Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.41 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.41 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.41

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.41
7.41 Manatee County.The boundary lines of Manatee County are as follows: Beginning on the south bank of Tampa Bay where the line between townships thirty-two and thirty-three south strikes said bay; thence east on said township line to where same is intersected by the line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line, known as the Washington line, to the southeast corner of township thirty-seven south, range twenty-two east; thence west on the township line between townships thirty-seven and thirty-eight south to the southwest corner of township thirty-seven south, range twenty-one east; thence north on the range line between ranges twenty and twenty-one east to the southeast corner of township thirty-five south, range twenty east; thence west on the township line between townships thirty-five and thirty-six south to the Gulf of Mexico; thence northward along the said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to a point midway between Egmont and Passage Keys; thence in a direct line to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, ch. 628, 1855; s. 4, ch. 1998, 1874; s. 1, ch. 3062, 1877; s. 2, ch. 3770, 1887; RS 51; GS 49; RGS 56; s. 1, ch. 8515, 1921; CGL 58.

F.S. 7.41 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.41 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.41


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.41
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.41.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ATLAS BREW WORKS, LLC, v. P. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 6 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 7.41(a). . . .

O HARA, v. DIAGEO- GUINNESS, USA, INC., 370 F. Supp. 3d 204 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . . §§ 7.41, 25.142(e). . . .

WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, INC. v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., 328 F. Supp. 3d 824 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . . § 7.41(a). . . . "to indicate the relative degree of health hazard" posed by the product being recalled. 21 C.F.R. § 7.41 . . .

O HARA, v. DIAGEO- GUINNESS, USA, INC., 306 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . . §§ 7.41, 25.142(e). . . . See 27 C.F.R. §§ 7.41, 25.142(e). . . .

ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, INC. M. R. S. T. R. M. M. v. L. THOMSEN, S. R. M. M., 198 F. Supp. 3d 896 (W.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . . § 7.41(2). . . . Stat. § 7.41(2) gives municipal clerks and chief election inspectors discretion to create an observation . . . Stat. § 7.41(2) in a way that impedes or intimidates voters. . . .

GATES, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., 192 F. Supp. 3d 704 (W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . . § 7.41(b) (describing FDA methodology in assessing device recall classification). . . . an assessment of the short- and long-term consequences of the occurrence of the hazard. 21 C.F.R. § 7.41 . . .

R. BEARDSLEE, Co- W. R. Co- W. A. Co- W. L. A. B. J. B. P. S. J. M. E. B. D. R. R. L. E. Jr. D. N. Y. LLC, W. W. A. K. R. M. D. K. A. v. INFLECTION ENERGY, LLC,, 798 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . & Regs. tit. 9, § 7.41). . . .

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, v. NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA, INC., 74 F. Supp. 3d 639 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . were not originated in accordance with the requirements of the Originator’s underwriting guidelines; 7.41% . . .

HOT STUFF FOODS, LLC, v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,, 771 F.3d 1071 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 7.41-7.59, and USDA by Directive 8080.1 of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (Oct. 26, 2010 . . .

R. BEARDSLEE, Co- W. R. Co- W. A. Co- W. L. A. B. J. B. P. S. J. M. E. B. D. R. R. L. E. Jr. D. N. Y. LLC, W. W. A. K. R. M. D. K. A. v. INFLECTION ENERGY, LLC,, 761 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . . & Regs. tit. 9, § 7.41. . . .

In SACKO, s, 394 B.R. 90 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . the following, other costs allegedly incurred in connection with the 1st Sheriffs Sale: location $ 7.41 . . . City transfer tax 984.48 record deed 156.50 acknowledge deed 4.00 commission 500.00 PGW 4.52 location 7.41 . . .

CLARK, v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF, LLC LLC, US, UDL, 567 F. Supp. 2d 711 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . . §§ 7.41(a)-(b) (2008). . . . See id. § 7.41(a). The same is true of the recall procedures. . . .

KOLANCIAN, v. H. SNOWDEN, A. J. E. E. A. R., 532 F. Supp. 2d 260 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1 and section 7.41 of the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act require that a derivative . . . Laws, ch. 156D, § 7.41. . . .

In SONUS NETWORKS, INC, a v. M. J. T. J. J. A. J. O N. R., 499 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . Laws Ann. ch 156D, § 7.41 (shareholder may only maintain derivative proceeding on behalf of Massachusetts . . .

Re In HUMAN TISSUE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 488 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.41-7.42. . . . Id. § 7.41(a). . . . Id. § 7.41(b). . . .

In DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF HYDE PARK, INC. v. Dr. H., 360 B.R. 787 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . calculated a capitalization rate of 12.9 and 13.5% in 1997 and 1998, which equated to a multiple of 7.75 and 7.41 . . .

In SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 398 F. Supp. 2d 563 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . 2.38 86 2.49 2.23 FRV 1.37 0.90 66 0.81 1.00 RV 2.43 2.86 118 2.75 2.98 RV/TLC 37 42 45 48 LCI 3.35 7.41 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. MUGAN,, 394 F.3d 1016 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . Id. at 7.41. Then in United States v. . . .

G. ONG G. ONG IRA G. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO. J. R. T. K. R. E. F. R. E. Co. Co. Co., 388 F. Supp. 2d 871 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

. . . had declined from the second to third quarter of 2001 and that delinquencies were down from 7.47% to 7.41% . . .

THE UNITED STATES v. CHARLESTON COUNTY, O. M. E. A. D. S. E. E. H. v., 316 F. Supp. 2d 268 (D.S.C. 2003)

. . . discussed above, of the 41 persons elected to the Charleston County Council since 1970, just three (7.41% . . .

ACE LOBSTER CO. INC. v. L. EVANS, U. S. C. E. H. v. L. v. L., 165 F. Supp. 2d 148 (D.R.I. 2001)

. . . 8.875 10 + Georges Bank & South 1.68 1.68 3.07 4.46 5.85 7.24 8.63 10 + SCCLIS 2.21 2.21 3.51 4.81 6.11 7.41 . . .

In CIENA CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 99 F. Supp. 2d 650 (D. Md. 2000)

. . . Mark Cummings 7,500 210,000 3.57% Andrew Petrik 25,000 90,250 27.70% Rebecca Seidman 10,000 135,000 7.41% . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. M. DALEY, In, 209 F.3d 747 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . In the end, then, the Service proposed a TAL of .7.41 million pounds for recreational harvest, 7.47 million . . .

In ESQUIVEL,, 239 B.R. 146 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . Debtor’s proposed amended plan provides for repayment in full through the plan of the 401(k) loan at 7.41% . . .

MARGATE SHIPPING COMPANY, v. M V JA ORGERON, UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL UNDERWRITERS, LTD. MONTCO OFFSHORE, INC. M V JA v. MARGATE SHIPPING CO. MARGATE SHIPPING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 143 F.3d 976 (5th Cir. 1998)

. . . The three-year treasury bill rate on November 15, 1994, was 7.41%, and we are confident that the cost . . .

BANFI PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 40 Fed. Cl. 107 (Fed. Cl. 1997)

. . . . § 7.41(a). . . . See 21 C.F.R. 7.41(b). . . . An HHE, as defined in 21 C.F.R. § 7.41(a), is conducted by a committee of FDA scientists, but was not . . . specifically request that an HHE be conducted by a committee of FDA scientists, as defined in 21 C.F.R. § 7.41 . . . ) Assessment of the consequences (immediate or long-range) of occurrence of the hazard. 21 C.F.R. § 7.41 . . .

CRESWELL TRADING CO. INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY D L Co. Co. P. RSI Co. R. B. Co. P. P. UMA Co. v. UNITED STATES, Co. Co. Co. U. S. Co., 964 F. Supp. 409 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . Agarwalla & Co. 7.41% 6.15% R.S.I. 7.18% 6.88% Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. . . .

Co. D L Co. Co. P. RSI Co. R. B. Co. P. P. Co. v. Co. Co. Co. U. S. Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 487 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . Agarwalla & Co. 7.41% 6.15% R.S.I. 7.18% 6.88% Serampore Industries Pvt. . . .

UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC. v. G. R. G. ENGINEERING, S. E., 927 F. Supp. 556 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . alleged defects in the materials supplied to the Roosevelt Roads Project, through Exhibits 7.39, 7.40, 7.41 . . . Exhibit 7.41 consists of two letters to Universal dated in November 1990 before materials were ever shipped . . .

In KATZMAN SOUTHERN COMMERCE BANK, v. KATZMAN,, 178 B.R. 883 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . the $25,000 liability was his portion of the total obligation encumbering the property based by his 7.41% . . .

FISHER BROS. SALES, INC. v. UNITED STATES BALMACEDA M. Y AGR LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA El v. UNITED STATES CARBEN, INC. v. UNITED STATES COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S. A. v. UNITED STATES NEW MARKET INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES GUZMAN Y DEL REAL, LIMITRADA, v. UNITED STATES Y, 46 F.3d 279 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 7.41(a)(4), (5). . . .

TYGER CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 31 Fed. Cl. 177 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . With an input equal to its new span, this unit produced only a 7.41 psi output, rather than the 15 psi . . .

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S LONDON, PLC,, 843 F. Supp. 597 (N.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . organized under the laws of the United Kingdom and authorized to do business in California, issued 7.41% . . .

