164 So. 3d 49 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Prior to June 7, 2013, section 702.06, Florida Statutes, which is entitled “Deficiency decree; common-law . . . Section 702.06 was amended in 2013 to read: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . In addressing Appellant’s argument, a review of the case law construing section 702.06 is instructive . . . While we agree that the plain language of both versions of section 702.06 supports an argument that a . . . Inc., 927 So.2d 41, 44-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that section 702.06 has been interpreted to allow . . .

KINNEY f k a v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L. P., 165 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . explicitly granted the authority to enter the legal remedy of a deficiency judgment by virtue of section 702.06 . . . portion of a deficiency, should one exist, shall be within the sound judicial discretion of the court.” § 702.06 . . .

ROJAS, v. LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL C. CONSUEGRA, P. L. O, 142 F. Supp. 3d 1206 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 702.06. . . . Section 702.06 provides in relevant part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or . . .

REDUS FLORIDA COMMERCIAL, LLC, v. COLLEGE STATION RETAIL CENTER, LLC, a E. Sr. C., 777 F.3d 1187 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 702.06 (2014) (“In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter executed the . . .

In WHIRLPOOL CORP. FRONT- LOADING WASHER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 45 F. Supp. 3d 724 (N.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . , and the trier of fact may accord it the weight it deems proper.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .

HAMMOND a k a v. KINGSLEY ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, a M. D. S. H. I. LLC LA. R. LLC, a a, 144 So. 3d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . .

CAIN, v. HARRIS TEETER, INC., 954 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . McLaughlin et al., Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[2][c], at 702-138 (2d ed.2012). . . .

ROYAL PALM CORPORATE CENTER ASSOCIATION, LTD. a a LLC, a LLC, a a V. III, v. PNC BANK, NA, NA,, 89 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The statute concerning deficiencies, section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), is more limited in nature . . . Although the reporters of the Restatement seem to believe that section 702.06 is something of a one-action . . . Section 702.06 binds a plaintiff to a deficiency decree once the plaintiff sets the deficiency process . . . With regard to the statute’s history, the legislature enacted what is now section 702.06, which took . . . Section 702.06’s grant of such power was designed to “relieve the parties from the expense and vexation . . .

LANG, Jr. v. CULLEN,, 725 F. Supp. 2d 925 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 702.06[8] (2d ed.2000) (“[t]here is no requirement under Rule . . .

In PHILLIPS, 439 B.R. 892 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2010)

. . . . §§ 702.06, 702.10. . . .

J. FRANKLIN v. REGIONS BANK, N. A., 25 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The appellants further rely on section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2008), which provides, in pertinent . . . but the complainant shall also have the right to sue at common law to recover such deficiency.... § 702.06 . . . We agree that, under section 702.06, the circuit court had the discretion, post-foreclosure, to allow . . . Our decision is without prejudice to the appellants’ right under section 702.06 to file a separate action . . .

L. A. D. PROPERTY VENTURES, INC. A. v. FIRST BANK,, 19 So. 3d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . & Loan Ass’n, 548 So.2d 282, 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (citing section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987 . . .

ARVELO, v. PARK FINANCE OF BROWARD, INC., 15 So. 3d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

O NEIL, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP., 538 F. Supp. 2d 304 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . action, and on about October 6, 2005, O’Neil obtained a default judgment against it in the amount of $702.06 . . .

BOTNICK, v. ZIMMER, INC., 484 F. Supp. 2d 715 (N.D. Ohio 2007)

. . . . § 702.06[1]; Redman v. John D. Brush and Co., 111 F.3d 1174 (4th Cir.1997). . . .

DE LAS CUEVAS, v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED, a k a, 927 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (2005) states as follows: Deficiency decree; common-law suit to recover . . . thereof at foreclosure sale and also is granted a deficiency decree against the original mortgagor. § 702.06 . . .

OCHOA- CARRILLO, v. GONZALES,, 437 F.3d 842 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . See Weinstein & Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (2005). . . .

CHRESTENSEN, v. EUROGEST, INC., 906 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . foreclosure specifically retained and reserved jurisdiction to enter deficiency judgments, section 702.06 . . .

SMITH, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 376 F. Supp. 2d 664 (W.D. Va. 2005)

. . . Weinstein et al., Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (2d ed.2005). . . .

K. WOODMAN, v. WWOR- TV, INC., 411 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . .”); 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 (“The credibility of witnesses is normally an issue left . . .

INDIANA INSURANCE CO. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., 326 F. Supp. 2d 844 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .

MOHNEY, v. USA HOCKEY, INC., 300 F. Supp. 2d 556 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .

