Cases from cite.case.law:

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. BY AND THROUGH MYRTLE BEACH BRANCH, v. CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, a a, 383 F. Supp. 3d 603 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . to rest on [the record] evidence, as they never requested a ... hearing"); see also Local Civil Rule 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. VITALE, v. MIMEDX GROUP, INC., 381 F. Supp. 3d 647 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . See Local Civil Rule 7.08 (D.S.C.). . . .

SKINNER, v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 369 F. Supp. 3d 649 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . The Court decides the motion without a hearing pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.08 (D.S.C.). . . .

DOE, v. COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY,, 359 F. Supp. 3d 367 (D.S.C. 2019)

. . . Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.08 (D.S.C.), the Court dispenses with a hearing on the motion. . . .

HDMG ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO., 355 F. Supp. 3d 373 (D.S.C. 2018)

. . . Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.08, the district court may decide motions without a hearing . . .

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A., 899 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Narachi and Klassen ... register[ed] six million Orexigen shares at an artificially inflated price of $7.08 . . .

ACCOUNTABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC v. WELLNESS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1133 (D. Kan. 2018)

. . . $90.00 $42.48 6274 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $5,227.50 $2,467.09 6275 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $15.00 $7.08 . . .

CS WANG ASSOCIATE, s v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. LLC, LLC LLC, 305 F. Supp. 3d 864 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 (Am. Law. Inst. 2006). . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. WIMAN,, 875 F.3d 384 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . District Court Judges § 7.08, at 268-69 (6th ed. 2013), available at https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default . . .

A. JONES v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC., 887 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 7.08 (agent commits a tort when acting with apparent authority in its dealings with a third party . . .

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A. AND ALL CONSOLIDATED CASES, 189 F. Supp. 3d 998 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Statement, registering six million shares of common stock at a proposed maximum offering price of $7.08 . . .

MVB BANK, INC. v. STIFEL BANK TRUST,, 164 F. Supp. 3d 825 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . . • Section 7.08 of the LSA provides that defendant is obligated, upon being notified by plaintiff at . . . See LSA § 7.08. . . . LSA § 7.08 (emphasis added). . . . See LSA § 7.08. IV. . . . LSA § 7.08. . . .

SPRINGFIELD PARCEL C, LLC, v. UNITED STATES, LLC,, 124 Fed. Cl. 163 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . The clause, located in Section 7.08 of the lease, provides that the lessor “shall not be responsible . . .

UNITED STATES v. AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT- OF- WAY OVER ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA, LLC, v. An LLC,, 140 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ala. 2015)

. . . He further submitted that the first 200 feet from the transmission lines, comprising about 7.08 acres . . . As such, it would comprise an area of 7.08 acres and diminish the value of the land, these witnesses . . .

A. PEARCE, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC. a LLC, a, 116 F. Supp. 3d 948 (D. Neb. 2015)

. . . . • See, e.g., Rest 3d Agency §§ 7.03-7.08. . . . See § 7.05, Rest. '3d Agency § 7.08 cmt. b (emphasis supplied). . . .

B. KINGSLEY, v. HENDRICKSON,, 135 S. Ct. 2466 (U.S. 2015)

. . . . § 7.08 (2009). . . .

PE A, v. GREFFET, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1103 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . The Third Restatement’s only reference to the aided-in-agency theory comes in the commentary to § 7.08 . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 cmt. b. . . . Section 7.08’s above-the-line text provides that “[a] principal is subject to vicarious liability for . . . constitute the tort or enable the agent to conceal its commission,” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 cmt. b (omission in original). . . .

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 786 F.3d 899 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Internet’s Hot Spot Problem, Wired (Aug. 1999), available at http://archive.wired. com/wired/archive/7.08 . . .

VEASEY, v. PERRY,, 71 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Senate Rules 7.08, 7.13 (2011). . Senate Rule 7.13 (2011). . . . .

In HERITAGE CONSOLIDATED, L. L. C. L. P. d b a d b a v. L. L. C., 765 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 7.08 (2013). . . .

In HERITAGE CONSOLIDATED, L. L. C. L. P. d b a d b a v. L. L. C., 765 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 7.08 (2013). . . .

J. ROOD, v. NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND, 39 F. Supp. 3d 241 (N.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . participant is injured on the job and receives a WC award that partially offsets his SSDI benefits, § 7.08 . . .

