Cases from cite.case.law:

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, L. P. v. HODGEMIRE,, 49 So. 3d 767 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Hodgemire was 7.44 ng/ml for two patches or 11.16 ng/ml for three patches. . . . Comparing this number range, 7.44 or 11.16 ng/ml, to the level measured after Mrs. . . .

HALEBIAN, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 590 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.44(a). . . . See id. § 7.44. . . . Id. § 7.44(a), (b)(1). . . . Id. § 7.44(d). . . . Laws Ch. 156D, § 7.44. . . .

NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION, v. ARTINO LLC Co-, 638 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (S.D. Iowa 2009)

. . . five-year lease duration to calculate NCMIC’s weighted average costs of capital and funding, which was 7.44% . . .

SAN JUAN COUNTY, UTAH, a v. UNITED STATES a, 503 F.3d 1163 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 7.44 (2004). . . .

HALEBIAN, III, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Id. § 7.44(a), (b)(1). . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.44(d). . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.44(a). . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.44(c). . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.44(c). . . .

LeBLANC, v. CHEVRON USA INC., 513 F. Supp. 2d 641 (E.D. La. 2007)

. . . LeBlanc’s cumulative lifetime benzene exposure, including possible dermal intake was no greater than 7.44 . . . Rando) or 7.44 ppm-years (per Dr. Paustenbach) is substantially lower 50-400 ppm-years. . . .

REPUBLIC TOBACCO COMPANY, v. NORTH ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY, INC., 481 F.3d 442 (7th Cir. 2007)

. . . post-trial motion for a remittitur or, alternatively, a new trial and reduced the jury verdict to $7.44 . . . December 23, Republic accepted the remittitur, and the district court entered an amended judgment of $7.44 . . . We also reduced Republic’s damage award from $7.44 million to $3 million and ordered each party to bear . . . to award, under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39(e), the costs associated with securing the $7.44 . . . prevailed, notwithstanding NATO’s successful post-trial motion, because the district court entered a $7.44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. McGEHEE,, 177 F. App'x 815 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . In addition to the 7.44 grams of methamphetamine that was recovered during the execution of the search . . .

SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, a v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, 387 F. Supp. 2d 1178 (D. Utah 2005)

. . . . § 7.44, amends the NPS’s regulations for Canyonlands National Park by prohibiting motor vehicles in . . . Creek Road above the Peekaboo campsite. 69 Fed.Reg. 32,871 (June 14, 2004) (codified at 36 C.F.R. § 7.44 . . .

H. FRANK v. LoVETERE,, 363 F. Supp. 2d 327 (D. Conn. 2005)

. . . Act (“MBCA”) § 7.44 (1999) (“Discovery is available to the plaintiff only after the plaintiff has successfully . . . The official commentary to § 7.44 of the MBCA, which is identical to § 33-724, explains that the MBCA . . . Official Commentary (2), MBCA § 7.44 (1999) (emphasis added). . . . Official Commentary (2), MBCA § 7.44. . . . Official Commentary (2), MBCA § 7.44 (1999) .As discussed infra, § III.C, the applicable Stockholder . . .

In RECOTON CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 358 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Kezsbom also allegedly exercised an option for 3,000 shares at $7.44 and immediately thereafter sold . . .

MDCM HOLDINGS, INC. On Of v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION,, 216 F. Supp. 2d 251 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . the underwriting agreement, Mortgage.com sold 7,062,500 shares of common stock to Credit Suisse for $7.44 . . . Underwriters agree, severally and not jointly, to purchase from the Company, at a purchase price of $ 7.44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. LASTER, 258 F.3d 525 (6th Cir. 2001)

. . . A bag inside the cab of the truck contained four other bags of methamphetamine weighing a total of 7.44 . . .

LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE SALOON, INC. v. W. ADAMS, 148 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Kan. 2001)

. . . The sale of Chilton’s shares left defendant with a claim to support from the holders of only 7.44% of . . .

In BONHAM, a In a, 251 B.R. 113 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2000)

. . . 89,480.00 7.29% 1989 $ 856,744.00 833,135.00 $ 23,609.00 2.76% 1990 $ 854,481.00 790,825.00 $ 63,606.00 7.44% . . .

ESTATE OF E. BOWGREN, D. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 105 F.3d 1156 (7th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 7.44. C. Examination of the Trust 1. The Tax Court determined that Mrs. . . .

UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC. v. G. R. G. ENGINEERING, S. E., 927 F. Supp. 556 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . in the materials supplied to the Roosevelt Roads Project, through Exhibits 7.39, 7.40, 7.41, 7.42, 7.44 . . . Exhibit 7.44 is just another copy of Luis R. . . . See Exhibits 7.30 through 7.36, and 7.44. See ¶ 9 of Luis R. Marin Aponte’s Unsworn Declaration. . . .

v., 104 T.C. 256 (T.C. 1995)

. . . 1.02 33.57 .58 34.25 (.10) 33.50 .65 32.40 1.60 33.45 .55 34.25 (.25) 33.50 .50 273.51 13.99 280.06 7.44 . . .

C. THORN, v. ITMANN COAL COMPANY, 3 F.3d 713 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . A resting blood gas was tolerably normal for Thorn’s age (pH of 7.44, pO2 of 75, and pCO2 of 33). . . .

A. EVERETT, v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, a, 840 F. Supp. 1528 (N.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . classification from Agricultural 2 and Residence 1 to Office-Residence Limited Use with site plan on 7.44 . . .

KAMEN v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 500 U.S. 90 (U.S. 1991)

. . . Model Business Corporation Act § 7.44, reprinted in 45 Bus. Law., at 1246-1247. . . . .” § 7.44, Official Comment, reprinted in 45 Bus. Law., at 1250. . . .

In CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 132 F.R.D. 455 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . The 1988 Proposed Amendments to the Model Business Corporation Act, in Section 7.44, also makes dismissal . . . However, sections 7.44(d) and 7.44(c) carry forward the distinction by establishing pleading rules and . . . independent majority, the burden is on the corporation to establish that the requirements of section 7.44 . . . Section 7.44. . . . Section 7.44 Dismissal, supra, at 550. . . . .

NEMETH, D. G. D. E. L. v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY,, 677 F. Supp. 899 (W.D. Mich. 1987)

. . . Even after adjusting these figures for the union’s cost-cutting proposals, a difference in cost of $7.44 . . .

JACQUES, Jr. v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, 677 F. Supp. 444 (M.D. La. 1987)

. . . In December 1983, eight months after the accident, he got a job with Wells Fargo making $7.44 per hour . . .

HOME HEALTH SERVICES, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 19 Fla. Supp. 2d 251 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . HRS had in mind the provisions of Rule 22-7.44(3), Florida Administrative Code, which requires Medicare . . .

v., 85 T.C. 557 (T.C. 1985)

. . . the sales of the Famous First Series books by Silver Burdett, based on a list price of not less than $7.44 . . . Petitioner’s receipts from hard cover sales would have been $1.53 per book (27.5 percent of $7.44 list . . . The sale of 4,928 hard cover copies yielded $19,936 to Silver Burdett (4,928 times $7.44 list less 25 . . .

SUSMAN, v. LINCOLN AMERICAN CORPORATION,, 578 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . He must have assumed about a 7.44% rate of return on investment assets because $160,000, his assumed . . .

INDIANA NATIONAL CORPORATION v. D. RICH,, 554 F. Supp. 864 (S.D. Ind. 1982)

. . . totaling (out of the then outstanding shares of common stock), respectively, 315,000 (6.37%), 368,000 (7.44% . . .

In TOLCO PROPERTIES, INC. a, 6 B.R. 482 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1980)

. . . The Property, commonly known as Triangle Plaza Shopping Center consists of approximately 7.44 acres of . . .

A. MILLER, S. M. Co. v. UNITED STATES, 620 F.2d 812 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . 6.18 percent; 1969, 7.03 percent; 1970, 8.04 percent; 1971, 7.39 percent; 1972, 7.21 percent; 1973, 7.44 . . .

AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSOCIATION v. GOLDSCHMIDT, 485 F. Supp. 811 (D.D.C. 1980)

. . . approximately the same time as the notice of proposed rulemaking was published reported that there are 7.44 . . .

C. CLISSOLD v. ST. LOUIS- SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY,, 600 F.2d 35 (6th Cir. 1979)

. . . evidence shows that Clissold’s loss could be as great as 25 per cent for 211/2 years, adjusted by a 7.44 . . . The Court assumed that Clissold’s history of receiving 7.44% annual wage increases which he had received . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS COMPANY, v. BERGLAND, s, 438 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . 21,701,959 7.47 7.37 -.10 $21,701.96 Apr. ’70 22,458,730 7.42 7.37 -.05 $11,229.37 May ’70 21,252,311 7.44 . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. H. SKELTON, G. a a, 543 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . are often reflections of community sentiment and are weighed in the matter of selection of parole. [7.44 . . .

