The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.03

7.03 Bay County.—The boundary lines of Bay County are as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of section eighteen in township two, north, range eleven, west; thence west on the section line to the southwest corner of section eighteen in township two, north, range twelve, west; thence south on the range line dividing ranges twelve and thirteen, west, to the Meridian base line; thence west on the base line to the thread of Pine Log Creek in range sixteen, west; thence southwesterly along the thread of said creek into the Choctawhatchee River to the thread of said river; thence southwesterly along the thread of said river to a point where said river intersects the range line dividing ranges seventeen and eighteen, west; thence south on said range line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence in a southeastwardly direction following the meanderings of said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, including all islands opposite the shoreline to a point where range line dividing ranges eleven and twelve, west, intersects with said gulf; thence north on said range line to place of beginning.

History.—ss. 1, chs. 6505, 6506, 6508, 1913; RGS 15; CGL 17.

F.S. 7.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GASTON, v. GHOSH,, 920 F.3d 493 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . be liable for fraud or defamation by sales representative); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 . . .

J. RANDLE, v. CROSBY TUGS, L. L. C., 911 F.3d 280 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Id. at § 7.03 cmt. b (emphasis added). . . .

FRANKFURT- TRUST INVESTMENT LUXEMBURG AG, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 336 F. Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (Id. ) Following the announcement, UTC's stock traded down 7.03%. (Id. ¶ 196.) . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . §§ 7.01-7.03, 10.02.) . . .

BERRY PLASTICS CORPORATION, n k a v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 903 F.3d 630 (7th Cir. 2018)

. . . Newman, HANDBOOK ON INSURANCE COVERAGE DISPUTES , § 7.03[b][2][D] (2011) ("[T]he most sensible reading . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ, v., 905 F.3d 165 (3rd Cir. 2018)

. . . See Third Circuit's Model Criminal Jury Instruction § 7.03 "Responsibility For Substantive Offenses Committed . . .

NAVAJO NATION v. J. DALLEY,, 896 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . ."); accord COHEN'S HANDBOOK , supra , § 7.03[1][a][ii], at 608. . . .

GLOBAL MARINE EXPLORATION, INC. v. UNIDENTIFIED, WRECKED AND FOR FINDERS- RIGHT PURPOSES ABANDONED SAILING VESSEL,, 348 F. Supp. 3d 1221 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . GME then complied with the publication requirement of Local Admiralty Rule 7.03(d)(1). . . .

IN RE M. STRINGER,, 586 B.R. 435 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2018)

. . . See RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF AGENCY §§ 1.01, 7.03 (2008). . . .

UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UINTAH v. G. LAWRENCE, D., 312 F. Supp. 3d 1219 (D. Utah 2018)

. . . Mot. 18, ECF No. 54 (citing COHEN'S HANDBOOK OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW § 7.03(1)(a)(ii), p. 608 (2012 ed. . . . s Emergency Mot. 18, ECF No. 54, citing COHEN'S HANDBOOK OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW § 7.03(1)(a)(ii), p. 608 . . .

NORKIN, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, a, 311 F. Supp. 3d 1299 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . Local R. 7.03(c)(2) as it is longer than 20 pages without leave of Court. . . .

BETHPAGE WATER DISTRICT, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION,, 884 F.3d 118 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . The District detected combined radium-226 and radium-228 in Well-1 at 5.55 pCi/L in May 2006, and at 7.03 . . . following times: February 2006 5.69 pCi/L in Well 4-2 May 2006 5.55 pCi/L in Well 4-1 September 2010 7.03 . . .

CRESCOM BANK, v. L. TERRY LLC, n k a CCT LLC LLC CCT LLC,, 269 F. Supp. 3d 708 (D.S.C. 2017)

. . . Under Local Civil Rule 7.03— a rule the Court cited in its July 6 order— motions should be filed “immediately . . . Rule 7.03 (D.S.C.). . . . motion nearly a month later—and after the order’s deadlines expired—was in no way consistent with Rule 7.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DISH NETWORK LLC,, 256 F. Supp. 3d 810 (C.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . . § 2315.21(C)(1); Restatement (Third) of Agency, § 7.03 comment ,e (2006) (citing with approval Restatement . . . Restatement (Third) of -Agency § 7.03 comment e states that with respect to a statute that authorizes . . . See Id.; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 comment e, (The applicability .of the punitive damages . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 comment e (liability for statutory penalty first depends on . . .

