The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 2
COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 2.04

2.04 Repealed statute not revived by implication.—No statute of this state which has been repealed shall ever be revived by implication; that is to say, if a statute be passed repealing a former statute, and a third statute be passed repealing the second, the repeal of the second statute shall in no case be construed to revive the first, unless there be express words in the said third statute for this purpose.

History.—Nov. 2, 1829; RS 62; GS 62; RGS 74; CGL 90.

F.S. 2.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 2.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 2.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 2.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 2.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

REHAIF, v. UNITED STATES, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (U.S. 2019)

. . . . ; see also Model Penal Code § 2.04, at 27 (a mistake of law is a defense if the mistake negates the . . .

MEARS GROUP, INC. v. KIAWAH ISLAND UTILITY, INC., 372 F. Supp. 3d 363 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . Article 2.04 explains that "Contractor shall start to perform the Work on the date when the Contract . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 361 F. Supp. 3d 203 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . . ¶ 15; Second Amended Plan Supplement at Exhibit A, § 2.04(b).) . . .

MURPHY OIL CORPORATION, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 791 (W.D. Ark. 2019)

. . . warranty; ... or (iii) any Retained Liability," see Doc. 30-2, p. 85, § 13.02(a); see also id. at p. 30, § 2.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARROYO,, 356 F. Supp. 3d 619 (W.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . , were officers of the INS, see Stephen Yale-Loehr & Ronald Wada, 1 Immigration Law and Procedure § 2.04 . . . Yale-Loehr & Wada, 1 Immigration Law and Procedure § 2.04 (2018). . . .

FORMULATRIX, INC. v. RIGAKU AUTOMATION, INC., 344 F. Supp. 3d 410 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . (See PEx. 1 Arts. 1.01, 1.02, 2.01, 2.04, 3.01). . . . of Formulatrix's case is the CSA's records transfer provision, which provides in relevant part: Art. 2.04 . . . (PEx. 1 Art. 2.04). . . . Formulatrix claims that Rigaku breached its contractual obligations under Art. 2.04 by failing to complete . . . (PEx. 1 Art. 2.04). . . .

UNITED STATES v. COX, v., 906 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . Model Penal Code § 2.04(3) (Am. Law Inst. 2017) (emphasis added). . . . Id. § 2.04 Explanatory Note. . . . Model Penal Code § 2.04(3)(b)(i). . . . See Model Penal Code § 2.04(3) Introductory Note. . . . Id. § 2.04(3)(b) (emphases added). . . .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION, v. ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED, USA M., 344 F. Supp. 3d 724 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . See SPA § 2.04. . . . See id. § 2.04(i). . . . Id. § 2.04(f). . . . See SPA § 2.04(b). . . . See SPA § 2.04. . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . §§ 1.08, 2.04(b)-(d).) . . . (Id. § 2.04(f).) . . . Opp'n 56.1 ¶ 69), violated Section 2.04(c) of the Use Agreement when it launched a marketing campaign . . . Specifically, the City contends that statements made on TOGI's behalf violated Section 2.04(c) of the . . . And to the extent TOGI does seek to rely on Section 2.04(f), its claim plainly fails. . . .

SNEED, v. BEARD,, 328 F. Supp. 3d 412 (E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . Standard Jury Instructions § 2.04). N.T. 3/13/85, at 40. Sneed-3 , 45 A.3d at 1111. Id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. GUTIERREZ,, 347 F. Supp. 3d 720 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . bail, see VII Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures: Appointment of Counsel in Criminal Cases ¶ 2.04 . . . bail, see VII Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures: Appointment of Counsel in Criminal Cases ¶ 2.04 . . .

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, U. S. NGN W. v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA NCUA, 898 F.3d 243 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Trust Agreement at 4, § 2.04. Id. at 1, para. 1. Id. at 8, § 3.01. . . .

GARNETT, v. REMEDI SENIORCARE OF VIRGINIA, LLC,, 892 F.3d 140 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency Law § 2.04. . . .

IN RE EP LIQUIDATION, LLC, A. Jr. EP LLC, v. P. A., 583 B.R. 304 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . Furthermore, Section 2.04 of the APA defined "Excluded Liabilities" as "any Liabilities of Seller arising . . . APA, § 2.04(a). APA, § 2.05. APA, § 6.12. APA, § 9.01. APA, §§ 6.12 and 9.12(b). APA, § 6.12. . . .

UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, L. L. C., 875 F.3d 170 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . See Restatement (Third) op Agency § 2.04 cmt. b (2006) (noting that the doctrine of respondeat superior . . . Id. § 2.04. . . .

IN RE ENGLE CASES, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . Rule 2.04(d), Local Rules, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 576 B.R. 325 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . JX-13 at 23 (USA § 2.02(e) (Delta II will keep its interest free of encumbrances); id. at 25 (USA § 2.04 . . .

USOV, v. MARC LAZAR, INC., 263 F. Supp. 3d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . December 2007 list the total weight as 5.10 carats, see PL’s Exs. 12-13, which refer to three diamonds: a 2.04 . . .

AUDIO MPEG, INC. S. p. A. v. DELL INC., 272 F. Supp. 3d 813 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . software or product that decodes or receives the encoded or broadcast information,” License Agreement § 2.04 . . . any other software or product that decodes or receives the encoded or broadcast information,” id. § 2.04 . . . License Agreement § 2.04. . . . Id. § 2.04. . . .

DOE, v. MEDEIROS, 266 F. Supp. 3d 479 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Assocs., 438 Mass. 317, 319-20, 780 N.E.2d 447 (2002); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 (Am. . . .

IN RE SUNEDISON, INC., 572 B.R. 482 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . (PSA at § 2.04(a) & (b).) . . . (PSA at § 2.04(g) (emphasis added).) . . . Event under the PSA, and the Accelerated Earnout Payment became due from the “Buyers” pursuant to § 2.04 . . . addition, it amended its original complaint in the State Court Action to assert that TERP breached §§ 2.04 . . . All Documents and Communications regarding any parties’ rights and obligations under Section 2.04 and . . .

UNITED STATES v. DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 253 F. Supp. 3d 89 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Boese, Civil False Claims & Qui Tam Actions § 2.04 (4th ed. updated 2017); see, e.g., United States v . . .

BENIHANA OF TOKYO, LLC, v. ANGELO, GORDON CO. L. P., 259 F. Supp. 3d 16 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . . § 2.04. . . .

WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. H. F. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 130 Fed. Cl. 653 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . willing buyer’s market share in New York would increase from 0.55% to 1.26% after five years, and to 2.04% . . .

PETEDGE, INC. v. GARG,, 234 F. Supp. 3d 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Section 2.05 that there were no representations other than those contained in Sections 2.01 through 2.04 . . . Here, as in our analysis of § 29(a) of the Exchange Act, a less detailed Section 2.04 might lead to a . . . But the exhaustive nature of the Section 2.04 representations adds to the specificity of Section 2.05⅛ . . .

IN RE MIGHELL, s, 564 B.R. 34 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . See Uniform Model, Penai, Code § 2.04 (3)(b) (mistake of law defense permitted when one “acts in reasonable . . .

E. EMERY, v. ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION,, 227 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (S.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . Section 2.04 (B) of the Policy Manual states the “APA will maintain and support a website and an electronic . . . Ex. ¾ § 2, subsec. 2.04(B). 12. APA’s website contains over 300,000 pages. . . .

DIAL CORPORATION, v. NEWS CORPORATION,, 317 F.R.D. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Jenkens & Gilchrist, 230 F.R.D. 317, 352-54 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (reducing multiplier from 2.04 to 1.5 on . . .

IN RE ESCARCEGA, In In In In, 557 B.R. 755 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . For example, Candalla left Sections 2.04, 2.06, and 2.07 blank, or stated none, but he only seeks to . . .

VASQUEZ, v. EMPRESS AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC., 835 F.3d 267 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04. . . .

COHEN, v. J. TRUMP,, 200 F. Supp. 3d 1063 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . See, e.g., Paul Batista, Civil RICO Practice Manual, § 2.04. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 828 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . per prisoner per day, the mainline option costs $1.89 per prisoner per day, the vegan option costs $2.04 . . .

G. STACY, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 654 F. App'x 1005 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . First, Stacy waived any argument that his vision loss was a severe impairment under Listing 2.04(A) by . . .

