Cases from cite.case.law:

VALENCIA GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. COMMUNITY RESOURCE SERVICES, INC., 272 So. 3d 850 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . In addition, article VII, section 7.16 of the Master Declaration asserts that Orangetree HOA "has entered . . .

S. FULLER, Jr. v. CARILION CLINIC,, 382 F. Supp. 3d 475 (W.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims and Defenses, Volume 1A, § 7.16, pg. 7-147. . . .

IN RE MAREMONT CORPORATION,, 601 B.R. 1 (Bankr. Del. 2019)

. . . .163 7.13 Dispute Resolution...163 7.14 Enforcement and Administration...163 7.15 Effectiveness...163 7.16 . . . Agreement shall not become effective until it has been executed and delivered by all the parties hereto. 7.16 . . .

FOURTH ESTATE PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, v. WALL- STREET. COM, LLC,, 139 S. Ct. 881 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Nimmer, Copyright § 7.16[B][3][a], [b][ii] (2018) (infringement suit is conditioned on application, while . . .

NEVILL, v. JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC,, 364 F. Supp. 3d 932 (E.D. Wis. 2019)

. . . No. 10-4 at ¶ 7.16. . . . No. 10-4 at ¶ 7.16. . . . No. 10-4 at ¶ 7.16(c) (2016 Plan), that is true of many valid arbitration provisions. . . . No. 10-4 at ¶ 7.16(d) (2016 Plan). . . . No. 1-4 at ¶ 7.16(e) (2016 Plan), and the plaintiff expresses concern that the defendant might select . . .

OLIVER, v. JOHANSON DB LLC,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 758 (W.D. Ark. 2018)

. . . Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16. . . .

UNITED STATES v. O MANN,, 899 F.3d 898 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law , § 7.16 (1986) ). In turn, Mr. . . .

NEW YORK, v. PVS CHEMICALS, INC., 324 F. Supp. 3d 352 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . wastes, chlorobenzene, arsenic and cadmium in concentrations as high as 3.7 parts per million (ppm), 7.16 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 238 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2018)

. . . amending rules 4-7.12 (Required Content); 4-7.13 (Deceptive and Inherently Misleading Advertisements); 4-7.16 . . . RULE 4-7.16 PRESUMPTIVELY VALID CONTENT The following information in advertisements is presumed not to . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. RATINER,, 238 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See Bar Rule 3-7.16(a) ("Inquiries raised or complaints presented by or to The Florida Bar under these . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR BIENNIAL PETITION, 234 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Bar Rule 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Bring Complaint) is renamed “Limitation on Time to Open Investigation . . . RULE 3-7.16 LIMITATION ON TIME TO BRING COMPLAIÑTOPEN INVESTIGATION (a) Time for Inquiries, Initiating . . .

BARBOSA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,, 263 F. Supp. 3d 207 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . §§ 7.1-7.16. . . .

FOURTH ESTATE PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION, v. WALL- STREET. COM, LLC, D., 856 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Nimmer, et al., 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3][b][v] (2016). . . .

RECORDINGS LIMITED, v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,, 165 F. Supp. 3d 156 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Licensing Agreement ¶¶ 7.1, 7.7, 7.16. . . . to pay 19 royalties is based on a “Royalty Base Price,” see Recording Agreement ¶¶ 1.33, 7.1, 1.1, 7.16 . . .

HALO CREATIVE DESIGN LIMITED, v. COMPTOIR DES INDES INC., 816 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3][b][ii] (2015), and therefore Halo’s copyright . . .

MEDIA. NET ADVERTISING FZ- LLC, v. NETSEER, INC., 156 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Google, Inc., 786 F.3d 733, 741 n. 7 (9th Cir.2015) (quoting 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3][b][vi . . .

MARYA v. WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., 131 F. Supp. 3d 975 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . See 2-7 Nimmer § 7.16. . . .

SIMMONS, v. NAPIER,, 626 F. App'x 129 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . minute,” Order at 10 n. 3, that the jury be instructed with Seventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.16 . . . See Seventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.16 (noting that the plaintiff must prove each element . . .