GRANT THORNTON, LLP, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. LLP,, 297 F. Supp. 2d 880 (S.D.W. Va. 2004)

. . . Kelley, 6 F.Supp.2d 1168, 1183 (D.Kan.1998) (quoting 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[8], p. 702 . . .

J J SNACK FOODS, CORP. v. EARTHGRAINS CO., 220 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D.N.J. 2002)

. . . See 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[3] n. 59. . . . See 4 Weinstein’s Feder al Evidence § 702.06[3]. . . .

BOUCHARD, v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., 213 F. Supp. 2d 802 (N.D. Ohio 2002)

. . . . § 702.06[1], at 702-52 (2000). . . .

BEAL BANK, a v. P. V. ASSOCIATES, a, 782 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Shoreline Garden Town- homes, II, Ltd., 538 So.2d 864, 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); § 702.06, Fla. . . .

DiCARLO v. KELLER LADDERS, INC. s, 211 F.3d 465 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 702.06[8] at 702-59 (“An expert witness’s bias goes to the weight, not the admissibility of the testimony . . .

NORWEST FINANCIAL, INC. v. FERN NDEZ, 86 F. Supp. 2d 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . of the testimony, and should be brought out on cross-examination.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .

H F LAND, INC. v. PANAMA CITY- BAY COUNTY AIRPORT AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,, 736 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1999)

. . . had access to all the information that must be contained in a recorded notice as required by section 702.06 . . .

CENTURY GROUP, INC. a v. PREMIER FINANCIAL SERVICES EAST, L. P. a, 724 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . amount of deficiency between the foreclosure sale amount and the judgment amount pursuant to section 702.06 . . .

LAURIA, No. v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION,, 145 F.3d 593 (3d Cir. 1998)

. . . Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06[4], at 702-39 (2d ed. 1997) (“A person may qualify as an . . .

UNITED STATES v. KELLEY,, 6 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Kan. 1998)

. . . of the testimony, and should be brought out on cross-examination.” 4 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 702.06 . . .

KHAN, v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. d b a, 687 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . 634 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (denial of deficiency on these facts an abuse of discretion); sec. 702.06 . . .

ESTEPA v. J. JORDAN,, 678 So. 2d 876 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . See § 702.06, Fla. . . .

In JACK GREENBERG, INC., 189 B.R. 906 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . See 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 702.06 at 702-29. . . .

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, v. GOODWIN BEACH PARTNERSHIP,, 644 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, authorizes entry of a deficiency decree, should a deficiency exist, . . . Meyer, 100 Fla. 235, 130 So. 57 (1930); § 702.06, Fla. Stat. (1993). . Consales, N.V. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. ALVARADO,, 5 F.3d 1425 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 702.06 (authorizing entry of deficiency decree in foreclosure proceeding). . 55 Am.Jur. . . .

PMI MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. A. CAVENDAR, 615 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1985), expressly permits the bank to sue to recover a deficiency after . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. HY KOM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, D. L. W. M. D. U. S., 603 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

CAPITAL BANK, v. NEEDLE f k a, 596 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . These holdings appear to be based upon the same statutory provisions now contained in section 702.06, . . .

SOUTH ATLANTIC PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, v. MORGAN, 573 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. H. MORLEY a a a a s No. Co. a, 915 F.2d 1517 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 702.06 (West 1976). The exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed absent abuse. . . . Rather than compelling an additional, lengthy procedure, the rationale behind section 702.06 has been . . .

E. TIMMERS A. v. HARBOR FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a, 548 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1987), the statutory section under which the appellee/bank asserted . . .

BANK OF FLORIDA IN SOUTH FLORIDA, v. W. KEENAN H., 519 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1985), expressly permits the bank to sue to recover a deficiency after . . .

NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA f k a N. A. v. PYRAMID CORPORATION, a, 497 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

P. RICARD, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES,, 462 So. 2d 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . section 697.01, Florida Statutes (1983), subject to the same rules of foreclosure, and that section 702.06 . . .

SAINTS IN CHRIST, TEMPLE OF HOLY GHOST J. D. v. R. FOWLER, a k a R., 448 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes; Lloyd v. Cannon, 399 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . . .

COPPOLA, v. HOUSING INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF FLORIDA,, 400 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Cominole, 253 So.2d 898 (Fla.1st DCA 1971); and Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

M. MORGAN, v. KEARNEY Co. a, 395 So. 2d 570 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . denied a motion for deficiency judgment sought against appellee, Dudley Kear-ney, pursuant to Section 702.06 . . .

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, v. BIG FOUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF W. P. B. INC., 394 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Section 702.06, Florida Statutes (1977) provides as follows: 702.06 Deficiency decree; common law suit . . . chapter might be thought to apply only to real estate but that limitation is dispensed with when Section 702.06 . . .

