Cases from cite.case.law:

CORALLO, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICES,, 971 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . following balances payable: $1524.51 on the cash assistance obligation; $910.18 for Medicaid; and $7.31 . . .

MILLER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 247 F. App'x 841 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.30 and 7.31, which prescribe appeals procedures. . . . . § 7.31, her appeal proceeded under the procedures outlined in 7 C.F.R. § 7.30. . . .

McINERNEY v. G. KLOVSTAD T., 935 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 7.31 of Silver Lake’s subdivision declaration provides in pertinent part: Side yard setbacks . . . judgment, the trial court concluded, in pertinent part: The Court concludes that the language of § 7.31 . . . Therefore, in order to determine whether the trial court erred in its interpretation of section 7.31, . . . Equally true, it appears that the intent of Silver Lake’s restriction in section 7.31 was to establish . . . Section 7.31 is less restrictive on one side of the line separating two lots (Silver Lake’s five-foot . . .

In PROTARGA, INC. f k a f k a v. L., 329 B.R. 451 (Bankr. D. Del. 2005)

. . . This table reflects an average price per share of $7.31. . . .

BRANDAID MARKETING CORPORATION. v. S. S. v., 418 F. Supp. 2d 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . (JPTO ¶ 7.31.) . . .

GARVEY, On v. ARKOOSH, 354 F. Supp. 2d 73 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Buck purchased 150 shares at $7.00 per share on March 11, 2002; and Loveless purchased 100 shares at $7.31 . . .

G. ONG G. ONG IRA G. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO. J. R. T. K. R. E. F. R. E. Co. Co. Co., 388 F. Supp. 2d 871 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

. . . slight decrease in year-over-year delinquencies, however, from 7.50% in the first quarter of 2001 to 7.31% . . . The 60 plus days delinquencies are down in the first quarter, approximately 20 basis points to 7.31% . . .

v. U. S. A USX LTV Co. U. S. A USX LTV Co. v., 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 377 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)

. . . United States — Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/R, at ¶¶ 7.31 . . .

NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, U. S. a USX LTV U. S. a USX LTV v., 146 F. Supp. 2d 835 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2001)

. . . States — Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/ DS184/R, at ¶¶ 7.31 . . .

In CM HOLDINGS, INC. G. M. G. v. CM, 254 B.R. 578 (D. Del. 2000)

. . . Interest Rate 1 9,31% 9.81%12.99% 2 10.11% 10.74% 14.15% 3 8.98% 9.49%12.59% 4 8.38% 8.84% 11.79% 5 6.95% 7.31% . . .

BUCHHOLZ, v. ALDAYA W. O, 210 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 7.30-7.31. . . . hearing, or to the Deputy Administrator, who must conduct a trial-type formal hearing, as 7 C.F.R. § 7.31 . . . See 7 C.F.R. § 7.31. . . . Buchholz claims that the termination provisions in ,7 C.F.R. §§ 7.28-7.31 limited defendants to terminating . . .

In A. SZYMCZAK, 246 B.R. 774 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2000)

. . . Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 7.31, at 7-74 to 7-75 (2d ed.1994). . . .

In M. ROBERTSON, v. M., 203 F.3d 855 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . Lee Hargrave, 16 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Matrimonial Regimes §§ 7.1-7.31 (2nd Ed.1997)(hereinafter . . .

In M. ROBERTSON, v. M., 203 F.3d 855 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . Lee Hargrave, 16 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Matrimonial Regimes §§ 7.1-7.31 (2nd Ed.l997)(hereinafter . . .

W. R. GRACE CO. CONN. v. INTERCAT, INC., 60 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Del. 1999)

. . . Selling Price (per pound) Grace’s Projected Selling Price (per pound) Price Differential 1993 $7.06 $7.31 . . .

MANCUSO, F. d b a v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 56 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . from sediment in the basin and found PCB concentrations ranging from a low of 3.46 ppm to. a high of 7.31 . . .

HIPP, W. Jr. v. LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 39 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . District Manager: January—May Sales Manager: May—December $47,787 - 9.67% 1993 Sales Manager $51,281 7.31% . . .

MILLER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICES AGENCY, USDA,, 143 F.3d 1413 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . §§ 7.30 and 7.31. . . .

CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC. v. THE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO. s,, 978 F. Supp. 589 (D.N.J. 1997)

. . . percentages: Policy Year Applicable LMI Limits Percentage 1961-62 $4,500,000 3.46% 1962-63 $9,500,000 7.31% . . . 1963-64 $9,500,000 7.31% 1964-65 $9,500,000 7.31% 1965-66 $9,500,000 7.31% 1966-67 $9,500,000 7.31% . . .

MANCUSO, F. d b a v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., 967 F. Supp. 1437 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . revealed soil concentrations on the Mancusos’ property ranging from a low of 3.46 ppm to a high of 7.31 . . .

In THE ITALIAN OVEN, INC. THE ITALIAN OVEN, INC. v. NO RESPONDENT, 209 B.R. 355 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1997)

. . . Cf., 40 Pa.Code § 7.31(a) (if license is returned because, inter alia, licensee no longer has a lease . . .

MILLER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICES AGENCY,, 966 F. Supp. 1087 (N.D. Ala. 1997)

. . . . §§ 7.30 and 7.31, a hearing before the Deputy Administrator. . . .

MOORE, v. GLICKMAN, R., 113 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 7.31. . . .

WEBB, a v. GAF CORPORATION GAF GAF, 949 F. Supp. 102 (N.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . 9/86 9/26/85 to 8/28/86 7.08 10/86 to 9/87 9/25/86 to 9/1/87 6.33 10/87 to 9/88 9/30/87 to 8/25/88 7.31 . . .

COOPER, v. UNITED STATES,, 37 Fed. Cl. 28 (Fed. Cl. 1996)

. . . On July 27, one day after the spillway was opened, the depth of the East Fork at the Fulton Gage was 7.31 . . .

BANCO DEL ESTADO, v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP., 942 F. Supp. 1176 (N.D. Ill. 1996)

. . . vendidos ano de 1993, carrocería nueva marea Wayne chasis International serie 3700 con motor diesel 7.31 . . .

MILLS, v. R. FREEMAN,, 942 F. Supp. 1449 (N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . Teacher 12.38 13.62 Experience (Years) Range of All Schools 7.31 — 17.81 8.39 — 17.44 1994-1995 Elementary . . .

MARKSMAN PARTNERS, L. P. On v. CHANTAL PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, 927 F. Supp. 1297 (C.D. Cal. 1996)

. . . Two days later, on January 8, 1996, Chantal’s stock lost 62% of its value, going from $19,125 to $7.31 . . .

VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC. a v. DURACRAFT CORPORATION,, 58 F.3d 1498 (10th Cir. 1995)

. . . See McCarthy, supra, §§ 1.09[3], 7.31, 27.03[1][b]. . . .

In RIDGEWOOD APARTMENTS OF DeKALB COUNTY, LTD., 183 B.R. 784 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . The ten year treasury note yield on March 3, 1995 was 7.31%. . . .

DURACO PRODUCTS, INC. v. JOY PLASTIC ENTERPRISES, LTD. d b a, 40 F.3d 1431 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . .”); 1 MoCarthy, TRADEMARKS and Unfair Competition § 7.31 n. 1 (citing conflicting sources). . . .

In L. BANKS, d. b. a., 170 B.R. 942 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1994)

. . . Lundin, Chapter IS Bankruptcy, § 7.31 at 7-75 (J. . . .

In SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY II SECURITIES LITIGATION., 843 F. Supp. 1341 (N.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . evidence, on November 8, 1988, Shugart bought back 100,000 shares of Seagate stock at an average price of $7.31 . . .

KOHLER CO. v. MOEN INCORPORATED, f k a, 12 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . See 1 McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 7.31 (3d ed.1992) [hereinafter McCarthy . . .

WHITE, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PDB KMS B B NFL, 836 F. Supp. 1458 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . See ¶¶ 7.27-7.31. . . . Supp.Decl. ¶ 11 (setting forth benefits received by NFL in the settlement of the licensing litigation). 7.31 . . .

V. KRUEGER, Jr. v. E. LYNG, J. J. D., 927 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . state committee, whose decision or action in turn may be appealed to the Deputy Administrator. 7 CFR § 7.31 . . .

A. HEALEY, v. CHELSEA RESOURCES LTD., 133 F.R.D. 449 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Healey and Press challenge the $196.00 hourly fee charged for 7.31 hours of work by the office of the . . . Accordingly, the 7.31 hours billed for Quattlebaum’s services at $196.00 per hour, for a total amount . . .