MERIT CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE v. CITY OF QUINCY,, 759 F.3d 122 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . 7.04(2); apprentice enrollment, see id. 7.07(1); reporting, see id. 7.07(2); and termination, see id. 7.08 . . .

CHEVRON CORPORATION, v. DONZIGER,, 974 F. Supp. 2d 362 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . principal liable for torts of agent committed with actual authority or ratified by principal), 7.03(2)(b), 7.08 . . .

B. KINGSLEY, v. HENDRICKSON,, 744 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . The committee wisely omitted such language of recklessness or purpose from its Pattern Instructions 7.08 . . . 109 S.Ct. 1865, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989); Federal Civil Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit No. 7.08 . . . Pattern Instructions 7.08 and 7.09 were drafted for use in excessive force cases for both arrestees under . . . The elements instruction, 7.08, includes three elements: 1. . . . The Pattern Instruction Committee also confronted this issue as part of its Instruction 7.08 and could . . .

YELTON, v. SCANSOURCE, INC., 983 F. Supp. 2d 683 (D.S.C. 2013)

. . . Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.08, the district court may determine motions without a hearing . . .

CARAZANI, v. ZEGARRA,, 972 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . housekeeper from December 25, 2006 to December 25, 2008; (2) the defendant would pay the plaintiff either $7.08 . . . pointing to the Contract, which stipulates that the defendant was to pay the plaintiff the greater of $7.08 . . . Though the Contract clearly states that the plaintiff was to receive a starting salary of $7.08 per hour . . . The Contract stipulated that the plaintiff would be paid $7.08 per hour and identified that amount as . . . 13, 2005, the prevailing wage for Level One housekeepers in the Washington, D.C. area was precisely $7.08 . . .

VANCE, v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY., 570 U.S. 421 (U.S. 2013)

. . . to third parties with whom it interacts through employees and other agents." 2 Restatement (Third) § 7.08 . . .

J. MALMSTEEN, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. UMG, 940 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . defined as “[n]ormal retail distribution channels, excluding sales of Records described in [§§ 7.05-7.08 . . .

P. CUVIELLO, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . When section 7.08(d) was in effect, it read, in relevant part, that Union Square ... . . . Yu then proceeded to cite Felsinger for violation of section 7.08(d). Id. . . . Thus, section 7.08(d) offers no shelter to Officer Yu. . . . To this extent, Plaintiffs have stated a Monell claim under section 7.08(d). . . . facial challenge to section 7.08(d). . . .

ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORP. f k a v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB ABS, LLC,, 920 F. Supp. 2d 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Although Assured is not a party to the MLPAs or the SSAs, sections 7.08 of the MLPAs and 8.06 of the . . . Exs. 198 § 8.06; 451 § 7.08. . . . Exs. 198 § 8.06; 451 § 7.08 (making Assured a third-party beneficiary to the SSAs and MLPAs); See PI. . . .

FOURNIER, v. STARWOOD HOTELS RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC., 908 F. Supp. 2d 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . See, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 cmt. b (2006) (“[A]pparent authority holds a principal . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 892 F. Supp. 2d 805 (N.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . Verizon exchanged the $7.15 billion in Ideare debt with $7.08 billion in Verizon debt, which JPMorgan . . .

A. THOMAS, v. UNITED STATES, M. Jr. v., 106 Fed. Cl. 467 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . On August 13, 2009, CSXT and MCC reached a Trail Use Agreement, pursuant to which CSXT transferred a 7.08 . . . It is the 7.08 mile portion of the railroad line that is at issue in this case. . . .

In JIANGBO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 884 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . to Plaintiffs, in reaction to these announcements, on November 16, 2010, Jiangbo’s shares closed at $7.08 . . .

PELCZYNSKI, v. ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., 284 F.R.D. 364 (D.S.C. 2012)

. . . Under Local Civil Rule 7.08 (D.S.C.), "hearings on motions may be ordered by the Court in its discretion . . .

SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY v. ACE INA INSURANCE, ACE d b a d b a, 877 F. Supp. 2d 398 (D.S.C. 2012)

. . . Under Local Rule 7.08, "hearings on motions may be ordered by the Court in its discretion. . . .

SCHIERTS, v. CITY OF BROOKFIELD, 868 F. Supp. 2d 818 (E.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . Reserve Corp., 144 F.3d 961, 965 (6th Cir.1998); Restatement (Third) Agency § 7.08 (2006). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEWIS,, 850 F. Supp. 2d 709 (N.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . Pattern Jury Instruction 7.08. . . .

