The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.09

7.09 Citrus County.—The boundary lines of Citrus County are as follows: Beginning at a point in the thread or center of the Withlacoochee River on the section line dividing sections twelve and thirteen, township twenty-one south, range twenty east; thence on said line west to the southwest corner of section nine, township twenty-one south, range nineteen east; thence north on said section line to township line dividing townships twenty and twenty-one south; thence west on said township line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence north along said gulf, including all islands along said gulf coast, and including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the most southern outlet of the Withlacoochee River at its mouth, leaving out all the islands in the mouth of said river; thence easterly along the thread of said river to the point of beginning, including all the lands and islands which said river line may enclose.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 107, 1847; s. 1, ch. 415, 1850; s. 1, ch. 3772, 1887; RS 44; GS 42; s. 1, ch. 6245, 1911; RGS 46; CGL 48; s. 1, ch. 94-313.

F.S. 7.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE TANGOE, INC. STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION, 333 F. Supp. 3d 77 (D. Conn. 2018)

. . . quarter ended June 30, 2015," when the Company's common stock dropped from $10.35, on August 6, 2015, to $7.09 . . . quarter ended June 30, 2015," when the Company's common stock dropped from $10.35, on August 6, 2015, to $7.09 . . .

MONTGOMERY, v. M. CUOMO, T. C. P. II,, 291 F. Supp. 3d 303 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . Reports of involuntary commitments are reported to NICS pursuant to MHL § 7.09(j), but reports under . . . Nurse de Reeder further indicates that she submitted the MHL § 7.09 report using "the New York State . . . As part of the SAFE Act, MHL § 7.09(j) was further amended, to require OMH to forward such information . . . MHL § 7.09(j)(1) (West 2018). Aff. of Donna Marie Call at ¶ 7. . . . Id. § 7.09(j). DCJS then sends that same information to the FBI, in order to update NICS." . . .

MCGRAW- HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC, v. MATHRANI, LLC,, 295 F. Supp. 3d 404 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . iBestBargains made 1,124 sales of books to New York consumers on three online marketplaces, representing 7.09% . . .

MCLAUGHLIN, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 260 F. Supp. 3d 523 (D.S.C. 2017)

. . . Under Local Civil Rule 7.09 (D.S.C.), "hearings on motions may be ordered by the Court in its discretion . . .

GUINDON, v. PRITZKER,, 240 F. Supp. 3d 181 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Similarly, the recreational sector receives quotas of 7.19 million pounds and 7.09 million pounds in . . .

GANESH v. UNITED STATES, 658 F. App'x 217 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . described as “excessively large”—while the average SNAP purchase at a Kentucky convenience store is $7.09 . . .

SAATHOFF, v. DAVIS,, 826 F.3d 925 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . This instruction was based largely on Seventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.09. . . .

IN RE CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO. INC., 562 B.R. 168 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . Wilmington notes that section 7.09(b) of the Collateral Agreement provides: “Neither this Agreement nor . . . As for section 7.09(b) of the Collateral Agreement, that provision is irrelevant. . . .

C. DETERS, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION,, 646 F. App'x 468 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . Court agreed with the KBA’s finding that Deters violated SCR 3.130-8.2(a), SCR 3.130-3,3(a), SCR 3.130-7.09 . . .

IN RE KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 166 F. Supp. 3d 822 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . resulting in an adverse impact on Key’s share price, which dropped nearly 17% from a closing price of $7.09 . . .

SPRINGFIELD PARCEL C, LLC, v. UNITED STATES, LLC,, 124 Fed. Cl. 163 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . Springfield’s counsel learned that there was a limited termination-for-convenience clause in Section 7.09 . . . Because the lease was signed on August 11, the 45-day time limit in Section 7.09 would expire on September . . . court, along with an application for a temporary restraining order to arrest the expiration of Section 7.09 . . . Springfield argued that unless this court halted the running of the 45-day limit on Section 7.09, the . . . The eourt granted a TRO that day, enjoining the expiration of Section 7.09 until October 9, 2015. . . .

IN RE BROOKE CORPORATION, J. v., 541 B.R. 492 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2015)

. . . Barkley Clark and Barbara Clark, The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code, ¶ 7.09 . . .

WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION, v. APPLE, INC., 135 F. Supp. 3d 865 (W.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . the infringing technology), the average prices of the accused iPhones would decrease by a range of $7.09 . . .

In CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION, 104 F. Supp. 3d 599 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Section 7.09(e) of the Citigroup Plan provides that in the event that a duty exists to determine whether . . . Compl. ¶ 114; see also Citigroup Plan § 7.09(e). . . .

VEASEY, v. PERRY,, 71 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Senate Rule 7.09(b)-(h) (2011). . . .

REGAN, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 40 F. Supp. 3d 698 (D.S.C. 2014)

. . . present Motion on various grounds and asking the Court to impose sanctions pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.09 . . . Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider, the City asks the Court to exercise its authority under Local Civil Rule 7.09 . . . Local Civil Rule 7.09, DSC. . . .

B. KINGSLEY, v. HENDRICKSON,, 744 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . committee wisely omitted such language of recklessness or purpose from its Pattern Instructions 7.08 and 7.09 . . . S.Ct. 1865, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989); Federal Civil Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit No. 7.08 & 7.09 . . . Pattern Instructions 7.08 and 7.09 were drafted for use in excessive force cases for both arrestees under . . . Instruction 7.09 then explains what is meant by excessive or unreasonable force, and it does so in purely . . . must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant used unreasonable force against him.” 7.09 . . .

FULLINGTON, v. PFIZER, INC. LLC PLIVA, LLC, 720 F.3d 739 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . . ¶¶ 7.09-7.12 with Bell Compl. ¶¶ 4.KM.14. . . .

In PARROTT BROADCASTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 492 B.R. 35 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2013)

. . . Id. at ¶ 7.09. . . .

In PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, H., 690 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Plan §§ 5.04, 7.09, 7.11, 7.13 (establishing the distribution account, and detailing powers and duties . . .

In PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, H., 690 F.3d 161 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Plan §§ 5.04, 7.09, 7.11, 7.13 (establishing the distribution account, and detailing powers and duties . . .

MARTELLO, M. D. v. SANTANA,, 874 F. Supp. 2d 658 (E.D. Ky. 2012)

. . . Presumably, Martel-lo is intending to refer to SCR 3.130 (7.09), which governs direct contact with potential . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HAGEN, a k a a k a, 468 F. App'x 373 (4th Cir. 2012)

. . . One investor testified that on February 13, 2006, he bought 1,000 shares for $7.09 per share, shares . . .

In CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION. K. v. N. A. O. E., 662 F.3d 128 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Section 7.09(e) of each Plan states that “provisions in the Plan mandate the creation and continuation . . .

DAVIS, v. DURAN,, 277 F.R.D. 362 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . See Instr. 7.09 (“An officer may use deadly force when a reasonable officer, under the same circumstances . . .

In ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE ERISA LITIGATION. v. LLC, v., 761 F. Supp. 2d 504 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Marlin I was comprised of approximately $1,024 billion in Marlin 7.09% Senior Secured Notes due December . . .

TRANSMONTAIGNE PRODUCT SERVICES, INC. v. M V WILBUR R. CLARK,, 679 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (S.D. Ala. 2009)

. . . (Doc. 212-2, p. 50, ¶ 7.09). . In Bonner v. . . .

D SUMRELL, v. MISSISSIPPI,, 607 F. Supp. 2d 748 (N.D. Miss. 2009)

. . . Secondly — though admittedly delving into state law- — under Rule 7.09 of the Uniform Rules of Circuit . . .

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON, v., 308 F. App'x 899 (6th Cir. 2009)

. . . obtained from Jackson and split, the district court attributed to Hines one-half of that one-half, or 7.09 . . . 14.17 grams) and half of the drug quantity Edwards obtained from another source and fronted to Hines (7.09 . . .

INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, v. CITY OF SAN LEANDRO,, 632 F. Supp. 2d 925 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . Policy 7.09 of the City’s General Plan establishes a policy of developing the West San Leandro industrial . . . See General Plan Policies 7.09; 10.04. c. . . .

In MIRANT CORPORATION,, 389 B.R. 481 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Gen were “free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests.... ” PSA, ¶ 7.09. . . . See PSA, ¶7.09; Plan, § 9.6. . . . Because the PSA, ¶ 7.09, refers to 11 U.S.C. § 363, the terms “lien,” “claim,” “encumbrance” and “interest . . .

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, v. AGFA- GEVAERT N. V., 560 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . equal to 0.6 micron provide 92.10% of the total projected area and have an average aspect ratio of 7.09 . . .