MAINE, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 854 F.3d 9 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . Applying the two-step methodology in this case, FERC created a new zone of reasonableness of 7.03 percent . . . In this case, the zone of reasonableness was 7.03 percent to 11.74 percent. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARDENA,, 842 F.3d 959 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . The instruction, based on Seventh Circuit Pattern Instruction § 7.03, provided; You should make every . . .

ABRASIVES- SOUTH, INC. v. AWUKO ABRASIVES WANDMACHER GMBH CO. KG,, 225 F. Supp. 3d 568 (D.S.C. 2016)

. . . Plaintiff’s motion cites Local Rule 7.03, but quotes Local Rule 7.04. . . . Local Rule 7.03 pertains to the Court’s expectation that counsel will “file motions immediately after . . .

UNITED STATES v. Le KOSS,, 831 F.3d 259 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . coconspirators in California, and 45.36 kilograms of marihuana from coconspirator Brian Smith, as well as 7.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. RIDLEY,, 826 F.3d 437 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . See Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit 7.03 (2012); Federal Civil Jury Instructions . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. WILLIAMS,, 819 F.3d 1026 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . , that there can be a unanimous verdict,” Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit 7.03 . . .

IN RE KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 166 F. Supp. 3d 822 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . The price of a share of Key common stock dropped 16% to $1.34 per share to close at $7.03 on July 18, . . .

Dr. C. S. LIN, v. UNITED STATES, 177 F. Supp. 3d 242 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Opp’n to USA’s Mot. at 36 (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency (2006) § 7.03(1)). . . .

SCHWARTZ, a f k a BSD f k a BSD v. PERSEON CORPORATION f k a BSD C. W. P. G. E. R. S. P. Jr. E. Jr., 175 F. Supp. 3d 390 (D. Del. 2016)

. . . (D.I. 1 ¶ 27) In particular, the price per share dropped from $7.03 in November 2010 to $0.99 in June . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SMITH,, 818 F.3d 299 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . It read aloud the so-called Silvern instruction, set forth in Section 7.03 of the Pattern Criminal Jury . . .

UNITED STATES v. Le KOSS,, 812 F.3d 460 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . This amount included 7.03 grams of a “brown chunky substance” and 5.42 kilograms of “marijuana butter . . . erred when it used the 1:167 gram ratio in reference to the 5.42 kilograms of marijuana butter and the 7.03 . . . contained detectable amounts of THC and that each substance had a net weight of 5.42 kilograms and 7.03 . . . converted the 5.42 kilograms of marijuana butter to 905.14 kilograms of marijuana equivalent and the 7.03 . . . fact contain detectable amounts of THC and that each substance had a net weight of 5.42 kilograms and 7.03 . . .

F. SIKORA, v. UPMC, a a k a UPMC, 153 F. Supp. 3d 820 (W.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . . §§ 2.01, 7.03. The Plan is operated and administered by the Plan Committee (“Committee”). . . .

ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. DNA v. SEQUENOM, INC. LLC,, 809 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents, § 7.03 at 7-15 (2015) ("An enabling disclosure is all that is required [for . . .

SPRINGFIELD PARCEL C, LLC, v. UNITED STATES, LLC,, 124 Fed. Cl. 163 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . Section 7.03 of the lease, titled “free rent and free space,” said: The Lessor shall provide up to 24,207 . . . AR 60-5084 (Executed Lease Section 7.03). . . .

GREEN, v. H. COSBY, Jr., 138 F. Supp. 3d 114 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 7.03, 7.07 (2006); see also Rivera v. Nat’l R.R. . . . Re statement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 cmt. b; see id. . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03; see also HBSC Ins. Ltd. v. . . .

MARYA v. WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., 131 F. Supp. 3d 975 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . See 2-7 Nimmer § 7.03 (“[A] public distribution of copies or phonorecords will not trigger the legal . . .

LNV CORP. v. HARRISON FAMILY BUSINESS, LLC,, 132 F. Supp. 3d 683 (D. Md. 2015)

. . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Terra Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7-8, Deed of Trust for HFB . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . .

