The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . ." § 772.11(a). . . . for each alternative under consideration, and compare the existing and predicted noise levels (see § 772.11 . . .
. . . Pursuant to the civil theft statute, section 772.11, Florida Statutes, the court trebled that amount. . . .
. . . App. 2015) (citing § 772.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2012) ). See supra note 18 and accompanying text. . . .
. . . Subsequently, based on section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes (2014), Pretium alleged a civil theft claim . . . In addition, the Florida Civil Theft Statute, section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes (2014), provides that . . . In addition to Pretium's failure to comply with sections 772.11(1) and 812.014(1), Pretium's complaint . . .
. . . . § 772.11. Defendants argue Count 4 should be dismissed for two reasons. . . . Florida Statute 772.11 requires that "[b]efore filing an action for damages under this section, the person . . . But the language of Florida Statute 772.11 is clear. . . . Plaintiffs must serve a demand on George Albertelli under Florida Statute 772.11 within ten (10) days . . .
. . . letters, Appellees filed a complaint seeking damages for (among other claims) civil theft under section 772.11 . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla. Stat. See City of Gainesville v. . . .
. . . JOHN ROLLAS provided Defendants with the statutory demand letter for Civil Theft under Section 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11 and Fla. Stat. § 812.014? Id. at 1025. . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla.- Stat. (2013). . . . .
. . . misappropriation and unfair competition; . (3) common law conversion;,- and (4) civil theft under section 772.11 . . . Stat. § 772.11 and Fla. Stat. § 812.014? Id. at 1025. C. . . . Stat. § 772.11 and Fla. Stat. § 812.014? Flo & Eddie, 827 F.3d at 1025. . . .
. . . orders or judgment,- it is unclear whether 'the trial court awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to sections 772.11 . . .
. . . Zurro’s attorney’s fees pursuant to section 772.11, Florida Statutes (2011). . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (providing civil remedy for theft); United Techs. Corp. v. . . .
. . . . § 772.11 for violations of Fla. Stat. § 812.014(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11 and Fla. Stat. § 812.014? . . .
. . . the Florida Statutes (the “Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act” or “FCCPA”), and (iii) Section 772.11 . . .
. . . Florida’s civil theft statute, Florida Statutes § 772.11, affords a private cause of action for treble . . . Stat. §§ 772.11, 812.014). . . .
. . . . § 772.11, as well as Fla. Stat. § 57.105. . . . Section 772.11 awards fees and costs to the prevailing party under the civil theft statute. . . . Stat. § 772.11, provides in relevant part: (1) Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence . . .
. . . See § 772.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
. . . calculated as the sum of the amount of the verdict ($141,551.20), trebled pursuant to Florida Statutes § 772.11 . . . that the treble damages awarded in the Final Judgment for civil theft under Florida Statutes section 772.11 . . . Finally, the treble damages awarded in the Final Judgment for civil theft under Florida Statutes section 772.11 . . .
. . . Under the civil theft statute, section 772.11, Florida Statutes (2011-12), the trial court tripled the . . .
. . . . § 772.11(1), [a]ny person who proves by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she has been injured . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . .
. . . , anti-kickback statute, and insurance fraud statutes. (5) civil theft (Count 5), in violation of § 772.11 . . . Florida’s civil theft statute, § 772.11, Fla. . . . . § 772.11(3), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 772.11, "[t]he defendant is entitled to recover reasonable attorney . . .
. . . Arcoiries, Inc., 561 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), § 772.11, Fla. . . .
. . . Under section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes (2011), the defendant (or counter-defendant) on a civil theft . . . claimant (or counter-claimant) “raised a claim that was without substantial fact or legal support.” § 772.11 . . .
. . . Rhodes sent civil theft demand letters to Turner LLC, Othel Turner, and Rainer, pursuant to section 772.11 . . . $410,451.79, three times the amount taken from the IRA plus attorney’s fees and costs as provided by section 772.11 . . . Civil Theft Under section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes (2012), a person who is injured by a violation . . . Plaintiff and obtain her funds through an act of theft giving rise to a civil remedy pursuant to § 772.11 . . .
. . . As a result, the Plaintiff made a written demand to the Defendant for damages under section 772.11, Florida . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla. Stat. (1997); Country Manors Ass’n v. . . .
. . . See §§ 812.014, 772.11, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . . § 772.11. . . .
