Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- BIENNIAL PETITION., 267 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 2019)

. . . Additionally, the Bar proposes deleting Bar Rules 2-9.8 (Practice Resource Institute) and 3-7.15 (Amendments . . . Bar's petition, we adopt most of the amendments as proposed by the Bar and delete rules 2-9.8 and 3-7.15 . . . Additionally, Bar Rule 3-7.15 is deleted as duplicative of Bar Rule 1-12.1(f). . . . RULE 3-7.15 AMENDMENTS RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE Petitions for revision of or amendments to chapter 3 will . . .

L. SHORTER, v. D. BACA D., 895 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . §§ 7.15, 7.18 & comm.(f) (2017 ed.). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MELGAR- CABRERA,, 892 F.3d 1053 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15(a), p. 301 (1986 and Supp.2003) ). . . .

WILDER, v. WORLD OF BOXING LLC,, 310 F. Supp. 3d 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . therefore the subject of a purse offer, following which WOB emerged as the winning bidder with a bid of $7.15 . . .

EREGLI DEMIR VE CELIK FABRIKALARI T. A. S, v. UNITED STATES,, 308 F. Supp. 3d 1297 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . Determination , Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 3.66 percent for Erdemir and 7.15 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 238 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2018)

. . . advertisement to endorse or recommend a lawyer, or to act as a spokesperson for a lawyer under Rule rule 4-7.15 . . . following information in advertisements is presumed not to violate the provisions of rules 4-7.11 through 4-7.15 . . .

FINJAN, INC. v. BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, LLC,, 283 F. Supp. 3d 839 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . accused products and product combinations at issue: Patent Asserted Claims Accused Products '844 1, 7.15 . . .

GAUGHAN, v. A. RUBENSTEIN,, 261 F. Supp. 3d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The New York State minimum wage ranged from $7.15 to $8.75 per hour during Plaintiffs employment. . . .

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COOPER CARRY INC., 861 F.3d 267 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . Agreement Art. 7.15, J.A. 34. . . .

VALLE v. GORDON CHEN S KITCHEN LLC, 254 F. Supp. 3d 665 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The New York State minimum wage rate as of July 12, 2013, was $7.15 per hour. NYLL § 652. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. KING,, 231 F. Supp. 3d 872 (W.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . The reason is that the deposits into this account — $7.15 million— are the basis for the government’s . . . deposits into an account associated with Legendz — are used as the basis for an extrapolation (from $7.15 . . . majority of the deposits,, representing seventy-six percent of the dollar amount, the government uses $7.15 . . . But the court has rejected the beginning number ($7.15 million), finding that only $61,604.40 of that . . . Viewed either as an extrapolation from a $7.15 million base or from a $61,604.40 base, the government . . .

LUXOTTICA GROUP, S. P. A. v. GREENBRIAR MARKETPLACE II, LLC,, 212 F. Supp. 3d 1375 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . have the right of injunction and the right to invoke any remedy allowed at law or equity;” (f) Section 7.15 . . .

CHAOHUI TANG, Li, v. WING KEUNG ENTERPRISES, INC., 210 F. Supp. 3d 376 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Under section 652, the minimum wage between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013 was $7.15 “or, if greater . . . Every employer shall pay to each of its employees for each hour worked a wage of not less than ... $7.15 . . .

BALLANTRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 203 So. 3d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Nelson, Real Estate Finance Law, § 7.15, at 573 (4th ed.2001)). . . .

FRANK, v. WALKER,, 196 F. Supp. 3d 893 (E.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . § 7.15(1). . . . Stat. § 7.15(1), could not disobey the commission’s directive to make affidavits available to voters . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. v. N. A., 551 B.R. 550 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016)

. . . Collateral Trust Agreement, § 7.15. . W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. . . .

RAMOS, Ed v. TELGIAN CORPORATION, 176 F. Supp. 3d 181 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . compliance with the third element of the FWW scheme, therefore, the relevant minimum wage is the NYLL’s $7.15 . . .

S. HUMPHREY, v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE SECURITY SERVICES LTD. ABC, 169 F. Supp. 3d 489 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . December 31, 2006 January 1, 2007-July 23, 2009 July 24, 2009-May 4, 2012 Minimum Wage $6.75 per hour $7.15 . . . minimum wage in New York State was $6.75 per hour worked from January 1 through December 31, 2006, and $7.15 . . .

