The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . malpractice litigation "does not comply with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201 - 766.212 . . .
. . . constitutes final agency action, and any appeal is governed by section 120.68, as provided in section 766.212 . . . only place "manifest injustice" appears in the Medical Malpractice Arbitration statute is in section 766.212 . . . manifest injustice language but in discussing a stay of the arbitration award, thus applying section 766.212 . . .
. . . whether the opposing party complied with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201 to 766.212 . . .
. . . . § 766.212(1), Fla. Stat, (1988). . § 766.207, Fla. Stat. . . . Stat. . § 766.212(1), Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . mailed by the claimant does not comply with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . provides, in relevant part: (1) Voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to this section and ss.766.208-766.212 . . .
. . . See § 766.212(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2012). II. . . . See § 766.212(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
. . . As used in sections 766.201 through 766.212, " '[m]edical negligence’ means medical malpractice, whether . . .
. . . by the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . initiate litigation was in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirement of sections 766.201-766.212 . . . of intent to sue ... is “in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . . § 766.212(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). The Estate has appealed. We agree with the arbitration panel. . . .
. . . dismiss for failing to comply with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201 to 766.212 . . . whether the opposing party complied with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201 to 766.212 . . . whether the claimant complies with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201 to 766.212 . . .
. . . of intent to sue ... is ‘in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . Mary’s contention that subsection 766.212(2) of the Florida Statutes, which limits the ability of a medical . . .
. . . So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), in dealing with Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act, sections 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . intent not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201 through 766.212 . . .
. . . Section 766.202(5), Florida Statutes (2002), provides that ‘‘[a]s used in ss. 766.201-766.212, the term . . .
. . . ANALYSIS The Medical Malpractice Act, sections 766.201 through 766.212, Florida Statutes (2002), was . . . Doig, 842 So.2d 106 (Fla.2003), "Medical Malpractice Act” refers to sections 766.201 through 766.212, . . .
. . . See §§ 766.207-766.212, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . complete, the parties may elect to enter voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to sections 766.207-766.212 . . .
. . . Social security retirement benefits are not collateral sources within the meaning of sections 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . an unframed question of great public importance regarding whether the express provisions of section 766.212 . . . Section 766.212(2) limits the ability of a medical malpractice defendant to stay an arbitration award . . . The district court certified to this Court the question of the constitutionality of section 766.212(2 . . . The first issue involves the certified question of whether the express provisions in section 766.212( . . . To that end, sections 766.211 and 766.212 provide as follows: 766.211. . . .
. . . Sections 766.201-766.212, Florida Statutes (1997), concern presuit investigation and arbitration of “ . . .
. . . by the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . . rejecting the claim is “in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766-201-766.212 . . .
. . . Sections 766.201 through 766.212, Florida Statutes. . . .
. . . Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 619 So.2d 482, 484 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (sections 766.201 through 766.212 . . .
. . . See §§ 766.207 and 766.212(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). A motion panel of this court denied the motion. . . . In reviewing the claimed error from the denial of the stay, we turn first to section 766.212. . . . Therefore, our review of this case should follow section 766.212. . . . We again refer to section 766.212(1). . . . See § 766.212, Fla. Stat. (1995), which provides that: "766.212. . . .
. . . sent only after plaintiff complies with the “reasonable investigation requirements of .ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . litigation is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201-766.212 . . . by the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . Obstetrics & Gynecology, 619 So.2d 482, 484 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (asserting that sections 766.201 through 766.212 . . . by the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . of intent was not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of sections 766.201-766.212 . . . by the claimant is not in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . arbitration award under the Medical Malpractice Act is subject to judicial review pursuant to sections 766.212 . . .
. . . investigation and notice requirements of the Medical Malpractice Reform Act, sections 766.101 through 766.212 . . .
. . . Those provisions were subsequently codified as sections 766.207 through 766.212, Florida Statutes (1993 . . . 766.106, or to the intended interplay, if any, between section 766,106 and sections 766.207 through 766.212 . . . To the extent relevant, sections 766.207 through 766.212, Florida Statutes (1993), read: 766.207 Voluntary . . . the parties from relying, on appeal, on the arbitration scheme set out in sections 766.207 through 766.212 . . . Finally, it is the only explanation for section 766.212(1), which states that an arbitration award is . . .
. . . Section 766.202(5) provides that “[a]s used in ss. 766.201-766.212, the term ‘medical expert’ means a . . .
. . . In 1988, the Florida Legislature adopted sections 766.201 through 766.212, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988 . . .
. . . rejecting the claim is “in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . The intent of sections 766.201 through 766.212, Florida Statutes (1989), setting forth presuit requirements . . .
. . . rejecting the claim is “in compliance with the reasonable investigation requirements of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .
. . . .— (1) Voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to this section and ss. 766.208-766.212 shall not apply . . . promulgate rules to effect the orderly and efficient processing of the arbitration procedures of ss. 766.201-766.212 . . .