FLAGSHIP STATE BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, a v. DREW EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a, 392 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla.Stat. (1979) reads in part: In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . .

In LOCKWOOD, 5 B.R. 294 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . Under the policy of the Florida courts as enunciated in Florida Statutes, § 702.06, and the cases thereunder . . .

C. STEKETEE, a J. W. a v. BALLANCE HOMES, INC., 376 So. 2d 873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Savings & Loan Assoc. would not bar the maintenance of the independent action sanctioned by Section 702.06 . . .

PROVIDENT NATIONAL BANK, a v. THUNDERBIRD ASSOCIATES, a a a, 364 So. 2d 790 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . See, however, F.S. 702.06. . $1,429,493.66. . . .

HAMILTON INVESTMENT TRUST, v. ESCAMBIA DEVELOPERS, INC. M. G., 352 So. 2d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . to grant (or deny) deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (Sec. 702.06 . . .

HARRIS, L. J. B. S. T. v. SIEGEL, COOPER, v. SIEGEL,, 438 F. Supp. 510 (S.D. Fla. 1977)

. . . Statute 702.06, so heavily relied upon by respondents, does not require a plaintiff to sue in foreclosure . . .

E. C. BRADBERRY, v. ATLANTIC BANK OF ST. AUGUSTINE,, 336 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . .” § 702.06, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that: “In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore . . .

N. MANDELL v. C. R. FORTENBERRY, 290 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1974)

. . . Section 702.06, F.S.A. — authorized the trial judge in his sound discretion to determine the portion . . .

JUNCTION BIT TOOL COMPANY, a v. VILLAGE APARTMENTS, INC. a, 262 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1972)

. . . . § 702.06, F.S.A., relating to deficiency suits arising out of foreclosures, suggests a contrary result . . .

WEST CORP. v. EQUITY CAPITAL CO., 235 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

. . . See § 702.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Kurkjian v. Fish Carburetor Corp., Fla.App. 1962, 145 So.2d 523. . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. WELLS L. UNITED STATES v. D. McKINLEY M. UNITED STATES v. LEE C., 403 F.2d 596 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . . § 702.06, which permits the award of deficiency judgments in the sound discretion of the court. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SKIPPER SMITH S MARINA, INC. a T. a a C. W. S. A. a, 283 F. Supp. 408 (S.D. Fla. 1968)

. . . . § 702.06 (1967), F.S.A. This contention is erroneous on both points. . . .

MAUDO, INC. a v. STEIN, 201 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . Allocca, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 903; Section 702.06, Florida Statutes, F. S.A. . . .

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF BROWARD COUNTY, a v. CONSOLIDATED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a R. S., 195 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1967)

. . . the right to secure a deficiency decree at law following a mortgage foreclosure is conferred by Sec. 702.06 . . . Nor do we find any evidence of interference with the relevant portion of Sec-702.06, supra, securing . . .

W. LARSEN v. V. ALLOCCA K., 187 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . .

WEINSTEIN L. v. PARK MANOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 166 So. 2d 842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . . Ma.Stat. § 702.06, F.S.A., states: “In all suits for the foreclosure of mortgages heretofore or hereafter . . .

R. FRANK, v. Hy LEVINE,, 159 So. 2d 665 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

. . . . § 702.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. . . .

B. P. GALLOWAY, v. D. L. MUSGRAVE a, 154 So. 2d 846 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . The discretion to grant deficiency decrees in mortgage foreclosure suits, provided for by statute (§ 702.06 . . .

MATZ S. v. C. O CONNELL, 155 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Although § 702.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., in effect states that in all suits for the foreclosure of . . .

B. CONNELLY, v. CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND,, 315 F.2d 683 (5th Cir. 1963)

. . . . §§ 702.02 and 702.06, F.S.A. . . .

HICKS v. GIBBS CORPORATION,, 20 Fla. Supp. 79 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1962)

. . . Jur. 510, 525; F.S. 702.06; Degge v. First State Bank (1941), 145 Fla. 438, 199 So. 564; Tendler v. . . .

D. TENDLER v. GOTTLIEB,, 126 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . The jurisdiction conferred by statute to enter a deficiency decree in a mortgage foreclosure suit [§ 702.06 . . .

R. FRANK, v. R. JENSEN A., 114 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . See § 702.06, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Provost v. . . .

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, a v. HURLBERT,, 114 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . Barnett, Fla., 53 So.2d 641: “(1) Under the provisions of Section 702.06, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S. . . .

M. KISSLING, v. J. McCARTHY, 100 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . deficiency decrees “within the sound judicial discretion of the court,” is provided for by statute, Section 702.06 . . .