INDIANA PETROLEUM MARKETERS AND CONVENIENCE STORE ASSOCIATION, v. COOK,, 808 F.3d 318 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 7.15-7-ll(a) (listing exceptions not applicable here). . . .

SALINAS, o, v. STARJEM RESTAURANT CORP. d b a, 123 F. Supp. 3d 442 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . From January 1, 2007 until July 23, 2009, the New York minimum wage rate was $7.15 per hour. N.Y. . . .

YONG KUI CHEN, Zu v. WAI YIN CHAN,, 615 F. App'x 10 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . 2009 based on the federal minimum wage of $7.25, rather than New York’s prevailing minimum wage of $7.15 . . . Law § 652(1) (providing minimum wage of $7.15 for periods on and after January 1, 2007, “or, if greater . . .

CHESS, v. J. DOVEY, CDC CDC CDC CDC G. s M. S. T., 790 F.3d 961 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Jury Instr. of 7th Cir., §§ 7.14, 7.15 (2009 rev.); 8th Cir. Civ. . . .

E. McCLAIN, Sr. On v. IRADIMED CORPORATION, X., 111 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . On September 3, 2014, Iradimed’s stock price closed at $7.15, a fall of $3.25, or 31%. Id. at ¶ 80. . . . Even factoring in the fall in stock price on September 3, 2014, when Iradimed’s stock price closed at $7.15 . . .

FORD- GREENE, v. NHS, INC. a k a NHS s NHS, 106 F. Supp. 3d 590 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . [s]even dollars fifteen cents ($7.15) an hour beginning July 1, 2007.” 43 Pa. . . .

W. NOBLE, Jr. v. R. SOMBROTTO,, 84 F. Supp. 3d 11 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . Additionally, the NALC pays both sides of the Social Security taxes, 7.15 percent, which is approximately . . .

FERMIN, v. LAS DELICIAS PERUANAS RESTAURANT, INC. De, 93 F. Supp. 3d 19 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . The New York minimum wage set by the NYLL was $7.15 for the period beginning January 1, 2007 through . . . determined that Defendants did not compensate Plaintiffs with the $7.25 federal minimum wage or the $7.15 . . .

D. MURPHY v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 74 F. Supp. 3d 1267 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . determined that the matter was one that could be addressed without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7.15 . . .

BELIZAIRE, v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES LTD., 61 F. Supp. 3d 336 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . , 2004 to Mar. 28, 2013) (for the period on and after January 1, 2007, setting the minimum wage at $7.15 . . . , when Plaintiff was hired by Defendant on January 14, 2009, the applicable state minimum wage was $7.15 . . .

R. HOVEN, v. WALGREEN CO., 751 F.3d 778 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . States Constitution; Article I, § 6 of the Michigan Constitution; Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions 2d 7.15 . . . States Constitution; Article I, § 6 of the Michigan Constitution; Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions 2d 7.15 . . . Michigan Criminal Jury Instruction 7.15 Hoven identifies the model jury instruction for criminal cases . . . Jury Instruction 2d 7.15. This argument is without merit. . . .

GALEANA v. LEMONGRASS ON BROADWAY CORPORATION, d b a, 120 F. Supp. 3d 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . at the beginning of the relevant period, but increased annually beginning in 2005 until it reached $7.15 . . . per hour, effective January 1, 2005, to $6.75 per hour, effective January 1, 2006, and finally to $7.15 . . .

E. BENNETT, On v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, D. N. G., 298 F.R.D. 498 (D. Kan. 2014)

. . . Sprint’s stock price dropped almost 70% from its class period high of $23.25 per share to less than $7.15 . . .

B. KINGSLEY, v. HENDRICKSON,, 744 F.3d 443 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . , 106 S.Ct. 1078, 89 L.Ed.2d 251 (1986); Federal Civil Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit No. 7.15 . . .

HOWARD TOWN CENTER DEVELOPER, LLC, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, v. LLC,, 7 F. Supp. 3d 64 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . VII § 7.15. . . . Development Agreement does not contain a survival clause, thus rendering the confidentiality terms of Section 7.15 . . . VII § 7.15. . . . relief since the Development Agreement does not provide any remedy to either party for violating Section 7.15 . . .

In CHINA VALVES TECHNOLOGY SECURITIES LITIGATION, 979 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . lightly here., On On January 13, 2011, China Valves’ stock fell 5.6 percent, from $8.72 per share to $7.15 . . .

