Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.67 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.67 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.67

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.67
7.67 Washington County.The boundary lines of Washington County are as follows: Beginning on the Choctawhatchee River on the line dividing townships four and five north; thence east on said township line to northwest corner of section four in township four north, thence east on said township line to northwest corner of section four in township four north, range fifteen west; thence south one mile on section line to the southwest corner of section four, township four north, range fifteen west; thence east one mile to southeast corner of section four, township four north, range fifteen west; thence south on section lines two miles to the southwest corner of section fifteen, township four north, range fifteen west; thence east on section lines to Holmes Creek; thence northward along the thread of Holmes Creek to a point where said creek intersects with section line running east and west between sections thirteen and twenty-four, fourteen and twenty-three in township five north, range fourteen west; thence east on said section line to the northeast corner of section twenty-four, township five north, range thirteen west; thence south on range line between ranges twelve and thirteen west to where said range line intersects with township line between townships four and five north; thence east on said township line to the southeast corner of section thirty-three, township five north, range twelve west; thence south on the section line to southwest corner of section fifteen, township two north, range twelve west; thence west on the section line to the southwest corner of section eighteen, township two north, range twelve west; thence south on the range line between ranges twelve and thirteen west to the meridian base line; thence west on the base line to the thread of Pine Log Creek in range sixteen west; thence down the thread of said creek into the Choctawhatchee River to the thread of said river; thence up the thread of said river to the place of beginning.
History.s. 4, Dec. 9, 1825; s. 2, Oct. 29, 1828; s. 1, ch. 108, 1847; s. 2, ch. 180, 1847; s. 1, ch. 1950, 1873; s. 1, ch. 3258, 1881; RS 15; s. 1, ch. 4236, 1893; s. 1, ch. 4577, 1897; GS 13; s. 1, ch. 6505, 1913; ss. 1, 2, ch. 6935, 1915; RGS 14; CGL 16.

F.S. 7.67 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.67 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.67


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.67
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.67.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE ALL ISLAND TRUCK LEASING CORP., 546 B.R. 522 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . administrative fees and expenses claimed totaling $157,750.04, of which, claimants are to receive a 7.67% . . .

In JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA, a v., 503 B.R. 849 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . example of a statement of operations and a statement of cash flows in Appendix A of SOP 90-7, SOP 90-7.67 . . .

J. WEBER, v. FUJIFILM MEDICAL SYSTEMS U. S. A. INC., 854 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D. Conn. 2012)

. . . Ames, 193 F.Supp.2d at 7.67 (quoting Raskin v. Wyatt, 125 F.3d 55, 60 (2d Cir.1997)). . . .

SHANTOU RED GARDEN FOODSTUFF CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 815 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . States at less than fair value and assigned Red Garden a preliminary weighted-average dumping margin of 7.67% . . .

In HERMOSILLA, v., 450 B.R. 276 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2011)

. . . + $450 (1.5 hours at an hourly rate of $300 for Rule 11 motion) + $383.50 (reducing hourly rate for 7.67 . . .

HOUSE OF FLAVORS, INC. v. TFG- MICHIGAN, L. P., 719 F. Supp. 2d 100 (D. Me. 2010)

. . . House of Flavors notes that Gallagher testified that Orix offered a financing package with a 7.67 percent . . . However, I observe that House of Flavors did not successfully consummate the Orix deal at 7.67 percent . . . I conclude that 7.67 percent interest, therefore, is too low an interest rate for House of Flavors to . . .

In HARDINGE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 696 F. Supp. 2d 309 (W.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . On November 8, 2007, the price of the stock closed at $22.28 per share, down $7.67 from the previous . . .

In VERISIGN, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION., 531 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (N.D. Cal. 2007)

. . . backdated option grants — a grant dated October 30, 1998, for 400,000 shares at the exercise price of $7.67 . . . backdated option grants — a grant dated October 30, 1998, for 180,000 shares at the exercise price of $7.67 . . . backdated option grant — a grant dated October 30, 1998, for 180,000 shares at the exercise price of $7.67 . . . backdated option grants — -a grant dated October 30, 1998, for 240,000 shares at the exercise price of $7.67 . . . backdated option grant — a grant dated October 30, 1998, for 360,000 shares at the exercise price of $7.67 . . .

In MAY, v. U. S. TERI, 368 B.R. 850 (Bankr. D. Neb. 2007)

. . . 150.00 during work week Recreation 100.00 Clothing 50.00 Dry cleaning and laundry 40.00 Newspapers 7.67 . . .

In Jo CHASE, M. v., 328 B.R. 675 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005)

. . . Under the Debtor’s current chapter 13 plan, the unsecured creditors will receive a dividend of 7.67 percent . . .

G. v., 123 T.C. 144 (T.C. 2004)

. . . The remaining $259,717 (or 7.67 percent) of the loss for 1990 was allocated to the Estate. . . . The remaining $11,955 (or 7.67 percent) of the loss was allocated to the Estate. . . .

