Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 238 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2018)

. . . The Bar proposes comprehensively amending rule 4-7.22 (Lawyer Referral Services), and amending or deleting . . . The Bar's petition stems from In re Amendments to Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.22-Lawyer Referral . . . Services , 175 So.3d 779 (Fla. 2015), where the Court rejected amendments to rule 4-7.22 proposed by . . . clients to lawyers for a fee, or any other type of benefit, unless the service complies with rule 4-7.22 . . . Bar proposes deleting or amending five other rules as a result of its proposed amendments to rule 4-7.22 . . . pay the usual fees charged by such programs, subject, however, to the limitations imposed by rule s 4-7.22 . . . RULE 4-7.22 LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES REFERRALS, DIRECTORIES AND POOLED ADVERTISING (a) Applicability . . .

IN RE PACKARD SQUARE LLC,, 574 B.R. 107 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . 8.33% of the projected amount of Canyon’s liens as of August 1, 2018, and more importantly, it is only 7.22% . . . equity cushion amount on August 1, 2018 of $4,811,645.23 divided by $66,668,354.77 equals .0722, or 7.22% . . .

R. ACOSTA, v. JM OSAKA INC., 270 F. Supp. 3d 907 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . Therefore, 'the complaint alleges that employees were paid at wage-rates of between $1.05 and $7.22 per . . .

OUTREACH HOUSING, LLC, L. v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,, 221 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . In addition, the OAG claims that fee-sharing with lawyers violated rule 4-7.22 of the Rules Regulating . . .

J. BORDONARO, v. FIDO S FENCES, INC., 565 B.R. 222 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . He noted on Schedule J'that his monthly expenses were $2,927.80, for a net monthly income of-$7.22. . . .

IN RE CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING CO. INC., 562 B.R. 168 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . Third, section 7.22 of the Collateral Agreement subjected the Collateral Agent’s exercise of rights and . . . The Collateral Agreement is expressly subject to the Intercreditor Agreement and provides in section 7.22 . . .

IN RE GOURLEY,, 549 B.R. 210 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . Gourley is reimbursed about $7.22 per gallon of gas. . . .

IN RE J. BORDONARO, s v. J., 543 B.R. 692 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Defendant further stated that his monthly expenses of $2,927.80 result in a monthly net income of -$7.22 . . . monthly income, was amended from $2,927.80 to $2,685.24, and; # 23(c), net income, from, a negative $7.22 . . .

JB AVIATION, v. R AVIATION CHARTER SERVICES, LLC,, 143 F. Supp. 3d 37 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . B to Complaint, Purchase Agreement ¶¶ 7.22-23), there is no dispute that plaintiffs were not signatories . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 175 So. 3d 779 (Fla. 2015)

. . . In re AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 4-7.22—LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES. No. SC14-2126. . . . The Florida Bar petitions this Court to amend Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-7.22 (Lawyer Referral . . . Rather than follow the first recommendation, the Board Review Committee proposed amendments to rule 4-7.22 . . . Accordingly, we reject the current petition and -.instruct The Florida Bar to propose-amendments to rule 4-7.22 . . .

HUSTEEL CO. LTD. NEXTEEL Co. HYSCO, ILJIN AJU Co. SeAH v. UNITED STATES, LLC, A JMC TMK IPSCO, L. P. USA, 98 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2015)

. . . and the revised CV profit rates calculated by the petitioners for the petition were between 7.19% and 7.22% . . .

IN RE OPUS EAST, LLC L. LLC, v. LLC, a A f b o f b o P. VII, L. P. VIII, L. P. P. LLC M. LLC LLC P. C. LLC LLC LLC LLC AE, 528 B.R. 30 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . The Third Edition of Minnesota Practice § 7.22 states that In response to the conflict between these . . .

RLM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. E. TUSCHEN, 66 F. Supp. 3d 681 (E.D.N.C. 2014)

. . . attorney time) 3.3 hours 06/12/14 through 06/18/14: no expenses awarded This results in a total of 7.22 . . . Multiplying the 7.22 hours attorney time by the $425 hourly rate yields an expense award of $3,068.50 . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. H. BAUER,, 723 F.3d 758 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Duration Fund during the first six months of 2000, and illiquid security levels rose from 5.75% to 7.22% . . .

In JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, a v., 503 B.R. 849 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . SOP 90-7.22 specifies that for the periods including and following a bankruptcy filing, the financial . . . Once more, the guidance from SOP 90-7 as it relates to separate disclosure is in SOP 90-7.22, .27, & . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES, 108 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2013)

. . . ; 4-7.20 (Exemptions From the Filing and Review Requirement); 4-7.21 (Firm Names and Letterhead); 4-7.22 . . . pay the usual fees charged by such programs, subject, however, to the limitations imposed by rules 4-7.22 . . . RULE 4-7.22 LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES (a) When Lawyers May Accept Referrals. . . .

In NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC., 478 B.R. 216 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . Section 7.22 of the Plan also provides: Indemnification. . . . first address the Release Provisions of Section 7.19, and then the Exculpation Provisions of Section 7.22 . . . These indemnity obligations were assumed in Section 7.22 of the Plan. . . . Thus, absent Section 7.22 of the Plan, an argument could be made that the officers' and directors’ claims . . . However, the inclusion of Section 7.22 in the Plan makes it plain that the Debtor has continuing indemnity . . .

S. PETRI, v. UNITED STATES,, 104 Fed. Cl. 537 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . See AFI 36-3212, ¶¶ 7.21-7.22. . . .

E. STONE, v. J. ASTRUE,, 804 F. Supp. 2d 975 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . When questioned by the ALJ, Plaintiff testified she is paid $7.22 an hour for caring for her mother ( . . .

K- TEC, a v. VITA- MIX,, 765 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (D. Utah 2011)

. . . According to Lance Gunderson, K-TEC’s actual borrowing rates were: 2006, 7.22%; 2007, 7.02%; 2008, 7.14% . . .

In Re BARTELINI, f d b a f d b a R. a k a In Re Jr. In Re D. Jr. E., 434 B.R. 285 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . The Bartelini Plan includes a distribution to general unsecured creditors of at least 7.22 percent. . . .

DIRECTV GROUP, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 89 Fed. Cl. 302 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . 889,683,156 $ 147,661,000 Segment’s Surplus $ 662,107,034 $ 144,479,491 Government’s Teledyne Share 7.975% 7.22% . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOVE,, 585 F. Supp. 2d 865 (W.D. Va. 2008)

. . . Multiplying 17,281 by the average wholesale price of a digital album in 2005 ($7.22), RIAA concludes . . . transferred albums on Dove’s server: 6,528 transfers multiplied by the average wholesale price in 2005 ($7.22 . . . Like the court in Hudson, I am skeptical that customers would pay $7.22 or $19 for something they got . . . Also, RIAA uses $7.22, the average wholesale price of a digital album in 2005, to calculate its loss, . . . but it is unclear whether member copyright holders would receive the full $7.22 as profit or only a . . .

BOWLING v. PBG LONG- TERM DISABILITY PLAN VPA,, 584 F. Supp. 2d 797 (D. Md. 2008)

. . . If VPA’s figure is used, a potential job need pay only $7.22 per hour (half of $14.45) to qualify as . . . vocational study as being within Bowling’s physical abilities have an estimated hourly wage of over $7.22 . . .

GUARANTY BANK, v. CHUBB CORPORATION,, 538 F.3d 587 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . Village of Darien, supra, 60 F.3d at 1277; 2 Anderson, supra, § 7.22, pp. 14-15. . . .

THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON,, 512 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.13(l)(3)(ii), 7.13(l)(4)(vii), 7.21(a)(3)(h), 7.21(a)(4)(vii), 7.22(g)(3)(ii). . . .

In ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 348 B.R. 136 (D. Del. 2006)

. . . Property..........................207 7.21 Management of Reorganized AWI...........................207 7.22 . . . agreements pursuant to section 8.8 of the Plan and the requirements of applicable nonbankruptcy law. 7.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BROCK,, 433 F.3d 931 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . testified that they had engaged in methamphetamine transactions with Brock, involving an additional 7.22 . . . (2), based on Dyer and Lewis’s testimony that Brock had transacted business involving an additional 7.22 . . . At the sentencing hearing, Brock argued that the district court should not consider the additional 7.22 . . .

FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON, v., 390 F. Supp. 2d 12 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . . §§ 7.13, 7.21, 7.22). . . .

BRANDAID MARKETING CORPORATION. v. S. S. v., 418 F. Supp. 2d 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . (JPTO ¶ 7.22; PX III — 15; Sloan Direct ¶ 334.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BROCK,, 417 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . methamphetamine and one kilogram of cocaine seized from the 3375 and 3381 residences, as well as an additional 7.22 . . .