GONZALEZ, s v. SEARS HOLDING COMPANY a k a s, 980 F. Supp. 2d 170 (D.P.R. 2013)

. . . See ECF Nos. 35-1, ¶¶ 10-11; 51-1, ¶¶ 1.10-1.11, 1.13-1.14, 7.13-7.15, 10-11; 63-1, ¶¶ 1.10-1.11.1.13 . . . -1.14, 7.13-7.15. . . .

CRESCENT RESOURCES LITIGATION TRUST BENSIMON, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION LLC LLC f k a LLC LLC B. W. W. R., 500 B.R. 464 (W.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . exchange, Ideare gave Verizon $2.4 billion in cash (most of it borrowed for this purpose), another $7.15 . . .

KOURSA, INC. v. MANROLAND, INC., 971 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . later than the Delivery Date of 12/31/11 due to [manro-land] (other than one of the causes provided in 7.15 . . . Section 7.15 governs delay or nonperformance under the Machinery Contract and excuses both Koursa and . . . The parties negotiated Section 7.15, and prior to signing the Machinery Contract, they removed language . . . If Koursa does not so accept delivery for a cause other than one of the causes provided in Section 7.15 . . . Man-roland further advised, in part: However, even if that were not the case, Section 7.15 of the [Machinery . . .

ENRIQUEZ, v. CHERRY HILL MARKET CORP., 993 F. Supp. 2d 229 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . For any weeks in which his effective pay rate was below the applicable minimum wage ($7.15/ hour until . . .

P. CUVIELLO, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . in fact, his allegations show he is not likely to violate section 7.15. . . . For section 7.15, however, the analysis is more complicated. . . . Section 7.15, on the other hand, is more amorphous. . . . It also can be construed as enforcement of section 7.15. . . . , no Monell claim is stated under section 7.15. . . .

PEREZ, v. G P AUTO WASH INC., 930 F. Supp. 2d 423 (E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . shortly before this date and, as such, would have been entitled to a minimum wage in the amount of $7.15 . . . Defendants, however, had to comply with the NYLL's higher minimum wage requirement of $7.15 per hour . . .

HENRY, v. F. DINELLE, E. J., 929 F. Supp. 2d 107 (N.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Jury Instr. 7th Cir. 7.15 Eighth Amendment: Excessive Force Against Convicted Prisoner-Elements (2010 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES, 108 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Deceptive and Inherently Misleading Advertisements); 4-7.14 (Potentially Misleading Advertisements); 4-7.15 . . . advertisement to endorse or recommend a lawyer, or to act as a spokesperson for a lawyer under Rule 4-7.15 . . . RULE 4-7.15 UNDULY MANIPULATIVE OR INTRUSIVE ADVERTISEMENTS A lawyer may not engage in unduly manipulative . . . pursuant to this rule for compliance with the applicable provisions set forth in rules 4-7.11 through 4-7.15 . . . use a firm name, letterhead, or other professional designation that violates rules 4-7.11 through 4-7.15 . . . something other than a private law firm, and is not otherwise in violation of rules 4-7.11 through 4-7.15 . . .

PURCHASE PARTNERS, LLC, v. CARVER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, s Sr., 914 F. Supp. 2d 480 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . §§ 7.12, 7.15), which it eventually did. (See Def.’s 56.1 Resp. Nos. 13-14). . . . (Agreement § 7.15). . . . (Agreement § 7.15 (emphasis added)). . . . And it implicitly admits that it failed to obtain Carver’s consent as Section 7.15 contemplated. . . . Here, Section 7.15 of the Participation Agreement plainly prohibited transfers and assignments without . . .

ZHENGFANG LIANG, v. CAF SPICE SB, INC. d b a Mr., 911 F. Supp. 2d 184 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Patricia Smith, Commissioner) that the New York State’s minimum wage was increased to $7.15 per hour . . .

GUNAWAN, v. SAKE SUSHI RESTAURANT,, 897 F. Supp. 2d 76 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . the Restaurant had an obligation to pay Gunawan a minimum hourly wage of $6.75 prior to 2007, and $7.15 . . . during the first 33.7 weeks of Gunawan’s- employment, from May 10, 2006 to December 31, 2006, and $7.15 . . . applicable minimum wage during the first 33.7 weeks of Gunawan’s employment was $6.75, and it was $7.15 . . . x $6.75) per week for the first 33.7 weeks of her employment (totaling $1,137.38), and $35.75 (5 x $7.15 . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 892 F. Supp. 2d 805 (N.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . consisted of $2.4 billion in cash ($1.95 billion in borrowed cash and $500 million in cash on hand) and $7.15 . . . Verizon exchanged the $7.15 billion in Ideare debt with $7.08 billion in Verizon debt, which JPMorgan . . .