USINOR, BEAUTOR, HAIRONVILLE, SOLLAC ATLANTIQUE, SOLLAC LORRAINE, v. UNITED STATES, LTV Co. U. S. a USX, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . . ¶ 7.67 (internal citations omitted). . . .

v. LTV Co. U. S. a USX CORP., 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 1107 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004)

. . . . ¶7.67 (internal citations omitted). . . .

STERLING CHINA COMPANY, v. GLASS, MOLDERS, POTTERY, PLASTICS ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL AFL CIO,, 357 F.3d 546 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . classification is concerned, the appendix provides for periodic increases that culminate in a base rate of $7.67 . . .

FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. MAINELLA,, 283 F. Supp. 2d 418 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . . § 7.67 (1963). . . . waterfowl may be hunted (3) Hunting is prohibited from March 1 through August 31 of each year. 36 C.F.R. § 7.67 . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD. S. R. G. W. R., 274 F. Supp. 2d 379 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Following the November 22, 1995 announcement, the stock price increased from $7.67 to $9.42. (Pl. . . .

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES, 250 F. Supp. 2d 748 (E.D. Mich. 2003)

. . . follows: Loaned Unloaned Policy Credited Credited Year Ending Rate Rate 10/29/92 8.65% 5.50% 10/29/93 7.67% . . .

HANGARTER, v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 236 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (N.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . The total awarded was $7.67 million, including $5 million for punitive damages, $1,520,849 for past and . . .

WIECHENS v. UNITED STATES, 228 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (D. Ariz. 2002)

. . . Gladden court determined that the March 24, 1983 Department of Interior notice initially allocated 7.67 . . . For example, both documents limit the HVID to 7.67 percent of the total supply of agricultural water . . .

WEBNER, v. TITAN DISTRIBUTION, INC., 101 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (N.D. Iowa 2000)

. . . Sherinian allocated to trial (2.10 hours), trial preparation (7.67 hours), and discovery (.76 hours). . . .

W. R. GRACE CO. CONN. v. INTERCAT, INC., 60 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Del. 1999)

. . . ) Grace’s Projected Selling Price (per pound) Price Differential 1993 $7.06 $7.31 $0.25 1994 $7.23 $7.67 . . .

T. L. v., 112 T.C. 209 (T.C. 1999)

. . . specific quantity of lower Colorado River water to which HID was entitled for the above purpose was 7.67 . . .

PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, v. CAMACHO,, 103 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 7.67. The statute, we may confidently say, does not punish thoughts or glances. . . .

QUILTER, v. V. VOINOVICH,, 912 F. Supp. 1006 (N.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . population in Sykes’ district from 35.40% to 43.07% (39.86% black voting age population), an increase of 7.67% . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR, 605 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1992)

. . . except that a member of the board may represent The Florida Bar on any review proceeding under rule 3-7.67 . . . Such appeal shall be made in the manner provided by rule 3-7.67. (f) Duty to Expedite Proceedings. . . . Review of referee reports in reinstatement proceedings shall be in accordance with rule 3-7.67. . . .

AMERICAN STANDARD INC. v. PFIZER INC., 722 F. Supp. 86 (D. Del. 1989)

. . . listed in the table is approximately 1 to 1 of the acetabular cup, PX-33, but the range of ratios is 7.67 . . . lists the ratios for the PCA hip stem as 8.4 to 1 and 16.7 to 1 as compared to a ratio of 1 to 1 and 7.67 . . .

HAWLEY, v. C. EVANS,, 716 F. Supp. 601 (N.D. Ga. 1989)

. . . Patients (hours) <1 2 7.67 1-10 9 6.49 10-20 5 8.19 20-63 6 12.82 Patients with severely Impaired renal . . .

G. CRAFT, v. P. HODEL,, 683 F. Supp. 289 (D. Mass. 1988)

. . . The Regulation, 36 C.F.R. 7.67(g), was promulgated in May 1975 by the United States Department of Interior . . .

CHANG v. UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, R. SELEEN, v. BOARD OF REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, KRAYNEK v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND, ROWORTH J v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION OF RHODE ISLAND,, 606 F. Supp. 1161 (D.R.I. 1985)

. . . Women Women Rank Hires Hires Hires Probability Instructor 18.6 42 1.00 Assistant 38 37 .421 Associate 7.67 . . .

THOMAS v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF REGIONAL COMMUNITY COLLEGES,, 599 F. Supp. 331 (D. Conn. 1984)

. . . on the litigation, plus the time reasonably expended in the fee application, to wit: (86.5 -i- 2 + 7.67 . . .

TRAVIS, F. v. KING, P. E. K. S. A. M. D. W. V. HAWAII COUNTY COMMITTEE, Sr. v. KING,, 552 F. Supp. 554 (D. Haw. 1982)

. . . 16,265 +3.86 + 0.95 65,016 16,254 + 3.79 + 0.88 cn 59,101 14,775 -5.65 - 8.30 05 59,509 14,877 -5.00 - 7.67 . . .