B. MARTINEZ, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 132 F. App'x 310 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . when he first began working at the library, until November 2001, he worked six hours per day and made $7.22 . . .

MENASHA CORPORATION v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, 361 F. Supp. 2d 887 (E.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . Strand, 63 F.Supp.2d 949, 957 (E.D.Wis.1999); Straz, 986 F.Supp. at 569; Anderson, supra, § 7.22. . . .

STEWART PARK AND RESERVE COALITION, INCORPORATED SPARC s v. E. SLATER, R. J. R. H., 358 F. Supp. 2d 83 (N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . following work is authorized by this permit: The discharge of clean fill material into approximately 7.22 . . .

J. RAHL, Jr. v. BANDE, C. S. C. Co. n k a LLP,, 316 B.R. 127 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . A ¶ 7.22.) . . .

MOHNEY, v. USA HOCKEY, INC., 300 F. Supp. 2d 556 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . Collins analysis also assumes the mass of Levi’s head neck complex was 7.22 kg and the moment of inertia . . .

HURD, v. CAREY,, 280 F. Supp. 2d 980 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . Between the driver’s seat and the center console they found a piece of plastic wrapped around 7.22 grams . . .

FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF AMERICA, v. AMERICAN STATE BANK,, 339 F.3d 764 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . . ¶ 7.22[2][e] at 7-116. . . .

BLIHOVDE, v. ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN, D. St. St. a St. St. a St. a St. St., 219 F.R.D. 607 (W.D. Wis. 2003)

. . . Inc., 279 B.R. 442, 450 (D.R.I.2002), and 2 Herbert Newburg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 7.22 . . . of the complaint, class certification is impossible.” 2 Newburg & Conte, Newburg on Class Actions § 7.22 . . .

C. F. TRUST, INC. v. FIRST FLIGHT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 140 F. Supp. 2d 628 (E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . refinancing of the Top Flight Airpack, Scott Peterson was still not entitled to distributions under Section 7.22 . . . Id. § 7.22. . . . .

INVEST ALMAZ, v. TEMPLE- INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORPORATION,, 243 F.3d 57 (1st Cir. 2001)

. . . The first two installments required by the agreement were $7.22 million in November 1993 and $5.5 million . . .

A. SWOPE, N. O. W. Jr. O. W. Jr. O. W. III O. W. III, v. SIEGEL- ROBERT, INC. a, 243 F.3d 486 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . for Determining Fair Value, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations (ALI) § 7.22 . . . Comment e to § 7.22 explains that in an appraisal proceeding, absent extraordinary circumstances, the . . . ALI § 7.22 cmt. e. . . . ALI § 7.22(a). . . . Comment e to § 7.22 further clarifies that extraordinary circumstances must consist of more than an absence . . .

In P. PETRUCCI,, 256 B.R. 704 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2001)

. . . of the claim will harm the other creditors in that their distributions will decrease from 84.5% to 7.22% . . .

LOZADA, A. D. v. DALE BAKER OLDSMOBILE, INC. a d b a KIA, d b a d b a d b a CFC- f k a a, 197 F.R.D. 321 (W.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . NEWBERG, ALBA CONTE, 2 NEWBERG ON CLASS ACTIONS (hereafter “NEW-BERG”) § 7.22, p. 7-77 (3d ed.1992). . . .

FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GRAPEVINE EXCAVATION INC. v. a, 197 F.3d 730 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . Art. 7.22. Therefore, it is not exempt from a claim for attorney’s fees pursuant to Art. 2226. . . .

In WILLIAMS, A. v., 240 B.R. 884 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)

. . . interest rate, carried higher monthly payments and provided the Debtor total cash proceeds of only $7.22 . . .

GRACE, v. THOMASON NISSAN,, 76 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (D. Or. 1999)

. . . . § 7.22(b); Utah Code Ann. § 76-2-204(2); Wash.Rev. Code Ann. § 9A.08.030(2)(b). . . . .

A. SWOPE, v. SIEGEL- ROBERT, INC., 74 F. Supp. 2d 876 (E.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . Additionally, the American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance, adopted in 1994, provide in § 7.22 . . .

In AIELLO, a k a a k a v. f k a, 231 B.R. 693 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . judicial notice of this fact and assume that joinder is impracticable. 2 Newberg on Class Actions § 7.22 . . .

