The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.04

7.04 Bradford County.—The county lines of Bradford County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the thread of New River intersects the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northeasterly concurrent with the east boundary of Union County following the meanderings of the said New River to where same is intersected by the middle township line of township four south, range twenty-two east; thence east on said middle township line to the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the southeast corner of section twelve, township nine south, range twenty-two east; thence west on the section line between section twelve and thirteen, township nine south, range twenty-two east to Santa Fe Lake; thence northwesterly following the northeast shore of Santa Fe Lake to its westernmost intersection with a line which is the prolongation of the north line of McManus Subdivision as per plat book “A,” page 117 of the public records of Alachua County; thence west along the north line of said subdivision to its intersection with the east line of government lot three of section twenty-one, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence north along said east line to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one; thence north along the lines between the east half and the west half of the northwest quarter of said section twenty-one to the north line of said section twenty-one; thence west along the north line of said section twenty-one to the southeast corner of section seventeen, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence west to the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said section seventeen; thence north to the half-mile corner on the south line of section eight, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said section eight; thence north to the northeast corner of the west half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section five, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section five; thence north along the west line of said section five to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section six, township eight south, range twenty-two east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section six; thence west along the north line of said section six to the northwest corner of said section six; thence north along the east line of section one, township eight south, range twenty-one east to the southeast corner of section thirty-six, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north along the east line of said section thirty-six to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said section thirty-six; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said section thirty-six; thence north along the west line of said section thirty-six to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of the Santa Fe River to its intersection with the east line of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section thirty-three, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-three; thence west to the northeast corner of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-two, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence west to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said section thirty-two; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section thirty-one, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said section thirty-one; thence west to the half-mile corner on the south line of section thirty, township seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north on the quarter section line of said section thirty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence southerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to its intersection with the south line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section twenty-eight, township seven south, range twenty east; thence west to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-eight; thence west to the northwest corner of said section twenty-eight; thence north along the east line of section twenty, township seven south, range twenty east to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of said section twenty; thence west on the quarter section line of said section twenty to its intersection with the thread of the Santa Fe River; thence northerly and westerly along the thread of said Santa Fe River to the point of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Mar. 15, 1844; s. 3, ch. 895, 1858; s. 1, ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1185, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1300, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1765, 1870; RS 30; GS 28; RGS 20; s. 1, ch. 8516, 1921; CGL 32; s. 2, ch. 28312, 1953.

F.S. 7.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE M. STERLING,, 933 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . ." § 7.04 cmt. b (2006). . . .

H. KRAKAUER, a v. DISH NETWORK, L. L. C. DRI-, 925 F.3d 643 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 570 (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 ). . . .

UTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, v. DIESEL POWER GEAR LLC, LLC, LLC, W., 374 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (D. Utah 2019)

. . . Lens.com. , 722 F.3d 1229, 1251 (10th Cir. 2013) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 ). . . .

ABS GLOBAL, INC. PLC, v. INGURAN, LLC, XY, LLC,, 914 F.3d 1054 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . But as one can see from his citation to section 7.04[3] of the treatise, which discusses only the written-description . . .

IN RE JUBILEE FARMS, LLC,, 595 B.R. 546 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2018)

. . . After deductions for moisture, damage, and hauling, the Debtors received an average net price of $7.04 . . .

AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 328 F. Supp. 3d 141 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . ¶ 71 (citing PSA § 7.04(b) ).) . . .

SAADE, v. SECURITY CONNECTION INC. LLC HSBC USA, PLLC, 282 F. Supp. 3d 414 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . . § 1692(e)(6), 940 CMR 7.04 (1)(A) and 209 CMR 18.16(2) (Unfair debt collection) Plaintiff alleges that . . .

A. JONES v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC., 887 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (agent acts with actual authority or the principal ratifies . . .

IN RE BIOSCRIP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 273 F. Supp. 3d 474 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . the basis that, applying the lodestar cross-check, the award would amount to a lodestar multiplier of 7.04 . . .

L. LESPERANCE, v. SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS,, 259 F. Supp. 3d 713 (W.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law, § 7.04[l][c] at n.65 (collecting cases). 2. . . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Laio, § 7.04[l][a] (footnotes omitted). . . .

