Cases from cite.case.law:

J. BROADWAY, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 364 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (M.D. Ala. 2019)

. . . See Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions: Civil 11.07 (2d ed. 1993). . . . Aug. 2, 2011) (citing 11.07 for the proposition that, since the instruction provides "no fixed standard . . .

IN RE TS EMPLOYMENT, INC. In S. TS v. N. A., 597 B.R. 494 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Ex. 1 § 11.07 (emphasis added).) . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 366 F. Supp. 3d 256 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . the New Bond Indenture or otherwise, in each case unless such Holder shall have complied with Section 11.07 . . .

IN RE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, In, 363 F. Supp. 3d 220 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . the New Bond Indenture or otherwise, in each case unless such Holder shall have complied with Section 11.07 . . .

FORD, Jr. v. DAVIS,, 910 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . ANN. art. 11.07, § 4(a) - (c). . . . The district court concluded that the state court, by citing Article 11.07, § 4(a) - (c), had implicitly . . . with such conflicting evidence, the TCCA dismissed the petitions as an abuse of the writ under Article 11.07 . . . The TCCA refused to consider Ford's IAC claim as an abuse of the writ under Article 11.07, § 4(a) - ( . . .

KING, v. DAVIS,, 898 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(b) ("Matters alleged in the application not admitted by the state are deemed denied . . . Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(b) ("Matters alleged in the application not admitted by the state are deemed denied . . .

UNITED STATES v. REYES,, 866 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . subsection (f) of Illinois’s aggravated battery statute, but instead concerned former sections 11.05, 11.07 . . .

DANA- FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, v. M. BURWELL,, 216 F. Supp. 3d 49 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . . § 11.07(1) (2004) (setting forth how the Division calculated each hospital’s Trust Fund payment based . . . Code Regs. § 11.07(4) (2004) ("The Division will calculate and process monthly Hospital payments. . . .

S. BRUMLEY E. Jr. M. W. J. v. ALBERT E. BRUMLEY SONS, INC. B., 822 F.3d 926 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . Nimmer, 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.07[A] (2015); see also Peter S. . . .

AYESTAS, v. STEPHENS,, 817 F.3d 888 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

IN RE NETZER, v., 545 B.R. 254 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . Kelley, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 11.07[A][2] (5th ed.2015). . . .

BALDWIN, v. EMI FEIST CATALOG, INC., 805 F.3d 18 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Steinbeck authorized a "[r]escission and [r]e-grant” scenario, 3 Nimmer § 11.07[E][2][b][iv], pursuant . . . See 3 Nimmer § 11.07[E][2][b][iv] (noting that a rescission and re-grant "extinguishes the children's . . . See 3 Nimmer § 11.07[E][1] (defining an “agreement to the contrary” as any agreement that "results in . . .

BUTLER, v. STEPHENS,, 625 F. App'x 641 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

BARNER v. THOMPSON CENTER ARMS COMPANY INC. LLC LLC, 796 F.3d 897 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 293-A:11.07(a). . . . law, id. § 293-A:14.05(a), while a corporation that merges into another ceases to exist, id. § 293-A:11.07 . . . Id. § 293-A:11.07(4). . . .

RAY CHARLES FOUNDATION, a v. ROBINSON, Jr. F., 795 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 11.07[E][4][b] (Matthew Bender, rev. ed.2014) (observing . . .

GREAT WALL DE VENEZUELA C. A. v. INTERAUDI BANK, v. ICA, 117 F. Supp. 3d 474 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . money but also the, cost and grief of injunction suits”); A.S, Pratt & Sons, Law of Letters of Credit ¶ 11.07 . . .

WALKER, v. STEPHENS,, 583 F. App'x 402 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . would be foreclosed from consideration on state habeas under [Texas Code of Criminal Procedure] article 11.07 . . .