CONGREGATION OF EZRA SHOLOM, v. BLOCKBUSTER, INC., 504 F. Supp. 2d 151 (N.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . On the day of the announcement Blockbuster Class A common stock fell $0.92, or 11%, from $8.01 to $7.09 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUCERO, a k a, 229 F. App'x 804 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . One ounce is 28.35 grams, resulting in one-quarter ounce being the equivalent of approximately 7.09 grams . . .

BROWN, v. UNITED STATES,, 76 Fed. Cl. 762 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . Plaintiff declares that he earns $7.09 an hour gross income, from which state and federal taxes, 10% . . .

D. COLLINS, Jr. v. J. ASTRUE,, 493 F. Supp. 2d 858 (S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . Lung volumes: Total lung capacity 7.09 liters (115%)... . . .

J. GODARD, Jr. v. ALABAMA PILOT, INC., 485 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (S.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . Alabama Pilot’s records reflect that, between March 2004 and August 2006, the pilot boats operated for 7.09 . . . 24 of the 30 months in which data is available. .All parties assume, without explanation, that the 7.09 . . . But two launch operators are on duty at a time; therefore, the 7.09 hours figure could only be accurate . . . Court will assume it to be true for purposes of this Order; otherwise, the parties’ agreed figure of 7.09 . . .

ORTHO- MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. v. KALI LABORATORIES, INC. v., 482 F. Supp. 2d 478 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . Smith's report actually claims that 1:3.55 to 1:7.09 is encompassed by "about 1:5.” Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BELSKIS,, 477 F. Supp. 2d 237 (D. Me. 2007)

. . . (113.40 grams) to drug quantity and the inclusion of the daily sales — of a quarter ounce per day (7.09 . . . The PSR calculates a quarter ounce of cocaine to equal 7.09 grams. . . .

FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. RENTOUMIS, 950 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 7.09 then provides: 7.09 Buyer and the Stockholder shall submit any dispute concerning the accounting . . . The procedure described in this Section 7.09 is referred to herein as the “Dispute Resolution Mechanism . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, In Co. v. GRAVES M. a, 479 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . For the reasons stated in the panel opinion, this court held that section 7.09(g)(i) of the merger agreement . . . Because section 7.09(g)(i) conditions the rights of the participants under the Dresser retiree medical . . . Relatedly, we express no view on how the other plans mentioned in section 7.09(g) of the merger agreement . . .

HELEN OF TROY, L. P. v. ZOTOS CORPORATION a k a, 511 F. Supp. 2d 703 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Plaintiff had a 7.09% return rate from the infomercial sales as of March 10, 2004, three months after . . . Two, Benz used the past tense in his correspondence: “We had a 7.09% return rate,” in response to the . . . Three, the rate of 7.09% came from Benz, one of Plaintiffs personnel. . . . Therefore, the Court finds the return rate as reported to QVC in March 2004 to be credible. . 7.09% of . . . 69,447 = 4,923.79 . 7.09% of 61,931 = 4,390.91 . . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 199 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2006)

. . . plea agreement to three counts of distributing and possessing with the intent to distribute at least 7.09 . . . credible; (2) that because the district court found relevant conduct to involve a drug quantity beyond the 7.09 . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, In Co. v. GRAVES M. a, 463 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . Following this provision, section 7.09(h) provides that: Subject to Section 7.09(g), until the third . . . Enforceability of Section 7.09(g) (i) as a Plan Amendment 1. . . . A comparison of section 7.09(g)(i) with the section succeeding it, section 7.09(h), provides further . . . (g)(i) meaningless and unnecessary in light of section 7.09(h). . . . We decline to read a three-year requirement into section 7.09(g)(i). 2. . . .

HALLIBURTON COMPANY BENEFITS COMMITTEE, Co v. B GRAVES M a, 191 F. App'x 248 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . limit its right to amend or terminate the Dresser Plan, (2) a declaration on the meaning of sections 7.09 . . . that the Merger Agreement requires Halliburton to maintain the Dresser Plan in accordance with section 7.09 . . . that the Merger Agreement requires Halliburton to maintain the Dresser Plan in accordance with section 7.09 . . .

Co. H. K. Co. Co. Co. Co. v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 736 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . The values obtained from the ACC data and the ranged Nekkanti/Devi data do not include the values of $7.09 . . .

ALLIED PACIFIC FOOD DALIAN CO. LTD. H. K. Co. Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . The values obtained from the ACC data and the ranged Nekkanti/Devi data do not include the values of $7.09 . . .

RICHMAN, B. v. SHEAHAN,, 415 F. Supp. 2d 929 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . The Committee Comments to Seventh Circuit Instruction 7.09 Fourth Amendment/Fourteenth Amendment: Excessive . . .

