The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.64

7.64 Volusia County.—Beginning at a point where the southerly boundary of the Domingo Acosta Grant, also known as section thirty-eight, township thirteen south, range twenty-seven east (said Acosta Grant lying and being in Putnam County) intersects the easterly shore of Lake George, said point being south sixty-five degrees west a distance of thirty-two chains from the southeasterly corner of said Acosta Grant, according to United States Government survey of township thirteen south, range twenty-seven east; run thence north seventy-five degrees fifteen minutes east to a point in the shore of Crescent Lake (see map of boundary line dividing Putnam and Volusia Counties recorded in map book 5, page 87, Volusia County, Florida); thence along the southeasterly shore of said Crescent Lake to the north bank of Haw Creek; thence easterly along the north bank of said Haw Creek to the range line between range twenty-eight east and range twenty-nine east; thence south along said range line to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township fourteen south, range twenty-nine east; thence east along the south boundary of said section nineteen and other sections to the southeast corner of section twenty-two, township fourteen south, range thirty-one east; thence north on the east boundary of said section twenty-two and other sections to the township line between township twelve south and township thirteen south; thence east on said township line to the point where said township line is intersected by Old King’s Road; thence northerly along said Old King’s Road to its point of intersection with the line dividing the Bulow and Ormond Grants; thence northeasterly along said line between Bulow and Ormond Grants to the easterly shore of Bulow Creek; thence following a continuance of said line between Bulow and Ormond Grants, which line now becomes the line dividing lots 7 and 8 as shown on map of partition of the Bulow Tract (Filed in office—September 20, 1867, L. M. Richardson, clerk, Volusia County) according to map recorded in St. Augustine, to the intersection with Haulover or Smith Creek; thence northerly, along said Haulover or Smith Creek, to the intersection with the section line running between sections twenty-nine and thirty and thirty-one and thirty-two, township twelve south, range thirty-two east; thence east along said township line to the Atlantic Ocean; thence southerly along line of the Atlantic Ocean, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida to the township line between township nineteen south and township twenty south; thence west on said township line to the range line between range thirty-three east and range thirty-four east; thence south on said range line to the township line between township twenty-one south and township twenty-two south; thence west on said township line to the thread of the St. Johns River; thence north along the thread of said St. Johns River, what is known as “Old River,” and running on the south and west sides of what is known on the maps of public surveys as “Huntoon’s Island” and on the south and west shores of Lake George to the mouth of Sulphur Springs (now Salt Springs run); thence northeasterly, in a direct line, across Lake George to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 4, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, Jan. 30, 1845; s. 1, ch. 624, 1854; s. 1, ch. 1036, 1859; s. 1, ch. 1764, 1870; s. 1, ch. 2068, 1875; s. 1, ch. 3175, 1879; RS 40; GS 38; s. 2, ch. 5730, 1907; s. 1, ch. 7399, 1917; RGS 41; CGL 43; s. 1, ch. 20888, 1941; s. 1, ch. 67-190; s. 1, ch. 83-217.

F.S. 7.64 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.64 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.64

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.64

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.64.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A., 899 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . After the revelation, the stock peaked at $9.37 per share, and closed at $7.64 per share on an unusually . . .

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION BP LLC,, 827 F.3d 122 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . that the nominal return on equity for this period was 13.01 percent with 5.37 percent inflation and 7.64 . . .

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION BP LLC,, 423 U.S. App. D.C. 480 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . that the nominal return on equity for this period was 13.01 percent with 5.37 percent inflation and 7.64 . . .

KHOJA, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. P. A. AND ALL CONSOLIDATED CASES, 189 F. Supp. 3d 998 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Defendant Orexigeris stock had closed at $5.79 per share on March 2, 2015, it closed on March 3, 2015 at $7.64 . . .

McGINNIS, v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., 817 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . 2010 as $638.32 — consisting of $490.13 for principal and interest, $140.55 for escrow deposit, and $7.64 . . .

In NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION, 988 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . That day, New Oriental shares declined by $7.64 per share, closing down 34.32%. (CAC ¶ 83.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. IACONA,, 728 F.3d 694 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Martin, 692 F.3d 760, 763-7.64 (7th Cir.2012); Tucker, 714 F.3d at 1011-1012. . . .

TEXAS, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 888 F. Supp. 2d 113 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . that “[i]f we rely on data from the Hispanic and black surveys (respectively), 6.72% of Hispanics and 7.64% . . .