A. WIATT v. WINSTON STRAWN LLP,, 838 F. Supp. 2d 296 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . Restat 3d of Agency, § 7.08 and Cmt. b. . . .

ELLINGTON CREDIT FUND, LTD. v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 837 F. Supp. 2d 162 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . (See e.g., PSA §§ 7.08-7.10). Accordingly, Count Eighteen is dismissed. 13. . . .

CLARETT, v. ROBERTS,, 657 F.3d 664 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . Pattern Civil Jury Instruction 7.08. . . .

In GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. LLC, v. FSB,, 460 B.R. 592 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Instead of paying Moelis from the Note Proceeds, the Indenture Trustee has asserted the right, under § 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. BALARK,, 412 F. App'x 810 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . Second and Tenth Circuits, claims the court committed plain error by failing to give Pattern Instruction 7.08 . . . The court in Wheaton cited the usage notes for the Pattern Instruction 7.08, which explicitly state an . . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 7.08 states: (1)You have heard the testimony of__ You . . .

T. CAMPBELL, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,, 766 F. Supp. 2d 661 (D.S.C. 2011)

. . . Under Local Rule 7.08, "hearings on motions may be ordered by the Court in its discretion. . . .

ARMOUR OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES, v. LLC,, 96 Fed. Cl. 726 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . 7.52 Cure Date 8/25/2004 Default 8/26/2004 Test No. 5 9/03/2004 2976 7.55 Test No. 6 9/24/2004 2940 7.08 . . . /sq ft (September 24, 2004 test results: 7.08 lbs./sq ft). . . .

In TALSMA d b a d b a LLC,, 436 B.R. 908 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Act § 158(3); 6 (Part 2) Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 7.08(4) (14th ed. 1978). . . .

M. MERRITT v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS B. K., 613 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . This would result in a new wage rate of $7.08 per hour, corresponding to a first-year QSA salary on the . . .

M. MERRITT v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS B. K., 613 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . This would result in a new wage rate of $7.08 per hour, corresponding to a first-year QSA salary on the . . .

CORBELL, v. SOUTHERN ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE GROUP HEALTH PLAN,, 695 F. Supp. 2d 835 (S.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . He also swears he billed Cor-bell for 7.08 hours of Ms. . . .

In BRIMONIDINE PATENT LITIGATION, 666 F. Supp. 2d 429 (D. Del. 2009)

. . . Exela’s own development work relating to ANDA 78-590 also reflect a pH drift from an initial pH of 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRESLEY,, 349 F. App'x 22 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . argues that the district court failed to read the final paragraph of Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08 . . . instruction substantially covered the substance of the last paragraph of Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08 . . . The district court’s failure to read the final paragraph of Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08 therefore . . .

MUNN- GOINS, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BLADEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE,, 658 F. Supp. 2d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2009)

. . . No. 7.08-CV-21-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. . . .

VITARROZ CORPORATION, v. G. WILLI FOOD INTERNATIONAL LTD. USA v., 637 F. Supp. 2d 238 (D.N.J. 2009)

. . . Section 7.08 of the Agreement set forth detailed confidentiality requirements that applied before and . . . written Award, the panel concluded that the press release breached the confidentiality provisions in § 7.08 . . . Additionally, § 7.08(b) of the Agreement reads in part: WHI ... may disclose Confidential Information . . . Defendants argue that § 7.08(b) does not “impose any obligation whatsoever on [GWFIL] or Williger [because . . . Section 7.08(b) holds WHI responsible for its representatives’ breach of the provision (here, GWFIL and . . .

ESTATE OF MILLER, v. THRIFTY RENT- A- CAR SYSTEM, INC., 637 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (M.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Section 7.08 of the Restatement (Third) deals specifically with tortious liability for acts of agents . . . Id. § 7.08 cmt. a. . . .

E TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION E TRADE a v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Ex. 5 § 7.08(c). . . .

In RADIAN SECURITIES LITIGATION, 612 F. Supp. 2d 594 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . For fiscal year 2006, the company reported a net income of $582.2 million and diluted net income of $7.08 . . .

EYAL R. D. CORP. v. JEWELEX NEW YORK, LTD., 576 F. Supp. 2d 626 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . incorporated therein even if such pre-exist-ing work has been previously published.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright, § 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RIDER,, 274 F. App'x 207 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . He argued that on the night of Yoder’s death, Rider had no more than one-fourth ounce (approximately 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHEATON,, 517 F.3d 350 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . The usage notes for Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 7.08, however, explicitly state that . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. MARTINEZ, 382 B.R. 285 (E.D. La. 2007)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.08 cmt. c(2) (2006) (emphasis added). . . .