S. BRANDON, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS AFL- CIO,, 393 F. Supp. 2d 1341 (N.D. Ga. 2005)

. . . See Lockheed’s Resp. [30]; Local 7.09’s Resp. [31]. . . .

FMC CORP. v. AMVAC CHEMICAL CORP., 379 F. Supp. 2d 733 (E.D. Pa. 2005)

. . . DCA, ¶ 7.09 ("The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the . . .

L. GOLDSTEIN, M. D. v. ASSOCIATES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY OF PITTSBURGH AMENDED AND RESTATED PENSION PLAN a L. M. D. M. M. D., 137 F. App'x 441 (3d Cir. 2005)

. . . See Article VII §§ 7.01, 7.02, 7.03 and 7.08 (Pension Plan) and §§ 7.01 and 7.09 (Profit Sharing Plan . . .

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHICAGO, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 298 F. Supp. 2d 725 (N.D. Ill. 2003)

. . . participation in prime contracts dropped to 5.74%, with WBEs having none, and MBE subcontracting dollars were 7.09% . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAKER, 78 F. App'x 318 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . Baker possessed 7.09 grams of crack cocaine in his bedroom. . . .

S. POWELL, v. FIRST REPUBLIC BANK,, 274 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . courts should examine the composition of the board or special litigation committee which, under section 7.09 . . . However, if the board or committee “substantially complied with” the procedures specified in section 7.09 . . .

COOPERATIVE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC. a v. R. OGDEN, 265 F. Supp. 2d 662 (M.D. La. 2003)

. . . LTD Plan § 7.09. . Social Security Reimbursement Agreement (RA), ¶ 3. . . . .

In FOXMEYER CORPORATION A. Jr. v. CIT La N. A. FSB N. A. BTM, 286 B.R. 546 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002)

. . . on June 19,1996: (a) $200,534,675 to repay outstanding principal and accrued interest on unsecured 7.09% . . .

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, v. MOTOROLA, INC., 184 F. Supp. 2d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . covenant, condition or agreement contained in [inter alia \ Article VII (other than Sections 7.06 and 7.09 . . .

W. BAKER, v. W. SUTHERS, K. R., 9 F. App'x 947 (10th Cir. 2001)

. . . The purchases were for $7.09 on June 27, 2000, and for $9.39 one on July 18, 2000. . . .

BJUSTROM, v. TRUST ONE MORTGAGE CORP., 199 F.R.D. 346 (W.D. Wash. 2001)

. . . Conte, Newberg 'on Class Actions § 7.09 (3rd ed.1992). In Eisen v. . . .

WESTCODE, INC. v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER RAIL SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA INC. f k a AEG, 123 F. Supp. 2d 819 (E.D. Pa. 2000)

. . . . § P.7.09.A. BART serves approximately 330,000 passengers per weekday. . . . that its legend, which reserves its manufacturing rights, was allowed by sections P.4.06.B.5 and P.7.09 . . .

BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,, 114 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D. Conn. 2000)

. . . same time, Bristol’s Wind/U related expenses totaled $2.73 million in CY95, $5.01 million in CY96, $7.09 . . .

TECA, INC. a v. WM- TAB, INC. a, 726 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Paragraph 7.09 of the contract provided as follows: Seller has not received any notice of, and does not . . . fact in support of its conclusion that appellants had breached the warranty contained in paragraph 7.09 . . .

SNAP- ON INC. Co. v. HUNTER ENGINEERING CO., 29 F. Supp. 2d 965 (E.D. Wis. 1998)

. . . First, they argue that Hunter’s order improperly defines “document” differently than does local rule 7.09 . . .

ASOCIACION COLOMBIANA EXPORTADORES FLORES, v. UNITED STATES,, 6 F. Supp. 2d 865 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Instead, Commerce applied BIA rates of 6.74 percent, 7.09 percent and 6.97 percent for the fifth, sixth . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 173 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Instead, Commerce applied BIA rates of 6.74 percent, 7.09 percent and 6.97 percent for the fifth, sixth . . .

In V. DESTREMPS, Jr., 193 B.R. 85 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

. . . Plan § 7.09. . . . deferred compensation is addition to and not part of retirement program or pension system); Plan at § 7.09 . . .

FOWLER, v. SUNRISE CARPET INDUSTRIES, INC., 911 F. Supp. 1560 (N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . Once Plaintiff Kerr became a mender, her hourly-rate of compensation eventually increased to $7.09. . . .