HIGH POINT SARL, v. T- MOBILE USA, INC. US, LLC,, 53 F. Supp. 3d 797 (D.N.J. 2014)

. . . Diagnostics GmbH, 62 A.3d 62, 86 (Del.Ch.Ct.2013); see generally Revised Model Business Corporation Act § 11.07 . . .

CANALES, Jr. v. STEPHENS,, 765 F.3d 551 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

DOUGLAS, P. A. v. REGIONS BANK,, 757 F.3d 460 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 79-4-11.07(a)(3); see also id. § 81-5-2 ("All the provisions of law relating to private corporations . . .

GARCIA, v. STEPHENS,, 757 F.3d 220 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

PALMER, v. DANIEL,, 568 F. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . of Criminal Appeals in accord with the time limitations in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 . . . Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 reflects that the transmittal of a habeas application . . . Daniel acted in accord with the provisions of article 11.07 and the directions of the convicting state . . .

In A. SANDERSON L. v. L., 509 B.R. 206 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 2014)

. . . Kelley, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 11.07[f] (5th ed. 2013); cf. . . .

McGEE, v. W. COLVIN,, 556 F. App'x 616 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . P, App. 1 §§ 11.04(B), 11.07, 111.06-07. . . .

JONES, v. STEPHENS,, 541 F. App'x 499 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . habeas corpus relief in a felony case without a death penalty, under Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 . . .

BRYANT L. Jr. v. SOUTHLAND TUBE,, 294 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . Two months later he received an annual raise to $11.07 per hour, and, less than three months after that . . .

MATAMOROS, v. STEPHENS,, 539 F. App'x 487 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

DORSEY, v. STEPHENS,, 720 F.3d 309 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Ann. art. 11.07 § 3 (West 2005 & Supp.2011). . Harrison v. . . .

In AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION, s, 494 B.R. 466 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . Damages Under the Terms of the SMS Agreement Termination Obligations Under the Dealer Agreement Section 11.07 . . .

THOMAS, v. THALER,, 520 F. App'x 276 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Art. 11.07, § 3(c). .Barrientes v. . . .

RICHARDS, v. THALER,, 710 F.3d 573 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Because Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure — the provision governing post-conviction . . . directing the trial court to determine when certain post-conviction petitions submitted under Article 11.07 . . .

RAY CHARLES FOUNDATION, v. ROBINSON,, 919 F. Supp. 2d 1054 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 11.07[E][2][b][ii], [3] (2012) (explaining how penalties . . .

LIOI, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MENTAL HYGIENE,, 914 F. Supp. 2d 567 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . part: Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information is a violation of New York City Health Code 11.07 . . .

HARTFIELD, v. THALER,, 498 F. App'x 440 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . on November 14, 2006, Hartfield filed a pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 . . . habeas application on May 30, 2007, again without opinion, as a subsequent application under Article 11.07 . . .

GREEN, v. THALER,, 699 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

McNAC, v. THALER,, 480 F. App'x 338 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . ) the state trial court created an impediment by violating Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 . . .

GATES, v. THALER,, 476 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

GOWAN, v. KELLER, a E. a a a a a A. a R. a a R. L. H., 471 F. App'x 288 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . denied access to courts by operation of the 35-day rule under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article § 11.07 . . . Additionally, Gowan argues that his due process rights were violated by the operation of Article 11.07 . . . habeas applications are forwarded to the TCCA as set forth in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 . . .

. . . Proc Ann. art. 11.07 § 3(b)-(c) (West 2005). . Id. § 3(c). . . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . § 11.07); • limited the Indenture Trustee’s liability to conduct constituting willful misconduct or . . . (Id. at 38-39 (citing Indenture § 11.07)). . . . Section 11.07 of the Indenture provides: The Trustee shall be under no obligation to take any action . . . Section 11.07 of the Indenture provides that the Indenture Trustee has no duty to take any action after . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 854 F. Supp. 2d 770 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . 11.02), and the Hollister Board has the authority to appoint and remove the Trustees, (id §§ 11.05-11.07 . . .