BOUCHARD, v. UNITED STATES,, 501 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D. Me. 2007)

. . . The hourly rate for these jobs ranges from a low of $7.08 to a high of $15.89 for the bench welding positions . . .

In OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. AB, v. AB, v. Dr. S. A. AB, v. Co. D. D. AB, v. AB, v., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . study which shows that when sulfuric acid was used to calibrate the electrodes, pH values of 6.97 and 7.08 . . .

LEDBETTER v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. INC., 550 U.S. 618 (U.S. 2007)

. . . White, Employment Discrimination: Law and Practice §7.08[F][3], p. 532 (3d ed. 2002). . . .

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . 778.111 (2003) Payment Date Amount Paid One Half Regular Rate of Pay Unpaid Wages July 3, 2002 $ 680.00 $ 7.08 . . . 26, 2002 $1,140.00 $n. $ 95.04 October 3, 2002 $1,320.00 $13.75 $ 110.00 October 10, 2002 $ 680.00 $ 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JUDON, v. Jr., 472 F.3d 575 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . As noted in the presentence investigation report, a quarter ounce (7.08 grams) multiplied by 56 weeks . . .

CALLOWAY, v. BARTLEY,, 467 F. Supp. 2d 850 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . -Criminal 7.08 (1968 ed.); see also Ill. Pattern Jury Instr.Criminal 7.08 (2006 ed.). . . .

RICHMAN, B. v. SHEAHAN,, 415 F. Supp. 2d 929 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . See Seventh Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08, Fourth Amendment/Fourteenth Amendment: Excessive Force . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. SAVOCA,, 166 F. App'x 183 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . Indeed, the charge is taken from Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08. . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. BUCHEIT,, 134 F. App'x 842 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . Sixth Circuit Judges Association, Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions § 7.08 (1991 ed.). . . .

L. GOLDSTEIN, M. D. v. ASSOCIATES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY OF PITTSBURGH AMENDED AND RESTATED PENSION PLAN a L. M. D. M. M. D., 137 F. App'x 441 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . See Article VII §§ 7.01, 7.02, 7.03 and 7.08 (Pension Plan) and §§ 7.01 and 7.09 (Profit Sharing Plan . . .

GLOBE SAVINGS BANK, F. S. B. v. UNITED STATES,, 65 Fed. Cl. 330 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . BaneFirst Corp. 15,500 5.81 900.55 Hall Properties BaneFirst Corp. 8,018 7.08 567.6744 NBC Bankshares . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASON,, 126 F. App'x 702 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . At trial, Mason requested that the trial court give Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.08, which . . . Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction 7.08: Testimony of an Accomplice. . . . Mason now appeals the failure of the trial court to give Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.08. . . . Neither party contests that Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.08 is a correct statement of the . . . Whether Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.08 concerned a point so important in the trial that . . .

In STONECRAFT, LLC. LLC, v., 322 B.R. 623 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2005)

. . . Slagter’s general responsibilities as Manager were set forth in § 7.08 of the Operating Agreement, as . . . follows: 7.08 Manager. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIFTY- TWO FIREARMS,, 362 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . reviewed the verified complaint pursuant to Local Rule 6.01(b) and (c)(18) and Local Admiralty Rules 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. SEXTON, A., 119 F. App'x 735 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . court prepared, sua sponte, a jury instruction based on the Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 7.08 . . .

Co. v., 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 480 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . 6.34 percent to exports of the subject merchandise by plaintiff Shanghai Foreign Trade Enterprises, 7.08 . . .

SHANGHAI FOREIGN TRADE ENTERPRISES CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . 6.34 percent to exports of the subject merchandise by plaintiff Shanghai Foreign Trade Enterprises, 7.08 . . .

In K. EVANS, B., 344 B.R. 440 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2004)

. . . rendered or incurred prior to the June 9 conversion of the case and $768.00 worth of compensation and $7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSTON, Jr., 353 F.3d 617 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . buying methamphetamine from Johnston in an amount totaling 17.72 grams; Wilt admits to selling Johnston 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. ECHOLS E., 84 F. App'x 544 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . the instructions contained warnings similar to those outlined in Sixth Circuit Pattern Instruction 7.08 . . .