A. PEARCE, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. a LLC, a, 116 F. Supp. 3d 948 (D. Neb. 2015)

. . . . • See, e.g., Rest 3d Agency §§ 7.03-7.08. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HANSEN,, 791 F.3d 863 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . See Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions (Criminal) 7.03 (2014). . . . See Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions (Criminal) 7.03 (2014). . . . .1995) (citing Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit 7.03 . . .

CANON INC. U. S. A. v. TESSERON LTD. L. L. C. P., 115 F. Supp. 3d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Section 7.03 provides in pertinent part that Tesseron shall have the right to immediately terminate this . . . Citing Section 7.03(c) of the Agreement, Tesseron explained that “[t]hrough its ownership and control . . . Plaintiffs argue that Section 7.03(c) of the Agreement is unenforceable as a matter of law because it . . . The principles enunciated in Lear render Section 7.03(c) unenforceable. . . . First, they emphasize that Section 7.03(c) reserves the right to terminate to Tesseron, and does not . . .

PE A, v. GREFFET, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1103 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . The closest analogue to the Second Restatement’s, § 219 is the Third Restatement’s § 7.03, which serves . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (2006). . . .

IN RE EMPRESAS OMAJEDE INC., 537 B.R. 63 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2015)

. . . Section 7.03 Notice is not Necessary. . . . Sección 7.03 Notificación no es Necesaria. . . .

In CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION, 104 F. Supp. 3d 599 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Citigroup Plan § 7.03; Citibuilder Plan § 7.03. . . .

D. THOMAS, v. CLINTON, PC, B. II,, 607 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 10A-5-7.03(b). . . . preserve the company business or property as a going concern for a reasonable time. ” See Ala.Code § 10A-5-7.03 . . . in a case like this one, the district court discussed expressly only the language in section 10A-5-7.03 . . . inapplicable because winding-up procedures specific to LLCs were "otherwise provided " by section 10A-5-7.03 . . .

MEDCALF, v. THOMPSON HINE LLP,, 84 F. Supp. 3d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . . § 7.03(2)(a)(b). . . .

P. MUSGROVE, v. BROOKINGS INSTITUTION,, 78 F. Supp. 3d 496 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . # 9-1] § 7.03(C)(1), PLAN_0043. . . .

In SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW CORNING TRUST. s v., 592 F. App'x 473 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 7.03(a). . . . SFA § 7.03(a). . . . Id. §§ 7.01(c)(iv), 7.03(a). . . . SFA §§ 7.01(c)(iv), 7.03(a). . . . Id. § 7.03(b). . . .

In SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW CORNING TRUST. s v., 592 F. App'x 473 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 7.03(a). . . . SFA § 7.03(a). . . . Id. §§ 7.01(c)(iv), 7.03(a). . . . SFA §§ 7.01(c)(iv), 7.03(a). . . . Id. § 7.03(b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. WILLIAMS,, 81 F. Supp. 3d 693 (E.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . One gave her negative answer; (2) not declaring a mistrial or giving Seventh Circuit Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . Seventh Circuit Jury Instruction 7.03: “Unanimity/Disagreement Among Jurors,” also known as a Silvern . . .

J. ROOD, v. NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND, 39 F. Supp. 3d 241 (N.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Plan § 7.03(a); Defs. SMF ¶ 7; Resp. to Defs. SMF ¶ 7. . . . Plan § 7.03(b); Defs. SMF ¶ 9; Resp. to Defs. SMF ¶ 9. . . . Plan § 7.03(c); Defs. SMF ¶ 11; Resp. to Defs. SMF ¶ 11. . . . Plan § 7.03(i); Defs. SMF ¶¶ 12-13; Resp. to Defs. SMF ¶¶ 12-13. . . . Plan § 7.03(i) (emphasis added). . . .

MERIT CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE v. CITY OF QUINCY,, 759 F.3d 122 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . Code Regs. 7.03(8)(b); the location of the program’s apprentice activities, see id. 7.03(8)(e); training . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . § 1981. 7.03 Defendants] discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of Plaintiffs race (black), and . . .

In CHERWENKA, Ga LLC L. v., 508 B.R. 228 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2014)

. . . Id. at 7.01, 7.03. . . .

CHEVRON CORPORATION, v. DONZIGER,, 974 F. Supp. 2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . .); Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 7.03(l)(a), 7.04 (principal liable for torts of agent committed . . . with actual authority or ratified by principal), 7.03(2)(b), 7.08 (principal liable for torts of agent . . .

