Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.66 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.66 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.66

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.66
7.66 Walton County.The boundary lines of Walton County are as follows: Beginning on the Alabama state line where same is intersected by the line dividing centrally range eighteen west; thence south on the section lines to the line dividing townships two and three north, in range eighteen west; thence east to the Choctawhatchee River; thence down the thread of the Choctawhatchee River to a point where said Choctawhatchee River intersects the range line dividing ranges seventeen and eighteen west; thence south on said range line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence in a westwardly direction following the meanderings of said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the range line dividing ranges twenty-one and twenty-two west; thence north on said line to the dividing line between Florida and Alabama; thence easterly along said state line to the place of beginning.
History.s. 2, Dec. 29, 1824; s. 2, Dec. 9, 1825; s. 7, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, ch. 176, 1848; s. 1, ch. 411, 1851; s. 1, ch. 571, 1853; ch. 3258, 1881; RS 13; GS 11; s. 1, ch. 6508, 1913; s. 1, ch. 6937, 1915; RGS 11; CGL 13.

F.S. 7.66 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.66 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.66


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.66
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.66.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. PERDUE,, 292 F. Supp. 3d 315 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Lutz, for instance, excised many entries from his billing records, while Katherine Meyer requests only 7.66 . . .

LASATER v. DIRECTV, LLC, 322 F. Supp. 3d 988 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . Out-of-Pocket Weekly Expenses Lasater 70 $1065.00 $9.64 Guzik 50 $702.42 $9.05 Trujeque 70 $535.97 $7.66 . . .

In ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT, ADLER, P. A. a. k. a. RRA, v. W. D., 717 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG S/R/W/L OF ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.92, N 7.66 . . .

In ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT, ADLER, P. A. a. k. a. RRA, v. W. D., 717 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG S/R/W/L OF ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.92, N 7.66 . . .

UNDERDOG TRUCKING, L. L. C. v. VERIZON SERVICES CORPORATION,, 276 F.R.D. 105 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Hammond: 7.66 hours $ 1,692.86 Daniel M. . . .

v., 133 T.C. 136 (T.C. 2009)

. . . payment rates 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Avg. 1995 9.07 9.05 9.73 8.03 8.67 8.35 8.46 8.02 7.21 8.90 8.47 7.66 . . . 8.47 1996 9.43 9.51 9.36 9.26 8.34 7.75 8.65 7.58 7.66 7.96 7.34 7.62 8.37 1997 8.16 8.23 8.82 8.01 . . .

In SCOTTISH RE GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION, 524 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . On or about December 23, 2005, Scottish Re sold approximately 7.66 million Ordinary Shares to the public . . .

McCABE E. v. ERNST YOUNG, LLP R. a k a LP B. V. I. M. L. H., 494 F.3d 418 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . negotiated between October and December 2000, during which period Vertex’s stock price fluctuated between $7.66 . . .

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . 2002 $1,132.50 $11.80 94.40 December 18, 2002 $1,950.00 $20.31 162.48 December 26, 2002 $ 735.00 $ 7.66 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION G. I. D L. P. A. D. D. De v. J., 448 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Applicants Z-Statistic (# of Standard Deviations) Blacks 21.4% 300 215 5.54 Hispanics 23.1% 324 203 7.66 . . .

AMERICAN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES,, 72 Fed. Cl. 586 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . issued the bank such warnings even though at that time American Federal had a tangible capital ratio of 7.66% . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROBERSON, v., 439 F.3d 934 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . Two jackets were hanging in the closet, one of which contained 378 grams of crack cocaine and 7.66 grams . . .

BACCARAT FREMONT DEVELOPERS, LLC, a v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS A. O K., 425 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) that under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) it has jurisdiction over 7.66 . . . The site contains 7.66 acres of wetland. . . . Corps’ San Francisco District (“the District”) determined that it had jurisdiction under the CWA over 7.66 . . .

CARTY, v. ASHCROFT,, 395 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 7.66 (2004). . . . See California Jury Instructions, Criminal,. 7th Ed. § 7.66 (2004) (enumerating elements of substantially . . .

UNITED STATES v. HEMINGWAY, a k a, 108 F. App'x 83 (4th Cir. 2004)

. . . Hemingway was ordered to pay a $300 special assessment and $7.66 restitution. . . .

