Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.54 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.54 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.54

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.54
7.54 Putnam County.The boundary lines of Putnam County are as follows: Beginning at a point on the south side of the Oklawaha River at low watermark where the range line dividing ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east, township eleven south, crosses said river; thence south on said range line to where same intersects the township line dividing townships eleven and twelve south; thence east on said township line to where same intersects the section line dividing sections two and three, township twelve south, range twenty-five east; thence south on said section line and other section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-three of said township twelve south, range twenty-five east; thence east on the section line dividing sections twenty-three and twenty-six and other sections to the range line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six east; thence south on said range line to the southwest corner of section seven, township thirteen south, range twenty-six east; thence east on the south boundary of said section seven and other sections to the west shore of Lake George; thence southwardly along the shore of Lake George to the mouth of Sulphur Spring; thence to a point on Lake George south of the Spanish Grant, known as the Acosta Grant of land, and on the northern boundary of Volusia County; thence in a direct line and along the northern boundary of Volusia County to the most southern part of Crescent Lake; thence along said northern boundary of Volusia County, following the southeast shore of Crescent Lake, to the mouth of Haw Creek and the boundary of Flagler County; thence westerly and then northwardly along the boundary of Flagler County through the middle of Crescent Lake crossing Bear Island on a line easterly of and parallel to the west line of section nineteen, township twelve south, range twenty-eight east, said line being 10,280 feet easterly, measured at right angles from said west line of section nineteen, which line crosses approximately in the center of Bear Island, then continuing north and westerly through the middle of Crescent Lake, to the range line dividing ranges twenty-seven and twenty-eight east; thence north on said range line to its intersection with Deep Creek; thence west along the center of Deep Creek to the mouth thereof; thence due west to the west margin of the main channel of the St. Johns River; thence northerly along the west margin of the main channel of said river to the intersection of the south boundary line of township seven south with said river; thence west on said township line to its intersection with the north margin of the Bellamy or federal road leading from St. Augustine to Tallahassee; thence south and westerly along the north margin of said road to the point of intersection with such margin of a northerly extension of the east boundary line of Hillcrest on the Lake, a subdivision, as same appears of record in Plat Book 2, page 52, Public Records of Clay County; thence south along the east boundary line of such subdivision to the southeast corner of such subdivision; thence west along the south boundary line of such subdivision to a point intersecting the north margin of the Bellamy Road; thence south and westerly along the north margin of said road to where same intersects the north boundary of section seventeen, township nine south, range twenty-three east; thence west on the section line between sections eight and seventeen, seven and eighteen, township nine south, range twenty-three east, to the southeast corner of said section seven; thence continue west on the section line between sections twelve and thirteen, township nine south, range twenty-two east to Santa Fe Lake; thence in a southeasterly direction to a point on the range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east where said range line is intersected by the Bellamy Road; thence south on said range line to where the same intersects the thread of Orange Creek; thence westerly along the thread of said creek to the intersection of same with the Oklawaha River; thence westerly along the south bank of said river at low watermark to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, ch. 280, 1849; s. 1, ch. 923, s. 3, ch. 1039, 1859; s. 1, ch. 2068, 1875; s. 1, ch. 3469, 1883; s. 1, ch. 3767, 1887; RS 36; GS 34; s. 1, ch. 5978, 1909; RGS 37; s. 1, ch. 12489, 1927; CGL 39; s. 2, ch. 59-488; s. 2, ch. 84-211.

F.S. 7.54 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.54 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.54


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.54
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.54.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

I. M. v. UNITED STATES M. D. N. P. M. D. L. L. P. R. N., 362 F. Supp. 3d 161 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . s pH was 7.54, which indicated she had alkalosis, and Dr. . . .

ACCOUNTABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC v. WELLNESS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1133 (D. Kan. 2018)

. . . $0.0012,13 $0.00 598214 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $10.70 $5.38 5983 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $15.00 $7.54 . . . $285.00 $143.22 5987 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $1,852.50 $930.92 5988 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $15.00 $7.54 . . . 1019 $97.50 $49.00 5990 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $45.00 $22.61 5991 9/2/2015 10/17/2015 1019 $15.00 $7.54 . . .

