The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.52

7.52 Pinellas County.—The boundary lines of Pinellas County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the line dividing townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south if projected in a westerly direction intersects with the western boundary of the jurisdictional waters of the State of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico; thence east on said line to the northeast corner of section one in township twenty-seven south, range sixteen east; thence south to the shore of old Tampa Bay; thence in a southerly direction through the middle waters of old Tampa Bay and Tampa Bay, to a point in Tampa Bay due east of the north shore of Mullet Key; thence due west to a point due north of a point 100 yards due east from the easternmost point of Mullet Key; thence in a line 100 yards from the shoreline around the southern portion of Mullet Key to a point 100 yards west of the northernmost shore of Mullet Key; thence west to a point where such line intersects the western boundary of the jurisdictional waters of the State of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico and northward, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to point of beginning; provided however that nothing herein contained shall now or at any time hereafter in any manner whatsoever repeal, amend, change or disturb in any manner whatsoever the apportionment, allotment, allocation, basis of computation, or other formula wherein and whereby the participation in the gas tax by both counties hereto under and by virtue of ss. 206.41 and 206.47 or any law hereafter enacted, is changed so that Hillsborough County would receive a lesser amount and Pinellas County would receive a greater amount of such gas funds or tax by reason of the change of the boundary line herein authorized.

History.—s. 1, ch. 6247, 1911; RGS 50; CGL 52; s. 1, ch. 19058, 1939; s. 1, ch. 67-601; ss. 1, 2, ch. 70-995.

F.S. 7.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

THOMAS, v. MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., 167 F. Supp. 3d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . following day, Magnachip’s stock price was cut in half, from its previous price of $15.02 per share to $7.52 . . . significantly, Plaintiffs allege that Magnachip’s stock price was cut in half, from $15.02 per share to $7.52 . . .

LUJAN, v. CITY OF SANTA FE,, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1109 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . matter jurisdiction over this appeal and over the Appellant Martin Lujan, pursuant to Rule 7.51, and 7.52 . . .

HEATHERLY, v. PORTILLO S HOT DOGS, INC., 958 F. Supp. 2d 913 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . that she never worked more than 4.72 consecutive hours without a break, and never worked more than 7.52 . . .

INLAND MORTGAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. CHIVAS RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC,, 841 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . distance of 13.87 feet to a point; THENCE South 85 degrees 52 minutes 41 seconds East for a distance of 7.52 . . .

ARMOUR OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES, v. LLC,, 96 Fed. Cl. 726 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . A velocity of 2891 feet per second was recorded, with a weight of 7.52 lbs. . . . Notice 7/30/2004 Test No. 2 8/10/2004 2527 9.87 Test No. 3 8/18/2004 2763 8.46 Test No. 4 8/23/2004 2891 7.52 . . . Notice 7/30/2004 Test No. 2 8/10/2004 2527 9.87 Test No. 3 8/18/2004 2763 8.46 Test No. 4 8/23/2004 2891 7.52 . . . reflected a velocity of 2891 fps, which was less than the requisite 2900 fps, and the weight shown was 7.52 . . . /sq ft to 7.52 lbs. . . .

GUTIERREZ, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 730 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . The purchase at Sandbags totaled $7.52 while the Jamba Juice purchase totaled $4.00. . . .

TILMAN v. UNITED STATES,, 644 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . (14) pencil sharpener ($21.44), (15) tape ($6.39), (16) office chair ($411.35), (17) eandleholder ($7.52 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEWIS,, 305 F. App'x 86 (4th Cir. 2008)

. . . CURIAM: After a jury trial, Carlton Joseph Lewis was convicted of possession with intent to distribute 7.52 . . . We conclude the evidence in this case was sufficient to show Lewis possessed the 7.52 grams of cocaine . . . Lewis was not charged with distribution, but with possession of the 7.52 grams of cocaine base with intent . . .