S. POWELL, v. FIRST REPUBLIC BANK,, 274 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . . § 7.08. . . . committee should consist of at least two disinterested individuals and be assisted by counsel, section 7.08 . . .

NATIONAL RURAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE, v. DIRECTV, INC., 319 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . AND/OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY ARE LIMITED TO THOSE SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 7.05, 7.07, 7.08 . . . Section 7.08 concerns the cessation of program services if the programming violates the law. . . .

RJE CORP. v. NORTHVILLE INDUSTRIES CORP., 329 F.3d 310 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Section 7.08 of the Option Agreement sets forth a choice of law provision selecting New York law: “This . . .

WALKER MANUFACTURING, INC. v. HOFFMANN, INC. J. R., 261 F. Supp. 2d 1054 (N.D. Iowa 2003)

. . . Milgrim, Business Organizations: Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 7.08[3][b], at 7-235 to 7-239). . . .

BLIHOVDE, v. ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN, D. St. St. a St. St. a St. a St. St., 219 F.R.D. 607 (W.D. Wis. 2003)

. . . to ready these issues for disposition by the court.” 2 Newberg & Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 7.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. CHAPIN,, 231 F. Supp. 2d 600 (E.D. Mich. 2002)

. . . Sixth Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions 7.08; United States v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CULPS,, 300 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . ) states that, based on the case agent’s information, a quarter-ounce of marijuana is equivalent to 7.08 . . .

WORLD FUEL SERVICES CORPORATION v. F. MOOREHEAD, Jr., 229 F. Supp. 2d 584 (N.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . Section 7.08(a) of the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Act provides, in relevant part: On application . . .

B. WARDEN, B. Jr. v. M. B. McLELLAND, a C. G. Jr. a J. J. Jr. a J. S. a E. F. a J. L. a L. C. a R. M. a, 288 F.3d 105 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . The adoption of section 7.08 made the demand requirement substantially stricter by narrowing the available . . .

RJE CORP. v. NORTHVILLE INDUSTRIES CORP., 198 F. Supp. 2d 249 (E.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Option Agreement § 7.08. . . .

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, v. MOTOROLA, INC., 184 F. Supp. 2d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . See PX 111, § 11.09(a); PX 112, § 13(a); PX 113, § 7.08; PX 114, § 5.08(a). 50. . . .

D. SCHEMBRE, C. P. A. v. ORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,, 199 F. Supp. 2d 944 (E.D. Mo. 2001)

. . . Section 7.08 provides that the contributions to these funds are to be made monthly. 5. . . .

POCHODAY, v. BUILDING SERVICE J PENSION FUND, J, 5 F. App'x 16 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . Section 7.08, which deals with the right to appeal a decision to deny benefits, provides that appeals . . .

M. ADAMS N. A. v. UNITED STATES, 218 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . Ribstein, Bromberg and Ribstein on Partnership § 7.08(b)(7), at 7:125-26 (Supp.1999-2). . . . .

TALIAFERRO, v. ASSOCIATES CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, a a AETNA U. S. a, 112 F. Supp. 2d 483 (D.S.C. 1999)

. . . Local Rule 7.08 (1999). 7. INTRODUCTION From April 1986 through October 1, 1997, Mr. . . .

In LABRUM DOAK, LLP, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, ESTATE OF LABRUM DOAK, a v. M. ASHDALE, S. F. G. R. M. R. M. R. R. P. G. O. D. L. M. A. C. J. J. R. F. D. Jr. F. K. J. H. M. J. H. J. M. J. E. M. J. J. J. R. L. A., 227 B.R. 391 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . RIBSTEIN, supra, § 7.08, at 7:79 to 7:80; J.W. . . . EPSTEIN, supra, § 7.08, at 7:83. . . .

VERMONT MICROSYSTEMS, INC. v. AUTODESK, INC. G., 138 F.3d 449 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . Milgrim, Milgrim on Trade Secrets (“Milgrim ”) § 7.08[3][a], at 7-314 to 7-318 (1990), or by the profits . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- GONZALEZ,, 136 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 1998)

. . . For example, Sixth Circuit pattern jury instruction 7.08 reads as follows: (3) The fact that_has pleaded . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . 3.88% 4.77% 3.89% 7.01% 8.14% 1993 2.46% 3.55% 4.28% 3.43% 5.87% 7.22% •1994 2.92% 5.74% 6.30% 5.31% 7.08% . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)