QUILTER, v. V. VOINOVICH,, 912 F. Supp. 1006 (N.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . See Former Local Rule 7.09(4)(c). . . .

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXCHANGE CORPORATION, v. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,, 892 F. Supp. 1520 (N.D. Ga. 1995)

. . . MCI Tariff § B-7.09. . . .

In CAMBRIDGE BIOTECH CORPORATION,, 178 B.R. 34 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1995)

. . . Barkley Clark, The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code ¶ 7.09[2] (2d ed. 1988 . . .

In EPSTEIN, 32 F.3d 1559 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

. . . Types in Format 6 $0.00 2 Types $6.00 30 Prints in Format 5 $6.00 1 Print transaction(s) $0.09 Dialnet $7.09 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. FLORES,, 856 F. Supp. 1400 (E.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . Weinberg, Federal Bail and Detention Handbook, § 7.09, (1988 & Supp. 1991). . . .

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, v. AMERI- TEL, INC., 852 F. Supp. 659 (N.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . Section B-7.09 of the Tariff provides that "In the event the Company incurs fees or expenses, including . . .

In LATIN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, DRABKIN, v. CAPITAL BANK, N. A., 156 B.R. 102 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1993)

. . . See Barkley Clark, The Law of Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code H 7.09[2] (2d ed . . .

In TRANEL TRANEL v. ADAMS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, In TRANEL TRANEL v. ADAMS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, 940 F.2d 1168 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . The Joint Plan provides in Paragraph 7.09: “the Trustee shall be compensated for services rendered as . . .

In TRANEL TRANEL v. ADAMS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, In TRANEL TRANEL v. ADAMS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, 940 F.2d 1168 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . The Joint Plan provides in Paragraph 7.09: “the Trustee shall be compensated for services rendered as . . .

MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS, INC. v. SHAREHOLDERS OF LOWERY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. A. A. K. Jr. A. B. J. Jr. M. D. III,, 771 F. Supp. 823 (S.D. Tex. 1991)

. . . Section B of this Article, the Corporation may make distributions in compliance with Article 6.04, 7.09 . . .

COBB, v. VILLAGE OF OAKWOOD, J., 789 F. Supp. 237 (N.D. Ohio 1991)

. . . Charter §§ 7.09 and 9.03 provide that certain employees serve at the pleasure of the mayor or the village . . .

In LIBERTY TRUST COMPANY. LIBERTY TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING TRUST v. HOLT, FSLIC, 130 B.R. 467 (W.D. Tex. 1991)

. . . If such liquidation were conducted by a state court, Art. 7.09 of the Texas Business Corporation Act . . . However, because this liquidation was undertaken by the Bankruptcy Court, Art. 7.09 does not afford a . . . Yet, there is no question but that Art. 7.09 contemplates such a result. . . . For this Court to hold otherwise would run contrary to Art. 7.09. . . . Act Ann., art. 7.09, (Vernon 1980 & Supp.1991) provides, in pertinent part, In proceedings to liquidate . . .

UNITED STATES v. FRONDLE,, 918 F.2d 62 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . Third, the district court added another 701 grams, aggregated from the following transactions: 7.09 grams . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE- SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION FUND, v. R. JONES,, 740 F. Supp. 449 (N.D. Ohio 1990)

. . . District of Ohio properly assigned this case to my docket because the case is “related”, under Local Rule 7.09 . . .

NEHRING, T. v. STEAMSHIP M V POINT VAIL,, 901 F.2d 1044 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . At the time the Funds intervened in this action, the pertinent section of Local Rule 7.09, which applies . . . Trust Funds assert in each complaint that their claims are brought pursuant to Local Admiralty Rule 7.09 . . . It may well be that Local Rule 7.09 means that when a vessel is already in the custody of the Marshal . . . The Seafarers Trust Funds contend that because of Local Rule 7.09, attachment would not issue once the . . . Even if applicable to the claims in question, however, Local Rule 7.09 cannot override the requirements . . .

GUARANTY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, v. ULTIMATE SAVINGS BANK, F. S. B. FSLIC, 737 F. Supp. 366 (W.D. Va. 1990)

. . . This represents 7.09% of the amount collected under the deficiency note. . . . principal payment it was due from the proceeds of the condominium sales it would have retained only a 7.09% . . .

SARACCO, v. LOCAL UNION BUILDING MATERIAL PENSION FUND,, 739 F. Supp. 1154 (N.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . In fact, in its reply, the Fund points out that Section 7.09(b)(2) of the Plan indicates that credits . . .