DURST v. DURST LLP LLP, 663 F. App'x 231 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . read the Operating Agreement connected with the Asset before signing it, and did not notice Section 7.04 . . . in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Cumberland County, Chancery Division, seeking to have Section 7.04 . . . opportunity to sue Parker Benjamin “for his failure to account for the devastating impact of Section 7.04 . . . appraisal, as he is charged with having known the terms of the Operating Agreement, including Section 7.04 . . .

ABRASIVES- SOUTH, INC. v. AWUKO ABRASIVES WANDMACHER GMBH CO. KG,, 225 F. Supp. 3d 568 (D.S.C. 2016)

. . . Plaintiff first argues that Local Civil Rules 7.04 and 7.07 bar the Court from considering the documents . . . Local Civil Rule 7.04 provides, in pertinent part, “motions shall be accompanied by affidavits or other . . . Plaintiff’s motion cites Local Rule 7.03, but quotes Local Rule 7.04. . . .

CHEVRON CORPORATION, v. DONZIGER, R. PLLC, De De La CIA, LTDA, a a a n, C n n n n J., 833 F.3d 74 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (emphasis added). . . .

BIRCHFIELD, v. NORTH DAKOTA. Jr. v. v., 136 S. Ct. 2160 (U.S. 2016)

. . . Green, Apprehending and Prosecuting the Drunk Driver § 7.04[7] (LexisNexis 2015). . . .

ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC. DNA v. SEQUENOM, INC. LLC,, 809 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 7.04[l][e] at 7-309-7-310.1 ("In Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. . . .

STIFEL, NICOLAUS COMPANY, INC. v. LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS, 807 F.3d 184 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04(l)(a), p. 613 & n. 11 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012) (citing . . .

STIFEL, NICHOLAUS COMPANY, INC. GODFREY KAHN, v. Du, 807 F.3d 184 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04(1)(a), p. 613 & n. 11 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012) (citing . . .

OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO. LTD. v. TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED, INC. Co. v. SA, Co. v. USA, Co. v. USA, LLC, Co. v. Co. v. FZE, USA, Co. v. Co. v. Co. v. Co. US U. S. LLC, Co. v. USA Co. v. USA, Co. v. Co. v. FZE, USA, Co. v. USA, Co. v. USA, LLC, Co. v. Sa, Co. v. USA Co. v. SA, Co. v. Co. v. Co. v. LLC, MSN Co. v. USA,, 151 F. Supp. 3d 525 (D.N.J. 2015)

. . . 3.92 ppm (t, J-=-6.3 Hz, 2B), 6.43 ppm (d, J-2.4 Hz, HI); 6.49 ppm (dd, J-8.4 Hz, J-2.4 Hz, 11.1), 7.04 . . .

MALLEIRO, v. MORI,, 182 So. 3d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Smith, Florida Estates Practice Guide, § 7.04(5) (2015). . . .

LNV CORP. v. HARRISON FAMILY BUSINESS, LLC,, 132 F. Supp. 3d 683 (D. Md. 2015)

. . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Terra Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7-8, Deed of Trust for HFB . . . ECF 17-2 § 7.03 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Term Loan; ECF 17-7 § 7.04 at 7, Deed of Trust for HFB Revolving . . .

PE A, v. GREFFET, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1103 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . is subject to direct liability to a third party harmed by an agent’s conduct when (a) as stated in § 7.04 . . .

IN RE EMPRESAS OMAJEDE INC., 537 B.R. 63 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2015)

. . . Section 7.04 Waivers. . . . Sección 7.04 Renuncias. . . .

CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, MASSACHUSETTS, v. WeCARE ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC,, 109 F. Supp. 3d 329 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Section 7.04(a) appears under the heading “Electricity” and provides: (a) During the Term, [WeCare] shall . . . Section 7.04(a) obligates WeCare to meter its electricity and specifies that the City will reimburse . . .

D. THOMAS, v. CLINTON, PC, B. II,, 607 F. App'x 903 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . Ala.Code § 10A-5-7.04(a). . . . Id. § 10A-5-7.04(b)(2). . . . See Ala.Code § 10A-5-7.04(b)(2). . . .

IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION, v. USA N. A. v. LLC, USA N. A. C. v. L. P. USA N. A., 80 F. Supp. 3d 781 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . (Settlement Agreement § 7.04(e).) . . . (Settlement Agreement § 7.04(f).) . . .