R. v., 112 T.C. 130 (T.C. 1999)

. . . fiscal year 1994 projected that the anticipated shareholders equity of the company would increase by 7.22 . . .

In BALDRIDGE,, 232 B.R. 394 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1999)

. . . Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 7.22 (2d. ed.1994) (a specific plan provision for the treatment of a . . .

D. FARISH, Jr. v. W. MURPHY, M., 727 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . land ranging in width from approximately 4.16 feet to 12.99 feet which continues on for a distance of 7.22 . . . dictate that trying to grow sod on a strip of land ranging in width from 4.16 feet to 12.99 feet that is 7.22 . . .

In SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. v. MID- CONTINENT RACING GAMING CO. I Co. II Co. III N. A. FCLT L. P., 226 B.R. 673 (D. Kan. 1998)

. . . present value of all of its payments at $19,514,-667.42 based on the “contract” rate of interest of 7.22% . . . The bankruptcy court noted two problems with using 7.22% as the discount factor in the present value . . . With respect to the bankruptcy court’s first conclusion, we agree that the 7.22% rate proposed in the . . . to liquidate the $3,519,425.46 claim were amortized equally over the 9 year plan period, assuming a 7.22% . . . the bankruptcy court also held that Appellants' present value calculation is flawed because it used 7.22% . . .

MILLER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICES AGENCY, USDA,, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 7.4, 7.9, 7.22. . . .

In SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. d b a, 219 B.R. 587 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1998)

. . . Using the contract rate of interest of 7.22 percent compounded monthly, Sunflower’s-present value analysis . . . They do not, however, because they are based on a 7.22 percent discount rate, a rate described by the . . . The present value analysis was prepared using the contract rate of interest of 7.22 percent compounded . . . This rate is 14 basis points higher than the 7.22 percent proposed for use in debtor’s plan. . . . In any event, simply using the contract interest rate of 7.22 percent does not accord with the weight . . .

VERMONT MICROSYSTEMS, INC. v. AUTODESK, INC. G., 138 F.3d 449 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . magistrate judge’s December 23, 1996 judgment in so far as it awarded post-judgment interest at the rate of 7.22 . . .

D. COOK, C. v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY,, 134 F.3d 771 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . CJI 2d § 7.22. . . .

In E. GLATSTIAN M. LAPIN, Dr. L. P. v. E. GLATSTIAN,, 215 B.R. 495 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1997)

. . . . § 1961, the applicable interest rate from January 1, 1988 through December 31, 1988 is 7.22%. . . . to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, the applicable interest rate from January 1,1995 through December 31, 1995 is 7.22% . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . 5.52% 5.86% 7.86 % 8.77% 1992 2.88% 3.88% 4.77% 3.89% 7.01% 8.14% 1993 2.46% 3.55% 4.28% 3.43% 5.87% 7.22% . . .

MARFIA, v. T. C. ZIRAAT BANKASI,, 968 F. Supp. 152 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . In Saulpaugh, the district court had awarded simple interest at the rate of 7.22% per year. . . . The Second Circuit's only comment on the rate of 7.22% was that it was not "unreasonable." 4 F.3d at . . .

MILLER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICES AGENCY,, 966 F. Supp. 1087 (N.D. Ala. 1997)

. . . . §§ 7.5. 7.9, 7.22. . . .

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. K N ENERGY, INC. a, 80 F.3d 405 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . This letter states: We hereby confirm that, pursuant to your request, the interest rate of 7.22% has . . .

NSK NSK v. Co., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 350 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . The Final Results established NSK’s rates for ball bearings and cylindrical roller bearings at 7.22% . . .

ROXBURY TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE, v. DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,, 886 F. Supp. 242 (N.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . 7.17% of the weighted votes, the Town is over represented when a three-fifths vote is required, with 7.22% . . .

HAMPEL, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,, 886 F. Supp. 760 (D. Colo. 1994)

. . . accordance with this order and that interest on this judgment shall accrue hereafter at the rate of 7.22% . . .

C. FRANK, v. R. RELIN,, 851 F. Supp. 87 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Plaintiff requests interest, compounded annually at a rate of 7.22% per year, for a total of $46,-292.97 . . . Plaintiff suggests that the Court use 7.22% as the prejudgment interest rate based solely on the fact . . . In Saulpaugh, the Second Circuit was not, as suggested by plaintiff, endorsing the use of 7.22% as the . . . I decline to award prejudgment interest at the 7.22% rate, without further clarification of its source . . .