HEDMAN, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 915 F.2d 1552 (Fed. Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 7.31 (1989). Hedman filed a complaint in the U.S. . . .

HEDMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 21 Cl. Ct. 385 (Ct. Cl. 1990)

. . . . §§ 7.29-7.31. . . . .

KEJRIWAL IRON AND STEEL WORKS, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, Co., 729 F. Supp. 1365 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)

. . . announced that The Department will instruct the Customs Service to assess countervailing duties of 7.31 . . .

v. Co., 14 Ct. Int'l Trade 37 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990)

. . . announced that The Department will instruct the Customs Service to assess countervailing duties of 7.31 . . .

RSI INDIA PVT. LTD. UMA Co. v. UNITED STATES, B. Co. Co. Co. Co. U. S., 876 F.2d 1571 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

. . . Government of India in that year upon export of iron-metal construction castings, e.g., manhole covers, was 7.31 . . .

RSI v., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 1059 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . results and gave notice that it would instruct the Customs Service to assess countervailing duties of 7.31 . . . contested 1984 entries of iron metal castings from India and assess countervailing duties in the amount of 7.31 . . .

RSI INDIA PVT. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 699 F. Supp. 929 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . results and gave notice that it would instruct the Customs Service to assess countervailing duties of 7.31 . . . contested 1984 entries of iron metal castings from India and assess countervailing duties in the amount of 7.31 . . .

RSI v., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 757 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . country-wide weight-average rate from all programs for both assessment and duty deposit purposes is 7.31 . . .

RSI INDIA PVT. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 693 F. Supp. 1189 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . country-wide weight-average rate from all programs for both assessment and duty deposit purposes is 7.31 . . .

HEDMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Cl. Ct. 1988)

. . . . § 7.31 (1984), on September 18, 1984, plaintiff appealed the County Committee’s decision to terminate . . . November 7, 1984, pursuant to Publication 22-PM, H11450 and 451, and as permitted under 7 C.F.R. § 7.31 . . . in the manual are codified in general terms in the Code of Federal Regulations, 7 C.F.R. §§ 7.29 to 7.31 . . .

In WINDSOR COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. t a WINDSOR COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. t a v. HAVERTOWN PRINTING COMPANY,, 79 B.R. 210 (E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . The rates of return for the relevant months of 1986 are: (1) January, 1986 — 7.31%; February, 1986— 7.19% . . .

HARRISON, v. UNITED STATES, 662 F. Supp. 1175 (W.D. Tenn. 1987)

. . . Harrison filled out form CDC 7.31 which informed her that most people do not have any side affects from . . . I noticed a numbness in both legs; however, I did not become alarmed due to information on form CDC 7.31 . . . Harrison recalled signing Form CDC 7.31 with an attached pamphlet (Important Information About Swine . . . However, I did not become alarmed due to information on Form CDC 7.31 that muscle aches within the first . . .

L. J. v., 87 T.C. 349 (T.C. 1986)

. . . Signal .4286 4.50 x .635 x .15 = 11.68 x .635 x .15 = 1.1125 Pittsburgh Forging .6615 4.50 .735 .20 7.31 . . .

AMERICAN BRIDGE DIVISION, U. S. STEEL CORPORATION, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL, 772 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . However, the $7.31 of the hourly rate attributable to allocations for overhead and profit lacks record . . . increased labor costs must be reduced to take into account that the hourly rate utilized was excessive by $7.31 . . . Moreover, the hourly rate used contains the $7.31 in overhead and profit allocations that we found improper . . . the judgment should be altered to reflect the above amount of 11502.31. . 3 hours X ($27.82/hour - $7.31 . . .

N. v., 85 T.C. 376 (T.C. 1985)

. . . Reg. sec. 519.112 was initially numbered sec. 7.31 (see 25 Fed. . . .

TEXTRON, INC. v. U. S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Co., 753 F.2d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

. . . CCPA 1982) (Nies, concurring); Morton-Norwich, 671 F.2d at 1343, 213 USPQ at 17; McCarthy, supra, § 7.31 . . .

CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, v. A. PECK, Jr. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, As A. Jr. As ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, As A. Jr. As, 751 F.2d 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . Tail Lamp Subcompact 10.34 5.83 44% Compact 8.19 7.31 11% Intermediate 8.64 6.25 28% Full Size 7.49 8.48 . . .