BRICKLAYERS TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. BARRON d b a, 317 F. Supp. 3d 157 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Barron owes the IMI contributions in the amount of $7.54, interest on the delinquent contributions in . . .

DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION v. Of, 833 F.3d 360 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . because the Skill-man Loop would affect 13.2 acres of riparian zone vegetation, and Pleasant Run Loop 7.54 . . .

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A. AND ALL CONSOLIDATED CASES, 189 F. Supp. 3d 998 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . with stock prices increasing from an opening price of $6.89 on March 26, 2015 to a closing price of $7.54 . . .

HESTERBERG, v. UNITED STATES, 71 F. Supp. 3d 1018 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . City of Anaheim, 63 Cal.App.4th 1269, 1272-73, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 614 (1998); see also BAJI § 7.54 (“A peace . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHAW,, 751 F.3d 918 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . White, 969 F.2d 681 (8th Cir.1992), we held that because 7.54 grams of cocaine was “insufficient standing . . .

FORREST, v. TROUSDALE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 954 F. Supp. 2d 720 (M.D. Tenn. 2013)

. . . The plaintiffs score of -7.54 was the second lowest among the eight teachers and placed her in level . . .

In STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO. FIXED INCOME FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION. Co. v., 842 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . is obtained by multiplying the percentage of the SEC settlement attributable to the civil penalty (7.54% . . .

GREEN, v. UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 646 F.3d 1042 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . Finnegan believed suitable work could be found locally for Green at his Schedule Amount wage rate ($7.54 . . . Green’s Schedule Amount was $1,306.67 per month (or $7.54 per hour). . . . .

CAMPOS, v. CITY OF MERCED,, 709 F. Supp. 2d 944 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . (BAJI No. 7.54.) Munoz v. . . .

GREEN, v. UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 700 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (W.D. Mo. 2010)

. . . secure certain sedentary work with some features of light work, positions that paid an hourly wage of $7.54 . . . believed were within Green’s physical capabilities and restrictions paying an hourly wage of more $7.54 . . . secure certain sedentary work with some features of light work, positions that paid an hourly wage of $7.54 . . .

In P. McGEE, v. GREGORY FUNDING, LLC,, 692 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D. Or. 2010)

. . . September 12, 2005, plaintiff signed the closing documents and refinanced his home for $174,900 at 7.54% . . . The transaction was for $184,400 at 7.54% interest with a one-year balloon payment of $185,559.72. . . . This transaction was for $216,216 at 7.54% interest with a loan maturity date of December 31, 2007 under . . .

UNITED STATES v. CRAIG, a k a, 358 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2009)

. . . On March 12, a police officer stopped Craig’s vehicle and found a 7.54 gram crack rock in the front of . . . As to Count Two, Craig argues that the 7.54 gram crack rock, the only cocaine base in his vehicle on . . . As to Count Two, the jury could have apportioned the 7.54 grams of crack in various amounts to Craig . . . Although the indictment could have been more specific and mentioned the 7.54 gram crack rock, it was . . .

STOFFELS, SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SBC, 555 F. Supp. 2d 745 (W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . prior to December 31, 2000); otherwise, these retirees received a fixed amount of $22.62 per quarter ($7.54 . . .

In McNEELY,, 366 B.R. 542 (Bankr. N.D. W. Va. 2007)

. . . The Debtors’ plan proposes that they retain the Houseboat while paying unsecured creditors 7.54% of the . . . claims is $23,300.71, and that, if their proposed plan is confirmed, the Debtors would be repaying 7.54% . . . In this case, the Debtors propose to repay their unsecured creditors $1,757.38, or about 7.54% of their . . . and which is not necessary for their effective reorganization — while repaying unsecured creditors 7.54% . . .

In WARFARIN SODIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 212 F.R.D. 231 (D. Del. 2002)

. . . When the aggregate lodestar (i.e., $7.54 million) is compared to the attorneys’ fee award of 22.5% of . . .