In SHELL OIL REFINERY, 155 F.R.D. 552 (E.D. La. 1993)

. . . Out of 18,157 known claimants, a total of 1,346 filed timely objections, which amounts to 7.41% of the . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. DOUGLAS, Jr. Jr., 837 F. Supp. 817 (N.D. Tex. 1993)

. . . venire were African-Americans, resulting in an underrepresentation of African-Americans by approximately 7.41 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WESLEY, UNITED STATES v. JOURNEY,, 990 F.2d 360 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . Keeper, 977 F.2d 1238, 1241 (8th Cir.1992) (7.41 grams of crack cocaine together with weapons and cash . . .

UNITED STATES v. KEEPER,, 977 F.2d 1238 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . Keeper intended to distribute the crack, even though Keeper actually and constructively possessed only 7.41 . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . Univ. of N.J. 7.41 U of Houston 7.2 State U of N.Y., Stoney Brook 6.93 Indiana State University 6.91 . . .

HADIX, v. JOHNSON,, 694 F. Supp. 259 (E.D. Mich. 1988)

. . . (p. 401); (4) GED (test, Exhibit 21). 7.41. (p. 401); (5) LSAT (test, Exhibit 22). 14.27. . . .

CSX v., 89 T.C. 134 (T.C. 1987)

. . . Depreciation Account before 1973 depreciation years allowed C&O DDB $266,421,639 less $162,078,385 7.41 . . . Remaining Account divided by unadjusted basis Class life years C&O DDB $141,006,235/$266,421,639 14 7.41 . . .

DELMARVA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 770 F.2d 1131 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . The Phase II rates were intended to take account of the addition to plant in service of Delmarva’s 7.41% . . .

Dr. REMSEN, v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA,, 429 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . heard before the University Senate Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure (AFTC) pursuant to Rule 6Cl-7.41 . . . Under Rule 6C1-7.41(1), a faculty member at the University may elect to have a grievance heard: (a) pursuant . . . According to Rule 6C1-7.41(2), an election of one of these methods precludes recourse to the remaining . . . Rule 6C1-7.41(6), Florida Administrative Code, states that the president is not bound by the recommendation . . . See Rule 6C1-7.41(2), Florida Administrative Code. . . .

DOUBLE H PLASTICS, INC. v. SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, 575 F. Supp. 389 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . In March, 1980, Sonoco introduced a 5% discount for truckload orders, bringing its price to $7.41 for . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. TONY AND SUSAN ALAMO FOUNDATION,, 567 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. Ark. 1982)

. . . 21.26 20.88 22.47 29.81 35.01 OTHER 134.93 105.73 122.03 147.43 136.00 163.80 RECREATION .00 .00 7.30 7.41 . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 7.40-7.41. Dr. . . .

OHIO POWER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 668 F.2d 880 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . this exhibit, we can derive an embedded cost of debt of 7.75% and embedded cost of preferred stock of 7.41% . . .

UNITED STATES v. PALMERI, P. Sr. No. UNITED STATES v. CAMPISANO, No. UNITED STATES v. CARIELLO, No. UNITED STATES v. SMITH, No. UNITED STATES v. CHESTNUT, No., 630 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1980)

. . . Id. at 4.180 to 4.182, 7.40 to 7.41. . . . Id. at 7.41 to 7.42, 7.67 to 7.68. . . .

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, n, CNG PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, ELIZABETHTOWN GAS COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Co. ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Co. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 584 F.2d 1003 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . Curtailment levels have gone from 7.41% in 1972-1973 to 44% in 1976-1977. . . .

McKENNA, J. v. FARGO,, 451 F. Supp. 1355 (D.N.J. 1978)

. . . (P-3, T. 7.41) An individual taking the inventory reads the instructions and proceeds through the test . . . (T. 7.41 — .42) The MMPI is administered in the United States several hundred thousand times per year . . .

INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CORPORATION, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, 449 F. Supp. 1158 (D. Haw. 1978)

. . . GTE’s share in 1969 came to 7.41% with Bell included, and 37.72% with Bell excluded. . . .

DONOHUE, G. T. A. v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 435 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . 685,133 608 44 7.23% 81 125 20.55% C 1,272,413 263 11 4.18% 13 24 9.12% D 655.083 903 _29 3.21% _38 _67 7.41% . . . B 685,133 7.23% 50,015 20.55% 141,137 C 1,272,413 4.18% 53,434 9.12% 115,789 D 655.083 3.21% 20.961 7.41% . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. H. SKELTON, G. a a, 543 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . the Board believes that he is able and willing to fulfill the obligations of a law-abiding citizen.” [7.41 . . .

REED, III, v. A. RHODES, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . During that same period, Moses Cleaveland’s black percentage remained virtually unchanged (7.42%-7.41% . . .

G. M. v., 66 T.C. 509 (T.C. 1976)

. . . Prior to 1969, a building known as the Leesona Building, a gas station, and a motel were constructed on 7.41 . . .