MAJOR COAT COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 543 F.2d 97 (Ct. Cl. 1976)

. . . The rate would have been 7.44 percent were the alleged excess removed (still excluding the GFP value, . . .

MAJOR COAT COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 211 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1976)

. . . The rate would have been 7.44 percent were the alleged excess removed (still excluding the GFP value, . . .

L. N. A. v., 66 T.C. 861 (T.C. 1976)

. . . further determined that the fair market value of the decedent’s stock in Steel and Supply was $26.64 and $7.44 . . .

RIPON SOCIETY, INC. v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY RIPON SOCIETY, INC. v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY, 525 F.2d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . The maximum deviation in category (3) is 7.44 to 1 (if the victory bonus is applied in terms of the 1972 . . . noted on pages 549-50, supra, the maximum deviation in total citizens represented by each delegate is 7.44 . . .

RIPON SOCIETY, INC. v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY RIPON SOCIETY, INC. v. NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY, 173 U.S. App. D.C. 331 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . The maximum deviation in category (3) is 7.44 to 1 (if the victory bonus is applied in terms of the 1972 . . . noted on pages 549-50, supra, the maximum deviation in total citizens represented by each delegate is 7.44 . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS, INC. v. L. BUTZ,, 389 F. Supp. 1 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . Class I Price 1970 1971 $7.44 7.58 7.29 7.44 6.52 6.68 There are various reasons for this differential . . .

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF CHICAGO ROBINSON s v. B. CONLISK, Jr. CAMACHO, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 385 F. Supp. 543 (N.D. Ill. 1974)

. . . a standard deviation of 7.63 and the average for the whites was 53.91 with a standard deviation of 7.44 . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . from origin in Hawaii to California), a storage charge of $22.32 and a warehouse handling charge of $7.44 . . .

WOODLAWN MEMORIAL PARK OF NASHVILLE, INC. v. L N RAILROAD CO. INC., 377 F. Supp. 932 (M.D. Tenn. 1972)

. . . . — 7.44 inches per hour 1:25 p. m. to 1:40 p. m. — 6.16 inches per hour The United States Weather Bureau . . .

D. SEWELL v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH POLICE JURY T. Sr., 338 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. La. 1971)

. . . Therefore, the total span of deviation in this plan is 7.44. . . . The total deviation of 7.44, while short of ideal, does not substantially dilute the voters’ rights. . . .

BATEMAN, v. STATE E. POTTER, v. STATE, 238 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 1970)

. . . Section 7.44, F.S.A., as follows: “So much of the State of Florida as is situated south of the county . . .

COMMERCIAL SOLVENTS CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 192 Ct. Cl. 339 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . Freight absorbed by CSC Net sales value January_ 3, 802 $63. 35 $10. 14 $53. 21 February— 3, 993 61. 52 7.44 . . .

BECKETT v. SCHOOL BOARD OF CITY OF NORFOLK, 308 F. Supp. 1274 (E.D. Va. 1969)

. . . From a time standpoint, the school buses average 7.44 miles per hour. . . .

D. PETERSON, v. UNITED STATES, 411 F.2d 1074 (8th Cir. 1969)

. . . the Jackson County State Bank, Kansas City, Mo., sold bank money order No. 29115 in the amount of $7.44 . . . They also learned on October 4 that the $7.44 money order was in payment of water used on the same premises . . .

BETH W. CORPORATION v. MIAMI BEACH FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION,, 28 Fla. Supp. 128 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1966)

. . . Broward County, and that on July 1, 1964 the plaintiff executed and delivered its warranty deed conveying 7.44 . . .

MOUNIER, v. STATE THOMPSON, v. STATE, 178 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1965)

. . . Article I, Constitution of the State of Florida. .Section 7.44, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A. . Ҥ 11 . . .

v., 44 Cust. Ct. 759 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . The former gives the following figures: Value eif Port Everglades_ 3,720 less 0.2% for non-insurance. 7.44 . . .

PUROFIED DOWN PRODUCTS CORP. v. TRAVELERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 172 F. Supp. 472 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . Prior to the commencement of this action, plaintiff offered to pay to the defendant $7.44 as an additional . . . Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the sum of $5,945.69 less $7.44, being the additional premium earned . . .