COOKE, v. UNITED STATES,, 85 Fed. Cl. 325 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . OHS received 7.61 percent, 11.78 percent, and 7.81 percent respectively; ORPH received 4.67 percent, 7.52 . . .

WEST BAY BUILDERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 85 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . Number Change in Weight (grams) Test Duration Hours Result (Lbs. of Moisture) Test Plot # 1 4.6 66.50 7.52 . . . Vierra indicated that West Bay’s moisture test results measured 7.52 and 4.58 pounds per 1,000 square . . .

WARREN, v. SOLO CUP COMPANY, a, 516 F.3d 627 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . She received three raises over the next two years and eventually reached an hourly wage of $7.52. . . .

COAST- TO- COAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 60 Fed. Cl. 707 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . utilized $21.5 million of the acquired $143 million in net operating losses, for a net tax savings of $7.52 . . .

BOWMAN, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA,, 350 F.3d 537 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . Coble’s minimum salary was actually eighty percent of $9.40 or $7.52 per inmate, per month. . . .

S. PEREIRA, v. S. COGAN, S. H., 294 B.R. 449 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Foa-mex stock was worth $7.52 a share' on December 15, 1995 and $11.75 a share on December 15,1998. . . .

In MICROSOFT CORP. ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 185 F. Supp. 2d 519 (D. Md. 2002)

. . . challenge his figures, their own expert estimates that the total processing cost per claimant would be $7.52 . . .

W. R. GRACE CO. CONN. v. INTERCAT, INC., 60 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Del. 1999)

. . . Accordingly, the price per pound of Grace’s lost sales is: $7.06 in 1993; $7.23 in 1994; and $7.52 in . . . Selling Price (per pound) Price Differential 1993 $7.06 $7.31 $0.25 1994 $7.23 $7.67 $0.44 ' 1995 $7.52 . . . $8.05 $0.53 1996 $7.52 $8.45 $0.93 The difference between the actual and projected price is multiplied . . .

R. RIO, v. T. RUNYON, U. S., 972 F. Supp. 1446 (S.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . Plaintiffs average mail volume was only 21.63 feet, her average office time during this period was 7.52 . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 973 F. Supp. 759 (M.D. Tenn. 1997)

. . . Thus, at a speed of 35 miles per hour, it would take a car 7.52 seconds to travel the 376 feet from the . . .

HERTZ CORP. v. CAULFIELD,, 796 F. Supp. 225 (E.D. La. 1992)

. . . 19-20, Bennett’s Camera & Video #3330 — $1.21; Hansell-Petiten #3369 — $32.89; Dixie Art Supplies — $7.52 . . .

MICRO MOTION, INCORPORATED, v. EXAC CORPORATION,, 761 F. Supp. 1420 (N.D. Cal. 1991)

. . . in 1985, 6.54 percent in 1986, 6.01 percent in 1987, 6.84 percent in 1988, 8.07 percent in 1989, and 7.52 . . .

v., 96 T.C. 226 (T.C. 1991)

. . . average margins on these eight parts for 1978 were as follows: Average Parts source margin SunPac. 7.52% . . . difference in petitioner’s average margins for these eight parts between the parts purchased from SunPac (7.52 . . .

PDL VITARI CORP. v. OLYMPUS INDUSTRIES, INC., 718 F. Supp. 197 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . On May 5, 1989, Curnow indicated that the price to plaintiff would be $7.52 per gallon of bulk mix, F.O.B . . . They agreed that the price would be $7.52 per gallon for the first year, minus certain allowances for . . .

W. BOEKELOO, A. S. M. M. L. v. HODEL,, 828 F.2d 727 (Fed. Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 7.52, 7.601 et seq. (Callaghan 1984)). . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, A. v. LADY BALTIMORE FOODS, INC., 643 F. Supp. 406 (D. Kan. 1986)

. . . The actual number was 6, thus producing a difference of 7.52 (6.88 with a sample of 81). . . .

BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM DIAGNOSTICS, INC. f k a v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., 531 F. Supp. 344 (S.D. Tex. 1981)

. . . From 1933 until the early 1970s, therefore, “250 francs per kilogram” was equal to approximately $7.52 . . . Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) had set air carrier liability for damaged goods under the Convention at $7.52 . . .

CORBIN, Co. v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, 629 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . interest arrangements required payment to FRB after three years of simple interest at a fixed rate of 7.52% . . . This extra interest increased the rate from 7.52% to 8.5%, compounded annually, but with payment delayed . . .

CORBIN, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK,, 475 F. Supp. 1060 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Indebtedness; (2) to modify the interest rate payable on the FRB Indebtedness by reducing the rate to 7.52% . . . then outstanding together with simple interest over the three-year period calculated at the rate of 7.52% . . . at the rate of 8.5% per annum (compounded annually) less the interest computed at the fixed rate of 7.52% . . . SOMA 7.06 7.19 7.22 7.23 7.61 7.52 Prime 11.50 11.75 12.00 — — 11.75 3-5 Yr. U. S. . . . the annually compounded rate of 8.5% over three years less the amount of the fixed interest paid at 7.52% . . .

AMERICAN TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH COMPANY, v. CONNECTICUT LIGHT POWER COMPANY,, 470 F. Supp. 105 (D. Conn. 1979)

. . . into one hour to determine the number of average-length conversations that would fit into one hour (7.52 . . . message ($1.83 per message) and multiplied this times the number of average-length messages per hour (7.52 . . .

BUSBY, v. WORTHEN BANK TRUST CO. N. A., 484 F. Supp. 647 (E.D. Ark. 1979)

. . . Under his computations, the yield varied from 2.26% in 1973 to a high of 7.52% in 1968. . . .

CORBIN, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK,, 458 F. Supp. 143 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . The Assumption Agreement provided for repayment of principal and simple interest of 7.52%, less certain . . . The FDIC has repaid FRB-NY as specified, with the final payment of principal and simple 7.52% interest . . . The Court reserves the question whether to the extent plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the 7.52% . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. LANSING BOARD OF EDUCATION, 429 F. Supp. 583 (W.D. Mich. 1976)

. . . . § 7.52, M.C.L.A. § 211.34. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. G. ZARB,, 532 F.2d 1363 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 7.52(1) and (2) (1976 Supp.), define branded and nonbranded independent marketers as persons “engaged . . .

BRADLEY v. G. MILLIKEN, AFL- CIO,, 484 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 7.52, M.C.L.A. § 211.34. . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, In SALE OF PARK AVENUE PROPERTIES, 354 F. Supp. 717 (E.D. Pa. 1972)

. . . 280 Park Avenue — West 80,000 6.61% 280 Park Avenue — East 262.000 4.99% 230 Park Avenue 2.303.000 7.52% . . . However, the Debtor’s estate presently receives about $2,303,000 annually from the property, a return of 7.52% . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, 346 F. Supp. 1277 (E.D. Mich. 1972)

. . . . § 7.52) . 1911, P.A. 44 (M.C.L.A. § 209.1, et seq.; M.S.A. § 7.601, et seq.) . . . .

B. GOTFREDSON B. v. UNITED STATES, 303 F.2d 464 (6th Cir. 1962)

. . . advertising done by the appellants relative to such sales was negligible, amounting to as little as $7.52 . . .

v. A. N., 46 Cust. Ct. 762 (Cust. Ct. 1961)

. . . Profit (8%) Total Reap. 296976-A Type “S” $7. 52 $2. 55 $0. 09 $0. 81 $10. 97 Reap. 296977-A “Universal” 7.52 . . .

A. N. v., 44 Cust. Ct. 630 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . Reap. 296976-A Cost of materials General and labor expenses Packing Profit (8%) Total Type “S” $0. 09 $7.52 . . .