TASTY BAKING COMPANY v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 395 F. Supp. 1367 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . .-53 percent to 7.41 percent), or a net change of 1.6 percent. . . .

SOCIETY OF PLASTICS INDUSTRY, INC. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION HOOKER CHEMICALS PLASTICS CORPORATION v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR B. F. GOODRICH COMPANY, v. J. BRENNAN FIRESTONE PLASTICS COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNIROYAL INC. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL DYNAMIC CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION DIAMOND SHAMROCK CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, 509 F.2d 1301 (2d Cir. 1975)

. . . assessments of the state-of-the-art of the technology,” the standard price of VCM would only rise frum 7.41 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. GOODMAN, Sr. UNITED STATES v. STREGE ROUSAR FISH COMPANY UNITED STATES v. S. STREGE, UNITED STATES v. E. STREGE, UNITED STATES v. G AND M FISHERIES, 486 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1973)

. . . DDT content in Chubs taken from five areas along the western shore were 6.00, 6.03, 6.98, 7.13 and 7.41 . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, In SALE OF PARK AVENUE PROPERTIES, 354 F. Supp. 717 (E.D. Pa. 1972)

. . . The net income from the six Properties, $4,410,000, is 7.41% of the total consideration of $59,549,000 . . . East 262.000 4.99% 230 Park Avenue 2.303.000 7.52% 245 Park Avenue 1.234.000 8.23% Total $4,410,000 7.41% . . . No. 26, these six properties currently produce income, after depreciation allowance, at the rate of 7.41% . . .

P. SHULTZ, v. P. MORRIS G. P. G. a, 315 F. Supp. 558 (M.D. Ala. 1970)

. . . Sewell 141.14 Gary Lee Stersland 7.41 Jane Teal 84.44 Joey Tew 157.77 Monty Wester 5.88 Charles A. . . .

NORWALK CORE, a k a v. NORWALK BOARD OF EDUCATION, a k a, 298 F. Supp. 213 (D. Conn. 1969)

. . . Cranbury .6 6.4 7.16 5.80 9.59 17.56 Fitch 12.8 13.1 12.80 18.11 20.19 21.21 Fox Run 10.0 9.3 8.30 7.41 . . .

NATIONAL BY- PRODUCTS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 186 Ct. Cl. 546 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . October 25, 1962, filed a declaration of taking which vested an easement estate in the Government in 7.41 . . .

R. v. H. v., 46 T.C. 65 (T.C. 1966)

. . . Meyer_ 290 21.48 Jack Becker_ 100 7.41 Richard C. Burstein- 100 7.41 Louis S. . . .

HUGHES TOOL CO. v. FORD, 114 F. Supp. 525 (E.D. Okla. 1953)

. . . 33,110 46,303 — % 72.8% 6.8%. 50,756 5,968 569,721 1950 430,220 40,525 42,252 8.9% 1.05% — 75.5% 7.1% 7.41% . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND IN CITY AND COUNTY OF CAMDEN, N. J., 63 F. Supp. 43 (D.N.J. 1945)

. . . UNITED STATES v. 7.41 ACRES OF LAND IN CITY AND COUNTY OF CAMDEN, N. J., et al. No. M 553a. . . .

v., 1 T.C. 249 (T.C. 1942)

. . . . § 7.41. . . .

PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA, 26 F. Supp. 507 (N.D. Cal. 1938)

. . . depreciation ($13,051,839), which equals $91,948,-161, the City of Oakland claims an average return of 7.41 . . . per cent as follows: 6.24 per cent, 7.41 per cent, 8.58 per cent, for the respective periods above mentioned . . .

WELLGENG v. MARSHALL, No., 32 F.2d 922 (W.D. Wash. 1929)

. . . insurance company to pay the plaintiff $17.41 per week entered on the 1st day of December, 1928, to $7.41 . . . claimant therefore has suffered a loss by reason of Ms injury equal to two-thirds of $11.12 per week, or $7.41 . . . the employer * * * and insurance carrier * * * shall pay to the claimant compensation as follows: $7.41 . . . January 24, 1929, inclusivo, amounting to the sum of $68.81; * * * that compensation at the rate of $7.41 . . . of December, 1928, that would indicate a gain of earning capacity from a loss of $17.41 per week to $7.41 . . .

SUPREME COUNCIL A. L. H. v CHAMPE, 127 F. 541 (6th Cir. 1904)

. . . . — Dear Sir: Enclosed find money order for $7.41, being all that I am permitted to pay on my benefit . . .

MATTHIAS v. BEECHE THE ASPHODEL, 111 F. 940 (E.D.N.Y. 1901)

. . . vessel steamed 45 days, 13 hours, and 18 minutes, through a distance of 8,246 nautical miles, averaging 7.41 . . .

v. s, 96 U.S. 588 (U.S. 1877)

. . . PI.., sect. 7.41. In Foster v. . . .