SMITH, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,, 568 F. Supp. 1175 (N.D. Ill. 1983)

. . . . § 7.31. . . .

E. MIDKIFF, Jr. Wo B. v. A. TOM, K. T. N. C. I. T. C. Y. K. H I, 702 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Nichols, Eminent Domain § 7.31[1] [1980]. . . .

K. DUTTON, K. v. CITY OF CREST HILL,, 547 F. Supp. 38 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . the United States only and is not applicable to the states.” 2A Nichols, The Law of Eminent Domain § 7.31 . . .

E. BRINK F. v. DaLESIO, M. E. BRINK F. v. DaLESIO, E. BRINK F. v. DaLESIO E. BRINK F. v. DaLESIO R., 667 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1981)

. . . square foot per year), and it spent $8,847 on renovations to make the new offices suitable, raising to $7.31 . . .

ESTATE PRESLEY, v. RUSSEN, d b a El, 513 F. Supp. 1339 (D.N.J. 1981)

. . . . § 7.31; Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice § 6.01. . . .

LITTLE, v. MASTER- BILT PRODUCTS, INC., 506 F. Supp. 319 (N.D. Miss. 1980)

. . . Total 129 39 168 X² = 18.52 1975 G-4, G-5, and supervisors 45 2 47 G-3 72 23 95 Total 117 25 142 X² = 7.31 . . .

SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, 633 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . See Findings of Fact 7.30, 7.31, and 7.32. . . .

O. CHERTKOF, v. MAYOR CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a, 497 F. Supp. 1252 (D. Md. 1980)

. . . See generally 2A Nichols, Eminent Domain § 7.31[1] (1979). . . .

E. BRINK v. DaLESIO, 496 F. Supp. 1350 (D. Md. 1980)

. . . Thus, the effective charge per square foot was $7.31. . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 609 F.2d 442 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . nonrenegotiable division of ADC showed a profit in the years 1963,1964, and 1965 of 11.94, 8.53, and 7.31 . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION AND JON- DELL, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 221 Ct. Cl. 364 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . nonrenegotiable division of ADC showed a profit in the years 1963,1964, and 1965 of 11.94, 8.53, and 7.31 . . .

SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a v. STATE Ci. V. I. C., 473 F. Supp. 996 (W.D. Wash. 1979)

. . . neighborhood schools irrespective of the racial distribution of the students attending those schools. 7.31 . . .

McKENNA, J. v. FARGO,, 451 F. Supp. 1355 (D.N.J. 1978)

. . . (T. 7.31-.32, 7.119) The LPS psychologist used the profile of scores, as is proper, and did not refer . . .

P. STOCKTON, v. R. HARRIS, 434 F. Supp. 276 (D.D.C. 1977)

. . . . § 7.31(a)(1) (1976). That regulation provides in part: “. . . . . . The regulations referred to are found at 24 C.F.R. § 7.31(b)(1) and (2). . 518 F.2d at 652. . . . .

J. COLLINS, Jr. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, C. MURTAUGH, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 532 F.2d 584 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . e) Percent change from 1971(c) 76.9%(i) $7.82 + 6.7% 87■9%(h) $7.56 + 3.1% 97,5% $7.36 + 0.4% 100% $7.31 . . . 189,000 shares of Du Pont; they will benefit by increased earnings of five cents ($0.05) per share (from $7.31 . . .

TASTY BAKING COMPANY, v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 529 F.2d 1005 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . According to its findings, however, the 10-year weighted average profit margin was 7.31%. . . . explain why it concluded that 7.26% was a fair profit margin limitation for the company rather than the 7.31% . . . beyond rectifying gross inequities the appellees had the duty to give strict effect to the precise 7.31% . . .

CHAPMAN v. MEIER,, 407 F. Supp. 649 (D.N.D. 1975)

. . . 12,440 -2.49 302 5B 12,367 -1.89 229 5C 12,502 -3.00 364 6 11,840 +2.46 298 7 12,956 -6.74 818 8 11.251 +7.31 . . .

TASTY BAKING COMPANY v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 395 F. Supp. 1367 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . calculated from the profit margin history attached to Tasty’s “Request for Exception” as exhibit “B” is 7.31 . . .