BACCARAT FREMONT DEVELOPERS, v. U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (N.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . The project site contains approximately 7.66 acres of seasonal wetlands in six delineated sites identified . . .

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES, 250 F. Supp. 2d 748 (E.D. Mich. 2003)

. . . Loan Interest Rate 10/29/92 9.42% 10/29/93 8.44% 10/29/94 7.50% 10/29/95 8.42% 10/29/96 7.i 10/29/97 7.66% . . . 10/29/98 7.66% 12/29/98 6.75% Effective 12/30/98 4.25% 10/29/00 4.25% 3/29/01 4.25% Effective 3/30/01 . . .

ROSS, v. E. SNYDER,, 239 F. Supp. 2d 397 (D. Del. 2002)

. . . On August 6, 2001, the court ordered plaintiff Ross to pay $7.66 as an initial partial filing fee and . . . On September 20, 2001, the court granted plaintiff Ross a thirty day extension of time to pay the $7.66 . . . Plaintiff Ross paid the $7.66 on September 28, 2001. . . .

SCHNEIDER, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a, 285 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Schneider requested an award of prejudgment interest at a fixed rate of 7.66%, compounded annually, for . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION J., 85 F. Supp. 2d 130 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Z-Statistic Blacks 21.4% 300 215 85 5.54 Qualified Blades 19.7% 165 63 102 8.89 Hispanics 23.1% 324 203 121 7.66 . . .

In INTERDEVELOPMENT, INC. R. v., 233 B.R. 372 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . sold Esprit, “232.46+/-ACRES DESCRIBED IN ATTACHED SURVEY FIELD NOTES (See Exhibit A) Save and Except 7.66 . . .

A. THORSON, v. GEMININ, INCORPORATED,, 96 F. Supp. 2d 882 (N.D. Iowa 1999)

. . . During her fourteen months at Northern Engraving, plaintiffs pay rose from $5.90 to $7.66, $1.70 per . . . plaintiff should still have been employed at Northern Engraving May 6, 1998 - August 20, 1998 (14 weeks X $7.66 . . . hours/week X $5/hour) 36,873.40 Total Back Pay Award + 1.996.80 Front pay 2080 hours X $.96 ($8.62 - 7.66 . . .

In E. GLATSTIAN M. LAPIN, Dr. L. P. v. E. GLATSTIAN,, 215 B.R. 495 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1997)

. . . . § 1961, the applicable interest rate from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990 is 7.66%. . . .

B. ACHEY F. v. LINN COUNTY BANK, DSP M. R., 174 F.R.D. 489 (D. Kan. 1997)

. . . Ray, Kansas Corporation Law & Practice §§ 7.53 to 7.66 (3d ed.1988). . . .

L. DOUGHERTY, v. CARVER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK T. M. R. W. R. R., 112 F.3d 613 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . day of trading, the price had plummeted over 23 percent from the initial $10 price — it closed at $7.66 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIKE, C. O Jr., 82 F.3d 1315 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . During the thirteen month period preceding the venire selection for this case, 7.66% of persons summoned . . . Appellants offer no argument challenging the district court’s reliance on the 10% and 7.66% figures, . . .

R. CURIALE, v. N. CAPOLINO, R. T. N., 883 F. Supp. 941 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . (See PX 89, 85) Haims testified that the fair market value was $3.65 per square foot versus the $7.66 . . .

SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD,, 871 F. Supp. 9 (D.D.C. 1994)

. . . in New Orleans, 5.41 hours; in Houston, 2.80 hours; in Toledo, 20.32 hours; in Puget Sound/Seattle, 7.66 . . .

In VEECO INVESTMENT CO. L. P., 170 B.R. 149 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1994)

. . . petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and Phoenix filed a proof of claim listing its claim as $7.66 . . .

In NORTH WASHINGTON CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 165 B.R. 805 (Bankr. D. Md. 1994)

. . . as required by most lenders in the market place, would be available at 2% over the treasury rate, or 7.66% . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. DOUGLAS, Jr. Jr., 837 F. Supp. 817 (N.D. Tex. 1993)

. . . thirteen-month period preceding the selection of the venire in Defendant’s case, African-Americans represented 7.66 . . . qualified jurors summoned for service in the thirteen months prior to the selection of Defendant’s panel, 7.66 . . .