DISCOUNT SLEEP OF OCALA, LLC, v. CITY OF OCALA,, 200 So. 3d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 2.04, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

IN RE ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., 552 B.R. 314 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . Sections 2.02 and 2.04 of the APA provide that the Stalking Horse Bidder shall not be required to assume . . .

UNITED ENERGY TRADING, LLC, v. PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC CO., 177 F. Supp. 3d 1183 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 (2006). . . .

IN RE HUYNH, v., 549 B.R. 421 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . F, Retailer Rules and Regulations ¶ 2.04(D) ]. . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. C. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . The excerpt consisted of pages 541-556 (16 pages), which was 2.04% of the 784-page work [Defs. . . . As is relevant to factor three, Professor Moloney uploaded 2.04% (16 pages) of the Handbook of Mixed . . .

B. HIME, v. A. McDONALD,, 28 Vet. App. 1 (Vet. App. 2016)

. . . Id. para. 2.04(c)(1). . . . Id. para. 2.04(c)(2). . . .

W. CHARRON, Jr. W. Jr. v. SALLYPORT GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC. JPD GPD AKA P. De-, 640 F. App'x 80 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . .- For ease of reference, we reproduce the full text of the Windfall Provision here: 2.04 Windfall Protection . . . additional payment to [Charron], on the basis and subject to the limitations provided in this Section 2.04 . . .

BLACKROCK CORE BOND PORTFOLIO, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 165 F. Supp. 3d 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . J § 2.04 ("In the event of discovery of a breach of any representation, warranty or covenant of the Seller . . .

IN RE LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, S. LB v., 544 B.R. 75 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . . § 2.04 (Repayments); § 2.06 (Repayment of Loans on the Maturity Date). . . . .

IN RE RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, v., 552 B.R. 50 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . the Reeds entered into an agreement with Scott and Traci Jacobs to sell the house to the Jacobs for $2.04 . . . As discussed above, the Reeds had reached an agreement to sell the Property to the Jacobs for $2.04 million . . .

IN RE MORTGAGE FUND LLC, L. v. L., 541 B.R. 467 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . interest, (c) sales of assets, and (d) advances by Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (‘Wells Fargo”). 2.04 . . . by REL” The Trustee argues that the Settlement Agreement defines a narrow category of claims in §§ 2.04 . . . period described in the Proof of Claim (i.e., December 2007-February 2009), and in the time period in § 2.04 . . . the Settlement Agreement says the $66 million was transferred from “December 2007 through 2008” and § 2.04 . . .

GOODMAN, v. CRITTENDEN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC. K. III W. Co. R. Jr G. Jr W. F. B. C. M. L. P. L. S. R. Le, 143 F. Supp. 3d 795 (E.D. Ark. 2015)

. . . Restatement (Timm) of Agency § 2.04 (2006). . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 (2006). . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 cmt. b. . . .

ZWEIMAN, v. AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 146 F. Supp. 3d 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Section 2.04 of Plaintiffs Contract provided, in part, that AXA had the right, “subject to compliance . . . Section 2.04 further provided that “[i]f the exercise of these rights results in a material change in . . . If an effort to save her Complaint, Plaintiff urges that I view portions of Section 2.04 of the Contract . . . Section'2.04 states that AXA'has the right to make changes to the Separate Accounts “subject to compliance . . . And Section 2.04 goes on to state that “[i]f the exercise of these rights results in a material change . . .

CONTRERAS, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v., 135 F. Supp. 3d 1208 (D. Nev. 2015)

. . . . § 2.04. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KALU,, 791 F.3d 1194 (10th Cir. 2015)

. . . See Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions 2.03, 2.04. Mr. . . . Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 2.03; see also Tenth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 2.04 (requiring . . .

STARR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 121 Fed. Cl. 428 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . The trustees were concerned with Section 2.04(d) of the Trust Agreement which set forth two potentially . . . The Government never removed Section 2.04(d) from the Trust Agreement, but did specify the two goals . . .

IN RE J. WOOD, Jr. S. M. Yu v. J. Jr. S., 530 B.R. 836 (Bankr. D. Haw. 2015)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04. . Haw. Rev. . . .