HOTHEM v. SCHNEIDER,, 865 F. Supp. 2d 962 (D.S.D. 2012)

. . . Stevens was making $11.07 per hour and Mr. . . .

WASHINGTON, v. THALER,, 464 F. App'x 233 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

GONZALEZ v. THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, 565 U.S. 134 (U.S. 2012)

. . . Ann., Art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon Supp. 2011). . . .

RAFAEL ARRIAZA GONZALEZ, v. RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, 181 L. Ed. 2d 619 (U.S. 2012)

. . . Ann., Art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon Supp. 2011). . . .

BROWN, v. THALER,, 455 F. App'x 401 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . P. 11.07 § 3(d), which denied the petition “without written order on findings of the trial court” on . . .

GRYPHON NETWORKS CORP. v. CONTACT CENTER COMPLIANCE CORP., 792 F. Supp. 2d 87 (D. Mass. 2011)

. . . Chisum Chisum on Patents § 11.07[4] (2005) (citing 35 U.S.C. §§ 301-307). . . . .

FRANKLIN, v. KELLER, E. P. R., 429 F. App'x 363 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . See Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07, Ex parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex.Crim.App.1996 . . .

BROUSSARD, v. THALER,, 414 F. App'x 686 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Ann. art. 11.07. . . .

N. BROCKWAY, v. J. ASTRUE,, 781 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Kan. 2011)

. . . and failed to properly evaluate whether Plaintiffs condition meets or equals the criteria of Listing 11.07 . . .

CALDWELL, v. THALER,, 770 F. Supp. 2d 849 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . Caldwell challenged his conviction by filing a state habeas corpus application under Article 11.07 of . . .

In SMURFIT- STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION,, 444 B.R. 111 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . Indenture § 11.07. . . . .

BALENTINE, v. THALER,, 629 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

ROCHA, v. THALER,, 628 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

R. WICKWARE, v. THALER,, 404 F. App'x 856 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Ann. art. 11.07, § 3(b), (c). . . . the TCCA dated February 6, 2004 and mailed March 1, 2004 stating: “On this day, the application for 11.07 . . . Habeas Corpus Seeking Relief from a Final Felony Conviction Under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07 . . .

BALENTINE, v. THALER,, 626 F.3d 842 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

ROCHA, v. THALER,, 626 F.3d 815 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Just one year later the Texas legislature codified the CCA’s abuse-of-the-writ doctrine in Article 11.07 . . . Articles 11.07 and 11.071 now statutorily require the consistent application of the ‘abuse of the writ . . .

ROCHA, v. THALER,, 619 F.3d 387 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

MATHIS, v. THALER,, 616 F.3d 461 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . During the relevant time period, Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure precluded a grant . . . Proc. art. 11.07 § 4(a) (West 1999). . . . . Because Article 11.071 § 5 is substantially identical to Article 11.07 § 4, Villegas controls here. . . . .

BALENTINE, v. THALER,, 609 F.3d 729 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

McGOWEN, v. THALER,, 717 F. Supp. 2d 626 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

WILLIAMS, v. THALER,, 602 F.3d 291 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

TIPTON, v. THALER,, 354 F. App'x 138 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Ann. art. 11.07, § 4(a) (Vernon 2005). . . .

MALDONADO, v. THALER,, 662 F. Supp. 2d 684 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

CARTY, v. THALER,, 583 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Coleman, 395 F.3d at 220, was not a death penalty case; thus, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure art. 11.07 . . .

ALLEN v. REGIONS BANK a a, 654 F. Supp. 2d 523 (S.D. Miss. 2009)

. . . . § 79-4-11.07(a)(l-4) (“When a merger becomes effective, the corporation ... that is designated in the . . .