GLOBALOPTIONS SERVICES, INC. v. NORTH AMERICAN TRAINING GROUP, INC., 131 F. Supp. 3d 1291 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Id. at 1302. ’ In § 7.16[B][3][cj of Nimmer on Copyright, Professor Nimmer states, “Absent issuance of . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer,' Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3][e] (Matthew Bender, rev. fed.) . . .

LENNAR HOMES OF TEXAS SALES AND MARKETING, LTD. v. PERRY HOMES, LLC,, 117 F. Supp. 3d 913 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . (citations omitted)); accord Patry § 17:89; Nimmer § 7.16[B][5][c]; see also id. at n. 332 (“[However . . . Compare Nimmer § 7.16[B][5][b], Registration Only of Underlying Work, with id. § 7.16[B][5][c], Registration . . .

E. McCLAIN, Sr. On v. IRADIMED CORPORATION, X., 111 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . It fell to $7.16 on September 18, and $6.75 on September 19, a fall of $0.57, or , 8%. Id. at ¶ 84. . . .

GARCIA, v. GOOGLE, INC. a LLC, a K. J. M., 786 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . determining the bounds of copyright protection — [can] be of great value.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

RECORDINGS LIMITED, v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,, 97 F. Supp. 3d 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . The treatment of third-party streaming services for royalty purposes is set forth in paragraph 7.16 of . . . Paragraph 7.16 distinguishes between two types of third-party agreements: first, those that “describe . . . (LA ¶ 7.16). . . . If this is so, then 19’s claims must fail, as they are contrary to the plain meaning of paragraph 7.16 . . . Paragraph 7.7, which covers electronic downloads, is "above” paragraph 7.16. . . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BAY AREA ROOFERS HEALTH WELFARE TRUST FUND, v. WESTECH ROOFING,, 42 F. Supp. 3d 1220 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . Plaintiffs are entitled to interest on this amount, at a ‘rate of $7.16, for the three days until the . . .

D. JONES, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., 564 F. App'x 432 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . Indemnity Clause With respect to the indemnity clause in section 7.16 of the loan modification agreement . . .

ALASKA STOCK, LLC, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING COMPANY R. R., 747 F.3d 673 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16(B)(5)(c) (2013). . . . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16(B)(5)(c) (2013). . Id. . . . .

ALICEA, p k a El p k a p k a p k a p k a v. MACHETE MUSIC, a UMG UMG LT s p k a p k a p k a El, 744 F.3d 773 (1st Cir. 2014)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3] (discussing the two approaches and favoring the . . . Nimmer, supra, § 7.16[B][3][c] (footnotes omitted); see also Kernel Records Oy v. . . .

BROWNSTEIN, v. LINDSAY, 742 F.3d 55 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 411(a); 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16. . . .

GONZALEZ, s v. SEARS HOLDING COMPANY a k a s, 980 F. Supp. 2d 170 (D.P.R. 2013)

. . . See ECF Nos. 51-1, ¶¶ 1.7, 1.9, 1.12, 1.14-1.15, 7.13-7.14, 7.16-7.17; 63-1, ¶¶ 1.7, 1.9, 1.12, 1.14- . . . 1.15, 7.13-7.14, 7.16-7.17. . . .

KOURSA, INC. v. MANROLAND, INC., 971 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Section 7.16 of the Machinery Contract also provides that “[i]f delivery of the [Printing Press], excluding . . .

PANORAMIC STOCK IMAGES, LTD. d b a v. JOHN WILEY SONS, INC., 963 F. Supp. 2d 842 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][a][i] (2008). . . .

O. COONEY, v. CASADY,, 735 F.3d 514 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . (citing 325 ILCS 5/7.16). . . .

BRANHAVEN, LLC, v. BEEFTEK, INC. v., 965 F. Supp. 2d 650 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . Schedule A listed the initial price for each DNA sample as $5.75 for a one-panel test, $7.16 for two . . . The initial prices were: $5.75 for a one panel test, $7.16 for two panels, and $1.41 for each additional . . . The initial prices were: $5.75 for a one panel test, $7.16 for two panels, and $1.41 for each additional . . .

PANORAMIC STOCK IMAGES, LTD. d b a v. McGRAW- HILL COMPANIES, INC., 961 F. Supp. 2d 918 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][a] (2003); Leventhal v. . . .