GOTTLIEB, v. Q. T. WILES,, 150 F.R.D. 174 (D. Colo. 1993)

. . . computations are as follows: Hill & Robbins Year Lodestar Interest Compounded to 6/30/93 1989 $ 93,969.75 7.66% . . . Silverman, Harnes, Obstfeld & Harnes Year Lodestar Interest Compounded to 6/30/93 1989 $104,935.00 7.66% . . . is compounded annually for 3.5 years at the statutory interest rate applicable December 31, 1989 of 7.66% . . .

MANLEY, BENNETT, McDONALD CO. v. ST. PAUL FIRE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 821 F. Supp. 1225 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . 21,363.65202,620.58 12/31/85 0.00 12.0% 24,314.47226,935.05 12/31/86 5,211.66 12.0% 27.232.21292.378.92 06/30/87 0.00 7.66% . . .

WEST, v. B. WEST,, 825 F. Supp. 1033 (N.D. Ga. 1992)

. . . , .indirect and beneficial trust ownership interests, on July 25, 1988, were: 4.05% in West Lumber; 7.66% . . . 12/31/86 12/31/87 7/25/88 West Lumber 7.99 8.09 8.03 6.77 4.05 West Enterprises 7.97 8.08 7.97 7.76 7.66 . . .

In ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 136 B.R. 396 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1991)

. . . Lincoln maintains that $7.66 reflects the adjustment for the actual space maintenance obligation for . . . The additional rent was to be paid by the following calculation: $ 7.66 Actual Space Maintenance —6.50 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, No. AFL- CIO, CLC, v. PARENTS AND FRIENDS OF THE SPECIALIZED LIVING CENTER,, 879 F.2d 1442 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . The situation facing P & F was that the state cut its budget by 7.66% (approximately $10,000 per month . . .

KUNZ CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 16 Cl. Ct. 431 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . Dec. 1984 6.54 7.18 7.66 8.38 9.01 9.09 1985 9.57 9.89 10.69 11.01 11.72 11.96 1986 12.13 11.48 12.20 . . .

GILA RIVER PIMA- MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. UNITED STATES., 9 Cl. Ct. 660 (Cl. Ct. 1986)

. . . calculate the fair rental value should have been: 1929 $14.94 1930 $10.43 1931 $6.12 1932 $5.39 1933 $7.66 . . .

C. A. v., 84 T.C. 722 (T.C. 1985)

. . . On or about July 30,1978, they acquired from Gemarvi one 7.66-carat euclase at a cost of $3,500. . . . One euclase, $3,264.00 $2,298 7.66 carats $15,320 2. . . .

E. BAUER, Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 748 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . = 2.15 to 1 1975: $1,952,944 divided by $677,973 = 2.88 to 1 1976: $3,880,642 divided by $506,092 = 7.66 . . .

UNITED STATES v. EXXON CORPORATION,, 561 F. Supp. 816 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . The weighted average price per barrel was not to exceed $7.66. Id. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY B. v. STATE OF LOUISIANA,, 690 F.2d 180 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . production from domestic properties subject to a statutory maximum weighted average first sale price of $7.66 . . . maintaining an initial weighted average first sale price for domestically produced oil not in excess of $7.66 . . .

A. DOCA C. v. MARINA MERCANTE NICARA- GUENSE, S. A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . For 1975, the comparable figures were 9.14% and 5.67%; for 1979, 11.26% and 7.66%. . . .

SOUTHLAND ROYALTY COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION F. O, 512 F. Supp. 436 (N.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . all domestic production after February 1, 1976 to be sold at a weighted average price not exceeding $7.66 . . .

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS By CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, v. UNITED STATES STATE OF TEXAS, v. UNITED STATES BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 631 F.2d 831 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

. . . The comparisons submitted by San Antonio reflected average earnings of 7.66 mills, see id. at 38-39, . . .

LAMPHERE v. BROWN UNIVERSITY In Re, 491 F. Supp. 232 (D.R.I. 1980)

. . . 42.23 47.64 Hispanic & Italian 39.57 40.21 Music 22.11 23.63 Philosophy 16.30 18.36 Religious Studies 7.66 . . .

