The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Stat., and not 'fraudulent transfers' pursuant to § 726.105, Fla. Stat ." . . . Plaintiffs seek judgment against Defendants under §§ 56.29 and 726.105(1)(a) of the Florida Statutes, . . . The claims under § 56.29 and § 726.105(1) entail the same analysis, so the Court considers them together . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). Kearney , 2017 WL 942118, at *10. Kearney , 712 F. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(b). Doc. No. 322, June 5 Tr., p. 154. Doc. No. 325, Sept. 12 Tr., pp. 130-31. . . .
. . . assets in order to avoid collection of LB Judgment's judgment, subject to avoidance under sections 726.105 . . .
. . . transferee) with the intent to defraud its creditors (including Wells Fargo) in violation of sections 726.105 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a), (b) and § 726.106(1). . . .
. . . The First District held that the complaint alleged fraudulent transfers under sections 726.105(1) and . . .
. . . Assignment, and (2) recover, pursuant to Sections 544 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statutes 726.105 . . . The trustee alleges constructive fraudulent transfer under Florida Statutes 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106 . . . Under Section 726.105(1)(b), a transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor if the debtor . . .
. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes §§ 726.105 . . . there was a fraudulent transfer under section 548 or under section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . under section 544(b)(1) because they are voidable under Florida law, specifically Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . .
. . . the Complaint to which the Motions are addressed: Avoidance of the Transfers as actual fraud under § 726.105 . . . Plaintiff's Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Claims under § 726.105(1)(b), § 726.106(1 ), and 11 U.S.C . . . Under § 726.105(1)(b), a transfer is fraudulent as to present or future creditors if the debtor made . . . Plaintiff's Actual Fraud Claims and § 726.105(1)(a), and § 548(a)(1)(A) (First Motion, Counts IV, XII . . . Under § 726.105(1)(a), a transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to either a present or future creditor . . .
. . . Section 726.109(1) specifically applies to fraudulent transfers voidable under § 726.105(1)(a), which . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)(a), the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA) (Count VIII); and a claim for . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1), and 726.108(l)(a). . . .
. . . unrebutted presumption was created that the transfer was fraudulent by operation of sections 56.29(6)(a) and 726.105 . . . Poker Run's second theory is based on a presumption of fraud under section 726.105(1)(a) of the Fraudulent . . . Therefore, 'because of the difficulty of proving actual intent to defraud creditors, section 726.105( . . . The language of section 726.105(2) provides as follows: In determining actual intent under paragraph . . . (j) The transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred. § 726.105( . . .
. . . Count III : Violation of Florida's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act ( section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)A), In this case, Ae debtor, FLTCI, was the immediate transferor but was allegedly controlled . . .
. . . . §§ 56.29, 726.105. . . . actions are made or contrived to “delay, hinder, or defraud” can be determined with reference to section 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2), who may consist of “[a] relative of the debtor or ... . . .
. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . .
. . . under the actual and constructive fraud provisions of section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . there was a fraudulent transfer under section 548 or under section 544 incorporating Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . under section 544(b)(1) because they are voidable under Florida law, specifically Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a)-(b). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . .
. . . Actual Fraudulent Transfers Under Section 726.105(l)(a) of the Florida Statutes (Count I) Pursuant to . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a); Aqua Clear, 361 B.R. at 583. . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . .
. . . . §§ 544, 548, and 550 and Florida Statutes §§ 726.105(a) and (b), 726.106(1), and 726.108. . . . .
. . . .] § 726.105(l)(a) without the need to consider the badges of fraud.” Id. . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a)) and New York (N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law § 276) as incorporated by 11 U.S.C. § 544. . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1). . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, 726.108, 222.30, and Chapter 85, Florida Statutes. R. . . . underlying lawsuit rather than the four-year look back period afforded by § 726.110; and (ii) unlike § 726.105 . . . Fla. 2015) (quoting § 726.105(l)(a), Florida Statutes). . See Fla. Stat. § 726.102(14). . Doc. . . .
. . . the Court assumes that the, Bank Account Transfer and the Condominium Transfer are avoidable under § 726.105 . . .
. . . In Counts III and Y of the Complaint, the Trustee- alleges- a fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105 . . . Equity IX for receiving a fraudulent transfer under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, and under §§ 726.105 . . . In Counts IV and VI- of the Complaint, the Trustee alleges a-fraudulent transfer claim under § 726.105 . . . employment contract and not in the ordinary course of business. .Count III of the Complaint is based on § 726.105 . . .