. . . fraud (damages) (Count III); conspiracy (Count IX); and civil theft in violation of Florida Statute § 772.11 . . . Civil Theft in Violation of Florida Statutes § 772.11 (Count X). . . . Stat. § 772.11. Motion for Summary Judgment at 16-18. . . . Florida Statutes § 772.11 provides that “[a]ny person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . .
. . . .” § 772.11(a). . . . See § 772.11. . . . predicted noise level [sic] through comparison between measured and predicted levels” as required. § 772.11 . . . regulations specifically exempt “developed lands that are not sensitive to highway traffic noise,” § 772.11 . . . For projects on existing alignments, predict existing and design year traffic noise impacts.” § 772.11 . . .
. . . The complaint set forth counts for conversion, civil theft pursuant to section 772.11, Florida Statutes . . . Turning to the count for civil theft, the applicable statute, section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes (2010 . . .
. . . page six, which sets out the claim of exploitation of the elderly by deception pursuant to sections 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . .
. . . . §§ 812.014 and 772.11, against all of the defendants, which occurred “through the theft of ZKE’s goods . . .
. . . Section 772.11 is not a standalone statutory provision. . . . Sections 812.014(1) and 772.11 were applied. GE Seaco Servs., Ltd. v. . . . Section 772.11 are incompatible with maritime law). . . . Section 772.11. Judgment is due to be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. . . . Sections 772.11 and 812.014(1). . . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (setting forth an unmet demand for the return of the property as a requirement for conversion . . . Stat. §§ 772.11, 812.014). . . .
. . . MDFRD awarding it $21,705.00 on its state law counterclaims for civil theft and conversion under §§ 772.11 . . .
. . . Infinity sued Nodal and PPIC, asserting, among others, causes of action based on civil theft, § 772.11 . . . Both Nodal and PPIC then filed motions for attorney’s fees under sections 627.428, 627.736, and 772.11 . . . But we reverse the court’s decision to deny section 772.11 fees and remand with directions to award Nodal . . . Section 772.11(1) provides that a defendant in a civil theft action “is entitled to recover reasonable . . . reverse the circuit court’s denial of Nodal’s and PPIC’s motions for fees and costs pursuant to section 772.11 . . .
. . . The parties later agreed that plaintiff could not receive a trebled damages award under section 772.11 . . .
. . . . §§ 772.5(g), 772.11(c), 772.13(c); 23 C.F.R. Part 772, Table 1. . . . noise abatement criteria (“NAC”) or when they substantially exceed existing noise levels. 23 C.F.R. § 772.11 . . . ., construction of noise barriers or acquisition of property to create a buffer zone). 23 C.F.R. §§ 772.11 . . . if noise levels approach or exceed the NAC, the agency must consider abatement measures. 23 C.F.R. § 772.11 . . .
. . . On October 5, 2005, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, wherein it removed the section 772.11 civil . . . Statutes (proposal for settlement), section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (frivolous lawsuit), and section 772.11 . . . entitlement to those fees incurred directly and exclusively associated with his prevailing on the section 772.11 . . .
. . . the March 8, 2005 civil theft demand letter did not strictly comply with the requirements of Section 772.11 . . . Stat. § 772.11 (2002) (providing for “a cause of action for threefold the actual damages sustained”). . . . Section 772.11 provides as follows: ... . . . Stat. § 772.11 (2002). . . . .
. . . within the meaning of section 489.126 and sought treble damages for civil theft pursuant to section 772.11 . . .
. . . Section 772.11. . . . Stat. § 772.11: Section 772.11 provides for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs where a . . . Plaintiffs’ Request: Section 772.11 provides for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs and . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . . Section 772.11 is inapplicable to this proceeding and provides no statutory basis for an award of fees . . .
. . . complaint, Sidney asserted that Ragucci violated Florida’s Civil Theft Act, Florida Statute Section 772.11 . . . Florida Statute Section 772.11 states that civil theft must be proven by clear and convincing evidence . . .
. . . . § 772.11(c), which states, “If a noise impact is identified, the abatement measures listed in § 772.13 . . . necessary only where frequent human use occurs and a lowered noise level would be of benefit.” 23 C.F.R. § 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11. . . .
. . . Under the provisions of F.S. 772.11, plaintiff may recover, upon proper proof, three times the actual . . .
. . . Practices Act (FDUTPA), fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty, seeking treble civil damages pursuant to § 772.11 . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla. Stat. (2006). Because Mr. . . .