IN RE NORTEL NETWORKS, INC., 532 B.R. 494 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . TR21508 (Rockstar License Termination Agreement) Arts. 2.01-2.04; TR43794 (IFSA) § 11(a). . . . .

FIBERLIGHT, LLC, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., 81 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . Compl., ECF No. 16-1, §§ 2.01, 2.04, 2.05 (noting that as of the closing date and upon payment of consideration . . . {See Purchase Agreement §§ 2.04, 2.05.) . . .

R. FANNING, v. BELL,, 82 F. Supp. 3d 60 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . See Plan of Benefits, Appx. 73, § 2.04 (“The Board shall have the responsibility and discretionary authority . . .

M. McDONOUGH, v. TOYS R US, INC. d b a R US, v. R US, d b a R US,, 80 F. Supp. 3d 626 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . As discussed above, I have previously approved a positive multiplier of 2.04, in which counsel received . . .

BRASETH TRUCKING, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 124 Fed. Cl. 498 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . Option 2 1 to 100 miles $3.00 $3.03 $3.08 101 to 300 miles $2.77 $2.80 $2.85 301 + miles $2.00 $7.77 $2.04 . . .

A. SCOTT, v. BANK OF AMERICA LLC SPV I, LLC, 580 F. App'x 56 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 2.04(d)(ii)-(iii)). . . .

In CLEMENTS MANUFACTURING LIQUIDATION COMPANY, LLC LLC LLC LLC, L. III, v. THB LLC, LLC, LLC, a LLC, a S. R. L. a v. a Co. a a A THB LLC, A v. Co. LLC, f k a LLC, a L. III,, 521 B.R. 231 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2014)

. . . No. 10-6123 at ¶¶ 2.01, 2.02, 2.04. .Id. at ¶¶ 1.01 (defining "THBA APA"), 3.01. . . . . No. 10-6123 at ¶¶ 2.01, 2.02, 2.04. . Ex. 10a of Docket #110 in Adv. . . . No. 10-6123 at ¶¶ 2.01, 2.02, 2.04. . Ex. 10c of Docket # 110 in Adv. . . . See Sakoma APA at 3, ¶¶ 2.02, 2.04(a). . Sakoma APA (Ex. 10b of Docket # 110 in Adv. . . .

IN RE RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC,, 517 B.R. 462 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . entered into an Agreement of Sale (the “Jacobs Sale Contract”) with the Jacobs to sell the Property for $2.04 . . . The second appraiser arrived at a value of $2.04 million. (See Sept. 15, 2014 Tr. 50:18-19.) . . .

ZINO, Jr. v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,, 47 F. Supp. 3d 561 (N.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . Dismemberment Insurance” (outlined in § 2.03); “Group Sickness and Accident Insurance” (outlined in § 2.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. KOSS,, 769 F.3d 558 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . including the portion to which Koss objects, was taken from Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 2.04 . . .

IN RE DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. CHEESE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 60 F. Supp. 3d 914 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . On May 5, 2004, Schreiber purchased 2 loads of barrels at a price $2.04. . . .

In OTERO COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. LLC,, 514 B.R. 315 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2014)

. . . someone while in the course and scope of their employment”) (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 . . .

WESTERN HOME TRANSPORT, INC. v. HEXCO, LLC d b a HC, 28 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D.N.D. 2014)

. . . purpose is to regulate those bills of lading that are negotiable instruments. 1-2 Goods in Transit § 2.04 . . .

GOLDEN STAR, INC. k k On v. MASS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 22 F. Supp. 3d 72 (D. Mass. 2014)

. . . Ex. 23, at 28 (§ 2.04(c)(xi)). . . .

JOHNSON v. NORCROSS, 565 F. App'x 287 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Penal Code §§ 2.03 and 2.04. . . .

SHIELDS, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 746 F.3d 782 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . See, e.g., Restatement (3d) of Agency § 2.04 (2006); Kerl v. . . .

B. WOLFF A. v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f k a CWMBS, CHL MERSCORP,, 997 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minn. 2014)

. . . Section 2.04 of the PSA provides in relevant part: The Depositior hereby represents and warrants to the . . . Id., Ex. 2; Butler Decl., Ex. 4 (PSA Section 2.04). . . . Plaintiffs claimed that the language of Section 2.04 of the PSA means that BNYM, as Trustee, received . . .

VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PTY LTD, PTE LTD, a a v. LIVERNOIS VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a v. PTY LTD, PTE LTD, a a, 995 F. Supp. 2d 758 (E.D. Mich. 2014)

. . . Barkley Clark & Barbara Clark, The Law of Secured Transactions under the Uniform Commercial Code ¶ 2.04 . . .

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, v. CANNON DUNPHY, S. C. S. C. v. Of, 997 F. Supp. 2d 937 (E.D. Wis. 2014)

. . . Principle 2.04 (Scope of Preservation) (a) Every party to litigation and its counsel are responsible . . .

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. v. GATEWAY FUNDING DIVERSIFIED MORTGAGE SERVICES, L. P., 989 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . PL’s Ex. 6 at § 2.04. Pasceri based this price on the value of Arlington’s loan pipeline. . . .

E. v. E. P. E. Co- P. v., 141 T.C. 551 (T.C. 2013)

. . . Restatement, Employment 3d, Tentative Draft No. 2, sec. 2.04 (2009). . . .

In DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF HYDE PARK, INC. A. v. f k a LLC,, 507 B.R. 558 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . . ¶¶ 2.03, 2.04) 57. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAKER,, 539 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2013)

. . . Adding the 2.04 kilograms of crack James Vick said he sold to Baker to the government’s current estimate . . .

DONGGUAN SUNRISE FURNITURE CO. LTD. Co. Co. Co. Co. COE Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 931 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . Commerce’s reasoning Commerce could select a CONNUM-specific margin for armoires of 336.72%, 189.33%, 2.04% . . .

CEMENT CONCRETE WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION FUND, v. HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY,, 964 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.04 (2006); Hollinger v. . . .

In BATAA KIERLAND LLC, JPMCC CIBC LLC, v. LLC,, 496 B.R. 183 (D. Ariz. 2013)

. . . Debtor points to the Loan Agreement, which provides: 2.04 Use of Funds Borrower hereby warrants, represents . . .

KISSICK, v. HUEBSCH,, 956 F. Supp. 2d 981 (W.D. Wis. 2013)

. . . (Id., at § 2.04(1).) . . . (Id. at § 2.04(2).) . . .

WALDING, v. UNITED STATES, 955 F. Supp. 2d 759 (W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . Further, she wrote, “In accordance with Departmental Grants Policy Directive (GPD) 2.04, urgent and unsolicited . . .

v., 140 T.C. 410 (T.C. 2013)

. . . Proc. 2004-40, sec. 2.04(1), 2004-2 C.B. at 51. . . . Proc. 2004-40, sec. 2.04(1). . . . Proc. 2006-9, secs. 2.01, 2.04, 10.02, 2006-1 C.B. at 279, 289. . . .

HIGHER TASTE, INC. a v. CITY OF TACOMA, a a C., 717 F.3d 712 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . Kirklin, Section 1983 Litigation: Statutory Attorney’s Fees § 2.04, at 2-33 to 2-46.1 (4th ed. 2003 & . . .

FELIX, v. NORTHSTAR LOCATION SERVICES, LLC, a Jo v. LLC, a, 290 F.R.D. 397 (W.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Consent Motion [42-1], § 2.04. I disagree. . . .

CIMC RAFFLES OFFSHORE SINGAPORE LIMITED, CIMC v. SCHAHIN HOLDING S. A. S. A. LLC, LLC, LLC,, 942 F. Supp. 2d 425 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . . § 2.04(a)-(c). . . .

UNITED STATES FOLLIARD, v. GOVPLACE,, 930 F. Supp. 2d 123 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . False Claims & Qui Tam Actions § 2.04(c)(1) (2d ed. 2000) (“To avoid summary judgment for the defendant . . .

BARCLAYS BANK PLC, v. A. POYNTER, LLC LLC N. A. LLC NA, 710 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . mortgage, which dictates that other liens cannot be placed on the vessel, specifically references Section 2.04 . . .

HUMANE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, O v. BRYSON, NOAA v., 924 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (D. Or. 2013)

. . . In 2011 the predation rate dropped to 1.6%, bringing the 3-year running average to 2.04%, which again . . .

ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORP. f k a v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB ABS, LLC,, 920 F. Supp. 2d 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Ex. 198 § 2.04(a). . . . Ex. 198 § 2.04(b). . . . Ex. 198 § 2.04(c). . . . Id. § 2.04(d). . . . Ex. 198 § 2.04(e). . . .

W. RATHBUN, v. INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES FSB, 916 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (D. Mont. 2013)

. . . (Doc. 18-4 at 21, § 2.04(i).) . . . (Doc. 18-3 at 23, § 4.02(b); Doc 18-4 at 22 § 2.04(m)-(n).) B. . . . Similarly, section 2.04 of the Servicing Purchase Agreement, entitled “Excluded Liabilities” provides . . . (Doc. 18-3 at 23, § 4.02(b); Doc 18-4 at 22 § 2.04(m)-(n).) . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. CCC ATLANTIC, LLC,, 905 F. Supp. 2d 604 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . Section 2.04(f) of the Loan Agreement provides that “[following and during the continuance of an Event . . .

In DOUGLAS ASPHALT COMPANY, v. E. Jr. E. P. C. J. LLC n k a LP, Co. ASC USA, CDW N S, Co. LLC, LLC Co. P C LLC, LLC d b a At S. A. F. E. LLC, Co. LLC, T M LLC, LLC, E. P. C. v., 483 B.R. 560 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . Amended Motion”) on September 10, 2012, and argued that the value of their lien should be increased to $2.04 . . . Thus, insisting that $2.04 million reflects the proper percentage of the $6 million, Attorneys claim . . . a Charging Lien in the amount of $2.04 million for their work in producing the Second Settlement. . . . By adding those numbers together, they come up with $2.04 million. . . . .

STARR INTERNATIONAL CO. v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK,, 906 F. Supp. 2d 202 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . from exercising their independent judgment with respect to any action to be taken under this Section 2.04 . . . Finally, Starr cites § 2.04(c) of the Trust Agreement. . . .

ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORP. f k a v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB ABS, LLC,, 892 F. Supp. 2d 596 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . N (“SSA”) §§ 2.04(a), 8.06. . . . See id. § 2.04(b). . . . the interest of the Issuer, the Noteholders or the Note Insurer in the related Mortgage Loan,” SSA § 2.04 . . . the cure or repurchase period ends 90 days after defendants learned of the loan breaches, see SSA § 2.04 . . .

In R. BROWN, B. v. R. L. L. C., 479 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2012)

. . . Barkley and Barbara Clark, 1 The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code, ¶ 2.04 . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 2.04 Transfer of Assets. Pursuant to the Plan, U.S. . . .

L. SOLIS, v. J. KORESKO, V,, 884 F. Supp. 2d 261 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . See Plan Document §§ 2.01, 2.03, 2.04, 9.02 (GX 14). . . .

STAGI v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION,, 880 F. Supp. 2d 564 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . I have previously approved a positive multiplier of 2.04, in which counsel received twice what they would . . .

FREISHTAT, v. LIVEPERSON, INC., 871 F. Supp. 2d 293 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . (PX-30 at § 2.04(a), (b); SF 6.) 19. . . . (PX-30 at §§ 1.01, 2.04(b).) 20. . . . (PX-30 at § 2.04(b)(iii).) V. Earn-Out Notice 22. . . . (Tr. 980-81; PX-30 at §§ 1.01, 2.04(b)(1).) D. . . . (PX-30 at § 2.04(b)(i)(II).) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. . . .

R. SELLERS, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 25 Vet. App. 265 (Vet. App. 2012)

. . . VI, ch. 3, para. 2.04(c), the June 2004 RO decision itself contains two signatures from rating specialists . . .

SYNCORA GUARANTEE INC. f k a XL v. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 874 F. Supp. 2d 328 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . default is not reasonably foreseeable, no repurchase or substitution pursuant to Sections 2.02, 2.03, or 2.04 . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . Professor Moloney requested that pages 541-556, or one full chapter totaling 2.04% of the book, be posted . . .

A. BERGERSON, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH,, 853 F. Supp. 2d 238 (N.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Accounting for a 2.04% pre-judgment interest, compounded annually from January 31, 2006, until this date . . . Therefore, pre-judgment interest will be calculated using the average of these figures, or 2.04%. . . . .