MERIT CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE v. CITY OF QUINCY,, 759 F.3d 122 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . location of the program’s apprentice activities, see id. 7.03(8)(e); training and instruction, see id. 7.04 . . . (l)(b)(l)-(4); wage rates, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(5); recordkeeping, see id. 7.04(l)(b)(23), 7.13; instructor . . . qualifications, see id. 7.04(2); apprentice enrollment, see id. 7.07(1); reporting, see id. 7.07(2); . . .

COACH, INC. v. J. SAPATIS,, 27 F. Supp. 3d 239 (D.N.H. 2014)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party . . .

WILLIAMS, v. HORRY- GEORGETOWN TECHNICAL COLLEGE,, 26 F. Supp. 3d 519 (D.S.C. 2014)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . filing with the EEOC, and attempting to complain to the City Council about her illegal termination. 7.04 . . .

B. WILLIAMS, Co. v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 9 F. Supp. 3d 1080 (W.D. Mo. 2014)

. . . The provision Wells Fargo refers to at bar is entitled Section 7.04 Limitation on Suits by Holders of . . .

CHEVRON CORPORATION, v. DONZIGER,, 974 F. Supp. 2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . .); Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 7.03(l)(a), 7.04 (principal liable for torts of agent committed . . .

CHOWDHURY, v. WORLDTEL BANGLADESH HOLDING, LTD., 746 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . no basis in tort law or agency law for Khan’s argument, see, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 . . .

LANGLEY, v. DOLGENCORP, LLC, d b a, 972 F. Supp. 2d 804 (D.S.C. 2013)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .

GRIFFIN, v. HOLDER,, 972 F. Supp. 2d 827 (D.S.C. 2013)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. . . .

M. LEWIS, v. OMNI INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 970 F. Supp. 2d 437 (D.S.C. 2013)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IY. DISCUSSION A. . . .

U. S. A. f. k. a. v., 141 T.C. 1 (T.C. 2013)

. . . Lys then creates two tables in which he attributes a 6.81% borrowing cost and a 7.04% borrowing cost . . . End of sublease term At 6.81% At 7.04% Net cash to John Hancock Equity investment Transaction fees $168.8M . . .

SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, LP III QP, LP IV, LP, v. NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, LLC,, 724 F.3d 129 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 7.04 (principal incurs tort liability vicariously where agent acts with actual authority). . . .

SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, LP III QP, LP IV, LP, v. NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, LLC,, 724 F.3d 129 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 7.04 (principal incurs tort liability vicariously where agent acts with actual authority). . . .

CONTACTS, INC. v. LENS. COM, INC. d b a a, 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 7.04. 1-800 does not contend that Lens, com ratified McCoy’s allegedly infringing ad. . . .

G. COULTER, v. MORGAN STANLEY CO. INC., 936 F. Supp. 2d 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (ESOP § 7.04(d)(i).) . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ,, 924 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . 11.40%_ 2009 20.67% - 16.02% = 4.65%_4.65 / 20,67 = 22.50%_ 2010 21.01% - 19.53% = 1.48%_1,48 / 21,01 = 7.04% . . .

FINE CONSULTING, INC. d b a A. v. RIVERA,, 915 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D.N.M. 2013)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook at § 7.04[3] at 632, citing Comstock Oil & Gas, Inc. v. . . .

TSAO, AKA v. DESERT PALACE, INC. T. AKA v. T., 698 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2012)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 cmt. b (“If the agent’s conduct is not tortious, the principal . . .

AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS INC. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 900 F. Supp. 2d 753 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . GE relies on Section 7.04 of the Consummation Order, which sets forth the Reorganization Court’s “Reservation . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 7.04 Obligations of U.S. Fi-delis. . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO., 944 F. Supp. 2d 363 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . Consummation Order, § 7.04. . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(c). . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(h), (i). . . . In § 7.04(i) of the August 17, 1978 Consummation Order, the court reserved jurisdiction To take such . . . Consummation Order, § 7.04(i). . . .

SOCIETY OF HOLY TRANSFIGURATION MONASTERY, INC. v. GREGORY, 689 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party harmed . . .

FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CRS, INC., 880 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 7.04 (Matthew Bender 2012). . . .

FRESNO MOTORS, LLC, a a v. MERCEDES- BENZ USA, LLC, a, 852 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . Section 7.04 Landlord Consent. . . .

J. L. WARD ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GREAT PLAINS TRIBAL CHAIRMEN S HEALTH BOARD, s, 842 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (D.S.D. 2012)

. . . (footnote omitted); see also Cohen, supra, at § 7.04[l][c] (“A tribe that incorporates as an entity under . . .

REACHING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY,, 831 F. Supp. 2d 871 (D. Md. 2011)

. . . Prince George’s County is comprised of two Parcels: (1) Parcel 28 is the front parcel that consists of 7.04 . . .

SLOAN COMPANY, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 653 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . fund the solé source of which is the owner's payment to the subcontractor.” 2-7 Construction Law P 7.04 . . .

AZZAM, v. RIGHTWAY DEVELOPMENT INC., 789 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . .”); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.04 (2006) (“A principal is subject to liability to a third party . . .

UNITED STATES v. LISTMAN,, 636 F.3d 425 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . on a theory of deliberate ignorance consistent with Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 7.04 . . .

A. HERNANDEZ, v. STATE, 61 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . This opinion is "unpublished” for purposes of Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.04(f) and is "not favored for . . .

SOUTH DAKOTA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 787 F. Supp. 2d 981 (D.S.D. 2011)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law, § 7.04[2] (citing Kansas v. . . .

In MILLER, 447 B.R. 425 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . Attend Sanctions Motion hearing— 3.0 hours ($675.00) TOTAL TIME — 7.04 hours ($1,584) This fact is not . . .

EXPORT- IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, v. UNITED CALIFORNIA DISCOUNT CORP., 738 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . See Dolan, The Law of Letters of Credit at § 7.04[4][d], 7-112. 4. . . .

VINEWOOD CAPITAL, LLC v. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER HAMPTON, LLP,, 735 F. Supp. 2d 503 (N.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Restatement (3d) of Agency §§ 2. 02 (Scope of Actual Authority); 7. 03 (Principal’s Liability-In General); 7.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NAVARRO,, 608 F.3d 529 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . District Court Judges § 7.04 (4th ed.2000); see also United States v. . . . District Court Judges § 7.04, at 222 n. 1 (5th ed.2007). . . . . . § 7.04. . 408 F.3d at 1206-07. . . . .

ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,, 598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Chisum, 3 Chisum on Patents § 7.04[l][e] (2009). . . .

In COMSCAPE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., 423 B.R. 816 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . Other provisions of the Regulations that are relevant to this dispute include §§ 5.07, 7.04, 7.05 and . . . Sections 7.04 and 7.05 provides as follows: 7.04 Removal and Resignation. . . . These actions were consistent with §§ 7.04 and 7.05 of the Regulations. . . . Ghany suggests that his appointment of Lisa Kuhn as Acting Corporate Secretary was proper under § 7.04 . . . Section 7.04 of the Regulations provides that an officer may be removed only by majority vote of the . . .

JEFFREDO L. S. B. M. M. A. v. A. MACARRO, 590 F.3d 751 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . .

JEFFREDO, L. S. B. M. M. A. v. A. MACARRO,, 599 F.3d 913 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. . . .

JEFFREDO L. S. B. M. M. A. v. A. MACARRO, 590 F.3d 751 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.04 (citing Iowa Mid. Ins. Co. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRESLEY,, 349 F. App'x 22 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . Finally, defendant argues that the district court failed to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 . . . He argues that the district court’s failure to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 caused the . . . instruction substantially fulfilled the purpose for which defendant claims Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 . . . It is also worth noting that the purpose of Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 is not, as defendant . . . Thus, failing to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.04 in this case also did not substantially . . .

A. PARKELL, v. SOUTH CAROLINA,, 687 F. Supp. 2d 576 (D.S.C. 2009)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. IV. DISCUSSION A. Standing 1. . . .

CORALES J. I, a I A Ad v. BENNETT, 567 F.3d 554 (9th Cir. 2009)

. . . . & Inst.Code § 601; Cal.Penal Code § 272(a)(1); Ontario Municipal Code §§ 5-7.04, 5-7.05. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MANNING,, 305 F. App'x 518 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . Davis, Federal Standards of Review § 7.04 (3d ed.1999) (“The standard to determine whether there is plain . . .