GREEN, v. NEW BALANCE ATHLETIC SHOE, INC., 182 F. Supp. 2d 128 (D. Me. 2002)

. . . Her hourly wage in Upper Prep was $7.54 per hour, calculated as a base rate of $6.15 (later $6.25) per . . .

PEPSICO, INC. v. CENTRAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, INC., 268 F. Supp. 2d 962 (S.D. Ohio 2001)

. . . 1994 2.91% 1994-1995 2.69% 1995-1996 2.71% 1996-1997 3.21% 1997-1998 3.28% 1998-1999 5.53% 1999-2000 7.54% . . .

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, v. CITY OF MALDEN, MASSACHUSETTS,, 2 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Mass. 1998)

. . . its by products The Certificate authorizes Tennessee to construct, install, operate, and maintain a 7.54 . . .

GANZ, v. LYONS PARTNERSHIP, L. P., 961 F. Supp. 981 (N.D. Tex. 1997)

. . . Rogers testified that Ganz would have cleared C$7.54 on each of the 174,000 toys it had received but . . .

In DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STRIPPER WELL EXEMPTION LITIGATION. W. R. MURFIN d b a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY R. O, 90 F.3d 1551 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . UPRC determined that if the injection wells were counted the Arch Unit averaged daily production of 7.54 . . .

T. GLENNIE, A. A. J. a v. ABITIBI- PRICE CORPORATION, a M. a M. a, 912 F. Supp. 993 (W.D. Mich. 1996)

. . . criteria: MBL with a bid of 7.9% on the principal and John Hancock Life Insurance Company with a bid of 7.54% . . . The 7.54% comes from Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact, no. 25 and plaintiffs’ expert Willard Goodman . . .

GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, v. CRYO- TRANS, INCORPORATED, CRYO- TRANS, INCORPORATED, v. GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION,, 897 F. Supp. 1121 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . Prejudgment interest, at a rate of 7.54%, as the parties have agreed, is appropriate. . . .

GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, v. CRYO- TRANS, INCORPORATED, CRYO- TRANS, INCORPORATED, v. GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION,, 893 F. Supp. 774 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . Prejudgment interest, at a rate of 7.54%, as the parties have agreed, is appropriate. . . .

In DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STRIPPER WELL EXEMPTION LITIGATION. W. R. MURFIN d b a Co. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,, 880 F. Supp. 1466 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . month period from January 1, 1977 through December 31, 1977 the property’s average daily production was 7.54 . . . stating that the Arch Unit. qualified as a stripper well property and had an average daily production of 7.54 . . .

JEROME B. GRUBART, INC. v. GREAT LAKES DREDGE DOCK CO., 513 U.S. 527 (U.S. 1995)

. . . . § 7.54”); Lawrence v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. LOPEZ, UNITED STATES v. WINEMILLER, Jr. UNITED STATES v. GUNTER, UNITED STATES v. WHITEHEAD, UNITED STATES v. WHITEHEAD,, 42 F.3d 463 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . In White, this court found that 7.54 grams of cocaine, which would make 75 to 80 dosage units, was insufficient . . .

A. WASHINGTON, P. L. M. v. AIRCAP INDUSTRIES, INC., 860 F. Supp. 307 (D.S.C. 1994)

. . . Nolie Caldwell (A) Before set-off: 7.54/hour x 44 days = $2654.08 Wages paid: 7.54/hour x 19 days = $1146.26 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STEPHENS, UNITED STATES v. McCRAY,, 23 F.3d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

. . . White, 969 F.2d 681, 684 (8th Cir.1992) (noting that possession of 7.54 grams of cocaine in itself would . . .