In SOPOREX, INC. G. d b a II, d b a II, v. D. J. D. Jr. G., 463 B.R. 344 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . The Complaint alleges that Linehan held 7.64% of Inc.’s preferred stock, Compl., ¶ 32, that Linehan’s . . . While it alleges that an entity called “Sabolik Family Limited Partnership” held 7.64% of the preferred . . .

PACE INDUSTRY UNION- MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND, L. J. v. DANNEX MANUFACTURING CO. INC., 394 F. App'x 188 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . employees’ year-end wages by the lowest wage rate on the Wage Schedule in the CBA ($7.24 in 1999 and $7.64 . . .

H. B. ROWE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. W. TIPPETT, P. E. A. J. G. A. Jr. R. NAACP, 615 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . to 2003)_Labor Pool_Index_Value $ % # % % Utilization % Availability _x 100_ African $ 11,682,435.12 7.64% . . .

GRANT, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE, 727 F. Supp. 2d 677 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . A significantly smaller percentage of black employees 5.08% to 7.64% held positions in the professional . . .

CARLSON, v. XEROX CORPORATION, KPMG LLP, A. G., 596 F. Supp. 2d 400 (D. Conn. 2009)

. . . .; Nortel II $1,074,265,298.00 7.74% McKesson $1,042,500,000.00 7.64% 10 Cardinal Health $ 600,000,000.00 . . . Certification 15,000,000_65_4.62 Nortel II_46_7.74 Class Certification 10,000,000 12_1.62 McKesson_2.1 7.64 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. JOHNSON, Jr., 553 F. Supp. 2d 582 (E.D. Va. 2008)

. . . Despite Arthur Andersen’s efforts, however, the 10Q still contained $7.64 million in allegedly improper . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . Asian Americans represent 7.64 percent of the available prime architecture and engineering firms and . . . Business Enterprises represent 24.77 percent of the available goods and other services firms and received 7.64 . . . and engineering prime contractors, 11.07% of available professional services prime contractors, and 7.64% . . .

v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1213 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . that analysis, the steel industry’s share of the benefits flowing from the 1% reduced rate drops from 7.64 . . .

ROYAL THAI GOVERNMENT, v. UNITED STATES,, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . that analysis, the steel industry’s share of the benefits flowing from the 1% reduced rate drops from 7.64 . . .

DALCOURT, s s v. s, 354 B.R. 868 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2006)

. . . Plaintiff from Debtor is $15,339.40 as of May 23, 2006, plus interest accruing at the contract rate of 7.64% . . .

NORMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 63 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . between the Moana Lane divide and Highway 395, referenced as wetlands 19 and 20 (WL 19 and WL 20); • A 7.64 . . .

L. FROST M. v. HOUSEHOLD REALTY CORPORATION, 61 F. Supp. 3d 740 (S.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . Corey further advised Plaintiffs that the interest rate under the Household mortgage would be 7.64% per . . .

In AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC., 298 B.R. 152 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2003)

. . . 4.75 6.25 8.52 3.67 2.7 1.22 2.87 11.47 9.17 4.05 3.5 24.66 3.38 1.69 4.33 0.33 0.31 2002 1.02 0.99 7.64 . . .

BURRELL, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM, INC., 255 F. Supp. 2d 591 (E.D. Tex. 2003)

. . . After seven months as Zone I Operations Superintendent, Brown received a 7.64% raise. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. BAKHIT,, 218 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (C.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . the closing price on each day of trading, the average trading price during the life of the fraud was $7.64 . . . Loss The third step is calculating the difference between the average selling price during the fraud ($7.64 . . . ) and the average selling price after the fraud ($5.55), which is $2.09 per share ($7.64 - $5.55 = $2.09 . . .

ALASKA, v. NORTON, T., 168 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (D. Alaska 2001)

. . . allotment which sits outside the boundaries of the 1961 right-of-way grant (7.36 acres) for a total of 7.64 . . .

NATIONAL LOAN INVESTORS L. P. v. TOWN OF ORANGE, 204 F.3d 407 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . General Statutes § 7-253, Northeast elected to pay the assessment in annual installments with interest of 7.64% . . . The district court found that the Authority had already assessed interest at the bond rate of 7.64%, . . . assessment over time rather than by lump sum without delay, Northeast (and its successors) incurred a 7.64% . . .