QUEEN, v. SCHULTZ, v., 888 F. Supp. 2d 145 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . See 2 Harper, James and Gray on Torts § 7.15, at 567 (3d ed. 2006) (noting that an action for damages . . .

MALENA, v. VICTORIA S SECRET DIRECT, LLC, 886 F. Supp. 2d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Plaintiff earned $75,000 annually (roughly $36 per hour), well above New York’s minimum wage, which was $7.15 . . .

CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,, 875 F. Supp. 2d 359 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . and an increased projection of diluted earnings per share from a range of $7.05-$7.25 per share to $7.15 . . .

A. GOODE, v. AMERICAN VETERANS, INC., 874 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . private inurnment of AMVETS’ funds, AMVETS would be within its rights to discharge Goode based on Article 7.15 . . . It seems wrong, then, that Article 7.15 can serve as a proper basis for termination yet cannot serve . . . discharge claim in the event an employee is discharged after fulfilling his obligations under Article 7.15 . . . Article 7.15 of the handbook states: "It is the duty of all employees to properly maintain and report . . .

In MANGIA PIZZA INVESTMENTS, LP,, 480 B.R. 669 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . See ¶ 7.15 of the Debtor’s Plan, which provides that Sayers gets 99.9% of the equity as a limited partner . . .

In W. R. GRACE CO., 475 B.R. 34 (D. Del. 2012)

. . . Section 7.15 of the Joint Plan provides the following: (e) Each Asbestos Insurance Entity shall be bound . . . (Joint Plan § 7.15(e).) . . . .

S. PETRI, v. UNITED STATES,, 104 Fed. Cl. 537 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . Board may recommend retention or removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List, see AFI 36-3212, ¶ 7.15 . . .

GRACE, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 845 F. Supp. 2d 664 (W.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . earned compensation which, when computed on an hourly basis, averaged $6.58 per hour ($520 per week), $7.15 . . .

TIMBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 103 Fed. Cl. 225 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . In its claim, Timber Products stated that “7.15 MBF of pine logs which were removed [in the spring of . . .

A. THARALDSON D. v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC HSBC USA, N. A., 840 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . Offer, the interest rate of 6.55% would apply until January 2013, at which point it would increase to 7.15% . . .

In TRIBUNE COMPANY,, 464 B.R. 126 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . Section 7.15 of the DCL Plan specifically provides that the issue concerning the respective priorities . . .

SANTILLAN, v. HENAO s, 822 F. Supp. 2d 284 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . hour; in 2006, the rate was $6.75 per hour; and from January 1, 2007, to July 23, 2009, the rate was $7.15 . . .

In CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC, v. E., 463 B.R. 423 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . The court then discussed Section 7.15 of a purchase and sale agreement discussed in the plan of reorganization . . .

COPANTITLA, De La v. FISKARDO ESTIATORIO, INC. d b a, 788 F. Supp. 2d 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . after March 31, 2000; $6.00 on and after January 1, 2005; $6.75 on and after January 1, 2006; and $7.15 . . .

In BRIMONIDINE PATENT LITIGATION. v., 643 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Alphagan® P has a pH between 7.15 and 7.8, a range that is higher than that of Alphagan®. . . . Alphagan® P formulation is sold at a pH of 7.6 to 7.8; the higher concentration is sold at a pH of 7.15 . . . researchers who developed Alphagan® P were concerned that brimonidine would not be soluble at a pH as high as 7.15 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. ALMIGHTY CLEANING, INC., 784 F. Supp. 2d 114 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . 2006, the minimum wage under the New York Labor Law was $6.75 per hour while that rate increased to $7.15 . . . Labor Law hourly minimum wage of $7.15. . . . Her hourly rate varied between $1.30 and $5.45. • New York’s minimum wage rate in 2007 was $7.15. . . . The difference between $7.15 and Maribel Rodriguez’s hourly rate for each week was calculated, yielding . . . overtime violations, Maribel Rodriguez’s overtime wages due for 2007 are calculated by multiplying $7.15 . . .