. . . Specifically, the Florida state court found eight different badges of fraud under Section 726.105. . . . Stat. § 726.105. Fourth, the Thackers argue the state court erred in returning property to Mr. . . .
. . . See §§ 726.105(l)(a),' .108(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . See generally §§ 726.105-.108. . . . such transfers:’ (1) transfers made “[w]ith actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” creditors, § 726.105 . . . the debtor does not receive “reasonably equivalent value” in exchange for the . asset transferred, §§ 726.105 . . . the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant; (2) Under s. 726.105 . . .
. . . preference period while permitting the parties to litigate in state court under Florida’s UFTA (See § 726.105 . . .
. . . The complaint in the present case thus alleged fraudulent transfers within the meaning of sections 726.105 . . .
. . . See, e.g., Mejia, 985 So.2d at 1112-13 (applying § 726.105 in evaluating a fraudulent transfer claim) . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b) (providing for avoidance where the debtor does not “receiv[e] a reasonably equivalent . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b) (providing for avoidance where the debtor does not “reeeiv[e] a reasonably equivalent . . .
. . . . § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.105(l)(b); ' (III) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfer pursuant . . .
. . . To proceed under section 726.105, one need be only a creditor, and a creditor can be someone who is not . . . Section 726.105(2), Fla. . . . consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to the value of the asset transferred.” § 726.105 . . . Section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes (2012), provides: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105-108. . . . .
. . . 674.2101(l)(a), thus excluding the deposits from the definition of a “transfer” under Florida Statute § 726.105 . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) (“FUFTA”), the Receiver seeks to avoid (and recover amounts representing) (1) movement . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). Lee, 753 F.3d at 1199-1200 (citing Johnson v. . . . that a transfer was made in furtherance of a Ponzi scheme establishes actual intent to defraud under § 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Id. §§ 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b), 726.106(1). Defendants attack Counts 3 and 4 on two grounds. . . .
. . . transfers were fraudulent under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA): (1) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . . the transfers were made with the actual intent to -hinder, delay, or defraud IIAP; (2) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . . unreasonably small in relation to what was required to satisfy its obligations; and (3) under FUFTA § 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). Straub, 979 F.Supp.2d at 1327-29. . . . alternatively was fraudulent because Burrell Shipping “inten[ded] to hinder, delay, or defraud,” id. § 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 548 or Florida Statutes, §§ 726.105 and 726.106. . . . unsecured creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1)) may avoid a transfer that is fraudulent under either § 726.105 . . .
. . . § 56.29(6) makes use of substantive provisions of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), see § 726.105 . . . actions are made or contrived to ‘delay, hinder, or defraud’ must be determined with reference to section 726.105 . . .
. . . law, the trial court asked the magistrate to clarify whether she had considered and applied sections 726.105 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.106(1)0»), and 726.106(1) (the “Berkman Adversary”). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1), the Court finds that Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proof . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), stating A transfer or obligation is not voidable under s. 726.105(l)(a) against . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Fla. Stat. § 726.105(l)(b). . Fla. Stat. § 726.106(1). . . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105-108. . . . .
. . . Transfers are both actually and constructively fraudulent under § 548 of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . SunTrust, and any of the hundreds of investor-creditors in this case could have brought a claim under § 726.105 . . . are avoidable as constructive fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.108 Count III: Constructive Fraud - Avoidance and Recovery of Fraudulent . . . determines that transfers are avoidable under Bankruptcy Code section 548 or under Florida Statutes section 726.105 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat.' § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k); see also Wiand v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194, 1200 (11th Cir.2014). . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k); see also Wiand v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194, 1200 (11th Cir.2014). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)(a), and constructive fraud, Fla. . . . . §§ 726.105(1)(b) and 726.106(1); and (2) unjust enrichment. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Id. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . .
. . . Section 726.105(1), Florida Statutes, provides as follows: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b)[,] 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), Count XI for constructive fraud pursuant to Fla. . . . . § 726.105(l)(b), and Count XII for constructive fraud pursuant to Fla. Stat. 726.106(1). . . .