GEOD CORPORATION, F. J. Jr. v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION,, 678 F. Supp. 2d 276 (D.N.J. 2009)

. . . ; 2005-25.0% DBE goal: 20.0% race conscious, 5.0% race neutral (NJT 0000004); 2006-17.38% DBE goal: 11.07% . . .

P. DeFAZIO, v. HOLLISTER, INC., 636 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . . §§ 11.05-11.07). . . .

MENDEZ, TDCJ v. QUARTERMAN,, 625 F. Supp. 2d 415 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . habeas corpus applications to challenge each conviction in cause numbers 981328 and 981329 under Article 11.07 . . .

LEVITON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. SHANGHAI MEIHAO ELECTRIC, INC., 613 F. Supp. 2d 670 (D. Md. 2009)

. . . Chisum, Chisum, on Patents, § 11.07, n. 35 (“The overall legislative purpose of reexamination ... suggests . . . Chisum, supra, at § 11.07. . . .

STURGEON, TDCJ v. QUARTERMAN,, 615 F. Supp. 2d 546 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . number and was never forwarded to the trial court for its consideration in compliance with Article 11.07 . . . compel the Harris County Clerk’s Office to process his amended application in accordance with Article 11.07 . . . noting that the trial court never truly adjudicated his claims on the merits contemplated by Article 11.07 . . . not adjudicate Sturgeon’s amended application in compliance with the procedures outlined in Article 11.07 . . . (Doc. # 30, Memorandum and Order, outlining the procedures found in Article 11.07 §§ 3(b) — 3(d) of the . . .

RICHARDS, v. QUARTERMAN,, 566 F.3d 553 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Proc. art. 11.07. . . .

GRIZZELL, As v. UNITED STATES, 612 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (S.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . including Howard, go so far as to approve the jury instruction defining negligence and ordinary care, MAI 11.07 . . .

HARTFIELD, v. QUARTERMAN,, 603 F. Supp. 2d 943 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . First, Hartfield’s state habeas application was processed under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal . . . ANN. art 11.07, § 1 (Vernon 2005). . . . But there is no reference to this supplemental writ in the district clerk’s article 11.07 certificate . . .

G. AVERY, v. J. ASTRUE,, 313 F. App'x 114 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . Avery did not meet the neurological Listings found at § § 11. 04, 11.07, or 11. 14, the ALJ found: “the . . .

JIMENEZ v. QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, 555 U.S. 113 (U.S. 2009)

. . . Ann., Art. 11.07 (Vernon 1977), arguing that he was denied his right to a meaningful appeal when he was . . .

VARGAS, v. QUARTERMAN,, 589 F. Supp. 2d 805 (W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . habeas corpus relief in a felony case without a death penalty, under Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 . . .

SCHULTZE, TDCJ v. QUARTERMAN,, 622 F. Supp. 2d 439 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Sehultze challenged his conviction further by filing a state habeas corpus application under Article 11.07 . . . Ann. art. 11.07, § 4(a). . . .

RICHARDS, v. QUARTERMAN,, 578 F. Supp. 2d 849 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . P. art. 11.07, §§ 1, 3(a) (Vernon Supp.2008). . . .

ROBERTS, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY,, 289 F. App'x 321 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . Section 11.07 of the CBA states that an employee is not eligible for transfer until he or she has completed . . .

PENGUIN GROUP USA INC. v. STEINBECK H., 537 F.3d 193 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . Appel-lees draw support for this theory primarily from Nirnmer on Copyright § 11.07 (6th ed.1978), referring . . . Appel-lees’ Br. at 80; see also Nirnmer on Copyright § 11.07. . . .

WARDLAW, v. CAIN,, 541 F.3d 275 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . P. art. 11.07, § 4, we conclude that, consistent with Villegas, Smith’s state application, although ultimately . . .

BATISTE, TDCJ v. QUARTERMAN,, 622 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Batiste challenged his conviction further by filing a state habeas corpus application under Article 11.07 . . .