KOLBE KOLBE MILLWORK, CO. INC. LLP, LLP, v. MANSON INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. St. R. ABC XYZ, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (W.D. Wis. 2013)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 cmt. e ("The approach outlined in § 909 [the complicity rule . . .

COMBAT VETERANS FOR CONGRESS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,, 983 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (describing principal’s responsibility for the actions of its . . .

PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA v. G. NASH, XVII, F., 972 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (D.N.M. 2013)

. . . See Cohen’s Handbook Of Federal Indian Law § 7.03[l][a][ii] at 609 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012)(“Cohen . . .

ALKANANI, v. AEGIS DEFENSE SERVICES, LLC,, 976 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (2006) (emphasis added); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency . . . § 7.03 cmt. b (2006) (confirming that “[principals, not agents, are subject to vicarious liability.”) . . .

BAKER, v. RR BRINK LOCKING SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,, 721 F.3d 716 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . R. 7.03 (“In all cases for the removal of disability of a resident minor, the minor must be produced . . .

F. MARACICH, v. SPEARS, 570 U.S. 48 (U.S. 2013)

. . . Conduct 7.02-7.03 (2013); Va. Rule Prof. Conduct 7.3 (Supp. 2012). That, indeed, was true here. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MAXWELL,, 948 F. Supp. 2d 749 (E.D. Ky. 2013)

. . . opinion testimony that was “substantially identical” to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . gave a jury instruction that tracked the language of Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . later “gave an instruction substantially identical to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . then giving an instruction substantially identical to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . Instructions) at 28 (Jury Instruction No. 23); see also Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 7.03 . . .

OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 291 F.R.D. 47 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (PSA § 12.06; Indenture § 10.11; SSA § 7.03.) . . .

In LMR, LLC d b a, 496 B.R. 410 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . best efforts to refinance the balloon payment due to AVF in the 5 th year of the Plan (dkt # 102, § 7.03 . . .

J. MALMSTEEN, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. UMG, 940 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Agreement §§ 7.01-7.03. . . . UMG has breached the Agreement by calculating royalties at the lower rates provided for under §§ 7.01-7.03 . . . UMG persuasively argues that the royalty rates set forth in §§ 7.01-7.03 apply here. . . . Applying the 8-15% royalty rate contained in §§ 7.01-7.03 to retail sales of digital downloads, rather . . . Accordingly, UMG was correct to apply the royalty rates set forth in §§ 7.01-7.03 to the sale of digital . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLAKE- SALDIVAR, 505 F. App'x 400 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . trial court gave general instructions about how to weigh evidence as well as Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . In giving Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03, the trial court said: You have heard the testimony of chemist . . . court’s failure to give an instruction on how to weigh expert testimony (e.g., Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . .

TRUSTEES OF EIGHTH DISTRICT ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, v. GIETZEN ELECTRIC, INC., 898 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Idaho 2012)

. . . B at §§ 6.02, 6.03, 7.03, 8.03, 9.01, 10.01 to Rodney James Decl. . . . C at §§ 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 7.03, 8.03 to Gill Decl. (Docket No. 22, Att. 5). . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Consumer Restitution Fund Expenses” means those expenses described in Sections 5.07, 5.08, 5.09, 5.10 and 7.03 . . . Section 7.03 Obligations of the Claims Administrator. . . .

In PERRY H. KOPLIK SONS, INC. S. H. v., 476 B.R. 746 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . 2001, pursuant to Section 2.09(c)(1) of the Revolver; (c) incurring indebtedness in breach of section 7.03 . . . They resulted from breaches of sections 4.11 (no material misstatements); 4.15 (use of proceeds); and 7.03 . . .

STOUT STREET FUNDING LLC v. JOHNSON a k a, 873 F. Supp. 2d 632 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . See, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (outlining principal's liability). . . . .

LEWIS, v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, 484 F. App'x 7 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at 85 (Plan Document, § 7.03). . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 854 F. Supp. 2d 770 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . of JDS Inc. held in the Trust Fund shall, subject to the provisions of the remainder of this Section 7.03 . . . (Ex. 501 § 7.03.) . . .