E. v., 42 Cust. Ct. 420 (Cust. Ct. 1959)

. . . Enlargers Foeomat Ila 213.96 46% 115.54 Accessory lens 26. 40 46% 14. 26 Printing boards 13. 92 46% 7.52 . . . Enlargers Foeomat Ila 214. 56 46% 115.86 Accessory lens 26. 40 46% 14. 26 Printing boards 13. 92 46% 7.52 . . . Enlargers Foeomat Ila 214. 56 46% 115.86 Accessory lens 26. 40 46% 14.26 Printing boards 13. 92 46% 7.52 . . . 14 Enlargers Foeomat Ila 214.56 46% 115.86 Accessory lens 26.40 46% 14.26 Printing boards 13. 92 46% 7.52 . . . 2 Enlargers Foeomat Ila 214.80 46%' 115.99 Accessory lens 26.40 46% 14.26 Printing boards 13.92 46% 7.52 . . .

S. A. HEALY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 140 Ct. Cl. 554 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . bond premiums. 26.The overhead expense of plaintiff and its subcontractor on the tunnel contract was 7.52 . . . finding 25, the net increased costs on the tunnel contract amounted to $202,147.75, on which overhead at 7.52 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, LIDO BEACH, TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, COUNTY OF NASSAU, STATE OF NEW YORK, A., 245 F.2d 140 (2d Cir. 1957)

. . . west of the condemned lots were 50% of their value — $3,000 per acre — which amounted to $11,280 for 7.52 . . .

FRANCO- ITALIAN PACKING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 130 Ct. Cl. 736 (Ct. Cl. 1955)

. . . claimed expenditures would amount to consumption of ice at the rate of $12.57 per day on the Sea Boy and $7.52 . . . at 5 cents, or $192.50; gaEey supplies for 12 men at $2.30'per day per man, or $303.60; and ice at $7.52 . . .

BROWN ROOT, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 126 Ct. Cl. 684 (Ct. Cl. 1953)

. . . Morgan Parcel 21 Contractor Government (a) 396.4 rods easement_ $396.40 (b) crop damage on 50' easement 7.52 . . .

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 331 U.S. 284 (U.S. 1947)

. . . tons of products of forests originated in 1941, the respective percentages were 58.73 per cent and 7.52 . . .

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY POLK COUNTY, TENN. STATE OF TENNESSEE,, 68 F. Supp. 692 (E.D. Tenn. 1945)

. . . Among the properties so acquired were 7.52 miles of 110-kv transmission line and 7.48 miles of 66-kv . . .

PAINE v. WELCH, 33 F. Supp. 341 (D. Mass. 1940)

. . . paid said proposed deficiency of $76.81, together with interest from March 15, 1935, in the amount of $7.52 . . .

V. J. v., 4 Cust. Ct. 86 (Cust. Ct. 1940)

. . . 18.6 per centum alumina and iron oxide, 2.9 per centum magnesium oxide, 4.48 per centum alkalies and 7.52 . . .

COTTMAN CO. v. DAILEY,, 94 F.2d 85 (4th Cir. 1938)

. . . investigation and make an appraisal as provided by the act and íound a foreign market value of from $7.52 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SUGAR INSTITUTE,, 15 F. Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1934)

. . . See R. 7.52, 756. It is unnecessary to multiply examples. . . .

J. H. Co. v. v. J. H. Co., 20 C.C.P.A. 344 (C.C.P.A. 1932)

. . . the various importations to range from $4 to $5 per ton and the foreign-market values to range from $7.52 . . .

v. J. H. Co., 18 C.C.P.A. 132 (C.C.P.A. 1930)

. . . of purchase and the foreign market value on the date of exportation was in reappraisement 81809-A, $7.52 . . .

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. MAY, 2 F.2d 680 (8th Cir. 1924)

. . . That the original assessment of $335,000 against appellants, with 7.52 miles of right of way in the district . . .

NILES v. CEDAR POINT CLUB, 175 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1899)

. . . The plat showed that 7.52 acres of it were in town 9, range 9; 28.49 acres in town 9, range 10, and 1.18 . . .