UNITED STATES PIPE FOUNDRY CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 140 Ct. Cl. 132 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . follows: Year Amount From To Interest 1941 EP $ 5,585.16 cr. 8-25-43 1-25-49 $ 1,815.18 211,240.84 cr. g_ 7.44 . . .

THE UINTAH AND WHITE RIVER BANDS OF UTE INDIANS v. THE UNITED STATES, 139 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . of purchase, reasonably valued at about $9,500, leaving an average price for the unimproved land of $7.44 . . . The time factor used on this sale was 80 percent and the $7.44 price per acre on that sale was thus reduced . . .

THE ARKANSAS RICE GROWERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION JOHN M. CHUMNEY AND ROBERT L. WILLIAMS, A PARTNERSHIP, TRADING AS GULF COAST RICE MILLS EL CAMPO RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. KAPLAN RICE MILL, INC. LAKE RICE MILL, INC. AND MAPLE CURTIS HUGHES AND JULIUS AUGUSTUS BOUTTE TO THE USE OF LAKE RICE MILL, INC. WILLIAM M. LOVING MERMENTAU RICE MILL COMPANY, INC. MOUTON RICE MILLING COMPANY NATIONAL RICE MILLS, INC. PRITCHARD RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. PRODUCERS RICE MILL, INC. RIVER BRAND RICE MILLS, INC. EUGENE P. SABATIER AND GEORGE SABATIER, A PARTNERSHIP, TRADING AS THE SUPERIOR RICE MILL COMPANY GEORGE SMITH, JOHN A. SMITH, C. P. CHENEY, OTTO LEIBROCK, MRS. J. A. SMITH, TRUSTEES OF SMITH RICE MILL COMPANY IN DISSOLUTION WAYNE THOMSON, LIQUIDATOR OF IMPERIAL RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. TYRRELL RICE MILLING COMPANY UNITED RICE MILLING PRODUCTS CO. INC. CECIL O. WOFFORD, MILLARD D. ROBERTS, WILLIAM D. ROBERTS, JR. AND LOUISE S. NORVELL, MRS. JAMES H. GULLEDGE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES H. GULLEDGE, DECEASED, AND HENRY T. STRATTON, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MRS. RUTH A. STRATTON, DECEASED, TO THE USE OF CECIL O. WOFFORD, MILLARD D. ROBERTS, AND WILLIAM D. ROBERTS, JR. WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. AND ROBERT B. HOLLAND TO THE USE OF WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. ARK. v. THE UNITED STATES BEAUMONT RICE MILLS EDMUNDSON- DUHE RICE MILL COMPANY, INC. LOUISIANA STATE RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. REPUBLIC RICE MILL, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES AMERICAN RICE GROWERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION v. THE UNITED STATES WILLIAM CRAWFORD, AN INDIVIDUAL, FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF WOODLAND RICE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 137 Ct. Cl. 442 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Announcement Gr-75,” “450,000 pounds of Zenith at $7.64 per 100 pounds, 500,000 pounds of Early Prolific at $7.44 . . .

Co. v., 36 Cust. Ct. 555 (Cust. Ct. 1956)

. . . we do not have on Exhibit 24 the .015- * * * * * * * We find the price of the .010 foil, which is $7.44 . . . foil, weight of foil, we interpolate by adding 50 percent to the price of the .010, in other words to $7.44 . . . .. 7.72 Embossing plus. 2.50 $6.98 7.26 7.60 8.20 8.30 8.08 9.56 3.34 1.08 $6.44 6.62 7.— 7.40 7.64 7.44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WESSEL DUVAL CO. THE EDWARD RUTLEDGE, 123 F. Supp. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

. . . Stand by engine, taking in lines. 7.22 — Slow ahead and navigating as per bell book. 7.32 — Anchor up. 7.44 . . .

COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, 209 F.2d 717 (10th Cir. 1953)

. . . earnings — offering price ratio was 7.03%, and the earnings — net price to the selling stockholders was 7.44% . . .

NORTH ATLANTIC TRANSPORT CO. THE CHAGRES. UNITED STATES. THE REIGH COUNT, 80 F. Supp. 308 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)

. . . The Reigh Count, whose speed seems to have been maintained at about 7.44 knots, took her departure from . . . Count’s speed during this time, from Sambro Light Vessel to the vicinity of the turning point was about 7.44 . . .