. . . Scorpion to Yali Golan or both Golans) are based on Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, section 726.105 . . . Under section 726.105(l)(b), Yali Golan transferred his ten million Scorpion Performance shares to joint . . . actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud Puleo regarding' the collection of h'is judgment (section 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a), and its constructive fraud provision, see Fla. Stat. § 726.105(1)(b). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . . that a transfer was made in furtherance of a Ponzi scheme establishes actual intent to defraud under § 726.105 . . .
. . . The complaint tracked the language of sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2012). . . .
. . . . § 726.105. . . . Notwithstanding the four-year limitation period, a cause of action under § 726.105(l)(a) may still be . . . Stat. § 726.105. . . . Section 726.105, meanwhile, explicitly applies to both present and future creditors, so the IRS is not . . . of the transfer, causes of action under § 726.105(l)(a) brought four years after the transfer may still . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b)(l). . . .
. . . Hamilton Bank (In re Model Imperial, Inc.), 250 B.R. 776, 791 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2000); see also § 726.105 . . .
. . . Alleging legal theories turning on the claim of a fraudulent transfer of assets under sections 726.105 . . . (l)(a), 726.105(l)(b)2, and 726.106(1), Florida Statutes (2010), the im-pleader complaint sought various . . . Stat. (2010) (using the word “voidable” to describe the application of § 726.105(l)(a)). . . . Sections 726.105 and 726.106, Florida Statutes (2010), define the circumstances where a transfer by a . . . Section 726.105 provides, in pertinent part: (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is . . .
. . . . § 541 and Florida Statute § 726.105; (2) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfers pursuant to . . . ) avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 544 and Florida Statutes § 726.105 . . .
. . . Count III is titled, “Action to Avoid and Recover Fraudulent Transfer Pursuant to § 726.105(l)(b), Florida . . . Count II: Florida Statute Section 726.105(l)(a) Count II alleges the transfer violates Florida Statute . . . Section 726.105(l)(a). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a), the UFTA looks to indicia of intent commonly known as “badges of fraud,” Amjad . . . See Fla Stat. §§ 726.105(2)(a)-(k). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(2). . . .
. . . Those “badges of fraud” are set forth in section 726.105, Florida Statutes (2013). . . . substantial debt was incurred (loans were made prior to, and forgiven during, the de Cespedes’ lawsuit). § 726.105 . . . Section 726.105, Florida Statutes (2013), provides, in part: (2) In determining actual intent under paragraph . . .
. . . To prevail on her fraudulent transfer claim under section 726.105(l)(a), the Trustee need only prove . . . transferred, the Trustee is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on her claims under section 726.105 . . . the Court’s entry of a final judgment in this proceeding for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(2). . § 726.105 . . . (citing In re Levine, 134 F.3d 1046, 1053 (11th Cir.1998)). . § 726.105(2), Fla. Stat. . Maurer v. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106, and 726.108. (Doc. 1). . . . from the Defendant as actually fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Statutes, and as constructively fraudulent transfers under § 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and § 726.105 . . . Section 726.109(1) of the Florida Statutes provides that a fraudulent transfer under § 726.105(l)(a) . . .
. . . Under section 726.105(l)(a), Florida Statutes, a transfer by a debtor “is fraudulent as to a creditor . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a). . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(B) and 726.108 (Count LVI) because the claims, as pled, are not facially plausible. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.108: (Count LVI — All Defendants). . . .
. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a): “A transfer or obligation is not voidable under s. 726.105(l)(a) against a person . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .
. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a). . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .
. . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1)(a)); Veigle v. . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(a)); Bay View Estates Corp. v. . . . Slat. § 726.105(1)(a). For the reasons given, it is hereby RECOMMENDED: 1. . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b)(1)-(2) and 726.106(1). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(b), and Fla. Stat. § 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105 and § 726.106 contemporaneously with 11 USC § 548); see also Freeman v. . . . Bankr.M.D.Fla.2001) (holding that a trustee had not met her burden under § 548 of the Bankruptcy Code or § 726.105 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a)-(b), 726.106(1), paid by Florida Manufacturing and Distribution (“Debtor”) to the . . .
. . . . §§ 548(a)(1)(A) and (B), 544, and 550, as well as, Florida Statute §§ 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), . . . The Foundation assumes that the Trustee can satisfy his burdens under § 548(a) and Florida Statute §§ 726.105 . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105-.108, Fla. Stat. (2010); Freeman v. . . .