DAVIS, v. KANSAS CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 822 F. Supp. 609 (W.D. Mo. 1993)

. . . Davis was employed by the defendant, her rate of pay went from $7.29 per hour to $7.54 per hour. . . . Davis does not make a disparate pay claim, her maximum pay of $7.54 per hour, which is approximately . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITE,, 969 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . A police chemist subsequently determined that the powder in the three baggies totaled 7.54 grams of cocaine . . . The quantity of cocaine that White possessed, 7.54 grams, is insufficient standing alone to support a . . . In addition, the government introduced expert testimony that 7.54 grams is a distribution quantity, and . . .

In DELAWARE HUDSON RAILWAY COMPANY, a P. DICELLO, v. BOSTON AND MAINE CORPORATION,, 127 B.R. 756 (Bankr. D. Del. 1991)

. . . Maine Central Railroad Company in the amount of $885,401.75, plus pre-judgment interest at the rate of 7.54% . . .

HUNTER, v. HERNANDO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Co., 578 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . attendant care at the federal minimum wage and direct that claimant’s daughter be paid at the rate of $7.54 . . .

ELMORE, v. CORCORAN, W. H. v. TOWN OF NARROWS,, 913 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . constitutional rights by arresting her after she resisted the termination of her water service over a $7.54 . . . had used more than 6,000 gallons of water, paid the flat rate, and refused to tender the additional $7.54 . . . he agreed to have Elmore’s water meter and lines checked for leaks and that she agreed to pay the $7.54 . . . Elmore’s June 1987 bill was again more than the minimum amount and carried the $7.54 as arrearage. . . . On June 9, she again visited Corcoran and again refused to pay the disputed $7.54. . . .

BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE, INC. v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,, 892 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

. . . between the actual investment rate of return and the plan rate was 15.29% in 1975, -15.76% in 1974, and -7.54% . . .

GUNN, v. CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, By PRESIDENT OF CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISS. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,, 705 F. Supp. 315 (N.D. Miss. 1989)

. . . WCBiDMOi W h* M tO H O O CO O to ® cn cs to to to CO 03 Oí H1 The five districts thus created would have a 7.54 . . .

G. CLARK, v. W. EDWARDS,, 725 F. Supp. 285 (M.D. La. 1988)

. . . a white householder, 1.14 percent lacked a complete bathroom; among those with a black householder, 7.54 . . .

CHRISTIAN KNIGHTS OF KU KLUX KLAN INVISIBLE EMPIRE, INC. v. TOWN OF POCAHONTAS, VIRGINIA,, 690 F. Supp. 1507 (W.D. Va. 1988)

. . . Interest shall run on all this judgment at the rate of 7.54%. . . .

F. NETSKY, W. v. UNITED STATES, 652 F. Supp. 783 (E.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . /4/81 with interest accrued from 6/2/81 to 8/18/81 (5) $1,000,000.00 Williamsport, PA Project Notes 7.54% . . .

ROBERTSON, v. DOCTORS HOSPITAL, 570 F. Supp. 663 (E.D. Ark. 1983)

. . . At the time of her discharge plaintiff was earning $7.54 per hour with an additional 10% differential . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. BOWLING, Jr. XXX XX XXXX E- U. S., 16 M.J. 848 (C.M.A. 1983)

. . . composed of military judge alone, appellant was found guilty of the possession, sale, and transfer of 7.54 . . .

LOUIS DREYFUS CORPORATION, v. J. B. BROWN, 709 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . $7.15 per bushel, while the second contract called for the delivery of 10,000 bushels of soybeans at $7.54 . . .

CITY GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 689 F.2d 943 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . The FPSC promulgated the following rules relating to customer deposits: Rule 310-7.54 Customer Deposits . . .

F. S. HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES C. M. HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES HAMILTON BROTHERS PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 687 F.2d 408 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . The General Partners will be credited with 7.54% of all gross partnership income from properties developed . . . by the partnership; with 7.54% of all gross partnership income from ■ mineral, royalty, overriding royalty . . . The General Partners will be credited with 7.54% of all gross receipts from sales of partnership properties . . . the sum of debt retirement and interest expense shall be allocated 92.46% to the Limited Partners and 7.54% . . . General Partners. (4) Depletion and depreciation deductions shall be allocated between the 92.46% — 7.54% . . .