PEARSON EDUCATION, INC. v. ISHAYEV d b a d b a d b a d b a, 963 F. Supp. 2d 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (second alteration in original) (quoting 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16(B)(5)(b))); Pearson Educ., Inc . . . Accord 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16(B)(5)(b) (“So long as the infringement relates to material common . . .

JEAN- BAPTISTE, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 958 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . F.Supp.2d 219, 226 (D.D.C.2005) (citing Robert Belton, Remedies in Employment Discrimination Law, § 7.16 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES, 108 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2013)

. . . Potentially Misleading Advertisements); 4-7.15 (Unduly Manipulative or Intrusive Advertisements); 4-7.16 . . . RULE 4-7.16 PRESUMPTIVELY VALID CONTENT The following information in advertisements is presumed not to . . . public media that contains no illustrations and no information other than that set forth in rule 4-7.16 . . . about the lawyer or law firm other than the permissible content of advertisements listed in rule 4-7.16 . . .

SANCHEZ, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 700 F.3d 919 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . Specifically, the instruction— adapted from Seventh Circuit Pattern Civil Jury Instruction No. 7.16 — . . . will also be instructed on the failure to intervene pursuant to Pattern Civil Jury Instruction No. 7.16 . . . modest one-word addition may not suffice to harmonize the two instructions, as Pattern Instruction No. 7.16 . . .

GRANGER, v. ACME ABSTRACT COMPANY, LLC, J. II,, 900 F. Supp. 2d 419 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[A][1] (explaining that a copyright in a work is created . . .

KERNEL RECORDS OY, v. MOSLEY, f. k. a. UMG A M, d. b. a. d. b. a. LLC,, 694 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . See Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3] (discussing “application” and “registration” approaches to registration . . . Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3][c]. . . . See Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[C][l][a][iv]. . . .

FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. v. UNITED FABRICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v., 896 F. Supp. 2d 223 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[A][1] (citing 17 U.S.C. § 408(a)). . . . still imprecisely refer to a work being ‘copyrighted’ rather than ‘registered.’ ” Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

S. PETRI, v. UNITED STATES,, 104 Fed. Cl. 537 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . See AFI 36-3212, ¶7.16. [¶] AFPC/DPPD can order a complete medical workup and formal hearing, if it believes . . .

In LANDAMERICA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. H. LFG v. A., 470 B.R. 759 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . See Joint Chapter 11 Plan at §§ 7.3 and 7.16. . See Joint Chapter 11 Plan at §§ 8.3(b) and 14.4. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. NAVARRETE,, 667 F.3d 886 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . million maintenance contract, which doubled the Company’s revenues from selling to the bank — from $7.16 . . .

PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. DOES, 843 F. Supp. 2d 565 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 (2011) (favoring application approach) with 1 Howard . . .

PAN- AMERICAN PRODUCTS HOLDINGS, LLC, v. R. T. G. FURNITURE CORP. To Go To Go R. T. G. To Go RTG L. P. To Go To Go, 825 F. Supp. 2d 664 (M.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . to comply with § 411(a), which remains a mandatory claim-processing rule); 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . . approach is consistent with the "application approach” advocated by Nimmer. 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD. v. BLOOMBERG L. P., 808 F. Supp. 2d 634 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . infringing acts occur at the moment of transmission-fixation or at a later time. 2 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 7.16 . . .

OLANDER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SPENCER GIFTS, LLC, LLC,, 812 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[C][l][a], 7.16[D] (rev. ed. 2011). . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. OLSON,, 646 F.3d 569 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 7.16(a), at 313-14 (1986)). . . . Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 7.16(b), at 315-17 (1986)). . . .

KERNAL RECORDS OY, v. Z. MOSLEY p k a, 794 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (S.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . drafted, not look to vindicate propositions of the Berne Convention directly.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

REAL ESTATE INNOVATIONS, INC. v. HOUSTON ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC. E- e- G. D. A. F. RK H. Re B. B. L. L. C. L. L. C., 422 F. App'x 344 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . claim but should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright, § 7.16 . . .

In BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND ERISA LITIGATION. To, 763 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . forced to resign; • On January 11, 2008, Bank of America made an agreement to bail out Countrywide for $7.16 . . .

LAW- YUE, v. MIAMI RIVER, L. L. C., 50 So. 3d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The Florida Bar, Florida Condominium and Community Association Law § 7.16 (2007). . . . .

WILSON, Jr. v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 730 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 7.16(c). . . .

RIDDELL, INC. v. SCHUTT SPORTS, INC., 724 F. Supp. 2d 963 (W.D. Wis. 2010)

. . . that 5.29% of the athletes wearing the Revolution helmet had diagnoses of cerebral concussions, while 7.16% . . .

PAUL, v. WILLIAM MORROW AND COMPANY, INC. CBS,, 380 F. App'x 957 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . Paul argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying her most recent “Rule 7.16” motion . . . Although there is no “Rule 7.16” in either the Federal Rules or the district court’s local rules, Paul . . . The district court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief under “Rule 7.16” because no such rule exists. . . .

COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. a v. IAC INTERACTIVECORP, a a HSN LP, a HSN LLC, a, 606 F.3d 612 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][a][i] (2008) (“Nimmer”). . . . See Nimmer § 7.16[B][l][a][i] (“[Gjiven ... a three-year statute of limitations for recovery of all damages . . . Nimmer § 7.16[B][l][a][i]. . . .

SAVANI, v. WASHINGTON SAFETY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,, 703 F. Supp. 2d 529 (D.S.C. 2010)

. . . shall be conclusive, final and binding on all parties, subject to the claims procedures under Section 7.16 . . .

LEWINSON, v. HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY, LLC, J., 659 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[A][1] (2009). . . .

COONEY, v. CASADY,, 652 F. Supp. 2d 948 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . being listed in the State Central Register, which is accessible by employers and others. 325 ILCS 5/7.16 . . .

R. W. BECK, INC. a v. CONSULTING, LLC, a, 577 F.3d 1133 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . .”); 2 Nimmer on Copyright, supra § 7.16[B][2][c], at 7-174-7-175. But cf. Oravec v. . . .

SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP, v. INTEGRATED SYSTEMS POWER, INC. f k a LLC, f k a LLC,, 642 F. Supp. 2d 206 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B] [2][b] (2008) (internal footnote omitted). . . .

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, Co. CAL IV LLC, d b a U. S. B. d b a X- F d LLC, LLC, v. INC. LLC, 633 F. Supp. 2d 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . perfume box because it was not timely registered as required by Section 412); 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . . See 17 U.S.C. §§ 411(a) & (c), 412, 504; accord 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][3], at 7-176. . . .

L. MORGAN, t a d b a v. HANNA HOLDINGS, INC., 635 F. Supp. 2d 404 (W.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][a], at 7-155 (2002); Xoom, Inc. v. . . .

ROSCO, INC. v. MIRROR LITE COMPANY,, 626 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . He began the negotiation with what he calculated as Mirror Lite’s incremental profit per mirror, $7.16 . . . Chases uses the $7.16 figure because he said that using Rosco’s incremental profit figure is akin to . . .

SALESTRAQ AMERICA, LLC, v. A. ZYSKOWSKI, 635 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Nev. 2009)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][a] (2008). . . . See Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 7.16[B][2][c] (“[W]hen the same party owns the derivative or collective . . .

DIAZ- HERNANDEZ, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 19 So. 3d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . own antecedent-unsatisfied judgment insurance (see Widiss, A Guide To Uninsured Motorist Coverage, s 7.16 . . .

SPECIFIC SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, v. INSTITUTE OF WORKCOMP ADVISORS, LLC,, 615 F. Supp. 2d 708 (M.D. Tenn. 2009)

. . . (Docket No. 12 at 3, quoting Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16(B)(l)(a)(i)). . . .

AMGEN, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, F. La La, 565 F.3d 846 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . . ¶ 7.16 (“On information and belief, Roche has imported and is importing products containing glycosylated . . .

In HOSKINS, Jo, 405 B.R. 576 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. 2009)

. . . See generally, Restatement, 3d of Property: Servitudes §§ 7.1-7.16 (2000) (setting forth the grounds . . .