CLASSIC MEDIA, INC. v. MEWBORN, v., 532 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . make such a further grant, is valid only if made after the effective date of termination.” 3 Nimmer § 11.07 . . .

SPIER, v. QUARTERMAN,, 278 F. App'x 303 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . The dismissal simply reads: APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS RECONSIDERED ON COURT’S OWN MOTION . . .

C. DOAK, v. QUARTERMAN, v., 271 F. App'x 466 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . State habeas applications in Texas are made pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure . . .

KELLY, v. QUARTERMAN,, 260 F. App'x 629 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Proc.Code art. 11.07 § 3(a)). . . .

MOORE, v. QUARTERMAN,, 526 F. Supp. 2d 654 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . been applied retroactively while amendments to the more generic Texas habeas corpus statute (Article 11.07 . . .

In URBAN COMMUNICATORS PCS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 379 B.R. 232 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . See Agreement Section 11.07, Agreement Exh. A (Promissory Note) at 2. . See N.Y. General Oblig. . . .

HOWLAND, v. QUARTERMAN,, 507 F.3d 840 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Johnson, we declined to apply the prison mailbox rule to Texas state habeas petitions governed by article 11.07 . . . Proc. art. 11.07 is a “civil action.” . . . Article 11.07 does not contain any filing deadline or limitations period. . . . applicable, which it is not, the mailbox rule would not apply in this case under Texas law because article 11.07 . . . Consequently, as Warner did not operate to change the filing requirements under article 11.07, this court . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . Enterprises represent 38.87 percent of the available prime professional services firms and received 11.07 . . . construction prime contractors, 41.87% of available architectural and engineering prime contractors, 11.07% . . .

W. CHARLESTON, v. QUARTERMAN,, 243 F. App'x 859 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . P. art. 11.07 § 5; because COA has not been granted as to this issue, the court is without jurisdiction . . .

MOORE, v. QUARTERMAN,, 491 F.3d 213 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SORRELL, 549 U.S. 158 (U.S. 2007)

. . . Jury Instr., Civ., Nos. 11.07, 11.14, and Comment (2005); 3 111. . . .

MOORE, v. QUARTERMAN,, 454 F.3d 484 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . timely initial application or in a previously considered application filed under this article or Article 11.07 . . .

STEINBECK, v. MCINTOSH OTIS, INC. a a H. USA v., 433 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., 3-11 Nimmer on Copyright § 11.07, n. 29. .17 U.S.C.A. § 304(a)(1)(C), in relevant part, states . . .

MILNE, COYNE, v. STEPHEN SLESINGER, INC., 430 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . Nim-mer, NimmeR on Copyright § 11.07(6th ed.1978). . . .

IANNI, v. B. BARNHART,, 403 F. Supp. 2d 239 (W.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . P, App. 1, § 11.07 (“ § 11.07”), disability based on cerebral palsy requires Cerebral palsy. . . . P, App. 1, § 11.07 (italics in original). . . . evidence, alone, satisfies the requirements for a finding of disability based on cerebral palsy under § 11.07 . . . claimant has cerebral palsy, he has not demonstrated the degree of dysfunction required under section 11.07 . . . Brennen’s diagnosis meets the criteria under § 11.07, the ALJ also failed to develop the record on this . . .

SHIVWITS BAND OF PAIUTE INDIANS d b a v. UTAH St. a A., 428 F.3d 966 (10th Cir. 2005)

. . . The second parcel "consists of 11.07 acres” and "has approximately 771 feet of 1-15 frontage....” . . .

F. CALDWELL, v. DRETKE, v. v., 429 F.3d 521 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Subsequently, on March 12, 2002, Beck filed an application for state habeas relief, pursuant to article 11.07 . . . Beck contends that according to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, he was not eligible . . . However, although Beck could not pursue collateral review under article 11.07, he had an available remedy . . . Habeas relief under article 11.07 requires a final conviction. . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)