GREENSPAN, T. v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN,, 495 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. Mich. 1980)

. . . Of the 18,400 applicants, some 1,409 or 7.66%, were actually hired. . . .

OAHU GAS SERVICE, INC. v. PACIFIC RESOURCES, INC., 460 F. Supp. 1359 (D. Haw. 1978)

. . . Part (a) of § 757 specifies a ceiling price for the “first sale” of crude oil of not over $7.66 per barrel . . .

UNITED STATES v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 454 F. Supp. 1077 (E.D. Va. 1978)

. . . Deviation Number of Standard Deviations Difference 12/31/73 396 21 68 47 7.51 6.3 12/31/74 412 18 70 52 7.66 . . .

MAPCO INC. A. v. CARTER, R., 573 F.2d 1268 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . defendants argue that there has been no factual showing that either the initial composite price ceiling of $7.66 . . .

v. I. v., 67 T.C. 694 (T.C. 1977)

. . . Pulaski Highway Associates 11/1/72. 735.00 Purchase of Pulaski Road property from Shorealty Co. 11/1/72. 7.66 . . .

FALK, A. v. KENNEDY,, 332 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1976)

. . . He had 7.66 years of creditable service in the Judicial Retirement System and in the elected state officers . . .

H. STARK, v. UNITED STATES P. STARK, v. UNITED STATES, 345 F. Supp. 1263 (W.D. Mo. 1972)

. . . share during the periods in question: EARNINGS PER CALENDAR YEAR SHARE 1962 $18.83 1963 3.59 ** 1964 7.66 . . .

SUN OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 445 F.2d 764 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . The exhibit also reveals that the Bell System in 1965 had an overall return of approximately 7.66 percent . . .

H. M. WALSH, v. UNITED STATES, 322 F. Supp. 613 (E.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . Code, § B19-7.66. . . .

J. BERGER, v. BELGULF TANKERS, S. A. S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. NAVARRO, NAVARRO, v. BELGULF TANKERS, S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. ARENA ELMAR, S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. NAVARRO,, 270 F. Supp. 813 (D.C.Z. 1967)

. . . The SS BELGULF PROGRESS properly kept her course and speed as required by section 7.66 of the Rules and . . . by Captain Valentine were proper and timely arid in full accordance with the provisions of sections 7.66 . . .

NEW ORLEANS TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, E. P. RIVAS, INC. v. NEW ORLEANS TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO., 368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)

. . . Only 7.66 percent of work done by ITU members was “reproduction proof” work destined for offset printing . . . It was there pointed out that before the typesetter was acquired 7.66 percent of the work done by ITU . . .

UNITED STATES v. CURTISS,, 330 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1964)

. . . In terms of tax due, the 1955 return stated the income tax payable to be $7.66, and the 1956 return stated . . . 3,000.00 3,000.00 Taxable income....................... 38.32 27.00 Tax................................. 7.66 . . .

TRANSAMERICA CORP. v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, 206 F.2d 163 (3d Cir. 1953)

. . . By 1948 Transainerica’s holdings of Bank of America stock had been reduced to 22.88% and by 1951 to 7.66% . . .

PONDER v. LAMAR LIFE INS. CO., 6 F.2d 294 (W.D. La. 1925)

. . . evidence to show that after the policy was issued the insured paid a bimonthly premium of $17.45 and $7.66 . . .

UNITED v. Co., 10 Ct. Cust. 177 (C.C.P.A. 1920)

. . . .■.. 25.53 Alizarin...,. 7.66 From that evidence the importers deduce that the importation is an alizarin . . .

DAVID WILSON v. MUNICIPALITY OF ARECIBO, 4 P.R. Fed. 293 (D.P.R. 1908)

. . . and hold that he is entitled to recover said sum, together with all costs and the examiner’s fee and $7.66 . . .

MUTUAL RESERVE LIFE INS. CO. v. HEIDEL, 161 F. 535 (8th Cir. 1908)

. . . policy was issued “Heidel paid the first bimonthly premium of $17.45 and the interest on the lien $7.66 . . .

THE SIRIUS. OLIVER v. THE SIRIUS, 54 F. 188 (9th Cir. 1893)

. . . We deduct $7.66 from the item of §147.66 charged for interest, to correspond approximately with the account . . .