JULIO SONS COMPANY, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 591 F. Supp. 2d 651 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . breached his constructive trustee and fiduciary duty obligations expressly established under section 7.16 . . .

PRECISION AUTOMATION, INC. a LLC, v. TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., 628 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (D. Or. 2008)

. . . Copyright Office ultimately issues the certificate, or by contrast denies it.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . . Falk, 916 F.Supp. 985, 994 n. 6 (C.D.Cal. 1996) (citing Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B](1) n. 39) (emphasis . . .

RUDNICKI, v. WPNA AM,, 580 F. Supp. 2d 690 (N.D. Ill. 2008)

. . . Nim-mer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][l][c], p. 7-168. . . . See Nim-mer on Copyright § 7.16[C][1], pp. 7-183-84 (“Still, the fact that foreign authors may find this . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOWARD,, 280 F. App'x 440 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Laboratory analysis indicated that the seized substances were 66.53 grams of crack and 7.16 grams of . . .

ORAVEC, v. SUNNY ISLES LUXURY VENTURES, L. C. LLC, LLC,, 527 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . compositions contained therein where plaintiff owned copyrights in both); 2 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 7.16 . . . See 2 Nimmer & Nimmer, supra, § 7.16[B][2][c], at 7-173 n.105.7 (“The assumption is that the derivative . . .

In COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. In, 542 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . This proposal values Countrywide stock at about $7.16 per share. . . .

SIEGEL v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. DC, 542 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . works, registration did not create the copyright, but merely recorded it.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . . Act, some questions as to the viability of the copyright might be raised.” 2 Nimmer on COPYRIGHT § 7.16 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 978 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2007)

. . . the Board of Governors); 3-7.6 (Procedures Before a Referee); 3-7.11 (General Rules of Procedure); 3-7.16 . . . (g)-(h) [No Change] RULE 3-7.16 LIMITATION ON TIME TO BRING COMPLAINT (a) Time for Inquiries, and Complaints . . .

In LITERARY WORKS IN ELECTRONIC DATABASES COPYRIGHT LITIGATION. v. LLC, E. L. P K M. E. L., 509 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . refused, the applicant is entitled to institute an action for infringement”), 2-7 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

CHRISTOPHER PHELPS ASSOCIATES, LLC, v. R. GALLOWAY, v. A. A., 492 F.3d 532 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][2][c], at 7-173 (perm.ed., rev.vol.2006) (same). . . .

BUC INTERNATIONAL CORP. a v. INTERNATIONAL YACHT COUNCIL LIMITED, a MLS a, 489 F.3d 1129 (11th Cir. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[A][1] (1998))]. . . .

R. PRUNT v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP,, 484 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . See 2 Nimmer on CopyRight § 7.16[B][l][a][i] (1999). . . . application for registration as a condition to filing an infringement action.” 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16 . . .

CHRISTOPHER PHELPS ASSOCIATES, LLC, v. R. GALLOWAY, v. A. A., 477 F.3d 128 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][2][c], at 7-173 (perm.ed., rev.vol.2006) (same). . . .

WOOD v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY,, 471 F.3d 931 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . Maus, 30 Missouri Practice: Insurance Law and Practice § 7.16 (1997). Mr. . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. O CONNOR,, 945 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 2006)

. . . cases in which we have dismissed Bar disciplinary proceedings for undue delay by the Bar under rule 3-7.16 . . . As the applicable time period under rule 3-7.16 is six years and, yet, is not self-executing, it would . . .

R. COUCH, v. JABE,, 479 F. Supp. 2d 569 (W.D. Va. 2006)

. . . Moreover, DOP 866-7.16(4) states: “Expiration of a time limit ... at any stage of the process shall qualify . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAWAHONGVA,, 456 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (D. Ariz. 2006)

. . . See Hopi Tribe Wildlife Ordinance Nos. 48, 7.11, 7.16. . . .

UNITED STATES v. YUSUF a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a d b a, 461 F.3d 374 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . gross receipts figures reported in United's 1998 through 2000 Virgin Islands tax returns to show a $7.16 . . . Government contends that information allegedly indicating that United had underreported its gross income by $7.16 . . .

