Cases from cite.case.law:

RUBIN S. WILLIAMS BAILBONDS, INC. v. STATE, 493 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . That opinion suggests that section 903.29, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), denies to the surety the right . . . The only construction of section 903.29, Florida Statutes (Supp.1984) that comports with the rationale . . .

In SPONHEIM, THEMALAKES, v. SPONHEIM,, 39 B.R. 381 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . bail-bondsman to arrest his principal after the bond has been forfeited is specifically granted by Chapter 903.29 . . .

ALLIED FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. STATE, 415 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 903.29, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. STATE, 135 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . Appellant contends that its rights are governed by Section 903.29(1), Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., . . . The state contends, and we agree, that Section 903.29(1), Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., has no application . . .

HUIE, v. STATE, 92 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1957)

. . . September 14, 1955, Huie, through his attorneys, moved for a remission of the forfeiture under Sections 903.29 . . . principal or his surety may within twenty-five days move for a remission of the forfeiture under Sections 903.29 . . .

CAPITOL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. STATE, 86 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1956)

. . . Also pertinent to the problem here presented are the provisions of Sections 903.29 and 903.30, ibid., . . . Constitution, • F.S.A., and that the provisions for a remission of the forfeiture made by Sections 903.29 . . . where, as here, provision for the remission of the forfeiture is expressly made by the statute, Section 903.29 . . .