. . . The applicable civil theft statute, section 772.11, Florida Statutes (2001), provides, in pertinent part . . . Instead, section 772.11 also requires the plaintiff to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he . . . See § 772.11. . . .
. . . The firm points out that § 772.11(1) requires a demand letter as a condition precedent to filing suit . . . It is true that § 772.11(1) requires written notice prior to initiating a civil theft recovery action . . . Stat. § 772.11. . . . The firm explains that the demand letters were sent pursuant to the procedure outlined in § 772.11(1) . . . [D.E. 165 at 19-20], Plaintiffs counter that the pre-suit notice requirement of § 772.11(1) does not . . .
. . . Abu-Ghazaleh, defendants motioned for attorney’s fees and costs under sections 57.041, 768.79, and 772.11 . . . non-named plaintiffs, Van Diepen and CSI, were “parties” within the meaning of sections 57.041, 768.79, and 772.11 . . . Abu-Ghazaleh must show that the civil theft suit “was without substantial fact or legal support.” § 772.11 . . . upon a finding that the claimant raised a claim that was without substantial fact or legal support.” § 772.11 . . . them Van Diepen and CSI, filed a civil theft claim that was without “substantial legal support.” § 772.11 . . .
. . . Section 772.11(1), Florida Statutes, provides that “[a]ny person who proves by clear and convincing evidence . . . injury under this section must make a written demand for treble damages prior to filing the claim. § 772.11 . . .
. . . Stat. §§ 772.11, 812.014. . . . Stat. § 772.11 (DE # 1 at 95, ¶ 344). 2. Fla. . . . Stat. § 772.11). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1); Fla. Stat. § 772.104(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1).”). . . .
. . . The claim was asserted pursuant to section 772.11, Florida Statutes (2001). . . .
. . . . §§ 812.014 and 772.11, and conversion; Wesb-Hem and APM were charged with unjust enrichment; WesWHem . . . Stat. §§ 772.11 (providing civil remedy for theft or exploitation), 812.014(1) (criminal theft statute . . . Stat. §§ 772.11 (providing civil remedy for theft or exploitation), 812.019 (criminal dealing in stolen . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (defendant is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs in the trial . . .
. . . . § 772.11. . Fed. R. . . .
. . . On July 1, 2002, the Plaintiff sent a letter to the Defendant, stating that pursuant to section 772.11 . . . letter, dated July 1, 2002, did not state an accurate and substantiated value of damages pursuant to 772.11 . . . See § 772.11. . . . Section 772.11 provides in relevant part as follows: Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence . . . Although section 772.11 provides that prior to commencing a civil theft action, "the person claiming . . .
. . . We must determine whether an award of damages pursuant to section 772.11, Florida Statutes (2004), should . . . Count II appears to be similar to count I, but it does not seek treble damages under section 772.11. . . . have not been consistent in determining whether the primary purpose of damage awards under section 772.11 . . . it is the economic lure of treble damages that attracts litigants to seek recompense under section 772.11 . . . Although section 772.11 permits an award of fees and costs incurred at trial and on appeal, the party . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (requiring adoption of reasonable and feasible mitigation measures). . . .
. . . . § 772.11, does not apply to the allegations, in the Complaint. . . . A review of the history of the civil theft statute discloses that prior to its amendment in 1999, § 772.11 . . . The current version of § 772.11- — which is applicable to this case — now includes in the list of enumerated . . . Stat. § 772.11 (1988). . Id. . Fla. Stat. § 812.014(1)(a)-(b). . See, e.g. . . .
. . . . § 772.11 she sought treble damages in the amount of $15 million. Id., ¶¶ 46-18. . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (West 2006), and under Florida’s common law doctrine of invasion of privacy. . . . Stat. § 772.11, to which Amazon apparently did not respond. . . . Stat. § 772.11; and (3) the Florida common law invasion of privacy doctrine. . . . Stat. § 772.11; see Palmer v. . . . Stat. § 772.11; see Ciaramello v. . . .
. . . which seeks recovery of monies allegedly owed by the UDC to the Debtors pursuant to Florida Statute, § 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (providing that victim of theft may state a claim for “minimum damages in the amount of $200 . . .
. . . operations, which were located in Florida at the time of the purported incident. b. civil theft Section 772.11 . . . Stat. § 772.11. . . .