LANZETTA, v. FLORIO S ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a s, 763 F. Supp. 2d 615 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . $ 6.00 1 hour 96 days $ 576.00 2006 Spread of hours 6.75 1 hour 96 days 648.00 2007 Spread of hours 7.15 . . . 1 hour 76 days 543.40 2008 Spread of hours 7.15 1 hour 40 days 286.00 Total 2,341.80 (c) Wrongfully . . . As of January 1, 2007 and for all relevant times thereafter, the minimum wage was $7.15. N.Y. Lab. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FLORES- GALLO,, 625 F.3d 819 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15(a), p. 301 (1986 and Supp. 2003); Black’s Law Dictionary 173 ( . . .

TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG,, 774 F. Supp. 2d 732 (D. Md. 2010)

. . . Plaintiff’s Terms 15A-B, 15D-E, 15G-H, 15J-M, 22C-I; Defendants’ Terms 7.15-7.31 . . . .

HARRIS, v. GARCIA,, 734 F. Supp. 2d 973 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . See Cal.Penal Code § 136.1(c)(2); CALJIC No. 7.15. . . . See CALJIC No. 7.15. . . .

THOMPSON, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., 717 F. Supp. 2d 468 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . beginning of the class period until December 31, 2006; $6.25 per hour beginning January 1, 2007; and $7.15 . . .

COE, v. TOWN OF BLOOMING GROVE, 714 F. Supp. 2d 439 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Ullrich 3.7 $350 $ 1,295.00 Amanda Stewart 13.1 $ 50 $ 655.00 Evelyn Brown Bell 7.15 $ 50 $ 357.50 Mary . . .

SAVANI, v. WASHINGTON SAFETY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,, 703 F. Supp. 2d 529 (D.S.C. 2010)

. . . thereof; (c) decide all facts relevant to the determination of eligibility for benefits or participation 7.15 . . . The determination of the Benefits Committee made pursuant to this Section 7.15 shall be conclusive, final . . . To support their counterclaim, Defendants rely on § 7.15 of the Plan, which provides that the Benefits . . . If this is true, the recoupment provision of the Plan (§ 7.15) relied on by Defendants to support their . . .

In STAR FIRE PROTECTION, INC., 426 B.R. 884 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . Additionally, it is noteworthy that the rate reflected in each of the Reports is $7.15 per hour, in accordance . . .

JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES, 559 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15(a), p. 301 (1986 and Supp. 2003); accord, Black’s 173. . . . E. 427, 428 (1921); see also 2 La-Fave & Scott, supra, § 7.15(a). . . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15, p. 301 (1986 and Supp. 2003); Black’s Law Dictionary 173 (9th . . .

CURTIS DARNELL JOHNSON, v. UNITED STATES, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15(a), p. 301 (1986 and Supp. 2003); accord, Black’s 173. . . . Commonwealth, 131 Va. 762, 765, 109 S.E. 427, 428 (1921); see also 2 LaFave & Scott, supra, § 7.15(a) . . . Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.15, p. 301 (1986 and Supp. 2003); Black’s Law Dictionary 173 (9th . . .

CAMPBELL, v. NATIONAL PASSENGER RAILROAD CORPORATION,, 718 F. Supp. 2d 1093 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . Schratz found 7.15 hours billed for calendaring or docketing, .10 hours billed for clerical work and . . .

MINNICK v. CLEARWIRE US, LLC, 683 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (W.D. Wash. 2010)

. . . . (¶¶ 7.1-7.15.) 3. . . .

J. LEBLANC, Jr. L. v. UNITED STATES,, 90 Fed. Cl. 186 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . Appeal of Meyer, 3 B.T.A. 1329, 1333 (1926); Paul Little, Federal Income Taxation of Partnerships § 7.15 . . .

NORTHSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. MERRILL LYNCH CO. INC. f k a F., 576 F.3d 827 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . Bicknell’s purchase price was $615 million, and that this purchase price would result in a fee of $7.15 . . .

SMITH, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., 662 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . the company of its intent to arbitrate Plaintiffs grievance under Sections 7.10C, 7.10D, 7.11D, and 7.15 . . .

SMITH, v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., 649 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . the company of its intent to arbitrate Plaintiffs grievance under Sections 7.10C, 7.10D, 7.11D, and 7.15 . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. L. SHARMA, M. D., 642 F. Supp. 2d 242 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . interest rates were going to keep going higher” and “would remain high and would very likely exceed 7.15% . . .

In D. WALKER, D. v. SLM P. C. S. C., 406 B.R. 840 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2009)

. . . She was hired by the local Wal-Mart, at $7.15 per hour. . . .