EAST TENNESSEE NATURAL GAS COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 686 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . States Treasury bonds, considered by the Commission to be a “riskless” investment, yielded an average 7.67 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PALMERI, P. Sr. No. UNITED STATES v. CAMPISANO, No. UNITED STATES v. CARIELLO, No. UNITED STATES v. SMITH, No. UNITED STATES v. CHESTNUT, No., 630 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1980)

. . . Id. at 7.41 to 7.42, 7.67 to 7.68. . . .

M. V. Jr. J. J. Jr. V. Jr. v., 69 T.C. 97 (T.C. 1977)

. . . Market Rate on Market Market new issue :yield new issue yield yield Other 7.069 6.94 7.309 7.19 7.08 7.67 . . .

WILLIAMS v. KLEPPE, 539 F.2d 803 (1st Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 7.67(g), which bars public nude bathing within the Seashore to all persons over ten years of age. . . .

WILLIAMS v. K. HATHAWAY, 400 F. Supp. 122 (D. Mass. 1975)

. . . Part 7, § 7.67) (“the Regulation”), which provides as follows: Public nudity, including public nude bathing . . .

MERRIAM v. L. KUNZIG,, 347 F. Supp. 713 (E.D. Pa. 1972)

. . . Gateway Centre Corp Gateway Building #1, NE Corner, 36th & Market Streets $8.90 $7.67 ($2,316,000 per . . .

KAUFFMAN v. S. OSSER, P., 321 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Pa. 1971)

. . . In Montgomery County, the Republican candidate received a share of the absentee vote 7.67 percentage . . .

AUTOMATIC RADIO MFG. CO. v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 390 F.2d 113 (1st Cir. 1968)

. . . If a dealer wished to buy a perforated cover separate from a kit, the price ranged from $5 to $7.67. . . . 10-99 $42.95 $39.95 100 or more $34.95 $45.45 Installation- — • antenna 1.75 Perforated plate 5. to 7.67 . . .

J. TOOMBS, G. L. v. W. FORTSON, Jr., 277 F. Supp. 821 (N.D. Ga. 1967)

. . . The 15th District, Gwinnett County, was underrepresented by +7.67 per cent on the 1960 population and . . .

J. BERGER, v. BELGULF TANKERS, S. A. S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. NAVARRO, NAVARRO, v. BELGULF TANKERS, S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. ARENA ELMAR, S. A. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, v. NAVARRO,, 270 F. Supp. 813 (D.C.Z. 1967)

. . . The MV PAITILLA III violated Sections 7.63, 7.67 and 7.68 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Navigation . . . BELGULF PROGRESS; and she did not slacken her speed or stop or reverse; all as required by Sections 7.63, 7.67 . . .

DIXIE CARRIERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 351 U.S. 56 (U.S. 1956)

. . . who are water carriers, requested the competing railroads to establish a joint rail-barge rate of $7.67 . . . establish a through rail-barge route and a joint rate and suggested that the joint rate be fixed at $7.67 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CASTILLO, 120 F. Supp. 522 (D.N.M. 1954)

. . . The note was in the principal amount of $275.95, payable in monthly installments of $7.67, with interest . . .

CAMP v. RECREATION BOARD FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 104 F. Supp. 10 (D.D.C. 1952)

. . . Of that total acreage, 7.67 acres were purchased on August 9, 1938, 'by the District of Columbia with . . .

ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. HENWOOD SOUTHERN PAC. CO. v. SAME DAVIS v. SAME MEYER v. SAME, 157 F.2d 337 (8th Cir. 1946)

. . . Kansas City Southern declined from 5.16 percent to 4.97 percent, and the Missouri-Kansas-Texas from 7.67 . . . ........ 10.64 11.73 9.29 6.81 Louisiana & Arkansas .. 2.52 3.57 5.11 4.22 Missouri-Kansas-Texas .. 7.67 . . .

McGOGNEY v. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK, 103 F.2d 649 (3d Cir. 1939)

. . . his birthday nearest to November 2, 1930”, it found that the cost of this term insurance per year is $7.67 . . .

Co., 7 B.T.A. 36 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . In fact, Parcel Z, which adjoins Block 1, had a sale price of $7.67 a thousand, as compared with the . . .

G., 5 B.T.A. 1035 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . the amount of $18,261.34; overassessment for the year 1920, $2.80; overassessment for the year 1921, $7.67 . . .

KANSAS CITY, C. C. ST. J. RY. CO. v. BARKER,, 242 F. 310 (W.D. Mo. 1915)

. . . 4.41 $3.00 Moscow . . 5.42 3.50 Winn Wood Lake. . 6.23 4.00 AVinnetonka . . 7.01 4.50 Maple Park. . 7.67 . . .