. . . any issue relating to the recovery of attorney’s fees for conversion under the theft statute, see § 772.11 . . .
. . . Court) seeks recovery of monies allegedly owed by the UDC to the Debtors pursuant to Florida Statute, § 772.11 . . . Florida Statute § 772.11 provides that ”[a]ny person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (Count III), fraud (Count IV), money had and received (Count V), and fraudulent conveyance . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (West 2005). . . . Stat. § 772.11 provides: Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that he has been injured . . .
. . . . § 772.11(1) (“Any person who proves by clear and convincing evidence that he or she has been injured . . .
. . . Silfredo Trujillo and Nil-da Olmo, that included a treble. damage claim for civil theft pursuant to § 772.11 . . . noted in an earlier appeal of the fee award, it is unclear whether the fee award was made pursuant to § 772.11 . . .
. . . .” § 772.11, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . The letter demanded payment of a treble damage sum of $3,069,000 under section 772.11, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Gordimer filed a motion with the trial court seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to sections 57.105 and 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11(a). . . .
. . . Usury, second transaction, under section 687.03; Count 5: Quiet Title; Count 6: Civil Theft, section 772.11 . . . See, section 772.11; Florida Desk, Inc. v. . . .
. . . of a trade secret count, Superior Garlic requested an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 772.11 . . . to attorney’s fees as the prevailing party on the civil theft of trade secret count, under section 772.11 . . . orders or judgment, it is unclear whether the trial court awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to sections 772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11 allows for the imposition of attorney’s fees and treble damages. . . .
. . . . § 772.11(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . . Stat. § 772.11(1), defendants found civilly liable for theft are subject to an award of threefold the . . . Stat. § 772.11(1), it is axiomatic that this prong of the Supreme Court’s due process test weighs in . . . Stat. § 772.11(1). . . . .
. . . See §§ 772.11 & 812.014(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . . .
. . . Alternatively, Snyder argued that he was entitled to fees under section 772.11, Florida Statutes, the . . . apparent conflict between the two statutes, the appellate court said: The trial court found that section 772.11 . . . Although Snyder argues that section 772.11 controls because it is more specific than section 733.705, . . .
. . . in favor of Countrywide and reserved jurisdiction to consider a motion for fees pursuant to section 772.11 . . . First Issue — Section 772.11 Fees The first issue on appeal is whether it was error to award fees pursuant . . . to section 772.11. . . . Section 772.11 provides that, in a suit for civil theft pursuant to sections 812.012-812.037, Florida . . . Consequently, it was error to award Countrywide fees on the basis of section 772.11. . . .
. . . , $82.14 in late charges for the January, February, and March 1997 payments, an escrow shortage of $772.11 . . .
. . . . § 772.11. . . . Florida Statutes § 772.11, Civil Remedy for Theft, provides that: “Any person who proves by clear and . . . Stat. § 772.11. . . . Stat. § 772.11 as follows: “A person commits theft if he or she knowingly obtains or uses ... the property . . .
. . . HUD, but also interest, as well as treble damages under Florida’s Civil Theft Law, Florida Statutes § 772.11 . . .
. . . contract case, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Caul-kins for civil theft under sections 772.11 . . .
. . . The statute alleged in Count II of the Plaintiffs complaint is Florida’s civil theft statute, § 772.11 . . . Stat. § 772.11 or within 18 U.S.C.1962. . . . No where within § 772.11 or § 1962 is there language stating that a remedy should be available despite . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . . § 772.11. . . .
. . . The claim in Count II is based on Fla.Stat. 772.11. . . .
. . . . § 772.11 (civil theft statute of Florida) and sought monetary damages plus treble damages under the . . . entitled to summary judgment because of Bay Area’s failure to comply with the requirements of Fla.Stat. § 772.11 . . . issue which is the impact, if any, of the failure to comply with the notice requirements of Fla.Stat. § 772.11 . . .
. . . sought attorney’s fees for pursuing the dischargeability proceeding in this court pursuant to Section 772.11 . . . In this case, the plaintiff asserts Section 772.11, Florida Statutes, as the basis for an award of attorney . . . the bankruptcy court does not qualify as a “trial or appellate court” within the meaning of Section 772.11 . . .
. . . See § 772.11, Fla. Stat. (1997); Country Manors Ass’n v. . . .
. . . As to the issue of treble damages, we hold that under section 772.11, Florida Statutes (1995), treble . . .