M. D AZ- ORTIZ, v. M. D AZ- RIVERA,, 611 F. Supp. 2d 134 (D.P.R. 2009)

. . . the Board of Appeals of the Personnel Administration System, pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 . . .

VFS FINANCING, INC. v. CHF EXPRESS, LLC,, 620 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . December 29, 2006, BALC entered into a Loan and Aircraft Security Agreement, whereby it loaned CHF $7.15 . . .

SINGLE STICK, INC. v. JOHANNS,, 601 F. Supp. 2d 307 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . 5.32 percent, raised its January to March 2005 assessment to $472,017.47 based on a market share of 7.15 . . .

WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, v. A. JAHELKA, O. A. III,, 586 F. Supp. 2d 972 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . PTX 19, Pg. 21, § 7.15; Pg. 7, § 1.1; Tr. Vol. 5A, pg. 75. . . . (PTX 19, § 7.15, pg. 21). . . .

THE WISCONSIN COMPRESSED AIR CORPORATION, v. GARDNER DENVER, INC., 571 F. Supp. 2d 992 (W.D. Wis. 2008)

. . . Michael Bowen & Brian Butler, The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law § 7.15 (3d ed.2007) (suggesting that . . .

In MIRANT CORPORATION,, 389 B.R. 481 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . PSA, ¶ 7.15(g). . . .

KOYO SEIKO CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES, U. S., 516 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . The Department calculated weighted-average dumping margin for ball bearings to be 12.78% for Koyo, 7.15% . . .

Co. v. US, 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1512 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . The Department calculated weighted-average dumping margin for ball bearings to be 12.78% for Koyo, 7.15% . . .

S. A. LITMAN, v. UNITED STATES, B. S. v. f k a v., 78 Fed. Cl. 90 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . Diener had been entitled under the Asset Purchase Agreement for HRN restricted stock (the “Section 7.15 . . . Section 7.15 provides, in relevant part: 7.15 2000 INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING. . . . The issuance of the Section 7.15 shares shall result in a share-for-share reduction in the number of . . . ; JX 4 at 22-23 (the “Section 7.15 Shares”). . . . Regarding Hotels.com’s argument that Sections 7.11.3 and 7.15 should be relied upon to determine the . . .

M. RODRIGUEZ, v. AMD GROUP OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. a, 623 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Therefore, the Court shall award Plaintiff for 7.15 billable hours by attorney Robert Norell, Esq. at . . .

In OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. AB, v. AB, v. Dr. S. A. AB, v. Co. D. D. AB, v. AB, v., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Davies reported to have a pH value of 7.15. . . . Davies’s 2006 testing produced values of 7.15, 7.36, and 7.53, respectively. . . .

In N. SULLIVAN,, 367 B.R. 54 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . The Payoff Letter also contained provisions for interest and late charges of $7.15, court document costs . . .

WITHEROW, v. CRAWFORD,, 468 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (D. Nev. 2006)

. . . D, Institutional Procedure 7.15 for NNCC, “Privileged Correspondence.” . . . D, Institutional Procedure ("IP") 7.15 for NNCC, “Privileged Correspondence”; # 167, Ex. . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. CRIPPLE CREEK AND VICTOR GOLD MINING COMPANY, v., 509 F. Supp. 2d 943 (D. Colo. 2006)

. . . charges: Date_Hours Amount 11/17/05_.25 $ 52.50 12/11/05 1,40 $ 294.00 1/10/06_.40 $ 90.00 1/23/06 7.15 . . .

CAMPBELL, v. JOHNSON, t, 465 F. Supp. 2d 597 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . See DOP 866-7.15. . . .

In ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 348 B.R. 136 (D. Del. 2006)

. . . Pursuit of the Demands referenced in Section 7.15(a)(x) of the Plan outside the procedures prescribed . . . ..........................203 7.14 Fractional Shares or Other Distributions.....................203 7.15 . . . cash will be paid in lieu of such fractional shares or Plan Notes in increments of less than $1,000. 7.15 . . . (xi) The actual amounts, numbers, and timing of the future Demands referenced in section 7.15(a)(x) of . . . (xii) Pursuit of the Demands referenced in section 7.15(a)(x) of the Plan outside the procedures prescribed . . .

GASKINS, v. M. JOHNSON,, 443 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . See DOP 866-7.15. . See Parker v. . . .

O. McGINTY, v. R. PLAYER, Jr., 396 F. Supp. 2d 593 (D. Md. 2005)

. . . At the current value of 7.15%, the death benefit continues through year 35 but does not show a change . . .