FERRIS F. AND MARY ANN S. HAMILTON v. THE UNITED STATES FREDERIC C. AND JANE M. HAMILTON v. THE UNITED STATES HAMILTON BROTHERS PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 231 Ct. Cl. 517 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . The General Partners will be credited with 7.54% of all gross partnership income from properties developed . . . by the partnership; with 7.54% of all gross partnership income from mineral, royalty, overriding royalty . . . The General Partners will be credited with 7.54% of all gross receipts from sales of partnership properties . . . the sum of debt retirement and interest expense shall be allocated 92.46% to the Limited Partners and 7.54% . . . to General Partners. (4) Depletion and depreciation deductions shall be allocated between the 92.46%-7.54% . . .

PAYNE, v. TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC., 673 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . The observed number of hires is 7.54 standard deviations fewer than the expected number. . . .

CHAPMAN v. MEIER,, 407 F. Supp. 649 (D.N.D. 1975)

. . . 12,524 -3.18 386 30 1 12,745 -5.00 607 31 1 12,712 -4.73 574 32A 1 12,024 + .94 114 32B 1 11,223 + 7.54 . . .

N. W. CONTROLS, INC. a v. OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, a, 333 F. Supp. 493 (D. Del. 1971)

. . . For example, a distributor price for a 14-foot cable before the 1961 price cut was $7.54, after the price . . .

DIPLOMAT ELECTRIC, INC. a v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a a, 430 F.2d 38 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . reflects charges from October 9, 1963, to June 6, 1964, and two credits, one on June 19, 1964, for $7.54 . . .

DUKE, W. C. v. H. A. BIRCHFIELD, d b a H. A., 222 F. Supp. 258 (E.D. Okla. 1963)

. . . Another parcel amounting to 7.54 acres has been deeded in fee to the State of Oklahoma but it is not . . . the Federal authority over the reservoir area is illustrated in this quitclaim deed to approximately 7.54 . . . This deed conveys the 7.54 acres for public park and recreational purposes only and expressly reserves . . .

M. SCHUBERT, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 286 F.2d 573 (4th Cir. 1961)

. . . .$4,583.32 $17,422.61 $17,422.31 Less: Real Estate Taxes 6,118.56 6,118.22 Insurance...... 7.54 12.32 . . .

N. C. HADJIPATERAS A. C. v. PAPADOPOULOS,, 250 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1957)

. . . to pay for four days off duty in the amount of $15.28, for two days’ waiting time in the amount of $7.54 . . .

UNITED STATES v. OREGON, 295 U.S. 701 (U.S. 1935)

. . . 30' E. 7.00 cha; N. 14°30' E. 11.00 cha; N. 11°30' E. 7.00 cha; N. 65°30' W. 4.00 cha; S. 49°30' W. 7.54 . . .

GANN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SAGER v. SAME, 61 F.2d 201 (7th Cir. 1932)

. . . The question, concretely stated, is whether the gain of $233,82(7.54 in 1928, in addition to the $200,000 . . .

NEW YORK QUEENS GAS CO. v. NEWTON,, 269 F. 277 (S.D.N.Y. 1920)

. . . aggregating 6.75 cents per 1,000 cubic feet of gas sold, leaving a net deficiency during the year 1919 of 7.54 . . .

AJAX METAL CO. v. BRADY BRASS CO., 155 F. 409 (C.C.D.N.J. 1907)

. . . who made the analysis having been produced, where the copper is given at 65.29 per cent., the tin at 7.54 . . .

CORSAR v. J. D. SPRECKELS BROS. CO. J. D. SPRECKELS BROS. CO. v. CORSAR, 141 F. 260 (9th Cir. 1905)

. . . Ed. 7.54, that: “If a jettison of a cargo, or a part of it (and, as matter of course, damage thereto) . . .

H. v. M. H. v. M., 54 U.S. 381 (U.S. 1851)

. . . Dig. 7.54. , From this article, we see that South Carolina abandoned the ground taken in her petition . . .