PETER KIEWIT SONS CO. v. UNITED STATES, 74 F. Supp. 165 (Ct. Cl. 1947)

. . . was 37.476 cents per cubic yard, which meant that they counted on a contribution of 6.108 cents and 7.44 . . .

PETER KIEWIT SONS CO. A CORPORATION, CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND WESTERN CONTRACTING CORPORATION, ACTING AS JOINT CONTRACTORS AND CO- ADVENTURERS UNDER CONTRACT NO. W- ENG- v. THE UNITED STATES, 109 Ct. Cl. 517 (Ct. Cl. 1947)

. . . was 37.476 cents per cubic yard, which meant that they counted on a contribution of 6.108 cents and 7.44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. O DELL, 160 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947)

. . . County of- Wayne, and the State of Michigan, amounted to $3,858.45, and under sections 7.81, 7.91 and 7.44 . . .

v., 1 T.C. 249 (T.C. 1942)

. . . . § 7.44. . . .

BENITEZ v. BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, 109 F.2d 743 (1st Cir. 1940)

. . . At p. 7.44 of this Report there is this statement: “Sec. 75. . . .

ROBINS v. WETTLAUFER, 81 F.2d 882 (C.C.P.A. 1936)

. . . Appellee’s witness Parks estimates it at 7.44 inches. . . . model, Robins’ Exhibit 2, it is five-eighths inches away; and that in the Verplanck machine it was 7.44 . . . center of gravity is one-half inch away, and the Verplanck machine in which the center of gravity is 7.44 . . .

v., 23 C.C.P.A. 952 (C.C.P.A. 1936)

. . . Appellee’s witness Parks estimates it at 7.44 inches. . . . model, Robins’ Exhibit 2, it is five-eighths inches away; and that in the Verplanck machine it was 7.44 . . . center of gravity is one-half inch away, and the Verplanck machine in which the center of gravity, is 7.44 . . .

OHIO ASSOCIATED TELEPHONE CO. v. GEIGER, 3 F. Supp. 997 (S.D. Ohio 1933)

. . . Ed. 390, decided that a rate of return less than 7.44 per cent, was confiscatory, and indicated that . . .

WABASH VALLEY ELECTRIC CO. v. YOUNG, 287 U.S. 488 (U.S. 1933)

. . . S. 234, 251-252, this court held that a rate of return for a street railway of less than 7.44 per cent . . .

WICHITA GAS CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF KANSAS, 2 F. Supp. 792 (D. Kan. 1933)

. . . the company itself sought from the Commission a rate which it appears would produce a return of about 7.44 . . . Ed. 390, this court held that a rate of return for a street railway of less than 7.44 per cent, was confiscatory . . .

BEAUMONT, SOUR LAKE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES UNITED STATES v. BEAUMONT, SOUR LAKE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, 282 U.S. 74 (U.S. 1930)

. . . W.. 7.05 7.44 4.97 4.81 St. L. S. W. of Texas. . . .

BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COM RS OF NEW JERSEY v. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO., 43 F.2d 478 (3d Cir. 1930)

. . . , and ‘independent judgment as to both law and facts/ ” holding that anything less than a return of 7.44% . . .

UNITED RAILWAYS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE v. WEST, CHAIRMAN, WEST, CHAIRMAN, v. UNITED RAILWAYS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, 280 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1930)

. . . the company itself sought from the commission a rate which it appears would produce a return of about 7.44 . . .

THOMAS THORKILDSEN, 2 B.T.A. 570 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . 12,631.97 Commissary- 1, 625. 83 Refund on prospecting account_ 20.00 Refund on laboratory account_ 7.44 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOYLAN, 256 F. 468 (N.D.N.Y. 1919)

. . . died about two years before the trial. 1844, November 12, Moses Charles deeded to Daniel Schenandoah 7.44 . . .

v. B. F. E. J. B. F., 53 Fla. 239 (Fla. 1907)

. . . hundred fifty-nine dollars and seventy-two cents for damages, besides court costs now here taxed at $7.44 . . .

SUPREME COUNCIL A. L. H. v CHAMPE, 127 F. 541 (6th Cir. 1904)

. . . brother-in-law, Stablman, and, with their knowledge and approval, along with the new assessment of $7.44 . . . Champe, at Nashville, a money order for $7.44, payable to “H B. Poole, Collector A. . . . days thereafter showed the witness the card acknowledging the receipt of the post-office order for $7.44 . . .