In MASSEY ENERGY CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 883 F. Supp. 2d 597 (S.D.W. Va. 2012)

. . . In 2009, 2.95 national average compared to 7.03 Massey company-wide. (CAC, ¶ 128.) . . . .

FRESNO MOTORS, LLC, a a v. MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC, a, 852 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . subject to several conditions, including approval from MBUSA and consent from the Landlord: Section 7.03 . . . (APA, at 7, sec. 7.03.) . . .

WEINBERG, BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. v. D. GOLD,, 838 F. Supp. 2d 355 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . requesting it to prosecute the action or take suitable corrective measures, unless demand is excused under § 7.03 . . . (d) Except as provided in § 7.03(b), the court should dismiss a derivative action that is commenced prior . . . to the response of the board or a committee thereof to the demand required by § 7.03(a), unless the . . . ALI, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.03, quoted in Werbowsky, 766 . . . discretion into the decision whether to excuse demand,’ ” id. at 141 (citing ALI, Principles, cmt. d to § 7.03 . . .

B. CAILLET H. v. REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 282 F.R.D. 406 (W.D. La. 2012)

. . . [Doc. 13-2, ¶ 7.03] However, defendant neglects to address the Splih-Dollar Agreement, which provides . . . Par. 7.03. . . .

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 103 Fed. Cl. 111 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . Federal Taxation of Insurance Companies ¶ 7.03, at 708 (1999) (footnote omitted). . . .

In DE LA SALLE, v. U. S. N. A., 461 B.R. 593 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011)

. . . Debtors stated in ¶ 7.03 of an attachment to the plan that they believed the entire debt secured by the . . . Bank in Class 2, but amended ¶ 7.03 to state that they did not know who was the owner of the note U.S . . .

UNITED STATES v. DODSON,, 450 F. App'x 505 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . court gave an instruction substantially identical to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . but before any questions have been posed to him.’ ” Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . then giving an instruction substantially identical to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 . . . This instruction is nearly identical to Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03. . . . Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions, 7.03 (2009). .The district court’s entry of judgment . . .

MAHNKE, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 821 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Instruction 7.03, the "Duty to Maintain Proper Lookout,” provides: When a person is using, or is about . . .

WITHCO, LLC v. REPUBLIC SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, LLC,, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (M.D. Tenn. 2011)

. . . made to secure an option at the time the Success Fee is paid pursuant to Section 7.01, and Section 7.03 . . .

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S LONDON, v. GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA, s v. s, 811 F. Supp. 2d 53 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . the current prime rate, the Court averages the prime rate from 1985 through 2011, with a result of 7.03% . . . Interest will be computed at a rate of 7.03% per annum from November 23, 1985 to the present. VI. . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC., 793 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (M.D. Ga. 2011)

. . . PX009 § 7.03(c). . . .

HANCOCK, v. M. McDERMOTT, 646 F.3d 356 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . R. 7.03(a) (requiring all documents filed with the court to be double-spaced). . . .

HANCOCK, v. M. McDERMOTT, 646 F.3d 356 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . R. 7.03(a) (requiring all documents filed with the court to be double-spaced). . . .

BAKER, v. SOCIALIST PEOPLE S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRYA, v. s, 775 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . the current prime rate, the Court averages the prime rate from 1985 through 2011, with a result of 7.03% . . . plaintiffs prejudgment interest on their damages for solatium and pain and suffering, computed at a rate of 7.03% . . .

SHOWERS v. BEARD,, 635 F.3d 625 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . SSJI (Crim), § 7.03 (2005) (“The speeches of counsel are not part of the evidence, and you should not . . .

SURPRENANT, v. MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY,, 768 F. Supp. 2d 312 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . See 730 C.M.R. 7.03(9); Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6(C), § 13(b). . . .

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A. v. KB HOME, 740 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Nev. 2010)

. . . release $1 million from the Cash Collateral Account in which Focus deposited funds pursuant to Section 7.03 . . . Section 7.03(b)(iii) of the Credit Agreement provides that when a Builder “takes down” a pod of property . . . , that funds deposited in a Cash Collateral Account by or on behalf of a Member pursuant to Section 7.03 . . .

In PROJECT ORANGE ASSOCIATES, LLC,, 432 B.R. 89 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . DeJoseph reasoned that Syracuse’s “responsive letter of January 16, 2009, initially advised that Section 7.03 . . .

CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a AURORA WATER, d b a a v. PS SYSTEMS, INC. a RAR LLC, a, 720 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (D. Colo. 2010)

. . . Part E (LPB) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the unit price adjustments described in 7.03 . . .

In LAS VEGAS MONORAIL COMPANY,, 429 B.R. 317 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2010)

. . . Indenture, § 7.03(2) (after a default, Trustee directed to pay first expenses necessary to protect the . . .

In LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION MD LAK In S. Jr. v., 706 F. Supp. 2d 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . See Restatement of Agency 3d § 7.03 (2006). . . .

COPAR PUMICE CO. INC. v. TIDWELL, J., 603 F.3d 780 (10th Cir. 2010)

. . . mineral materials occurs “by contract let through competitive bidding.” 1-7 American Law of Mining § 7.03 . . .

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,, 697 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . Section 7.03 of the TRA states in relevant part: MBTA shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless CONRAIL . . . The MBTA admits that MBCR is an “operating contractor” as that term is used in Section 7.03. (Def. . . . Section 7.03 provides that the “MBTA shall defend ... . . . Section 7.03 of the TRA provides that the “MBTA shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless [CSX] and . . . The MBTA next contends there is an inconsistency between Sections 7.03 and 7.07 of the agreement. . . .

MARATHON E. G. HOLDING LIMITED E. G. v. CMS ENTERPRISES COMPANY,, 597 F.3d 311 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . In particular, Marathon proposed that Section 7.03 provide: It is understood, however, that Seller [CMS . . . The proposed subsection (c) of Section 7.03 stated: Seller [CMS] agrees to protect, defend, indemnify . . . Section 7.03 provides that “Seller [CMS] hereby agrees to ... indemnify [Marathon] and agrees to pay . . . This — the time period to which the $2.75 million in taxes is “attributable” under Section 7.03(a)' — . . . Section 7.03 simply provides that a claim shall not be permitted unless it is timely made. . . .

In IDEARC INC., 423 B.R. 138 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . follows: (a) The Credit Facility Claims shall be allowed as of the Petition Date in the amount of $7.03 . . .

In DEQUEEN GENERAL HOSPITAL. PLLC, d b a v. JCE LLC,, 418 B.R. 289 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2009)

. . . expenses and the escrow set out in paragraph 6.04 will be distributed in the Initial Distribution. 7.03 . . .

In PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION. N. V. L. P. v. USA, Dr. s Dr. s Co. N. V. L. P. v., 583 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 7.03(6) (2007). The Supreme Court in Brenner v. . . .

BONNIEVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC F. N. J. K. R. Qi G. Yi Lu v. WOODMONT BUILDERS, L. L. C. L. L. C. A. G. S. J. Co- S., 655 F. Supp. 2d 473 (D.N.J. 2009)

. . . .”); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (2006). . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. KING,, 339 F. App'x 604 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . Jury Instr. 7.03 Expert Testimony (2005) (emphasis added). . . . Comm., cmt. to Instr. 7.03 (2008 update). The current model instruction omits the term “expert.” . . . Jury Inst. 7.03 Opinion Testimony (2008 update); United States v. . . .

In METALDYNE CORPORATION,, 409 B.R. 661 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . § 7.03.) . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 636 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . (Trust Instrument §§ 7.02, 7.03.) . . . . Plaintiffs' additional argument that HolliShare trustees may not rely on section 7.03 of the Trust Instrument . . .

LANDSTAR EXPRESS AMERICA, INC. v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION, 569 F.3d 493 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 7.03 (principal liability); Judah v. . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 6.01, 7.03; 46 C.F.R. § 515.4(b)(2) (Ocean Transportation Intermediaries . . .

ESTATE OF MILLER, v. THRIFTY RENT- A- CAR SYSTEM, INC., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07-.08. . . . E.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07-.08. . . .

SOLID HOST, NL, v. NAMECHEAP, INC. a d b a a d b a, 652 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . Crank, 400 F.3d 667, 673 (9th Cir.2005), and Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.03 (2006)). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEELEY,, 308 F. App'x 870 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . The instruction given was consistent with the Sixth Circuit Criminal Pattern Jury Instruction 7.03 at . . . On December 31, 2007, the 2005 Edition was updated, and the Committee Commentary to Rule 7.03 reveals . . .