In DANNY THOMAS PROPERTIES III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, An a k a Le II, 231 B.R. 298 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1999)

. . . Choosing between a 7.64% rate and an 8.5%-9% discount rate is difficult. . . . Interest only due in year 1 and 2 at 7.64%. . . . Metro claim of $15,568.84 paid over 12 months plus 7.64% interest at $1,351.72 per month equals total . . . Interest only payable in year 1 and year 2 at the rate of 7.64% per annum. . . . Beginning in year 3 and thereafter, amortized in 120 months with interest accruing at 7.64% per annum . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOLLAND,, 59 F. Supp. 2d 492 (D. Md. 1998)

. . . bag of .133 grams) were seized from Corbin; (3) on September 15, 1995, 50 bags with a total weight of 7.64 . . .

NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND,, 885 F. Supp. 1029 (N.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . These costs were allocated as follows: Application process: $ 7.64 Supervisory costs: $26.74 License . . .

BAKER, v. FARMERS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., 34 F.3d 274 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . after the state lawsuit was filed, expressly reclassified Baker as a custodian/yardman at a salary of $7.64 . . .

SWEENEY, M. v. Jo BANE,, 996 F.2d 1384 (2d Cir. 1993)

. . . computer analysis that pegged the grade level of the first notice at 8.58, and of the revised notice at 7.64 . . .

PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. AGUALO,, 948 F.2d 1116 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 7.64(c)(3). . . .

In INNS, LTD. a, 76 B.R. 573 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1987)

. . . obligation, which is nearest to the thirty year amortization proposed by the debtor, is reflected at 7.64% . . .

SATURN SYSTEMS, INC. a v. SATURN CORPORATION, a, 659 F. Supp. 865 (D. Minn. 1987)

. . . Maybelline, the defendant’s sales to Arkansas retailers comprised 2% of its total sales, or approximately $7.64 . . .

MAYBELLINE CO. v. NOXELL CORPORATION SSC B, 813 F.2d 901 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . Arkansas retailers constitute approximately two percent of the company’s total sales, or approximately $7.64 . . .

JEAN, v. C. NELSON,, 711 F.2d 1455 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . Gitlow was 7.64, well outside of the Castaneda “two or three standard deviations” range. . . .

TRAVIS, F. v. KING, P. E. K. S. A. M. D. W. V. HAWAII COUNTY COMMITTEE, Sr. v. KING,, 552 F. Supp. 554 (D. Haw. 1982)

. . . Percentage Deviation from State- Hawaii 6 91,749 15,292 - 7.15 [6] [15,292] [ - 7-15] Maui 4 70,911 17,728 + 7.64 . . .

In D. BOWERS,, 16 B.R. 298 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1981)

. . . In his filed list of creditors Bowers sets forth twenty-three creditors with claims ranging from $7.64 . . .

HOOTS, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, X. W. X., 587 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1978)

. . . 1970 % Black Total Black Edgewood 66 5101 1.29 Forest Hills 26 9561 .27 North Versailles 1025 13416 7.64 . . .

INVESTORS DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 216 Ct. Cl. 192 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . Bonds % of Tax Exempts to Total Assets 1954 319,495,296 4,739,884 1.48% 1955 375,357,697 28,678,540 7.64% . . .

In PUBLIC LEASING CORPORATION COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK OF WARR ACRES, v. C. C. VICTORY, HOBBS DIVISION OF FRUEHAUF CORPORATION, v. C. C. VICTORY,, 488 F.2d 1369 (10th Cir. 1973)

. . . sale of such property over the amount due on the note and the amount claimed as attorney’s fees was $7.64 . . .

HOOTS, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 359 F. Supp. 807 (W.D. Pa. 1973)

. . . 2494 11.75 East Pittsburgh 3006 3.85 Edgewood 5101 1.29 Forest Hills 9561 .27 North Versailles 13,416 7.64 . . .

SUN OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 445 F.2d 764 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . Earnings of selected natural gas distribution companies in 1965 averaged 7.64 percent overall with earned . . .