SAULPAUGH M. v. MONROE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, J. Jr., 4 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 1993)

. . . As a result, Saul-paugh was only awarded 7.22% interest on the total amount of damages. . . . For example, if the average interest rate from Saulpaugh’s discharge until her award was 7.22% a year . . .

WHITE, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PDB KMS B B NFL, 836 F. Supp. 1458 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . Motions to Amend and Approve the Settlement Agreement and to the Wording of the Proposed Consent Judgment 7.22 . . . White, 822 F.Supp. ¶ 7.22, at 1430. . . . See infra ¶¶ 7.22-7.33. . . . .

WHITE, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PDB KMS B B NFL, 822 F. Supp. 1389 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . agreement with the NFLPA to “exit” the market for player licensing rights may be open to question. 7.22 . . .

TRANSPORTATION LEASING COMPANY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 861 F. Supp. 931 (C.D. Cal. 1993)

. . . refuse collected within the city be lawfully disposed of in existing public dumps outside the city. [7.22 . . .

WEINBERGER, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. BTZ, INC. v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. RYAN, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP., 801 F. Supp. 804 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . Clayton: 12/5 1.95 1/8 .7 12/7 1.25 1/14-■16 .35 12/11 .4 1/17 .37 1/3 1.3 1/18 .5 1/7 .4 Firm Total 7.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO,, 803 F. Supp. 758 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . election, Walker and his slate defeated the incumbent slate, which included John Jacobs (“Jacobs”), Local 7.22 . . .

AUSTIN, J. v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 788 F. Supp. 192 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.22 at 107 (2d Ed.1979). . . .

In OIL SPILL BY THE AMOCO CADIZ OFF THE COAST OF FRANCE ON MARCH, 954 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1992)

. . . its opinion by awarding PIL statutory costs and by setting the annual prejudgment interest rate at 7.22 . . . The court awarded statutory costs as well as compound prejudgment interest at an annual rate of 7.22 . . . The court added prejudgment interest at 7.22% per annum without compounding. . . . That notice has been distributed and the current interest rate is 7.22 percent. . . . The court ultimately applied the same 7.22% rate, but without compounding, to PIL’s award. . . .

UNITED STATES v. EASTERN OF NEW JERSEY, INC., 770 F. Supp. 964 (D.N.J. 1991)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.22 (2d ed. 1979) (quoting Bowles v. . . .

DUNAND, v. BOWLING GREEN STORAGE VAN CO., 755 F. Supp. 106 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . The exchange rate as of February 14, 1986 was 7.22 FF = $1.00 USD. . . .

In SUBURBAN MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. K. YODER, v. T. E. L. LEASING, INC., 124 B.R. 984 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1990)

. . . the following parties in the respective amounts, which include prejudgment interest at the rate of 7.22% . . .

In MARK ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNITED STATES v. LEDLIN,, 105 B.R. 1101 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . ); Matter of Hirsch-Franklin Enterprises, Inc., 63 B.R. 864, 870-71 (Bankr.M.D.Ga.1986) (claim for $7.22 . . .

In MARK ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION, INC. UNITED STATES v. LEDLIN,, 886 F.2d 1101 (9th Cir. 1989)

. . . ); Matter of Hirsch-Franklin Enterprises, Inc., 63 B.R. 864, 870-71 (Bankr.M.D.Ga.1986) (claim for $7.22 . . .

GIBBS, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 714 F. Supp. 85 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . Plaintiff’s Payroll Change Authorization indicates that she was earning $7.22 as a clerk and would be . . .

LUBRIZOL CORP. v. CARDINAL CONSTRUCTION CO. Co., 868 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . The trial court also awarded costs and prejudgment interest at the rate of 7.22% against Cardinal and . . . Finally, the appellant challenges the prejudgment interest rate of 7.22%. Analysis A. . . . Interest The appellant asserts that the trial court improperly set the prejudgment interest rate at 7.22% . . . The trial court’s award of a rate of 7.22% lacks a basis in Texas law and, had there been a cross-appeal . . . There being no cross-appeal, the award of 7.22% prejudgment interest is therefore, with all other aspects . . .

L. EVANS, v. UNITED LIFE ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a L. EVANS, v. UNITED LIFE ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 871 F.2d 466 (4th Cir. 1989)

. . . Evans also protested the 7.22% annual interest rate assigned in the judgment, contending that the correct . . .