In CARTE BLANCHE SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. v. CARTE BLANCHE INTERNATIONAL, LTD., 888 F.2d 260 (2d Cir. 1989)

. . . In October, 1985, CBI and CBS filed demands for arbitration with the ICC pursuant to paragraph 7.09 of . . .

In FOX HILL OFFICE INVESTORS, LIMITED, FOX HILL OFFICE INVESTORS, LIMITED, v. MERCANTILE BANK, N. A. v. KROH BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT CO., 101 B.R. 1007 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1989)

. . . Finally, Mercantile relies on § 7.09 of the Partnership Agreement. . . . Accordingly, the Court further concludes that § 7.09 did not authorize KBEC to make the note or mortgage . . .

In WATER GAP VILLAGE, a, 99 B.R. 226 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Epstein (for pre-petition services) , 396.67 —Spooner Michelle & Ford 500.00 —Steinhouer’s Stationary 7.09 . . .

In CARTE BLANCHE SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. v. CARTE BLANCHE INTERNATIONAL, LTD., 683 F. Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . Craco, Esq., who had originally been designated as CBS’s party arbitrator under paragraph 7.09 of the . . . arbitrators with substantial discretion: All proceedings in this arbitration shall be governed by Paragraph 7.09 . . . Paragraph 7.09 of the Franchise Agreement provided in pertinent part: AH disputes between CBI and Franchisee . . .

FLORIDA MINING MATERIALS CORPORATION, v. CITY OF PORT ORANGE,, 518 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Anderson, 1 American Law of Zoning, § 7.09 (1986). . . .

J. v. J. E. K. v., 86 T.C. 388 (T.C. 1986)

. . . February 1978, just before these silver trades, closed at $6.51 at the end of December 1978, and at $7.09 . . .

In S I ACQUISITION, INC. In AIS COMPANY, Co., 58 B.R. 454 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1986)

. . . See TEX.BUS.CORP.ACT ANN. arts. 7.05(A), 7.06(A)(3), 7.09 (Vernon 1980 & Supp.1982) (noting relationship . . .

DEMJANJUK, v. PETROVSKY, Mo., 612 F. Supp. 571 (N.D. Ohio 1985)

. . . .1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1036, 103 S.Ct. 447, 74 L.Ed.2d 602 (1982), pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.09 . . . Local Civil Rule 7.09. . . . petition is related to Case No. 83-Misc. 349 (the extradition proceeding) and thus, that Local Rule 7.09 . . . Lambros transferred the petition to this Court as a “related matter”, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.09 . . . Local Civil Rule (N.D.Ohio) 7.09(4)(c) (Assignment of Cases other than by Lot) provides, in relevant . . .

THE CENTRE FOR COUNSELING AND EDUCATION, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 20 Fla. Supp. 2d 182 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1984)

. . . Section 10E-7.09, Florida Administrative Code, establishes the purpose of that chapter to be the prevention . . .

L. FISHMAN v. ESTATE OF WIRTZ,, 594 F. Supp. 853 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . -80 playing season through the 1981-82 playing season, the NBA average ticket price has risen from $7.09 . . .

JACKSHAW PONTIAC, INC. T. V. v. CLEVELAND PRESS PUBLISHING CO. Co. E., 102 F.R.D. 183 (N.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . issued, two additional antitrust complaints were filed as related cases pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.09 . . .

STEWART, v. NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND,, 730 F.2d 1552 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . They rely on § 7.09 of the plan: The benefits to which a Participant is entitled under the terms of this . . . Section 7.09 provides that only benefits to which a participant is “entitled under the terms of [the] . . .

In DEMJANJUK, a k a a, 584 F. Supp. 1321 (N.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . Rule 7.09 of the Rules of the United {States District Court, the Northern District of Ohio, covers the . . . RULE 7.09 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES OTHER THAN BY LOT. . . .

FINE, v. FIRESTONE,, 443 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . note with respect to the functions of the Secretary of State, as sole party respondent, that Rule 10-7.09 . . .

In MORTGAGEAMERICA CORPORATION, AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF AUSTIN, v. MORTGAGEAMERICA CORPORATION,, 714 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . recovered in that action are then distributed, according to section 98 of the Model Act and section 7.09 . . .

In MORTGAGEAMERICA CORPORATION, AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF AUSTIN, v. MORTGAGEAMERICA CORPORATION,, 714 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . recovered in that action are then distributed, according to section 98 of the Model Act and section 7.09 . . .