THE ARKANSAS RICE GROWERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION JOHN M. CHUMNEY AND ROBERT L. WILLIAMS, A PARTNERSHIP, TRADING AS GULF COAST RICE MILLS EL CAMPO RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. KAPLAN RICE MILL, INC. LAKE RICE MILL, INC. AND MAPLE CURTIS HUGHES AND JULIUS AUGUSTUS BOUTTE TO THE USE OF LAKE RICE MILL, INC. WILLIAM M. LOVING MERMENTAU RICE MILL COMPANY, INC. MOUTON RICE MILLING COMPANY NATIONAL RICE MILLS, INC. PRITCHARD RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. PRODUCERS RICE MILL, INC. RIVER BRAND RICE MILLS, INC. EUGENE P. SABATIER AND GEORGE SABATIER, A PARTNERSHIP, TRADING AS THE SUPERIOR RICE MILL COMPANY GEORGE SMITH, JOHN A. SMITH, C. P. CHENEY, OTTO LEIBROCK, MRS. J. A. SMITH, TRUSTEES OF SMITH RICE MILL COMPANY IN DISSOLUTION WAYNE THOMSON, LIQUIDATOR OF IMPERIAL RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. TYRRELL RICE MILLING COMPANY UNITED RICE MILLING PRODUCTS CO. INC. CECIL O. WOFFORD, MILLARD D. ROBERTS, WILLIAM D. ROBERTS, JR. AND LOUISE S. NORVELL, MRS. JAMES H. GULLEDGE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES H. GULLEDGE, DECEASED, AND HENRY T. STRATTON, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MRS. RUTH A. STRATTON, DECEASED, TO THE USE OF CECIL O. WOFFORD, MILLARD D. ROBERTS, AND WILLIAM D. ROBERTS, JR. WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. AND ROBERT B. HOLLAND TO THE USE OF WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. WONDER RICE MILLS, INC. ARK. v. THE UNITED STATES BEAUMONT RICE MILLS EDMUNDSON- DUHE RICE MILL COMPANY, INC. LOUISIANA STATE RICE MILLING COMPANY, INC. REPUBLIC RICE MILL, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES AMERICAN RICE GROWERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION v. THE UNITED STATES WILLIAM CRAWFORD, AN INDIVIDUAL, FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF WOODLAND RICE COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 137 Ct. Cl. 442 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . Walton offered to CCC, “pursuant to CCC Rice Purchase Announcement Gr-75,” “450,000 pounds of Zenith at $7.64 . . .

Co. v., 36 Cust. Ct. 555 (Cust. Ct. 1956)

. . . .— 7.40 7.64 7.44 8.48 3.09 1.— All figures including agent's commission and cash discount, if any. . . .

D. B. COLE, v. HUGHES TOOL COMPANY, a B. F. CONAGHAN, v. HUGHES TOOL COMPANY, a HUGHES TOOL COMPANY, a v. R. W. FORD,, 215 F.2d 924 (10th Cir. 1954)

. . . inclusive, Hughes’ net profits were: 1940— 23.47% 1941— 22.39% 1942— 14.03% 1943— 15.29% 1944— 15.89% 1945— 7.64% . . .

E. v., 30 Cust. Ct. 153 (Cust. Ct. 1953)

. . . x 51 2. 90 4. 25, 4. 40 41 x 51 “ figures 4. 10 6. 50 41 x 61 3. 10, 3. 15 5. 19 41 x 61 “ figures 7.64 . . .

CLAY v. MOTOR FREIGHT EXPRESS,, 52 F. Supp. 948 (E.D. Pa. 1943)

. . . 35.00 : 75 ‘ -46% 18.67 24.50 43.17 35.00 8.17 5/21-5/27 35.00 1 71 ‘ .493 19.72 22.92 42.64 35.00 7.64 . . .

HUDSON MANHATTAN R. CO. v. HARDY, 22 F. Supp. 105 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)

. . . where the passenger is transported only between the Hudson Terminal and the Exchange Place station, 7.64 . . .

a v. T. A., 79 Fla. 424 (Fla. 1920)

. . . plaintiff received from the insurer notice of its cancellation of the policy, and that a draft for $7.64 . . .

PORTLAND RAILWAY, LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OREGON, 229 U.S. 397 (U.S. 1913)

. . . .• 7.64 " 10 “ Sycamore......-................ 8.12 “ 10 “ ' Jenne...'...................... 9.07 “ 10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TISDALE, U. S., 114 F. 883 (5th Cir. 1902)

. . . $17.45, $9.84, $10.92, $9, $40.35, $37.78, $37.62, $53.52, $66.12, $54.54, $14.10, $5.71, 78e., $20.47, $7.64 . . .

UNITED STATES, THOMAS LAUGHLIN CO. v. MORGAN, 111 F. 474 (C.C.D. Me. 1900)

. . . lubricators, $66.67; tin and tarred paper used in the construction of buildings on the premises for storage, $7.64 . . .

v., 3 F. 305 (S.D.N.Y. 1880)

. . . States redeemed to Alexander Pinover United States 5-20 bonds, account, etc., $500.00 Interest, « » - - 7.64 . . .