KELLER, v. ALBERTSONS, INC. EMPLOYEES DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN,, 589 F. Supp. 2d 1205 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . its decision, shall afford no deference to the initial adverse benefit determination.... ” (Plan ¶ 7.04 . . . (Plan ¶ 7.04, AR 235.) . . .

REACHING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY,, 584 F. Supp. 2d 766 (D. Md. 2008)

. . . Id RHI’s property was comprised of two parcels: the front parcel (Parcel 28) of 7.04 acres and the rear . . .

RECORDS, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. LLC d b a, 566 F. Supp. 2d 305 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . required by Rule 26(a); no written objection to Artemis’s accounting statements was made as required by ¶ 7.04 . . . Paragraph 7.04 of the distribution agreement provides in part as follows: All statements rendered by . . . past due or were improperly charged should have been specifically objected to in writing pursuant to ¶ 7.04 . . .

FISHER, v. UNITED STATES v. L. v. No., 549 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (D. Ariz. 2008)

. . . the 2,513 Native American students; 129 or 7.99% of the 1,614 Asian American students, and 1,625 or 7.04% . . .

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, v. AGFA- GEVAERT N. V., 560 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . From Kodak’s data, the average aspect ratio of this subset of grains was 7.04 for those grains having . . .

In MONTGOMERY WARD, L. L. C., 388 B.R. 49 (Bankr. D. Del. 2008)

. . . Section 7.04 of the Ward I provides as follows: Post-Petition Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases . . . Dika-Ward asserts that Section 7.04 of the Ward I Plan alters Debtors’ discharge. . . . Section 7.04 does not impact the scope of the discharge granted to Debtors by the Bankruptcy Code and . . . Instead, Section 7.04 clarified that entry of the Confirmation Order did not change any of a non-debtor . . . If the Court accepted Dika-Ward’s construction of Section 7.04, it would mean that Debtors disclaimed . . .

A. HUFFMAN H. A. E. M. M. A. A. v. COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE,, 518 F.3d 357 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Gertzman, supra, ¶ 7.04[1] at 7-30. . . . Gertzman, supra, ¶ 7.04[3][b], at 7-45. . . . See Gertzman, supra,. ¶ 7.04, at 7-30; LaRue, supra, at 23-25 n. 54 ("Indexes developed using the double-extension . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- ADVERTISING, 971 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2007)

. . . Prof'l Conduct 7.04; Utah R. Prof'l Conduct 7.4; Vt. R. Prof'l Conduct 7.4; Va. R. Prof! . . .

GRAVES, v. HORRY- GEORGETOWN TECHNICAL COLLEGE,, 512 F. Supp. 2d 413 (D.S.C. 2007)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. B. . . .

BAILEY, v. UNITED STATES,, 78 Fed. Cl. 239 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . Other adverse wetland impacts caused by the unauthorized road are also substantial — approximately 7.04 . . .

PFIZER INC. G. D. Co. G. D. LLC, LLC LLC v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 482 F. Supp. 2d 390 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . See, e.g., 3 Chisum on Patents § 7.04; Invitrogen Corp. v. Clontech Labs. . . .

CENTRAL SPORTS, INC. v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP. U. S. A., 477 F. Supp. 2d 503 (D. Conn. 2007)

. . . Ex. 2 ¶ 7.04). . . .

In AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. L. v. LLC, N. A. LP, W., 362 B.R. 149 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007)

. . . Section 7.04 of the Transfer Agreement provides: Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary . . . (Transfer Agreement § 7.04 (emphasis added).) . . .

A. WARD, v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH,, 457 F. Supp. 2d 625 (D.S.C. 2006)

. . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. . . . Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993); Local Rules 7.04, 7.05, D.S.C. . . .

In WORLDCOM, INC., 352 B.R. 369 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Debtors, aware that the Plan prevents payment of interest on TSI’s Allowed Claim (see Plan ¶ 1.10, 7.04 . . . {See Plan 7.04.) . . . (See Plan ¶¶ 1.10, 7.04.) . . .