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, v. FATHI YUSUF MOHAMMED YUSUF a k a FATHI YUSUF WALEED MOHAMMED HAMED a k a WALLY HAMED WAHEED MOHAMMED HAMED a k a WILLIE YUSUF MAHER FATHI YUSUF a k a MIKE YUSUF ISAM MOHAMAD YOUSUF a k a SAM YOUSEF UNITED CORPORATION d b a PLAZA EXTRA NEJEH FATHI YUSUF, 48 V.I. 980 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . gross receipts figures reported in United’s 1998 through 2000 Virgin Islands tax returns to show a $7.16 . . . Government contends that information allegedly indicating that United had underreported its gross income by $7.16 . . .

In ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 348 B.R. 223 (D. Del. 2006)

. . . Nothing in this Order shall in any way affect the provisions of Section 7.16 of the Plan, which provide . . . AWI decides that one of the conditions to the occurrence of the Effective Date set forth in Section 7.16 . . .

In ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 348 B.R. 136 (D. Del. 2006)

. . . the Plan) and fees and expenses payable in connection with any exit facility referred to in section 7.16 . . . date by which all of the conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the Plan specified in Section 7.16 . . . term loan credit facility, to be borrowed under the working capital facility referenced in Section 7.16 . . . Claimants’ Committee, the Future Claimants’ Representative, and the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee. 7.16 . . . (f) Reorganized AWI will enter into the working capital facility referenced in section 7.16 of the Plan . . .

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, a a v. a, 454 F.3d 951 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . L.R. 7.16. . . .

PHOENIX RENOVATION CORP. d b a v. RODRIGUEZ,, 403 F. Supp. 2d 510 (E.D. Va. 2005)

. . . Beard, 730 F.2d 384, 386-87 (5th Cir.1984) (citing 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.16[B][1]); see also Eltra . . .

BRANDAID MARKETING CORPORATION. v. S. S. v., 418 F. Supp. 2d 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . (JPTO ¶ 7.16.a; Tr. at 145.) The parties agreed to the extension. (Sloan Direct ¶ 154.) . . . mechanics for closing the deal (PXs 11-18, 11-19, 11-20, 11-21, 11-22, II-23, 11 — 24, 11-25; see JPTO ¶ 7.16 . . .

COX, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA Jr. v. Jr., 416 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . informed by Travelers Rest police officers that they were in violation of Travelers Rest Ordinance ch. 7.16 . . . AFFIRMED APPENDIX Chapter 7.16 ASSEMBLIES, PARADES, PROCESSIONS AND EXHIBITIONS Sections: 7.16.010 Enforcement . . .

LA RESOLANA ARCHITECTS, PA, a v. CLAY REALTORS ANGEL FIRE, a K. a, 416 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, Vol. 2 § 7.16[B][l][a], p. 7-154-56. . . . See Nimmer, § 7.16[B][l][a][i]; Apple Barrel Prod., Inc., 730 F.2d at 386-87 (citing Nimmer); Foraste . . . Nimmer, § 7.16[B][l][a][i]. . . . See Nimmer, § 7.16[B][l][a], Whatever the practical force of this argument, we cannot ignore the plain . . .

In SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 398 F. Supp. 2d 563 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . Rx Meas Pre Rx % Ref Post Rx Meas Post Rx % Ref Post Rx % Chg VC Liters 4.95 1.12 4.51 91 TLC Liters 7.16 . . .

E. GLYMPH, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 374 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . Robert Belton, Remedies in Employment Discrimination Law, § 7.16 at 236 (1992). Cf. Pollard v. . . . Belton, § 7.16 at 236-37. . . .

R. JOHNSON, v. GORDON, Jr., 409 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 2005)

. . . See 2 Nim-mer § 7.16[B][2][b]. . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. A. BARRETT,, 897 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 2005)

. . . barred by the six-year statute of limitations which is provided in Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 3-7.16 . . . improper solicitation concerning Molly Glass occurred in approximately March 1994; however, rule 3-7.16 . . . Bar, 658 So.2d 930 (Fla.1995) (adopting rule 3-7.16). . . . Walter, 784 So.2d 1085, 1086 (Fla.2001) (rule 3-7.16 not applicable where misconduct occurred prior to . . .