H. BROWN v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, a, 385 F. Supp. 1128 (D. Nev. 1973)

. . . “Recreation District “7.31 Specific Purposes: (1) To assure adequate public opportunity for outdoor recreation . . .

In SPECTRUM ARENA, INC., 340 F. Supp. 784 (E.D. Pa. 1971)

. . . Further, in 6 Colliers On Bankruptcy, ¶ 7.31, at p. 1273, the authors state: “Once the plan is approved . . .

l. v., 62 Cust. Ct. 761 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . similar merchandise, for which vendors at wholesale in the United States are ordinarily liable, was $7.31 . . . basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $7.31 . . .

ETHYL CORPORATION, v. HERCULES POWDER COMPANY,, 232 F. Supp. 453 (D. Del. 1963)

. . . See Toulmin’s, Anti-Trust Laws of the United States, Vol. 4, § 7.31; see also Morton Salt Co. v. G. . . .

ANNETTE T. RUBINSTEIN, DOING BUSINESS AS ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL v. THE UNITED STATES, 153 Ct. Cl. 301 (Ct. Cl. 1961)

. . . claim for tuition in the amount of $200, and a claim for the furnishing of supplies in the amount of $7.31 . . . The plaintiff is suing for the $200 and the $7.31 in the present action. 39. . . .

GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. LOCAL NO. INTERNATIONAL LADIES GARMENT WORKERS UNION, AFL- CIO,, 283 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1960)

. . . to exercise its asserted right to reopen the wage question, the Consumer’s Price Index having risen 7.31% . . . what it unsuccessfully asserted when it attempted to have the arbitrator fix the wages by ordering a 7.31% . . .

LOCAL NO. INTERNATIONAL LADIES GARMENT WORKERS UNION, AFL- CIO, v. GLENDALE MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 179 F. Supp. 222 (W.D.N.C. 1959)

. . . 15, 1955, (2) and if a reopening was authorized at that time, whether the requested wage increase of 7.31% . . . Arbitrator further determined that the Union grievance dated May 15, 1958, seeking a wage increase of 7.31% . . .

E. A. v., 14 T.C. 902 (T.C. 1950)

. . . As stated in Paul’s Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, ¶7.31, pp. 388-389: * * * In theory husband and . . .

MATHER CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 171 F.2d 864 (3d Cir. 1949)

. . . interest of Josephine in the $540,000 before incorporation was $45,000, or 8.33%; after $39,-500, or 7.31% . . .

v., 12 Cust. Ct. 456 (Cust. Ct. 1944)

. . . invoice value of $1.90 per pound, less freight from Lakefield, Ontario, Canada, to New York- City of $7.31 . . .

v. Co., 29 C.C.P.A. 186 (C.C.P.A. 1941)

. . . Our plant cost is $7.31. Q. Per ton? — A. Yes. Q. Which makes a net loss of how much on each ton? . . .

WINKELMAN v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION KAHN v. SAME, 39 F. Supp. 826 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

. . . Management Corporation 1,375,-000 shares of General Motors common stock at $40 a share, which was $7.31 . . .

OAK WOODS CEMETERY ASS N v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE EVERGREEN CEMETERY ASS N v. SAME, 111 F.2d 863 (7th Cir. 1940)

. . . While the average net selling price per square foot for space in Section I was $7.31 for 1912 and $4.71 . . .

Co. v., 4 Cust. Ct. 47 (Cust. Ct. 1940)

. . . Our plant cost is $7.31. Q. Per ton? — A. Yes. Q. Which makes a net loss of how much on each ton? . . .

THE VELMA LYKES, 6 F. Supp. 886 (S.D. Tex. 1934)

. . . AM arrived off Colon. 6.23 past jetties, 6.26 AM pilot and doctors on board, 7.23 arrived off wharf. 7.31 . . .

W., 5 B.T.A. 1274 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . average earnings, after deducting dividends paid on the preferred stock, amounted to $73,121.59, or $7.31 . . .

In KELLER, 109 F. 118 (N.D. Iowa 1901)

. . . Stake from October 1 to November 12, 1900, both inclusive, to amount of $410.79, with a credit of $7.31 . . .

A. D. PATCHIN, 1 F. Cas. 183 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1849)

. . . Paint, Id. 7.31S: Harley v. Railroad Iron, Id. 6,068; The Williams, Id. 17,710; Chapman v. . . .