GUTIERREZ v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 702 F. Supp. 1050 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.22 at 107 (2d Ed. 1979), the Second Circuit has apparently followed . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN KENT COUNTY, STATE OF DELAWARE,, 702 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Del. 1988)

. . . Deficiency, increased by compounded interest ($15,929 + $919) $16,848 Multiply by: interest rate X 7.22% . . .

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF KING, v. R. PIERCE, t, 701 F. Supp. 844 (D.D.C. 1988)

. . . McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 81 S.Ct.1743, 6 L.Ed.2d 1230 (1961); Koch, Administrative Law and Practice, § 7.22 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. CITY OF MT. LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA, 842 F.2d 1480 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.22, at 107 (1979). That fact, however, is not dispositive. . . .

ROBERTS, v. WAMSER,, 679 F. Supp. 1513 (E.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . Henderson found that 7.22% of the ballots cast by black voters were not counted, whereas only 1.77% of . . .

In MITCHELL,, 77 B.R. 524 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . These rates vary from 7.22 percent for 13-week Treasury Bills on September 13, 1985, to an 11%% prime . . .

CSX v., 89 T.C. 134 (T.C. 1987)

. . . $14,081,411 B&O DDB 112,717,135 less 56,635,630 9.40 years 5,966,118 RL DDB 139,081,124 less 87,700,515 7.22 . . . $266,421,639 14 7.41 years B&O DDB $75,687,991/$112,717,135 14 9.40 years RL DDB $71,743,507/$139,081,124 14 7.22 . . .

A. ROSENBERG, v. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI,, 118 F.R.D. 591 (S.D. Ohio 1987)

. . . Sunbeam Corp., 108 F.R.D. 410 (N.D.Ill.1985); see also 2 Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions §§ 7.17-7.22 . . .

DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. CTS CORPORATION, D. B. F. H. Jr. J. M., 643 F. Supp. 215 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . The section in question follows § 7.22 of the Model Act. . . . See 1 Model Business Act Annotated, § 7.22 at 609, § 7.24 at 625 (3d ed. 1985). . . .

In HIRSCH- FRANKLIN, ENTERPRISES, INC. M. FLATAU, v. F. JACKSON,, 63 B.R. 864 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1986)

. . . The Court finds that that portion of Defendant’s claim for interest in the sum of $7.22 and costs in . . .

THE AUTHORS LEAGUE OF AMERICA, INC. v. OMAN, A. III,, 790 F.2d 220 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.22[C], at 7-161 n. 51 (1985); see also Notes of the Committee on the . . . Professor Nimmer viewed the manufacturing clause as a prior restraint, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.22[C], . . .

STAPLETON, v. WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, U. S. R. RAY, v. JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION MULLINS COAL COMPANY, INC. OF VIRGINIA, v. CORNETT, 785 F.2d 424 (4th Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law, § 7.22 (2d ed. 1980). . . . Davis, Administrative Law § 7.22 (1979). . . .

COOLING SYSTEMS AND FLEXIBLES, INC. a v. STUART RADIATOR, INC., 777 F.2d 485 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . See 2 Nimmer, § 7.22[C][3], at 7-162. . . . hire” is that of the employer-corporation and not that of the individual employee-writer. 2 Nimmer, § 7.22 . . . Clause, designed to shelter American bookbinders and typographers from foreign competition, 2 Nimmer, § 7.22 . . . that] has proved destructive of the best interests of both copyright creators, and users.” 2 Nimmer, § 7.22 . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 27.72 29.55 29.25 34.69 24.29 26.37 22.07 21.30 22.49 23.81 23.29 25.59 23.84 26.14 26.96 20.47 28.80 7.22 . . .

DICK WARNER CARGO HANDLING CORPORATION, v. AETNA BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., 746 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . Alderman, A Transactional Guide to the Uniform Commercial Code § 7.22 at 957 (2d ed. 1983) (distinguishing . . .

In STABLE MEWS ASSOCIATES,, 35 B.R. 603 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . The leases pertaining to the non-holdover tenants provide for payment of rent ranging from $3.19 to $7.22 . . .

T. GINDES L. v. UNITED STATES H. KAPLAN v. UNITED STATES A. L. KAPLAN v. UNITED STATES SINROD, H. v. UNITED STATES, 661 F.2d 194 (Ct. Cl. 1981)

. . . Interest _valne_ Corrected . value, Chillum Road Shopping Center 7,0 $ 24,000 Dupont Park Apartments 7.22 . . .