In A. DECEDER, A. v. D B A, 351 B.R. 261 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2006)

. . . See M.G.L. ch. 93, § 49(b); M.G.L. ch. 93A, § 2; 940 CMR 7.04(2). . . . .

A. E. v., 126 T.C. 322 (T.C. 2006)

. . . Id. par. 7.04[1], at 7-30. . . . Gertzman par. 7.04[1], at 7-30. We are here concerned with the dollar-value method. . . . [Id. par. 7.04[3], at 7-36 (fn. ref. omitted).] . . . See Gertzman par. 7.04[3][b], at 7-44. . . . Gertzman par. 7.04[3][b], at 7-45. . . .

SMITH, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. F. R. M. J. F. Jr. E. M. J. B., 422 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (N.D. Ga. 2006)

. . . . § 7.04(a), pp. 74-75 (DAL 000947-948). . . . Id. § 7.04(a), p. 74 (DAL 000947). . . .

E. LEWIS, v. ROBERTS, El, 157 F. App'x 37 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . as an unpublished opinion, the Supreme Court of Kansas granted a motion to publish pursuant to Rule 7.04 . . .

PIKULAS, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER,, 397 F. Supp. 2d 883 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . VII, sec. 7.04(a)-(b)). . . . VII, Sec. 7.04(c)). . In prior reports, Dr. . . .

J. O NEAL, v. CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, 378 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (N.D. Ga. 2005)

. . . Sections 7.04 and 7.14 of the Fund Plan outline its administrative appeal procedure. Albert E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NAVARRO- VARGAS, v., 408 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . District Court Judges § 7.04 204 n.l (4th ed.2000 rev.). . . . District Court Judges § 7.04 (4th ed.2000 rev.). . . . .

INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND Co. v. ACON LABORATORIES, INC., 367 F. Supp. 2d 182 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Chisum, Chi-sum on Patents § 7.04 (2003). . . .

BIRD, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,, 390 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . II, tab 3 (“1997 Plan Doc.”), § 7.04(b) [EK00116].) . . . alive when the Participant die[d], no further payments [were] made” under the Plan. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04 . . . annuitant did not survive him, “no further payments [would be] made” after his death. (1997 Plan Doc. § 7.04 . . .

RUSH, a v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY,, 399 F.3d 705 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . See Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 7.04. . . . .

P. O BRIEN, E. A. v. G. O. MOORE,, 395 F.3d 499 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees ¶ 7.04[4], at 7-74 & n.89 (2004) (citing the Hill court’s inclusion . . .

UNITED STATES v. POWERS,, 318 F. Supp. 2d 339 (W.D. Va. 2004)

. . . Weinberg, Federal Bail and Detention Handbook, § 7.04, at 7-12 (PLI, Rel. No. 16, 2004). . . .

In JAMES, In, 304 B.R. 131 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2004)

. . . recordation that Congress intended that the lien would be a statutory lien.” 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 7.04 . . .

METCALF, v. FASCO EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN,, 293 F. Supp. 2d 591 (E.D.N.C. 2003)

. . . The powers and responsibilities of the Trustee are outlined in 7.04 of the Plan. . . .

UNICREDITO ITALIANO SPA, SA, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, J. P. Co. J. P. N. A., 288 F. Supp. 2d 485 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Section 7.04 Bank Credit Decision Each Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance . . . B to Gertzman Deck at 31-32, 34-35; and 2001 L/C Facility Agreement §§ 7.02-7.04, 8.02-8.04, Ex. . . . transactions with Enron “with no duty to account therefor” to the participating banks, and section 7.04 . . . (Id. §§ 7.03-7.04, Ex. C to Gertzman Deck at 31.) . . . See 2000 Credit Facility § 7.04 and parallel provisions of other operative documents. . . .

N. POKORNE, v. A. GARY, 281 F. Supp. 2d 416 (D. Conn. 2003)

. . . Our inquiry, therefore, focuses on Section 7.04. . . . As the defendants argue, because Gary was entitled to a fee for his services under Section 7.04, that . . . The plaintiff makes other claims under Section 7.04 that have no basis in the contract. . . . Section 7.04 states precisely that “[a]ny contract of dealing referred to [in this Section] shall be . . . 7.04 necessarily must be deducted from gross proceeds. . . .