The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 772.101 - 772.19, against Jorge, Acebo, Dr. Queral, Dr. . . .
. . . . § 772.101, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
. . . . § 772.101. . . . .
. . . . § 772.101 (“Florida RICO”) against Defendant-Appellee Damon Carpenter (“Carpenter”). . . .
. . . . § 772.101 et seq., Florida’s equivalent of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations . . .
. . . . § 772.101, the analysis of personal jurisdiction for such claims would also be addressed under the . . .
. . . . § § 772.101-772.19 (hereinafter, the “Florida RICO Act”). . . .
. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . .
. . . . § 772.101, and for conspiracy to violate the Florida RICO Act. . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101 et seq. Silver failed to file a Civil RICO Case Statement pursuant to S.D. Fla. . . .
. . . . § 772.101, et seq., implicate federal law issues sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction . . . Stat. § 772.101, et seq. . . .
. . . fraudulent misrepresentations constitute a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statute § 772.101 . . .
. . . . § 772.101 et seq.; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.; Florida . . .
. . . Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, codified as Florida Statues, Section 772.101 et . . .
. . . This Act, Florida Statutes § 772.101 et seq., is patterned after the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt . . .
. . . . § 772.101, et seq. (hereinafter “state civil RICO”). . . .
. . . Durland, and others, and was based on Florida’s Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, sections 772.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101-772.104, the party filing the claim shall serve a RICO Case Statement. . . .
. . . civil RICO violation (Count II), a pattern of racketeering activity and damages pursuant to sections 772.101 . . .
. . . are James Bradstreet, M.D., Morgan Bunch, III, M.D., Lori Nelson, D.D.S., and Peter Taraschi, D.O. . 772.101 . . .
. . . permitting, instead of total rescission, claims by the carrier for treble damages for theft, see §§ 772.101 . . .
. . . Sec. 772.101 Florida’ Civil Anti-Theft statute Defendant argues that Seaman’s breach of contract action . . .
. . . . §§ 1961-64 (the federal RICO statute) and Florida Statutes Chps. 772.101-104 (the Florida RICO statute . . .
. . . Count III: Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act Pursuant to Florida Statute Chapter 772.101 . . .
. . . This is an action under the Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act, Sections 772.101, et seq., FlaStats . . .
. . . . § 772.101 et seq. . . . Car-gill’s pattern of racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and Fla.Stat. §§ 772.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101 et seq. (1978). . . .
. . . right to appeal to the Civil Service Commission’s Federal Employee Appeals Authority. 5 CFR §§752.203, 772.101 . . .
. . . . §§ 752.203 and 772.101 (1978). . . . . § 772.101 (1978). The FEAA and the Civil Service Commission no longer exist. . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101-.312 (1976) (former regulations governing adverse-action appeals of agency adverse actions . . . See 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101-312 (1976). . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101-.404 (1978). . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101-772.312 (1977). . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101-772.312 (1977). . . .
. . . Part 752 § 772.101, § 772.301 (1978) [All references in this opinion to the C.F.R. are to the 1978 edition . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101, 772.307(b) (1978). . . .
. . . . §§ 351.901, 772.101, 772.301(a) (1978), and to hear all appeals concerning “adverse actions,” see 5 . . . C.F.R. §§ 752.203(a), 772.101, 772.301(a) (1978). . . .
. . . . §§ 772.101, et seq., filed an order denying petitioner’s claim concerning a reduction in force action . . .