. . . . § 726.105. . Cal. Corp.Code § 25400(d). . See Kamen v. . . .
. . . transfer or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless action is brought: (1) Under s. 726.105 . . . obligation: (a) With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debt- or. ..." § 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)(a) and (b). Fla. . . . . § 726.105(1)(a) concerns actual fraud while Fla Stat. § 726.105(1)(b) concerns constructive fraud. . . . Stat. § 726.105 provides: (1) A transfer is made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105 states that “[a] transfer is made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105 (emphasis added). . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a) and 726.108(1); (b) in Count II (Constructive Fraud) avoidance and recovery of certain . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(1)(b), 726.106(1) and 726.108; and (d) in Count IV, recovery of the avoided transfers . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a), alleging that the Debtor made the Transfers with the actual intent to hinder, delay . . . Stat. 726.105(1)(b), alleging that the transfers were constructively fraudulent because the Debtor did . . .
. . . . § 726.105 against the Fraudulent Transfer Defendants. (Id.) . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) and § 726.108. Bankruptcy Code § 548 and Fla. . . . . §§ 726.105 and 726.108 are substantially the same, with the exception of Florida’s more favorable four-year . . . investments in the TCTS Stock Program were constructively fraudulent transfers under § 548 of the Code and §§ 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . World Vision, 275 B.R. at 656; see also Wiand v. . . .
. . . of two parcels of real property on the ground they were fraudulently made in violation of sections 726.105 . . . (1) and 726.105(2), Florida Statutes (2009). . . . barred by section 726.110, Florida Statutes (2009), which extinguishes a cause of action under section 726.105 . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a) brought against all Defendants, on the grounds that Plaintiffs “allegation that the . . . Stat. § 726.105, provides that “[a] transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . .
. . . . § 726.105. It entered judgment against her in that amount. This is her appeal. II. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(1)(a) & (b), 726.106(1), 726.108(1). . . .
. . . The Amended Complaint contains four counts: (I) Fraudulent Transfer under Florida Statute Section 726.105 . . . (l)(a); (II) Fraudulent Transfer under Florida Statute Section 726.105(l)(b); (III) Fraudulent Transfer . . .
. . . . § 544(b) and Florida Statutes section 726.105(l)(a), Plaintiff sues “the EHF Defendants, the Wholesaler . . .
. . . The three counts in the Complaint rely on Florida Statutes sections 726.105(l)(a), 726.105(l)(b), and . . . Florida Statutes section 726.110(1) provides that a cause of action under section 726.105(l)(a) is extinguished . . . For actions brought under sections 726.105(l)(b) or 726.106(1), the cause of action is extinguished if . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105, 726.106 and 726.108 ("FUFTA”). . . . . or obligation under ss. 726.101-726.112 is extinguished unless such action is brought: (1) Under s. 726.105 . . . Stat. §§ 726.105(l)(b) and 726.106(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Cuthill v. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). .World Vision, 275 B.R. at 656; see also Wiand v. . . .
. . . . § 726.105). . . . .
. . . . § 726.105. (DE # 64 ¶¶ 859-65). . . . Stat. § 726.105(1). . . . Stat. § 726.105(2). . . . Stat. 726.105(l)(b) (emphasis added). . . . Stat. § 726.105. . . . .
. . . . § 726.105(1)(a) for making transfers of ZKE property and of proceeds from the sale of ZKE’s property . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). ZKE alleges that Defendants are liable under Fla. . . . Stat. 726.105(l)(b) because Defendants made certain transfers of ZKE property and proceeds from the sale . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a) remains as to all defendants. Summary judgment is DENIED. b. . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(b) remains as to all defendants. Summary judgment is DENIED. c. . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105, 739.402, Fla. . . .
. . . Africh is an avoidable fraudulent transfer under § 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Florida Statute § 726.105 . . . Ex. 230. .Count VII of the Second Amended Complaint in 6:04-ap-79 uses "§ 726.105(l)(b),” the section . . . Stat. § 726.105(l)(a). . Mejia v. . . . Because the Court finds actual fraudulent intent under § 726.105(l)(a), the Court need not address the . . . Chapter 7 trustee's argument for finding a constructively fraudulent transfer under § 726.105(l)(b) . . .
. . . . §§ 726.105(l)(a),(b) or § 726.106(1). . . .
. . . . § 726.105(l)(a), (b). . . .